岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 63–72.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250406

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    

川中合川—潼南地区二叠系茅三段岩溶储层特征及油气成藏过程

王敬朝, 金玮, 常立朋, 董忠良, 王高文   

  1. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-12 修回日期:2025-04-01 发布日期:2025-07-05
  • 第一作者:王敬朝（1996-），男，博士，工程师，主要从事油气地球化学综合评价相关研究工作。地址：（163712）黑龙江省大庆市让胡路区西灵路18号。Email：wangjing_zhao@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技项目“海相碳酸盐岩油气规模增储上产与勘探开发技术研究”（编号：2023ZZ16YJ01）资助。

Characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation process of karst reservoir in the third member of Permian Maokou Formation，Hechuan-Tongnan area，central Sichuan Basin

WANG Jingzhao, JIN Wei, CHANG Lipeng, DONG Zhongliang, WANG Gaowen   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Co., Ltd., Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2025-03-12 Revised:2025-04-01 Published:2025-07-05

PDF (PC)

30

摘要： 基于最新取心井资料，通过碳酸盐岩岩石学特征、包裹体岩相学特征及流体包裹体均一温度分析，确定了川中合川—潼南地区茅三段岩溶储层特征及油气成藏过程，明确了储层发育的控制因素，并初步预测了勘探有利区。研究结果表明：①合川—潼南地区茅三段储层岩性以亮晶—泥微晶生屑灰岩为主，储集空间为构造扩溶缝洞及溶蚀孔洞，为以裂缝为主的特低孔、特低渗缝洞型岩溶储层，平均孔隙度为2.04%，平均渗透率为0.210 mD。②研究区茅三段发育3期矿物充填，从早至晚依次为粒间胶结粉—细晶方解石，缝洞充填细—中晶方解石，缝洞充填中—粗晶方解石；3期矿物充填中发育的流体包裹体均一温度分别为90～106℃，111～136℃及173～193℃；存在晚三叠世古油藏形成期、早侏罗世古油气藏形成期与中—晚侏罗世裂解古气藏形成期3期油气充注成藏。③茅三段岩溶储层发育受表生岩溶作用和构造断裂活动的共同控制，储层发育的岩溶及构造叠合有利区为2 139 km2，主要分布于研究区中部。

关键词: 缝洞型岩溶储层, 表生岩溶作用, 构造裂缝, 裂解气, 包裹体均一温度, 茅口组三段, 二叠系, 合川—潼南地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: Based on the latest core well data， characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation process of karst reservoir in the 3rd member of Maokou Formation（Ma3）in Hechuan-Tongnan area of central Sichuan Basin were determined through analysis of carbonate rock petrology， inclusion petrography and fluid inclusion homogenization temperature. The controlling factors of reservoir development was clarified，and favorable exploration areas were preliminarily predicted. The results show that： （1）In Hechuan-Tongnan area，the reservoir lithology of Ma3 is dominated by bright crystalline-muddy microcrystalline bioclastic limestone，with reservoir spaces characterized by structural enlarged dissolution fracture-vug and pore. Formed fracture-vug karst reservoir is characterized by ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability，mainly composed of fractures，with an average porosity of 2.04% and an average permeability of 0.210 mD.（2）Three stages of mineral filling are developed in Ma3 of the research area，from early to late，which are intergranular cemented powder-fine crystal calcite，fracture-vug filling finemedium crystal calcite，and fracture-vug filling medium-coarse crystal calcite. The homogenization temperatures of fluid inclusions developed in the three stages mineral filling are 90-106 ℃，111-136 ℃ and 173-193 ℃，respectively. There are three stages of hydrocarbon filling and accumulation，including the Late Triassic paleo-oil reservoir formation period，early Jurassic paleo-hydrocarbon reservoir formation period，and Middle-Late Jurassic cracked paleo-gas reservoir formation period.（3）The development of karst reservoir in Ma3 is jointly controlled by epigenetic karstification and tectonic fracture activity. The favorable area of karst and tectonic overlap in reservoir development is 2 139 km2， mainly distributed in the central part of the study area.

Key words: fractured-vuggy karst reservoir, epigenetic karstification, structural fracture, cracked gas, inclusion homogenization temperature, the 3rd member of Maokou Formation, Permian, Hechuan-Tongnan area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 胡明毅,胡忠贵,魏国齐,等.四川盆地茅口组层序岩相古地理特征及储集层预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(1):45-55.HU Mingyi,HU Zhonggui,WEI Guoqi,et al.Sequence lithofacies paleogeography and reservoir prediction of the Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):45-55.
[2] 肖迪,谭秀成,山述娇,等.四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组二段沉积微相研究[J].沉积学报,2015,33(6):1182-1191.XIAO Di,TAN Xiucheng,SHAN Shujiao,et al.Sedimentary microfacies of the second member in Maokou Formation,Middle Permian,south Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(6):1182-1191.
[3] 刘宏,马腾,谭秀成,等.表生岩溶系统中浅埋藏构造-热液白云岩成因:以四川盆地中部中二叠统茅口组为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(6):916-927.LIU Hong,MA Teng,TAN Xiucheng,et al.Origin of structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite in epigenetic karst system during shallow burial:An example from Middle Permian Maokou Formation,central Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(6):916-927.
[4] 沈平,张健,宋家荣,等.四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新突破的意义及有利勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2015,35(7):1-9.SHEN Ping,ZHANG Jian,SONG Jiarong,et al.Significance of new breakthrough in and favorable targets of gas exploration in the Middle Permian system,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(7):1-9.
[5] 胡安平,潘立银,郝毅,等.四川盆地二叠系栖霞组、茅口组白云岩储层特征、成因和分布[J].海相油气地质,2018,23(2):39-52.HU Anping,PAN Liyin,HAO Yi,et al.Origin,characteristics and distribution of dolostone reservoir in Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation,Sichuan Basin,China[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2018,23(2):39-52.
[6] 何文渊,白雪峰,蒙启安,等.碳酸盐台内斜坡认识突破与重大发现:以川中地区中二叠统茅口组二段气藏勘探为例[J].中国石油勘探,2023,28(1):59-70.HE Wenyuan,BAI Xuefeng,MENG Qi'an,et al.New understanding and significant discovery in the inner slope of carbonate platform:A case study of gas exploration in the second member of Maokou Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(1):59-70.
[7] 印长海,师江波,郑剑锋,等.四川盆地合川-潼南地区茅二段滩相白云岩储层特征、主控因素及勘探意义[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(1):1-10.YIN Changhai,SHI Jiangbo,ZHENG Jianfeng,et al.Characteristics,controlling factors and exploration significance of shoal facies dolomite reservoirs in 2nd member of Maokou Formation in Hechuan-Tongnan area of Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(1):1-10.
[8] 印长海,师江波,谭秀成,等.四川盆地中部合川-潼南地区茅二下亚段白云岩储层特征及成储机制[J].海相油气地质,2024,29(2):136-146.YIN Changhai,SHI Jiangbo,TAN Xiucheng,et al.Characteristics and formation mechanism of dolomite reservoirs in the lower submember of Maokou member 2 in Hechuan-Tongnan area,central Sichuan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2024,29(2):136-146.
[9] 肖迪,谭秀成,山述娇,等.四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组古岩溶地貌恢复及其石油地质意义[J].地质学报,2014,88(10):1992-2002.XIAO Di,TAN Xiucheng,SHAN Shujiao,et al.The restoration of palaeokarst geomorphology of Middle Permian Maokou Formation and its petroleum geological significance in southern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2014,88(10):1992-2002.
[10] 孟宪武,陈安清,李雯,等.四川盆地南缘二叠系茅口组构造-沉积分异及控储效应[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2025,52(1):94-107.MENG Xianwu,CHEN Anqing,LI Wen,et al.Platform margin tectono-sedimentary differentiation and reservoir control effects of the Permian Maokou Formation,southern margin of Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2025,52(1):94-107.
[11] 任梦怡,汪泽成,江青春,等.川南地区中二叠统茅口组碳酸盐岩储层孔隙特征与储层成因[J].东北石油大学学报,2021,45(3):32-43.REN Mengyi,WANG Zecheng,JIANG Qingchun,et al.The carbonate reservoir characteristics and pore genesis in the middle Permian Maokou Formation,southern Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2021,45(3):32-43.
[12] 李跃杰,谢静平,袁海锋,等.蜀南地区二叠系茅口组流体包裹体特征与油气充注期次分析[J].天然气勘探与开发,2023,46(4):69-79.LI Yuejie,XIE Jingping,YUAN Haifeng,et al.Fluid inclusion and hydrocarbon-charging episodes in the Permian Maokou Formation,southern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2023,46(4):69-79.
[13] 李毕松,苏建龙,蒲勇,等.四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(1):69-77.LI Bisong,SU Jianlong,PU Yong,et al.Facies-controlled karst characterization and effective reservoir prediction of Permian Maokou Formation in Yuanba area,Sichuan Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(1):69-77.
[14] 吴丰,习研平,张亚,等.川东-川南地区茅口组岩溶储层分类识别及有效性评价[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(2):90-99.WU Feng,XI Yanping,ZHANG Ya,et al.Classification and effectiveness evaluation of karst reservoirs of Maokou Formation in eastern and southern Sichuan Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(2):90-99.
[15] 张坦,贾梦瑶,孙雅雄,等.四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(1):111-120.ZHANG Tan,JIA Mengyao,SUN Yaxiong,et al.Restoration and characteristics of karst paleogeomorphology of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(1):111-120.
[16] 张峰,罗少成,李震,等.四川盆地茅口组岩溶缝洞型储层有效性测井评价[J].石油钻探技术,2020,48(6):116-122.ZHANG Feng,LUO Shaocheng,LI Zhen,et al.Logging evaluation on the effectiveness of karst fractured-vuggy reservoirs in the Maokou Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2020,48(6):116-122.
[17] 戴晓峰,张明,江青春,等.四川盆地中部下二叠统茅口组岩溶储集层地震预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):79-88.DAI Xiaofeng,ZHANG Ming,JIANG Qingchun,et al.Karst reservoirs seismic prediction of Lower Permian Maokou Formation in central Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):79-88.
[18] 杨帅,陈安清,张玺华,等.四川盆地二叠纪栖霞-茅口期古地理格局转换及勘探启示[J].沉积学报,2021,39(6):1466-1477.YANG Shuai,CHEN Anqing,ZHANG Xihua,et al.Paleogeographic transition of the Permian Chihsia-Maokou period in the Sichuan Basin and indications for oil-gas exploration[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2021,39(6):1466-1477.
[19] 周进高,姚根顺,杨光,等.四川盆地栖霞组-茅口组岩相古地理与天然气有利勘探区带[J].天然气工业,2016,36(4):8-15.ZHOU Jingao,YAO Genshun,YANG Guang,et al.Lithofacies palaeogeography and favorable gas exploration zones of Qixia and Maokou Fms in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(4):8-15.
[20] 许海龙,魏国齐,贾承造,等.乐山-龙女寺古隆起构造演化及对震旦系成藏的控制[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(4):406-416.XU Hailong,WEI Guoqi,JIA Chengzao,et al.Tectonic evolution of the Leshan-Longnüsi paleo-uplift and its control on gas accumulation in the Sinian strata,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(4):406-416.
[21] 黎荣,胡明毅,杨威,等.四川盆地中二叠统沉积相模式及有利储集体分布[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(2):369-379.LI Rong,HU Mingyi,YANG Wei,et al.Sedimentary facies model and favorable reservoir distribution of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(2):369-379.
[22] 苏旺,江青春,陈志勇,等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组层序地层特征及其对源储的控制作用[J].天然气工业,2015,35(7):34-43.SU Wang,JIANG Qingchun,CHEN Zhiyong,et al.Sequence stratigraphic features of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the Sichuan Basin and their controls on source rocks and reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(7):34-43.
[23] 田小彬,师江波,董景海,等.川中地区茅口组一段沉积相新认识:基于最新钻井资料[J].天然气地球科学,2021,32(11):1646-1655.TIAN Xiaobin,SHI Jiangbo,DONG Jinghai,et al.New understanding of sedimentary facies of the first member of Maokou Formation based on the latest drilling in central Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2021,32(11):1646-1655.
[24] 郝毅,姚倩颖,田瀚,等.四川盆地二叠系茅口组沉积特征及储层主控因素[J].海相油气地质,2020,25(3):202-209.HAO Yi,YAO Qianying,TIAN Han,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir-controlling factors of the Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2020,25(3):202-209.
[25] 江青春,胡素云,汪泽成,等.四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及勘探选区[J].石油学报,2012,33(6):949-960.JIANG Qingchun,HU Suyun,WANG Zecheng,et al.Paleokarst landform of the weathering crust of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(6):949-960.
[26] 何斌,徐义刚,肖龙,等.峨眉山地幔柱上升的沉积响应及其地质意义[J].地质论评,2006,52(1):30-37.HE Bin,XU Yigang,XIAO Long,et al.Sedimentary responses to uplift of Emeishan mantle plume and its implications[J].Geological Review,2006,52(1):30-37.
[27] 石油地质勘探专业标准化委员会.油气储层评价方法:SY/T 6285-2011[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2011.Petroleum Geology Exploration Professional Standardization Committee.Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs:SY/T 6285-2011[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011.
[28] 吕正祥,廖哲渊,李岳峰,等.玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖云质岩储层成岩作用[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(5):26-37.LYU Zhengxiang,LIAO Zheyuan,LI Yuefeng,et al.Diagenesis of alkaline lacustrine dolomitic reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(5):26-37.
[29] 冯明友,高瑞琪,王兴志,等.川西南宝兴地区二叠系栖霞组一段白云岩储层充填序列及流体指示[J].岩性油气藏,2023,35(2):11-20.FENG Mingyou,GAO Ruiqi,WANG Xingzhi,et al.Sequence filling succession and fluid indication of dolomite reservoirs of the first member of Permian Qixia Formation in Baoxing area,southwestern Sichuan Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(2):11-20.
[30] 何斌,徐义刚,王雅玫,等.东吴运动性质的厘定及其时空演变规律[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2005,30(1):89-96.HE Bin,XU Yigang,WANG Yamei,et al.Nature of the Dongwu Movement and its temporal and spatial evolution[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2005,30(1):89-96.
[31] 张亚,陈双玲,张晓丽,等.四川盆地茅口组岩溶古地貌刻画及油气勘探意义[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(3):44-55.ZHANG Ya,CHEN Shuangling,ZHANG Xiaoli,et al.Restoration of paleokarst geomorphology of Lower Permian Maokou Formation and its petroleum exploration implication in Sichuan Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(3):44-55.
[32] 江青春,胡素云,姜华,等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组地层缺失量计算及成因探讨[J].天然气工业,2018,38(1):21-29.JIANG Qingchun,HU Suyun,JIANG Hua,et al.Calculation and inducement of lacuna in the Mid-Permian Maokou Fm of the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(1):21-29.
[33] 李小佳,邓宾,刘树根,等.川南宁西地区五峰组-龙马溪组多期流体活动[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(6):135-144.LI Xiaojia,DENG Bin,LIU Shugen,et al.Multi-stage fluid activity characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Ningxi area,southern Sichuan Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(6):135-144.
[34] 周文,徐浩,余谦,等.四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组与筇竹寺组页岩含气性差异及成因[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):18-25.ZHOU Wen,XU Hao,YU Qian,et al.Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):18-25.
[35] 管树巍,姜华,鲁雪松,等.四川盆地中部走滑断裂系统及其控油气作用[J].石油学报,2022,43(11):1542-1557.GUAN Shuwei,JIANG Hua,LU Xuesong,et al.Strike-slip fault system and its control on oil & gas accumulation in central Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(11):1542-1557.
[36] 焦方正,杨雨,冉崎,等.四川盆地中部地区走滑断层的分布与天然气勘探[J].天然气工业,2021,41(8):92-101.JIAO Fangzheng,YANG Yu,RAN Qi,et al.Distribution and gas exploration of the strike-slip faults in the central Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(8):92-101.
[37] 钟原,杨跃明,文龙,等.四川盆地西北部中二叠统茅口组岩相古地理、古岩溶地貌恢复及其油气地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(1):81-93.ZHONG Yuan,YANG Yueming,WEN Long,et al.Reconstruction and petroleum geological significance of lithofacies paleogeography and paleokarst geomorphology of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(1):81-93.
[38] 陈卫东,陈义才,徐发波,等.四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组地层划分、对比与岩溶古地貌恢复[J].天然气工业,2021,41(6):27-36.CHEN Weidong,CHEN Yicai,XU Fabo,et al.Stratigraphic division and correlation and karst palaeogeomorphology restoration of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(6):27-36.
[39] 冯磊,刘宏,谭磊,等.岩溶古地貌恢复及油气地质意义:以四川盆地泸州地区中二叠统茅口组为例[J].断块油气田,2023,30(1):60-69.FENG Lei,LIU Hong,TAN Lei,et al.Karst paleogeomorphology restoration and hydrocarbon geological significance:A case study of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Luzhou area of Sichuan Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2023,30(1):60-69.
[40] 刘冉,罗冰,李亚,等.川西地区二叠系火山岩展布与茅口组岩溶古地貌关系及其油气勘探意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(3):575-585.LIU Ran,LUO Bing,LI Ya,et al.Relationship between Permian volcanic rocks distribution and karst paleogeomorphology of Maokou Formation and its significance for petroleum exploration in western Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(3):575-585.
[1] 王青, 田冲, 罗超, 张景缘, 杨雪, 吴伟, 陶夏妍. 四川盆地遂宁—合江地区二叠系龙潭组煤岩气储层特征及勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 26-37.
[2] 邢倩, 李杨凡, 李翔, 万子千, 李雅兰. 川北米仓山地区寒武系仙女洞组碳酸盐岩储集特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 50-62.
[3] 杨旭, 白鸣生, 龚汉渤, 李皋, 陶祖文. 川西新场地区三叠系须二段构造裂缝特征及定量预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 73-83.
[4] 杨雪, 杨雨然, 张景缘, 田鹤, 王青, 宋芳, 张赛柯, 陈瑶. 川北地区开江—梁平海槽二叠系海相页岩特征及优质储层形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 108-119.
[5] 赵艾琳, 赖强, 樊睿琦, 吴煜宇, 陈杰, 严双栏, 张家伟, 廖广志. 基性火山岩核磁共振响应机理及孔隙结构评价方法——以四川盆地西南部二叠系峨眉山玄武岩组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 153-164.
[6] 林鹤, 杜金玲, 徐刚, 容娇君, 梁雪莉, 衡峰, 郭俊宁, 马梦茜. 随机森林算法在水力压裂套管变形预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 185-193.
[7] 李凌, 邓禹, 张新宇, 罗文军, 赵东方, 曾建军, 刘耘, 谭秀成. 川中蓬莱—高磨地区震旦系灯二段泡沫绵层白云岩成因及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 60-69.
[8] 李亚, 王尉, 赵立可, 刘冉, 张玺华, 陈延贵, 黄天海, 肖笛. 四川盆地德阳—绵阳凹陷南缘二叠系栖霞组沉积演化及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 81-91.
[9] 吴冠桦, 刘宏, 宋林珂, 曾琪, 杨涛. 四川盆地西南部东瓜场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沉积特征及有利储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 92-102.
[10] 张坤, 刘宏, 谭磊, 梁锋, 王立恩, 马梓珂, 刘博文, 杨孟祥. 川中北部蓬莱地区震旦系灯影组二段地震沉积学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 189-200.
[11] 钱永新, 赵毅, 刘新龙, 刘鸿, 刘国梁, 朱涛, 邹阳, 陈方文. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 115-125.
[12] 闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[13] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[14] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[15] 乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发