岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 111–121.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250510

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    

松辽盆地龙虎泡油田白垩系构造-岩性圈闭类型及成藏主控因素

张云峰1, 史晓东2, 刘宗堡3, 杨雪微4, 王鸿军2, 郝彬5   

  1. 1. 辽宁石油化工大学 石油天然气工程学院, 辽宁 抚顺 113001;
    2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 第九采油厂, 黑龙江 大庆 163853;
    3. 东北石油大学 地球科学学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318;
    4. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 第五采油厂, 黑龙江 大庆 163513;
    5. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-04 修回日期:2025-03-18 发布日期:2025-09-06
  • 第一作者:张云峰（1988—），男，博士，讲师，主要从事油气成藏及储层沉积学方面的教学与科研工作。地址:（113001）辽宁省抚顺市望花区丹东路西段1号。Email:756948048@qq.com。
  • 通信作者: 刘宗堡（1982—），男，博士，教授，主要从事储层沉积学及油气成藏机理方面教学和研究工作。Email:lzbdqpi@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金“基于储层构型理论解析的三角洲相致密砂岩储集性多级次表征研究”（编号：42172161），黑龙江省自然科学基金联合基金重点项目“火山和热液作用下古龙页岩黏土矿物转化机制对储层可压性的控制”（编号：ZL2024D003）联合资助。

Structural-lithologic trap types and main controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation of Cretaceous in Longhupao Oilfield，Songliao Basin

ZHANG Yunfeng1, SHI Xiaodong2, LIU Zongbao3, YANG Xuewei4, WANG Hongjun2, HAO Bin5   

  1. 1. College of Petroleum Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, Liaoning, China;
    2. No. 9 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Co., Ltd., Daqing 163853, Heilongjiang, China;
    3. College of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China;
    4. No. 5 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Co., Ltd., Daqing 163513, Heilongjiang, China;
    5. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China
  • Received:2024-12-04 Revised:2025-03-18 Published:2025-09-06

PDF (PC)

11

摘要： 利用岩心、录井、测井和生产动态等资料，基于构造特征和砂体几何学特征，对松辽盆地龙虎泡油田白垩系构造-岩性圈闭类型进行了识别和划分；从源岩条件、油源断层输导及构造和砂体配置关系对成藏主控因素进行了研究，总结了不同类型圈闭的油气成藏模式。研究结果表明：①龙虎泡油田白垩系构造-岩性圈闭主要发育于葡萄花油层，发育水下分流河道、河口坝、前缘席状砂3种微相，具有北部物源控制的三角洲前缘亚相薄窄砂体特征。②研究区构造-岩性圈闭可分为西部斜坡带断层-岩性圈闭、东部鼻状构造带鼻状构造-岩性圈闭和中部洼陷区断鼻-岩性圈闭三大类，可进一步细分为断层-条带砂体型、断层-片状砂体型、断层-透镜砂体型，鼻状构造-条带砂体型、鼻状构造-片状砂体型、鼻状构造-透镜砂体型，断鼻-条带砂体型和断鼻-片状砂体型等8个亚类。③研究区构造-岩性圈闭的成藏受“源-断-储-势”联合控制，青山口组一段源岩提供了充足的油气资源，油源断裂提供了油气垂向运移通道，构造与砂体配置关系控制了圈闭内的油气富集。④研究区发育“油源断层垂向输导+有利沉积微相富集”的断层-岩性圈闭成藏模式、“砂体侧向输导+正向构造富集”的鼻状构造-岩性圈闭成藏模式以及“断-砂复合输导+连片砂体/厚层砂体富集”的断鼻-岩性圈闭成藏模式。

关键词: 构造-岩性圈闭, 鼻状构造, 油源断裂, 三角洲前缘亚相, 白垩系, 龙虎泡油田, 松辽盆地

Abstract: Based on structural characteristics and sand body geometry features，the structural-lithologic trap types of Cretaceous in Longhupao Oilfield of Songliao Basin were identified and classified by utilizing data from rock cores，master logging，well logging，and production dynamics. The main controlling factors for reservoir formation were studied from three aspects，such as source rock conditions，oil source transport fault，and the relationship between structure and sand body configuration. Oil and gas accumulation models of different types of traps were summarized. The results show that：（1）Cretaceous structural-lithologic traps in Longhupao Oilfield are mainly developed in Putaohua oil layer，with three microfacies ，such as underwater distributary channels，estuary bar，and front sheet sands，which maintain the characteristics of thin and narrow sand bodies in the delta front subfacies controlled by the northern source.（2）The structural-lithologic traps in the study area can be divided into three categories：fault-lithologic traps in the western slope zone，nose shaped structural-lithologic traps in the eastern nose shaped structural zone，and fault-nose shaped structural-lithologic traps in the central subsag zone. They can be further subdivided into eight subtypes：fault-strip sand type，fault-sheet sand type， fault-lens sand type，nose shaped structural-strip sand type，nose shaped structural-sheet sand type，nose shaped structural-lens sand type，fault nose-strip sand type，and fault nose-sheet sand type.（3）The formation of structural-lithologic traps in the study area is jointly controlled by“source-fault-reservoir-potential”. Source rocks from the first member of Qingshankou Formation provide sufficient oil and gas resources，oil source faults serve as vertical migration pathways for oil and gas，and the relationship between structure and sand body configuration controls the enrichment of oil and gas within traps.（4）There are three types of structural-lithologic trap accumulation models developed in the study area：fault-lithologic trap accumulation model of“vertical transport of oil source faults and enrichment of favorable sedimentary microfacies”，nose shaped structure-lithologic trap accumulation model of“lateral transport of sand bodies and enrichment of positive structures”，and faultnose shaped structure-lithologic trap accumulation model of“fault and sand composite transport，and enrichment of connected sand bodies or thick sand bodies”.

Key words: structural-lithologic trap, nose shaped structure, oil source fault, delta front subfacies, Cretaceous, Longhupao Oilfield, Songliao Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 周志军,薛江龙,赵立斌. 数值模拟拟合精度方法研究:以龙虎泡油田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(1):101-105. ZHOU Zhijun,XUE Jianglong,ZHAO Libin. Numerical simulation fitting technology:A case study from Longhupao oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(1):101-105.
[2] 徐长贵,周心怀,杨波,等. 渤中凹陷石南陡坡带构造-岩性复合圈闭的形成及分布规律[J]. 现代地质,2009,23(5):887-893. XU Changgui,ZHOU Xinhuai,YANG Bo,et al. Forming and distribution regularity of the structural-lithologic composite traps in the Shinan Steep Slope Zone,Bozhong Sag[J]. Geoscience, 2009,23(5):887-893.
[3] 杨东升,赵志刚,徐建永,等. 古近系陡坡扇构造-岩性复合圈闭识别与储层刻画技术及应用[J]. 特种油气藏,2020,27(5):38-44. YANG Dongsheng,ZHAO Zhigang,XU Jianyong,et al. Technology and application of structural-lithologic trap identification and reservoir characterization of Paleogene steep slope fans[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(5):38-44.
[4] 张磊,李莎,罗波波,等. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏,2024,36(4):57-70. ZHANG Lei,LI Sha,LUO Bobo,et al. Accumulation mechanism of overpressured lithologic reservoirs of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in northern Dongpu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(4):57-70.
[5] 刘化清,刘宗堡,吴孔友,等. 岩性地层油气藏区带及圈闭评价技术研究新进展[J]. 岩性油气藏,2021,33(1):25-36. LIU Huaqing,LIU Zongbao,WU Kongyou,et al. New progress in study of play and trap evaluation technology for lithostratigraphic reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(1):25-36.
[6] 陶士振,袁选俊,侯连华,等. 中国岩性油气藏区带类型、地质特征与勘探领域[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2016,43(6):863-872. TAO Shizhen,YUAN Xuanjun,HOU Lianhua,et al. Play types, geologic characteristics and exploration domains of lithological reservoirs in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(6):863-872.
[7] 国芳馨,张阳,王晓欢,等. 松辽盆地齐家-古龙凹陷扶余油层油气成藏区带定量预测与评价[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2023,42(3):20-29. GUO Fangxin,ZHANG Yang,WANG Xiaohuan,et al. Quantitative prediction and evaluation of hydrocarbon accumulation plays in Fuyu reservoir in Qijia-Gulong Sag in Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2023,42(3):20-29.
[8] 郭泽清,刘卫红,张林,等. 中国陆相岩性地层油气藏分布规律和控制因素研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报,2009,28(5):71-77. GUO Zeqing,LIU Weihong,ZHANG Lin,et al. Review of distribution and controlling factors for continental lithologic and stratigraphic oil gas reservoirs in China[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2009,28(5):71-77.
[9] 刘宗堡,李雪,郑荣华,等. 浅水三角洲前缘亚相储层沉积特征及沉积模式:以大庆长垣萨北油田北二区萨葡高油层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(1):1-13. LIU Zongbao,LI Xue,ZHENG Ronghua,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and models of shallow water delta front subfacies reservoirs:A case study of Sapugao oil layer in north-Ⅱ block of Sabei oilfield,Daqing placanticline[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(1):1-13.
[10] 罗浩渝,陈军,章学岐,等. 河控浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及对岩性油藏的控制:以库车坳陷南斜坡巴西改组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2021,33(5):70-80. LUO Haoyu,CHEN Jun,ZHANG Xueqi,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of fluvial dominated shallow water delta front and its control on lithologic reservoir:A case study of Baxigai Formation in south slope of Kuqa Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(5):70-80.
[11] 金忠康,孙晓庆. MJZ油田构造岩性油藏滚动扩边潜力评价与认识[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2023,13(2):173-180. JIN Zhongkang,SUN Xiaoqing. Evaluation and recognition of rolling expansion potential of structural lithologic reservoir in MJZ Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2023,13(2):173-180.
[12] 杨占龙,彭立才,陈启林,等. 地震属性分析与岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 石油物探,2007,46(2):131-136. YANG Zhanlong,PENG Licai,CHEN Qilin,et al. Seismic attributes analysis and lithological reservoir exploration[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2007,46(2):131-136.
[13] 李建忠,赵文智,胡素云,等. 岩性地层型油气聚集区带的基本特征[J]. 石油学报,2007,28(1):14-19. LI Jianzhong,ZHAO Wenzhi,HU Suyun,et al. Principal features of stratigraphic-lithological hydrocarbon accumulation zone[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(1):14-19.
[14] YEMISI C A,VICTOR O T,DOTUN E O,et al. Structural and stratigraphic reservoir characterization of "Money"field? Niger delta[J]. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation,2024,11(3):104-119.
[15] SNIEDER S,GRIFFITHS C M,HOWELL J A,et al. Quantifying the sensitivity of distributive fluvial systems to changes in sediment supply and lake level using stratigraphic forward modelling[J]. Sedimentology,2023,70(7):2196-2219.
[16] 李田野. 大庆龙虎泡油田龙12区块葡萄花油层油成藏主控因素分析[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学,2022. LI Tianye. Analysis on main controlling factors of oil accumulation in Putaohua reservoir of Long 12 Block in Daqing Longhupao oilfield[D]. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2022.
[17] 任颖惠,闫明琦,李闻虚,等. 松辽盆地齐家-古龙凹陷泥页岩特征及成藏期次[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,46(6):660-666. REN Yinghui,YAN Mingqi,LI Wenxu,et al. Study on shale characteristics and reservoir accumulation period in Qijia-Gulong Depression,Songliao basin,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2019, 46(6):660-666.
[18] YIELDING G,FREEMAN B,NEEDHAM D T. Quantitative fault seal prediction[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(6):897-917.
[19] 胡欣蕾,吕延防. 基于SGR下限值法对断层侧向封闭性评价方法的改进[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2019,48(6):1330-1342. HU Xinlei,LYU Yanfang. Improvement of lateral sealing evaluation of fault based on SGR threshold[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2019,48(6):1330-1342.
[20] GIBLING M R. Width and thickness of fluvial channel bodies and valley fills in the geological record:A literature compilation and classification[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2006,76(11):731-770.
[21] 张云峰,刘宗堡,应玉双,等. 决口扇对三角洲平原亚相砂体连通性的影响:以松辽盆地卫星油田葡萄花油层为例[J]. 沉积学报,2023,41(5):1329-1339. ZHANG Yunfeng,LIU Zongbao,YING Yushuang,et al. Effect of crevasse splay on the connectivity of sand bodies in delta plain subfacies:A case study of the Putaohua oil layer in the Weixing oilfield,Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2023,41(5):1329-1339.
[22] 张云峰,刘宗堡,赵容生,等. 三角洲平原亚相储层砂体静态连通性定量表征:以松辽盆地肇州油田扶余油层为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(6):1314-1322. ZHANG Yunfeng,LIU Zongbao,ZHAO Rongsheng,et al. Quantitative characterization of delta plain subfacies reservoir sandbody static connectivity:Taking Fuyu oil layer of Zhaozhou oil field in Songliao Basin as an example[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2017,46(6):1314-1322.
[23] 西智博,廖建平,高荣锦,等. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏,2024,36(3):127-136. XI Zhibo,LIAO Jianping,GAO Rongjin,et al. Tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation in northern Chenjia fault zone,Liaohe Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(3):127-136.
[24] 秦迎峰. 松辽盆地三肇凹陷葡萄花油层油气成藏主控因素及成藏模式[J]. 特种油气藏,2023,30(4):28-34. QIN Yingfeng. Main controlling factors and reservoir formation mode of oil and gas in the Putaohua reservoir in Sanzhao Sag,Songliao Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2023, 30(4):28-34.
[1] 张紫薇, 刘峻桥, 李娇娜, 胡欣蕾, 吴昊, 吕延防, 蒋飞. 松辽盆地南部余字井地区中浅层断裂发育特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 105-114.
[2] 户昶昊, 裴家学, 蔡国钢. 开鲁盆地陆东凹陷白垩系九佛堂组油气连续成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 1-12.
[3] 尹照普, 朱峰, 周志尧, 王丽丽, 刘晓晔, 娜孜伊曼, 汪钰婷, 黄大瑞. 准噶尔盆地莫南斜坡侏罗系西山窑组油气成藏条件及富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 33-46.
[4] 冉逸轩, 杜长鹏, 张晶晶. 松辽盆地北部葡萄花油田白垩系泉四段源下型致密油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 47-58.
[5] 何星, 金玮, 张帆, 霍秋立, 李跃, 鲍俊驰, 刘璐, 曾庆兵. 海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷白垩系铜钵庙组原油地球化学特征及来源[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 41-52.
[6] 陈红果, 张凤奇, 江青春, 刘红艳, 孙立东, 刘刚. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷白垩系沙河子组超压形成机制及其演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 102-114.
[7] 卫欢, 单长安, 朱松柏, 黄钟新, 刘汉广, 朱兵, 吴长涛. 库车坳陷克深地区白垩系巴什基奇克组致密砂岩裂缝发育特征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 149-160.
[8] 冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[9] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[10] 肖博雅. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 135-148.
[11] 王洪星, 韩诗文, 胡佳, 潘志浩. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 35-45.
[12] 杨为华. 松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段致密油成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 25-34.
[13] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[14] 卢科良, 吴康军, 李志军, 孙永河, 徐少华, 梁锋, 刘露, 李爽. 川中古隆起北斜坡寒武系龙王庙组油气成藏特征及演化模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 159-168.
[15] 何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发