岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 135–148.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240613

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布

肖博雅   

  1. 中国石油华北油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 河北 任丘 062550
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-27 修回日期:2024-04-12 出版日期:2024-11-01 发布日期:2024-11-04
  • 第一作者:肖博雅(1988—),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事储层特征综合研究工作。地址:(062550)河北省任丘市建设路勘探开发研究院二连地质研究所。Email:741169144@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份公司重大科技专项“华北油田持续有效稳产勘探开发关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2017E-15)资助。

Characteristics and favorable zone distribution of tuff reservoirt of Cretaceous in A’nan sag,Erlian Basin

XIAO Boya   

  1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development of Huabei Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China
  • Received:2024-02-27 Revised:2024-04-12 Online:2024-11-01 Published:2024-11-04

摘要: 阿南凹陷白垩系腾一下亚段凝灰岩类储层是近年来二连盆地致密油勘探的重点领域。通过岩心观察、薄片鉴定、储层物性分析及X-衍射分析等,采用高压压汞、氮气吸附、场发射电镜、CT扫描等实验方法,分析了二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层的岩性、物性、储集空间类型和孔隙结构特征,结合有利储层形成机制预测了有利储层发育区。研究结果表明:①二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾一下亚段发育凝灰岩、沉凝灰岩、凝灰质泥岩、凝灰质(粉)砂岩4种凝灰岩类。②研究区凝灰岩类储层物性变化范围较大,平均孔隙度为4.88%,其中超低孔、特低孔的样品数占比为83.6%,平均渗透率为0.067 mD,整体属于超低孔、超低渗储层。凝灰岩主要发育溶蚀孔和脱玻化孔,呈“立体”网络孔隙结构,以介孔、宏孔为主,储层物性最好;凝灰质(粉)砂岩主要发育溶蚀孔和粒间孔,具有微细孔—微喉孔隙结构,介孔发育,储层物性较好;沉凝灰岩和凝灰质泥岩主要发育溶蚀孔、晶间孔和微裂缝,多发育孤立型孔隙结构,以介孔为主,储层物性较差。③研究区凝灰岩类优质储层受沉积作用、成岩作用和构造作用共同控制,沉积作用为优质储层形成提供了物质基础,控制了储层的形成和分布;压实作用和胶结作用降低了储层物性,白云岩化和脱玻化作用改善了储集性能;溶蚀作用是有效储层形成的关键,对物性改善具有积极作用。④研究区发育Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ类凝灰岩类储层,Ⅰ类储层集中分布在洼槽区,Ⅱ类储层沿西部缓坡呈条带状分布,Ⅲ类储层分布范围最广。其中A43东、A27北、H16西和A11西南等区块发育的Ⅰ类储层是下一步凝灰岩类致密油勘探的有利区带。

关键词: 凝灰岩类, 致密油储层, 超低孔超低渗储层, 溶蚀作用, 洼槽区, 腾格尔组, 白垩系, 阿南凹陷, 二连盆地

Abstract: The tuff reservoir in the lower part of the first member of Cretaceous system in A’nan sag has become one of the key fields for tight oil exploration in Erlian Basin in recent years. Based on core observation,thin section authentication,reservoir physical property analysis and X-ray diffraction analysis,using the experimental methods such as high pressure mercury injection,nitrogen adsorption,field emission scanning electron micros copy and CT scanning,the characteristics of lithology,physical property,reservoir space type and pore struc ture of tuff reservoir of Cretaceous system in A’nan sag in Erlin basin were analyzed. Favorable tight tuff reservoir zones were predicted according to favorable reservoir formation mechanism. The results show that:(1)The tuff tight reservoirs in the lower part of the first member of Cretaceous Tenggeer Formation of A’nan sag of Erlian Basi,are mainly composed of tuff,tuffite,tuffaceous mud and tuffaceous sandstone.(2)The range of physical properties of tuff reser-voirs in the study area is largely,with average porosity is 4.88%. Among them,the num ber of samples with ultra-low porosity and extra-low porosity accounted for 83.6%,with the average permeability is 0.067 mD. It is an ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoir. The tuff reservoir space include dis solved pores and devitrified pores,and have stereoscopic network pore structures,the tuff is mainly composed of mesopores and macropores,the physical properties are the best. The main reservoir spaces of tuffaceous sand stone include dissolution pore and intergranular pores,have micro-thin pore-micro throat pore structures,and mainly develop mesopores,with good physical characteristics. Tuffite and tuffaceous mud mainly develop dis solved pores,intercrystal pores and microcracks,have isolated pore structures,the pore types are mainly meso pores,with poor physical properties.(3)Sedimentation,diagenesis and tectonism jointly control the formation of high-quality tuff reservoir in the study area,sedimentation provide the material basis for the formation of highquality reservoirs,which control reservoir formation and distribution,compaction and cementation reduces reser voir physical properties,dolo-mitization and devitrification improves reservoir performance,the dissolution is the key factor of effective reservoir forming,which has positive impact on improving the physical properties of reservoir.(4)The tuff reservoir can be classified into three types,class Ⅰ,class Ⅱ and class Ⅲ. the reservoir in class Ⅰ is mainly concentrated around trough area,the reservoir in class Ⅱ is distributed in the form of stripes along the western gentle slope zone,the distribution range of reservoir in class Ⅲ is the widest,the areas where develop the reservoir in class Ⅰsuch as the east blocks of A43 well,the north blocks of A27 well,the west blocks of H16 well and south west blocks of A11well are the next favorable targets for tuff tight oil exploration.

Key words: tuff, tight oil reservoir, ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoir, dissolution, trough area, Tengger Formation, Cretaceous, A’nan sag, Erlian Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 李庆,卢浩,吴胜和,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系长73亚段凝灰岩沉积成因及储层特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(5):1141-1154. LI Qing,LU Hao,WU Shenghe,et al. Sedimentary origins and reservoir characteristics of the Triassic Chang 73 tuffs in the southern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(5):1141-1154.
[2] 马剑,黄志龙,钟大康,等.三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷二叠系条湖组凝灰岩致密储集层形成与分布[J].石油勘探与开发,2016, 43(5):714-722. MA Jian,HUANG Zhilong,ZHONG Dakang,et al. Formation and distribution of tuffaceous tight reservoirs in the Permian Tiaohu Formation in the Malang sag,Santanghu Basin,NW China [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(5):714- 722.
[3] 王建强,刘池洋,李行,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长7段凝灰岩形成时代、物质来源及其意义[J]. 沉积学报,2017,35(4):691-704. WANG Jianqiang,LIU Chiyang,LI Hang,et al. Geochronology, potential source and regional implications of tuff intervals in Chang- 7 member of Yanchang Formation,South of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2017,35(4):691-704.
[4] 钟蓉,孙善平,傅泽明.山东及邻区晚石炭世—早二叠世火山事件沉积及地层对比[J].地质学报,1996,70(2):142-152. ZHONG Rong,SUN Shanping,FU Zeming. Volcanic event deposits and stratigraphic correlation of the late Carboniferous-early Permianin Shandong and adjacent regions[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,1996,70(2):142-152.
[5] 刘书强,姚孟多,冯亚琴,等.马朗凹陷条湖组凝灰岩脱玻化孔影响因素与油气关系[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(1):16-19. LIU Shuqiang,YAO Mengduo,FENG Yaqin,et al. Influencing factor analysis of devitrification pore and its relationship with hydrocarbon in Tiaohu Formation of Malang Depression[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(1):16-19.
[6] 周健,单玄龙,迟唤昭,等.德惠断陷沙一段凝灰岩储层特征及测井识别[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(3):50-55. ZHOU Jian,SHAN Xuanlong,CHI Huanzhao,et al. Tuff reser voir properties and logging identification in the Sha1 member of Dehui fault Depression[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2018,25(3):50-55.
[7] 朱国华,张杰,姚根顺,等.沉火山尘凝灰岩:一种赋存油气资源的重要岩类:以新疆北部中二叠统芦草沟组为例[J].海相油气地质,2014,19(1):1-7. ZHU Guohua,ZHANG Jie,YAO Genshun,et al. Sedimentary volcanic dust tuff,an important kind of rock storing hydrocar bon resources:Discusion on the lithology of middle permian Lucaogou oil-bearing rocks in the North of Xinjiang[J]. Marine origin petroleum geology,2014,19(1):1-7.
[8] 焦立新,刘俊田,李留中,等.三塘湖盆地沉凝灰岩致密油藏测井评价技术与应用[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(2):83-91. JIAO Lixin,LIU Juntian,LI Liuzhong,et al. Logging evalution technology and application of tight tuff reservoir in Santanghu Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(2):83-91.
[9] 陈旋,司学强,刘书强,等.马朗凹陷沉凝灰岩致密储集层特征及主控因素[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(6):40-44. CHEN Xuan,SI Xueqiang,LIU Shuqiang,et al. Characteristics and main control factors of sedimentary tuff tight reservoirs in Malang Sag[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(6):40-44.
[10] 蒋宜勤,柳益群,杨召,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷凝灰岩型致密油特征与成因[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):741-749. JIANG Yiqin,LIU Yiqun,YANG Zhao,et al. Characteristics and origin of tuff-type tight oil in Jimusar Depression,Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015, 42(6):741-749.
[11] 张晗,黄虎,侯明才.四川广元地区朝天剖面上二叠统吴家坪组凝灰岩成因及其地质意义[J].地球科学与环境学报,2020, 42(1):36-48. ZHANG Han,HUANG Hu,HOU Mingcai. Origin of tuffa from Upper Permian Wujiaping Formation in Chaotian section if Guangyuan area,Sichuan,China and its geological significance[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2020,42(1):36-48.
[12] 徐雄飞,文川江,李玉平,等.马朗凹陷条湖组凝灰岩致密储层特征及形成条件分析[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(3):34-41. XU Xiongfei,WEN Chuanjiang,LI Yuping,et al. Characteris tics and formation condition of tight tuff reservoir of Tiaohu Formation in Malang Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017, 29(3):34-41.
[13] 蓝宝锋,杨克兵,彭传利,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷致密油勘探潜力分析[J].复杂油气藏,2014,7(2):9-12. LAN Baofeng,YANG Kebing,PENG Chuanli,et al. Analysis of the exploration potential of tight oil in A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin [J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2014,7(2):9-12.
[14] 魏巍,朱筱敏,朱世发,等.阿南凹陷腾格尔组凝灰质混积岩岩相及储集空间特征[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(2):68-76. WEI Wei,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Shifa,et a1. Lithofacies and res ervoir space characteristics of the tuffaceous- siliciclastic mixed rocks of the Lower Cretaceous Tenggeer Formation in A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(2):68-76.
[15] 孙振孟,钱铮,陆现彩,等.内蒙古二连盆地阿南凹陷腾格尔组一段下部特殊岩性段储集性能[J].地质通报,2017,36(4): 644-653. SUN Zhenmeng,QIAN Zheng,LU Xiancai,et a1. Reservoir property of the special lithologic section in the lower Tengger Formation of A’nan depression,Er’lian Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,2017,36(4):644-653.
[16] 张以明,付小东,郭永军,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾一下段致密油有效储层物性下限研究[J].石油实验地质,2016, 38(4):551-558. ZHANG Yiming,FU Xiaodong,GUO Yongjun,et a1. Petro physical property limits of effective tight oil reservoirs in the lower part of the first member of Cretaceous Tengger Forma tion,A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin,North China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(4):551-558.
[17] 付小东,张天付,吴健平,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾格尔组致密油储层特征及主控因素[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(1):64-76. FU Xiaodong,ZHANG Tianfu,WU Jianping,et a1. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight oil reservoirs in Creta ceous Tengger Formation,A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Petro leum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(1):64-76.
[18] 魏巍,朱筱敏,朱世发,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷下白垩统腾格尔组湖相云质岩成因[J].地球科学,2017,42(2):258-272. WEI Wei,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Shifa,et al. Origin of lacustrine dolomitic rocks of the Lower Cretaceous Tengge’er Formation in A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Earth Science,2017,42(2): 258-272.
[19] 张文朝,雷怀玉,姜冬华,等.二连盆地阿南凹陷的演化与油气聚集规律[J].河南石油,1998,12(2):1-5. ZHANG Wenchao,LEI Huaiyu,JIANG Donghua,et al. Evolu tion of the A’nan Sag in the Erlian Basin and hydrocarbon ac cumulation[J]. Henan Petroleum,1998,12(2):1-5.
[20] 李秀英,肖阳,杨全凤,等.二连盆地阿南洼槽岩性油藏及致密油勘探潜力[J].中国石油勘探,2013,18(6):56-61. LI Xiuying,XIAO Yang,YANG Quanfeng,et al. Lithologic reservoir and tight oil exploration potential in A’nan Subsag,Erlian Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2013,18(6):56-61.
[21] 魏巍,朱筱敏,朱世发,等.湖相富火山物质复杂储层的岩石学特征及成岩作用:以二连盆地阿南凹陷下白垩统腾一段为例[J].地学前缘,2018,25(2):147-158. WEI Wei,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Shifa,et al. Petrologic and dia genetic characteristics of the lacustrine volcanic-siliciclastic tight reservoir:An example form the first member of the Teng ger Formation in the Lower Cretaceous,A’nan Sag,Erlian Basin [J].Earth Science Frontiers,2018,25(2):147-158.
[22] 刘英辉,朱筱敏,朱茂,等.准噶尔盆地乌—夏地区二叠系风城组致密油储层特征[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(4):66-72. LIU Yinghui,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Mao,et al. Characteristics of tight oil reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Wuxia area,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(4):66-72.
[23] 时保宏,李荣堃,田雯,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区延长组长9 1段储层差异性特征及成因[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(4):1-10. SHI Baohong,LI Rongkun,TIAN Wen,et a1. Differences of characteristics and genetic of reservoirs in Chang 91 of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan area,Ordons Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2019,43(4):1-10.
[24] 魏钦廉,王翀峘,刘军峰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地樊家川地区长63储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(2):31-44. WEI Qinlian,WANG Chonghuan,LIU Junfeng,et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Triassic Chang 63 reservoir in Fanjiachuan area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022, 34(2):31-44.
[25] 朱世发,徐黎明,朱筱敏,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长4+5致密砂岩储层成岩作用特征[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(3):22-27. ZHU Shifa,XU Liming,ZHU Xiaomin,et al. Diagenetic char acteristics of tight sandstone of Chang4+5 reservoir in Longdong area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(3):22-27.
[26] 薛晶晶,孙靖,朱筱敏,等.准噶尔盆地二叠系风城组白云岩储层特征及成因机理分析[J].现代地质,2012,26(4):755-761. XUE Jingjing,SUN Jing,ZHU Xiaomin,et a1. Characteristics and formation mechanism for dolomite reservoir of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Junggar Basin[J].Geoscience,2012, 26(4):755-761.
[27] 江文剑,侯明才,邢凤存,等.川东南地区娄山关群白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):44-51. JIANG Wenjian,HOU Mingcai,XING Fengcun,et al. Charac teristics and main controlling factors of dolomite reservoirs of Cambrian Loushanguan Group in the southeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):44-51.
[28] 马剑,黄志龙,刘再振,等. 三塘湖盆地条湖组含沉积有机质凝灰岩致密储层特征[J].地学前缘,2015,22(6):185-196. MA Jian,HUANG Zhilong,LIU Zaizhen,et al. Tight reservoir characteristics of sedimentary organic matter-bearing tuff in Tiaohu Formation of Santanghu Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2015,22(6):185-196.
[29] 雷涵,黄文辉,孙启隆.等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部奥陶系马五段去白云石化成因及模式[J].现代地质,2021,35(2):378-387. LEI Han,HUANG Wenhui,SUN Qilong,et al. Dedolomitiza tion origin and model for the ordovician Majiagou Formation (5th member)in the Southern Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2021,35(2):378-387.
[30] 张振华,张小军,钟大康,等.柴达木盆地西北部南翼山地区古近系下干柴沟组上段储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2023,35(3):29-39. ZHANG Zhenhua,ZHANG Xiaojun,HONG Dakang,et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of upper mem ber of Paleogene Xiaganchaigou Formation in Nanyishan area, northwestern Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(3):29-39.
[1] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[2] 王洪星, 韩诗文, 胡佳, 潘志浩. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 35-45.
[3] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[4] 杨为华. 松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段致密油成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 25-34.
[5] 何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[6] 史卜庆, 丁梁波, 马宏霞, 孙辉, 张颖, 许小勇, 王红平, 范国章. 东非海域大型深水沉积体系及油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 10-17.
[7] 马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36.
[8] 范蕊, 刘卉, 杨沛广, 孙星, 马辉, 郝菲, 张珊珊. 阿曼盆地A区白垩系泥岩充填型碳酸盐岩溶蚀沟谷识别技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 72-81.
[9] 罗贝维, 尹继全, 胡广成, 陈华, 康敬程, 肖萌, 朱秋影, 段海岗. 阿联酋西部地区白垩系森诺曼阶高孔渗灰岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[10] 刘计国, 周鸿璞, 秦雁群, 邹荃, 郑凤云, 李早红, 肖高杰. 非洲Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩系AG组岩性油气藏勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 82-91.
[11] 齐育楷, 郭景祥, 罗亮, 骆福嵩, 周学文, 姚威, 张坦, 林会喜. 库车坳陷南部斜坡带隐蔽圈闭发育模式及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 108-119.
[12] 杜长鹏. 松辽盆地莺山-双城断陷白垩系致密火山岩天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 115-124.
[13] 曾治平, 柳忠泉, 赵乐强, 李艳丽, 王超, 高平. 准噶尔盆地西北缘哈山地区二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 25-35.
[14] 隋立伟, 杨文璐, 李军辉, 樊晓东, 姜洪福, 文全, 张大智, 袁勇. 断陷湖盆滩坝沉积特征及其控藏作用——以塔南凹陷白垩系铜钵庙组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 100-109.
[15] 李承泽, 陈国俊, 田兵, 袁晓宇, 孙瑞, 苏龙. 珠江口盆地深层高温高压下的水岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 141-149.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[3] 郑荣才, 耿威, 周刚, 韩永林, 王海红, 文华国. 鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6 砂岩成岩作用与成岩相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 1 -8 .
[4] 王天琦, 王建功, 梁苏娟, 沙雪梅. 松辽盆地徐家围子地区葡萄花油层精细勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 22 -27 .
[5] 陈永波,雍学善,刘化清. 沉积体系域控制下的岩性油气藏预测方法研究及应用———以鄂尔多斯盆地北部中生界延长组岩性油气藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 62 -66 .
[6] 黄思静,黄培培,王庆东,刘昊年,吴 萌,邹明亮. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[7] 杨 华,刘显阳,张才利,韩天佑,惠 潇. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组渗透岩性油藏主控因素及其分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 1 -6 .
[8] 宋子齐, 伊军锋, 庞振宇, 王艳, 李伟峰. 三维储层地质建模与砂砾油层挖潜研究———以克拉玛依油田七中区、七东区克拉玛依组砾岩油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 99 -105 .
[9] 刘树根, 黄文明, 张长俊, 赵霞飞, 戴苏兰, 张志敬, 秦川. 四川盆地白云岩成因的研究现状及存在问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 6 -15 .
[10] 曲春霞, 杨秋莲, 刘登飞, 刘旭, 李爱琴, 崔攀峰. 长庆油田延长组特低渗透储层物性影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 43 -47 .