岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 125–130.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180615

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于甲型水驱规律曲线的表征方法改进

凌浩川, 孟智强, 石洪福, 孙强, 潘杰   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司 渤海石油研究院, 天津 300459
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-08 修回日期:2018-09-16 出版日期:2018-11-16 发布日期:2018-11-16
  • 作者简介:凌浩川(1987-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事油气开发及油藏数值模拟方面的研究工作。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号渤海石油管理局。Email:xuanmuzixu@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家重大科技专项“渤海油田加密调整及提高采收率油藏工程技术示范”(编号:2016ZX05058001)资助

Improvement of characterization method based on type A water drive curve

LING Haochuan, MENG Zhiqiang, SHI Hongfu, SUN Qiang, PAN Jie   

  1. Bohai Oilfield Research Institute, Tianjin Company of CNOOC Ltd., Tianjin 300459, China
  • Received:2018-07-08 Revised:2018-09-16 Online:2018-11-16 Published:2018-11-16

摘要: 甲型水驱曲线可以用泰勒展开方法近似成双曲递减曲线来研究油藏产量递减规律,该方法仅在含油率初值邻域内具有二阶精度,导致在产量预测后期误差较大。为了更加精确地建立甲型水驱曲线与Arps递减规律之间的联系,提高甲型水驱曲线预测油田分年产量的计算精度,通过对常用的水驱曲线递减率公式进行对比、分析,提出了甲型水驱曲线递减率的幂函数拟合表征方法,利用方差函数最小值分析方法得到了甲型水驱曲线在不同含水阶段含油率幂函数拟合的误差。结果表明:含水率越高,含油率幂函数拟合方法的误差越小;当含水率大于70%时,甲型水驱曲线含油率幂函数拟合方法不仅在含油率初值邻域内拟合较好,且在全局内拟合最优。改进的含油率幂函数拟合方法可以用来快速预测甲型水驱曲线的产量剖面,实例应用表明该方法计算精度较高,适用于符合甲型水驱特征且含水率大于70%的油藏的产量预测。

关键词: 水驱曲线, 递减规律, 幂函数, 含油率, 产量预测

Abstract: Type A water drive curve can be approximated to hyperbolic decline curve by Taylor expansion method to study the law of reservoir production decline. This method only has second-order precision in the neighborhood of initial oil cut, resulting in a large error in the late production prediction. In order to establish the relationship between the type A water drive curve and Arps decline law, and to improve the calculation accuracy of forecasting annual production of oilfields by the type A water drive curve, by comparing and analyzing the decline rate formulas of commonly used water drive curves, an oil cut power function fitting method for the decline rate of the type A water drive curve was proposed. The error of the oil cut power function fitting in different water cut stages was obtained by using the method of minimum value analysis of variance function. The results show that the higher the water cut is, the smaller the error of the oil cut power function fitting is, and when the water cut is greater than 70%, the oil cut power function fitting of the type A water drive curve not only fit better in the neighborhood of initial oil cut but also fit best in overall prediction time. The improved oil cut power function fitting method can be used to predict the annual oil production of the type A water drive curve quickly. The application proves the high accuracy of this method, and it is suitable for predicting the production of reservoirs with water cut greater than 70% which conform to the characteristics of type A water drive.

Key words: water drive curves, decline law, power function, oil cut, oil production forecast

中图分类号: 

  • TE341
[1] 林志芳, 俞启泰, 李文兴.水驱特征曲线计算油田可采储量方法.石油勘探与开发, 1990, 17(6):64-71. LIN Z F, YU Q T, LI W X. A method for estimating recoverable reserves of an oilfield by using the displacement characteristic curves. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1990, 17(6):64-71.
[2] 陈元千, 刘雨芬, 毕海滨. 确定水驱砂岩油藏采收率的方法. 石油勘探与开发, 1996, 23(4):58-60. CHEN Y Q, LIU Y F, BI H B. A method of determining recovery factor for water drive oil reservoir. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1996, 23(4):58-60.
[3] 陈元千. 油田可采储量计算方法.新疆石油地质, 2000, 21(2):130-137. CHEN Y Q. Calculation methods of recoverable reserves of oilfields. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2000, 21(2):130-137.
[4] 姜汉桥, 姚军, 姜瑞忠.油藏工程原理与方法.东营:中国石油大学出版社, 2006:237-247. JIANG H Q, YAO J, JIANG R Z. Principles and methods of reservoir engineering. Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press, 2006:237-247.
[5] 俞启泰. 水驱油田的驱替特征与递减特征.石油勘探与开发, 1995, 22(1):39-42. YU Q T. Drive curves and decline curves for water drive field. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1995, 22(1):39-42.
[6] 俞启泰. 逐年计算水驱油田可采储量方法.石油勘探与开发, 1996, 23(2):52-56. YU Q T. Methods for calculating oil recoverable reserves of a water-drive field by year. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1996, 23(2):52-56.
[7] ARPS J J. Analysis of decline curves. Transactions of the AIME, 1945, 160(1):228-247.
[8] 徐赢, 潘有军, 周荣萍, 等. 油田注水开发期含水率随时间变化规律研究. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):127-132. XU Y, PAN Y J, ZHOU R P, et al. Water cut change law with time in waterflooding oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):127-132.
[9] 张荻萩,李治平,苏皓. 页岩气产量递减规律研究. 岩性油气藏,2015, 27(6):138-144. ZHANG D Q, LI Z P, SU H. Production decline trend of shale gas. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(6):138-144.
[10] POSTON S W, POE B D. Analysis of production decline curves. Richardson:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2008.
[11] 何德志. 大洼油田洼20区块产油量递减规律研究.岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3):105-107. HE D Z. Oil production decline law of Wa 20 block in Dawa Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3):105-107.
[12] 关恒. 基于液油比的特高含水期水驱开发指标预测方法. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5):100-103. GUAN H. Forecasting method of development index based on liquid/oil ratio in extra-high water cut stage. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(5):100-103.
[13] PALACIO J C, BLASINGAME T A. Decline curve analysis using type curves-Analysis of gas well production data. SPE 25909, 1993:12-14.
[14] 俞启泰. 一种重要水驱特征曲线的油水渗流特征及其使用价值.油气采收率技术, 1998, 5(1):41-44. YU Q T. Characteristics of oil-water seepage flow for several important water drive curves. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1998, 5(1):41-44.
[15] 王涛. 底水油藏直井含水上升预测新方法的建立. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5):109-112. WANG T. A new method for water cut rising forecasting of vertical wells in bottom water reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(5):109-112.
[16] 俞启泰. 水驱油田产量递减规律.石油勘探与开, 1993, 20(4):72-80. YU Q T. Decline curve analysis for a water drive reservoir. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1993, 20(4):72-80.
[17] 裴连君, 王仲林. Arps递减曲线与甲型水驱曲线的相关性及参数计算.石油勘探与开发, 1999, 26(3):62-65. PEI L J, WANG Z L. Correlativity of Arps production decline curve vs. type A water drive curve and their parameter calculation. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1999, 26(3):62-65.
[18] 姚建. 4种水驱特征曲线与Arps递减曲线的关系.新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(4):447-451. YAO J. Relationships among 4 types of water-drive characteristic curves and Arps decline curve. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(4):447-451.
[19] 高文君, 刘瑛. 产量递减规律与水驱特征曲线的关系.断块油气田, 2002, 9(3):45-49. GAO W J, LIU Y. The relationship of the production decline and water drive curve. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2002, 9(3):45-49.
[20] 王华. 改进型水驱特征曲线计算技术可采储量的公式推导及其应用. 油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(4):84-86. WANG H. Application of improved water drive curve in recoverable reserves. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(4):84-86.
[21] 侯健, 王容容, 夏志增, 等. 特高含水期甲型水驱特征曲线的改进. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(6):72-75. HOU J, WANG R R, XIA Z Z, et al. Improvement of water displacement curve for water flooded oil reservoirs at ultra-high water cut stage. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2013, 37(6):72-75.
[1] 杨美华, 钟海全, 李颖川. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏新型油藏生产指示曲线[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 163-170.
[2] 黄全华,付云辉,陆 云,陈 冲,刘 彤. 应用改进无偏灰色模型预测油气田产量[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5): 117-122.
[3] 佘 刚,马丽娟,徐永发,叶高鹏,米小银,李成元. 油砂储层特征及测井评价方法研究——以柴达木盆地干柴沟地区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(6): 119-124.
[4] 张荻萩,李治平,苏 皓 . 页岩气产量递减规律研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(6): 138-144.
[5] 关恒. 基于液油比的特高含水期水驱开发指标预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5): 100-103.
[6] 张海茹,李 昊. 煤层气峰值产量拟合及产量动态预测方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(4): 116-118.
[7] 何德志. 大洼油田洼20 区块产油量递减规律研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 105-107.
[8] 何俊,陈小凡,乐平,王龙飞. 线性回归方法在油气产量递减分析中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 103-105.
[9] 冯义娜. 经济可采储量评价研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 106-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广,刘博,吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,王永诗,王洪玉,刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .