岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 133–144.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250512

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    

四川盆地东部南雅地区二叠系吴家坪组构造特征及其控藏机制

詹淋1,2, 范存辉1,2, 唐雯3, 杨西燕1,2, 刘冬玺3, 李博4, 杨昕睿3   

  1. 1. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500;
    2. 油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室西南石油大学, 成都 610500;
    3. 中国石油西南油气田公司 重庆气矿, 重庆 401120;
    4. 中国石油西南油气田公司 页岩气研究院, 成都 610051
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-12 修回日期:2025-06-09 发布日期:2025-09-06
  • 第一作者:詹淋（2000—），男，西南石油大学在读硕士研究生，研究方向为非常规油气地质。地址:（610500）四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号。Email:1844379476@qq.com。
  • 通信作者: 范存辉（1980—），男，博士，副教授，主要从事地质学专业的教学与科研工作。Email:fanchswpi@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学重点项目（企业联合基金）“注采交变作用下断层稳定性与储气库动态密封性评价研究”（编号：U24B2038）、油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室开放基金“差异构造-热演化过程及对页岩气富集保存的影响机理”（编号：PLN-2023-31）和中国石油西南油气田分公司2023年科研计划项目“龙门—巫山坎区块吴家坪组页岩储层特征及勘探开发潜力研究”（编号：20230304-10）联合资助。

Structural characteristics of Permian Wujiaping Formation，Nanya area， eastern Sichuan Basin and their hydrocarbon reservoir control mechanism

ZHAN Lin1,2, FAN Cunhui1,2, TANG Wen3, YANG Xiyan1,2, LIU Dongxi3, LI Bo4, YANG Xinrui3   

  1. 1. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    3. Chongqing Gas Field, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chongqing 401120, China;
    4. Shale Gas Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610051, China
  • Received:2025-05-12 Revised:2025-06-09 Published:2025-09-06

PDF (PC)

20

摘要： 四川盆地东部南雅地区二叠系吴家坪组获高产工业气流，显示研究区具有较大页岩气勘探潜力。基于区域构造演化特征，结合钻井、测井及地震等资料，分析了构造特征及其对页岩气的生成、储集和保存的控制作用。研究结果表明：①四川盆地东部南雅向斜地区经历了3期构造运动的改造，塑造了现今隔挡式褶皱带格局。断层可分为5级，以NE—SW走向Ⅰ级断层为主，断距大于300 m，该类断层对页岩气保存有较大的破坏作用。②受拉张应力形成的“开江—梁平”海槽为研究区深水陆棚相页岩的形成提供了有利场所，构造运动导致地层发生抬升和沉降，直接影响了页岩中有机质的热演化程度，主要排烃期为侏罗纪，主要生气期为中侏罗世—早白垩世早期。③构造作用形成的微裂缝以及纳米级孔隙为页岩气提供了储集空间，网状缝系统与水平最大主应力方向匹配，有效改善了页岩的物性，也有利于页岩气的运移和富集。断层是页岩气逸散的主要通道，页岩气的保存主要受Ⅰ级断层的影响，部署井位应与Ⅰ级断层的距离至少大于1.5 km。④构造作用对页岩气的生成、储集和保存均具有重要影响，“适中的构造改造、有效的网状裂缝、完整的封闭系统”是页岩气成藏的关键，南雅向斜区域为川东页岩气勘探有利区。

关键词: 页岩气, 构造控藏, 隔挡式褶皱带, “开江—梁平”海槽, 深水陆棚相, 网状缝, 吴家坪组, 二叠系, 南雅地区, 川东地区

Abstract: Permian Wujiaping Formation in Nanya area of eastern Sichuan Basin has obtained high-yield industrial gas flow，which shows great shale gas exploration potential in the study area. Based on the characteristics of regional tectonic evolution，combined with drilling，logging，and seismic data，the structural features and their control over the generation，storage，and preservation of shale gas were analyzed. The results show that：（1）Nanya syncline area in eastern Sichuan Basin has undergone three tectonic movements，shaping the current pattern of barriertype fold belts. Faults can be classified into 5 levels，level Ⅰ faults in NE-SW direction are the main ones，with a fzult space greater than 300 m. This type of fault has a significant destructive effect on shale gas preservation. （2）“Kaijiang-Liangping”trough，formed by extensional stress provides a favorable location for the formation of deep-water shelf facies shale in the study area. Tectonic movements cause uplift and subsidence of the strata， directly affecting the thermal evolution of organic matter within the shale. The primary hydrocarbon expulsion period occurred during Jurassic，while the main gas generation phase was the early period of Middle Jurassic-Early Cretaceous.（3）The micro-fractures and nano-scale pores formed by tectonic activity provide storage space for shale gas. The reticular fracture system matches the direction of the maximum horizontal principal stress，effectively improving the physical properties of shale and facilitating the migration and enrichment of shale gas. Faults are the main channels for the escape of shale gas，and the preservation of shale gas is mainly affected by level Ⅰ faults. The deployment of well locations should be at least 1.5 km away from level I faults.（4）Tectonic activity has an important impact on the generation，storage，and preservation of shale gas，and“moderate structural transformation，effective reticular fractures，and complete sealing system”are the key factors for shale gas reservoir formation. Nanya syncline area is a favorable area for shale gas exploration in eastern Sichuan Basin.

Key words: shale gas, structural control hydrocarbon accumulation, barrier-type fold belts, “Kaijiang-Liangping” trough, deep-water shelf facies, reticular fracture, Wujiaping Formation, Permian, Nanya area, eastern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 邹才能,赵群,丛连铸,等.中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J].天然气工业,2021,41(1):1-14. ZOU Caineng,ZHAO Qun,CONG Lianzhu,et al. Development progress,potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(1):1-14.
[2] 柴建,张晓空,贾锐宁,等.底线思维下中国天然气供需平衡研究[J].管理科学学报,2024,27(12):1-18. CHAI Jian,ZHANG Xiaokong,JIA Ruining,et al. China's natural gas supply and demand balance embedded in bottom-line thinking[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China,2024, 27(12):1-18.
[3] 杨跃明,陈玉龙,刘燊阳,等.四川盆地及其周缘页岩气勘探开发现状、潜力与展望[J].天然气工业,2021,41(1):42-58. YANG Yueming,CHEN Yulong,LIU Shenyang,et al. Status, potential and prospect of shale gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(1):42-58.
[4] 罗冰,文华国,廖义沙,等. 川东北地区二叠系吴家坪组二段页岩储层特征及有利区分布[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(1):1-12. LUO Bing,WEN Huaguo,LIAO Yisha,et al. Shale reservoirs characteristics and favorable areas distribution of the second member of Permian Wujiaping Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2025,37(1):1-12.
[5] 雍锐,吴建发,吴伟,等.四川盆地寒武系筇竹寺组页岩气勘探发现及其意义[J].石油学报,2024,45(9):1309-1323. YONG Rui,WU Jianfa,WU Wei,et al. Exploration discovery of shale gas in the Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation of Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(9):1309-1323.
[6] 闫建平,罗静超,石学文,等.川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组- 志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J].岩性油气藏, 2022,34(6):60-71. YAN Jianping,LUO Jingchao,SHI Xuewen,et al. Fracture development models and significance of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(6):60-71.
[7] LUO Tao,GUO Xiaowen,HE Zhiliang,et al. Contrasting fracturing and cementation timings during shale gas accumulation and preservation:An example from the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales in the Fuling shale gas field,Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2024,170:107138.
[8] 包汉勇,刘超,甘玉青,等.四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(1):14-22. BAO Hanyong,LIU Chao,GAN Yuqing,et al. Paleotectonic stress field and fracture characteristics of shales of OrdovicianWufeng Formation to Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southern Fuling area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(1):14-22.
[9] 魏全超,李小佳,李峰,等.四川盆地米仓山前缘旺苍地区下寒武统筇竹寺组裂缝脉体发育特征及意义[J].岩性油气藏, 2023,35(5):62-70. WEI Quanchao,LI Xiaojia,LI Feng,et al. Development characteristics and significance of fracture veins of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Wangcang area at Micang Mountain front, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(5):62-70.
[10] 陈孔全,张斗中,庹秀松.中扬子地块西部地区结构构造与页岩气保存条件的关系[J].天然气工业,2020,40(4):9-19. CHEN Kongquan,ZHANG Douzhong,TUO Xiusong. Relationship between geological structure and marine shale gas preservation conditions in the western Middle Yangtze Block[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2020,40(4):9-19.
[11] 赵安坤,余谦,周业鑫,等.盆缘构造复杂区页岩气保存条件分析与量化评价:以黔北地区海相页岩为例[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2021,41(3):376-386. ZHAO Ankun,YU Qian,ZHOU Yexin,et al. Analysis and quantitative evaluation of the shale gas preservation conditions in the margin areas of Sichuan Basin[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2021,41(3):376-386.
[12] 唐洪明,刘贤,陈洋,等. 不同构造单元页岩孔隙结构差异及其油气地质意义:以四川盆地泸州地区深层页岩为例[J].天然气工业,2024,44(5):16-28. TANG Hongming,LIU Xian,CHEN Yang,et al. Pore structure difference of shale in different structural units and its petroleum geological implications:A case study on deep shale in the Luzhou area,southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2024, 44(5):16-28.
[13] 邹玉涛,段金宝,赵艳军,等.川东高陡断褶带构造特征及其演化[J].地质学报,2015,89(11):2046-2052. ZOU Yutao,DUAN Jinbao,ZHAO Yanjun,et al. Tectonic characteristics and evolution of the high and steep fault folding belt in east Sichuan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2015,89(11):2046-2052.
[14] 包汉勇,刘皓天,陈绵琨,等.川东地区高陡构造带寒武系洗象池群天然气成藏条件[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(2):43-51.BAO Hanyong,LIU Haotian,CHEN Miankun,et al. Accumulation conditions of natural gas of Cambrian Xixiangchi Group in high-steep structural zones,eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(2):43-51.
[15] 刘树根,孙玮,钟勇,等.四川海相克拉通盆地显生宙演化阶段及其特征[J].岩石学报,2017,33(4):1058-1072. LIU Shugen,SUN Wei,ZHONG Yong,et al. Evolutionary episodes and their characteristics within the Sichuan marine craton basin during Phanerozoic Eon,China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017,33(4):1058-1072.
[16] 刘宣威.川西北上二叠统吴家坪组地层及沉积特征研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2021. LIU Xuanwei. Stratigraphic and sedimentary characteristics of the Upper Permian Wujiaping Formation in Northwest Sichuan[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2021.
[17] 赵金祥,李玮,康文彬.勉略构造带构造变形过程及其地质意义[J].地质学报,2021,95(11):3220-3233. ZHAO Jinxiang,LI Wei,KANG Wenbin. Tectonic deformation processes of the Mianlue tectonic zone and its geological signifacance[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2021,95(11):3220-3233.
[18] 王兴志,李博,杨西燕,等.四川盆地北部中二叠世晚期"广元- 旺苍"海槽特征及其油气地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2021, 48(3):562-574. WANG Xingzhi,LI Bo,YANG Xiyan,et al. Characteristics of "Guangyuan-Wangcang"trough during late Middle Permian and its petroleum geological significance in northern Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021,48(3):562-574.
[19] 舒逸.沉积-成岩-构造联合控制下的涪陵页岩气富集机理研究[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学(武汉),2021. SHU Yi. Enrichment mechanism of Fuling shale gas under the joint control of sedimentary diagenesis and tectonism[D]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences(Wuhan),2021.
[20] 梁鑫鑫,张银涛,陈石,等.塔里木盆地富满油田走滑断层多核破碎带地震响应特征[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(2):127-138. LIANG Xinxin,ZHANG Yintao,CHEN Shi,et al. Seismic response characteristics of strike-slip fault multi-core damage zones in Fuman Oilfield,Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2025, 37(2):127-138.
[21] 聂海宽,金之钧,边瑞康,等.四川盆地及其周缘上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组页岩气"源-盖控藏"富集[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):557-571. NIE Haikuan,JIN Zhijun,BIAN Ruikang,et al. The"source-cap hydrocarbon-controlling"enrichment of shale gas in Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016,37(5):557-571.
[22] 聂海宽,包书景,高波,等.四川盆地及其周缘下古生界页岩气保存条件研究[J].地学前缘,2012,19(3):280-294. NIE Haikuan,BAO Shujing,GAO Bo,et al. A study of shale gas preservation conditions for the Lower Paleozoic in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(3):280-294.
[23] 肖红纱,井翠,郑健,等.长宁地区五峰组底界微断层识别及对页岩气开发工程的影响[J]. 中国矿业,2022,31(5):171-180. XIAO Hongsha,JING Cui,ZHENG Jian,et al. The identification of micro-faults at the bottom of Wufeng Formation in Changning area and its influence on shale gas development[J]. China Mining Magazine,2022,31(5):171-180.
[24] 陈更生,石学文,刘勇,等.四川盆地南部地区五峰组-龙马溪组深层页岩气富集控制因素新认识[J].天然气工业,2024, 44(1):58-71. CHEN Gengsheng,SHI Xuewen,LIU Yong,et al. New understandings of the factors controlling of deep shale gas enrichment in the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation of the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2024,44(1):58-71.
[25] 王跃鹏,刘向君,梁利喜.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组张家滩陆相页岩各向异性及能量演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2019,31(5):149-160. WANG Yueping,LIU Xiangjun,LIANG Lixi. Anisotropy and energy evolution characteristics of Zhangjiatan continental shale of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(5):149-160.
[26] 包汉勇,赵帅,张莉,等.川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(4):12-24. BAO Hanyong,ZHAO Shuai,ZHANG Li,et al. Exploration achievements and prospects for shale gas of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area,eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(4):12-24.
[27] 李小佳,邓宾,刘树根,等.川南宁西地区五峰组-龙马溪组多期流体活动[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(6):135-144. LI Xiaojia,DENG Bin,LIU Shugen,et al. Multi-stage fluid activity characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Ningxi area,southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021, 33(6):135-144.
[28] 黄向胜,闫琢玉,张东峰,等.琼东南盆地Ⅱ号断裂带新生界多期热流体活动与天然气运聚特征[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(5):67-76. HUANG Xiangsheng,YAN Zhuoyu,ZHANG Dongfeng,et al. Characteristics of multi-phase thermal fluid activity and natural gas migration-accumulation of Cenozoic in No. 2 fault zone of Qiongdongnan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(5):67-76.
[29] 李风豪,韩润生,张艳,等.非岩浆后生热液矿床构造-流体耦合成矿作用研究现状综述[J]. 地质论评,2024,70(5):1927-1948. LI Fenghao,HAN Runsheng,ZHANG Yan,et al. Review on tectonics-fluids coupling mineralization processes in non-magmatic hydrothermal ore deposits[J]. Geological Review,2024, 70(5):1927-1948.
[30] 杨旭,白鸣生,龚汉渤,等.川西新场地区三叠系须二段构造裂缝特征及定量预测[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(3):73-83. YANG Xu,BAI Mingsheng,GONG Hanbo,et al. Characteristics and quantitative prediction of structural fractures in the second member of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang area,western Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2025,37(3):73-83.
[31] 姚秀田,王超,闫森,等. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新生界断层精细表征及地质意义[J].岩性油气藏,2023,35(4):50-60. YAO Xiutian,WANG Chao,YAN Sen,et al. Fine characterization of Cenozoic faults and its geological implications in Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(4):50-60.
[32] 余海波,程秀申,漆家福,等. 东濮凹陷古近纪断裂活动对沉积的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2019,31(5):12-23. YU Haibo,CHENG Xiushen,QI Jiafu,et al. Control of fault activity on sedimentation of Paleogene in Dongpu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(5):12-23.
[33] 弓义,李天宇,吴凯凯,等.涪陵页岩气田五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气保存条件评价[J]. 海相油气地质,2020,25(3):253-262. GONG Yi,LI Tianyu,WU Kaikai,et al. Evaluation of shale gas preservation condition of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2020,25(3):253-262.
[1] 陆江, 王健, 吴楠, 李程善, 冯子飞. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘奥陶系乌拉力克组页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 34-48.
[2] 刘冠伯, 陈世加, 李世宏, 邹阳, 李勇. 玛湖凹陷玛中构造带二叠系风城组烃源岩生气潜力及成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 83-96.
[3] 王振, 王兴志, 朱逸青, 杨雨然, 杨一茗, 康家豪, 黄柏文, 吕豪. 四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷槽寒武系筇竹寺组地层划分及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 97-110.
[4] 叶慧, 朱峰, 王贵重, 石万忠, 康晓宁, 董国宁, 娜孜依曼, 王任. 准噶尔盆地二叠纪—侏罗纪古地貌恢复及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 122-132.
[5] 王青, 田冲, 罗超, 张景缘, 杨雪, 吴伟, 陶夏妍. 四川盆地遂宁—合江地区二叠系龙潭组煤岩气储层特征及勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 26-37.
[6] 王敬朝, 金玮, 常立朋, 董忠良, 王高文. 川中合川—潼南地区二叠系茅三段岩溶储层特征及油气成藏过程[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 63-72.
[7] 杨雪, 杨雨然, 张景缘, 田鹤, 王青, 宋芳, 张赛柯, 陈瑶. 川北地区开江—梁平海槽二叠系海相页岩特征及优质储层形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 108-119.
[8] 赵艾琳, 赖强, 樊睿琦, 吴煜宇, 陈杰, 严双栏, 张家伟, 廖广志. 基性火山岩核磁共振响应机理及孔隙结构评价方法——以四川盆地西南部二叠系峨眉山玄武岩组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 153-164.
[9] 林鹤, 杜金玲, 徐刚, 容娇君, 梁雪莉, 衡峰, 郭俊宁, 马梦茜. 随机森林算法在水力压裂套管变形预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 185-193.
[10] 李亚, 王尉, 赵立可, 刘冉, 张玺华, 陈延贵, 黄天海, 肖笛. 四川盆地德阳—绵阳凹陷南缘二叠系栖霞组沉积演化及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 81-91.
[11] 罗冰, 文华国, 廖义沙, 张兵, 姚永君, 温思宇, 杨凯. 川东北地区二叠系吴家坪组二段页岩储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 1-12.
[12] 钱永新, 赵毅, 刘新龙, 刘鸿, 刘国梁, 朱涛, 邹阳, 陈方文. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 115-125.
[13] 吴松, 冯冰, 于继良, 蓝宝锋, 李龙, 王胜, 沈家宁, 李刚权. 黔北正安地区安场向斜奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 182-193.
[14] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[15] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发