Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2014, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 21-26.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2014.02.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reservoir characteristics of Xujiahe Formation in Woxinshuang area, Sichuan Basin

WANG Changyong1, ZHOU Yi1, LI Shilin2, LI Shuang2, WANG Xiaojuan3, ZHENG Rongcai1   

  1. 1. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China; 2. Chongqing Gas Field, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chongqing 400021, China; 3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610051, China
  • Online:2014-04-06 Published:2014-04-06

Abstract:

Based on the data of cast slice, SEM, X-ray and normal physical properties, this paper studied the reservoir rock types, diageneses characteristics and reservoir space types of Xujiahe Formation in Woxinshuang area, and analyzed the impact of different diagenese on the reservoir. The result shows that the reservoir lithology is mainly feldspathic litharenite and lithic sandstone with the characteristics of low compositional maturity and medium-high textural maturity, and the provenance is proximal and rapidly accumulated. The sandstone in the study area experienced six diageneses: compaction-pressure solution, cementation, dissolution, replacement, fracturing and authigenic mineral filling. The intensely compaction-pressure solution, calcite cementation and authigenic mineral filling are the main reasons for the degradation of reservoir porosity and permeability and densification. The chlorite rim cementation is the main cause for the preservation of some primary intergranular pores. Dissolution to a certain extent, improves the reservoir performance. Fracturing is more effective for communicating the primary pores and secondary pores, and greatly improves the reservoir permeability. Xujiahe Formation in Woxinshuang area mainly developed fractured-porous type and extra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoir. The reservoir porosity and permeability is poorly correlated in whole, but with the porosity getting higher, the correlation between porosity and permeability is gradually getting better. The Woxinshuang area has favorable conditions for oil and gas accumulation and has a certain exploration and development potential.

Key words: shale gas, total organic carbon, BP neural network, natural gamma ray spectrum, kerogen

[1] 童崇光.新构造运动与四川盆地构造演化及气藏形成[J].成都理工学院学报,2000,27(2):123-130.
[2] 蒋炳铨.川东一带隔挡、隔槽式褶皱形成力学机制[J].四川地质学报,1984,5(1):1-12.
[3] 四川油气区石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志(卷10):四川油气区[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989:1-50.
[4] 中国地层典编委会.中国地层典———三叠系[M].北京:地质出版社,2000.
[5] 郑荣才,朱如凯,戴朝成,等.四川盆地上三叠统须家河组层序-岩相古地理特征[J].地质论评,2009,55(3):731-744.
[6] 郑荣才,戴朝成,罗清林,等.四川类前陆盆地上三叠统须家河组沉积体系分析[J].天然气工业,2011,31(9):17-24.
[7] 金惠,张俊,马石玉.四川盆地上三叠统遗迹化石及其沉积环境[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(1):24-28.
[8] 张健,李国辉,谢继容,等.四川盆地上三叠统划分对比研究[J].天然气工业,2006,26(1):12-15.
[9] 郑荣才,李国晖,雷光明,等.四川盆地须家河组层序分析与地层对比[J].天然气工业,2011,31(6):12-20.
[10] 徐惠芬,崔京钢,邱小平.阴极发光技术在岩石学和矿床学中的应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2006:1-62.
[11] 朱平,黄思静,李德敏,等.粘土矿物绿泥石对碎屑储集岩孔隙的保护[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2004,31(2):153-156.
[12] 郑荣才,魏钦廉,高红灿,等.川西坳陷中段须四段钙屑砂岩储层特征及有利区块预测[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2007,34(5):489-496.
[13] 戴朝成,郑荣才,朱如凯,等.四川前陆盆地中西部须家河组成岩作用与成岩相[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2011,38(2):211-219.
[14] 王昌勇,王成玉,梁晓伟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区上三叠统延长组长8 油层组成岩相[J].石油学报,2011,32(4):598-604.
[1] YAN Jianping, LAI Siyu, GUO Wei, SHI Xuewen, LIAO Maojie, TANG Hongming, HU Qinhong, HUANG Yi. Research progress on casing deformation types and influencing factors in geological engineering of shale gas wells [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 1-14.
[2] YANG Xuefeng, ZHAO Shengxian, LIU Yong, LIU Shaojun, XIA Ziqiang, XU Fei, FAN Cunhui, LI Yutong. Main controlling factors of shale gas enrichment of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Ningxi area,Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[3] BAO Hanyong, ZHAO Shuai, ZHANG Li, LIU Haotian. Exploration achievements and prospects for shale gas of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area,eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[4] SHEN Youyi, WANG Kaifeng, TANG Shuheng, ZHANG Songhang, XI Zhaodong, YANG Xiaodong. Geological modeling and“sweet spot”prediction of Permian coal measures shale reservoirs in Yushe-Wuxiang block,Qinshui Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[5] DUAN Yifei, ZHAO Weiwei, YANG Tianxiang, LI Fukang, LI Hui, WANG Jianan, LIU Yuchen. Source-reservoir characteristics and accumulation rules of shale gas of Permian Shanxi Formation in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[6] CHENG Jing, YAN Jianping, SONG Dongjiang, LIAO Maojie, GUO Wei, DING Minghai, LUO Guangdong, LIU Yanmei. Low resistivity response characteristics and main controlling factors of shale gas reservoirs of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Changning area,southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[7] JI Yubing, GUO Bingru, MEI Jue, YIN Zhijun, ZOU Chen. Fracture modeling of shale reservoirs of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Luobu syncline in Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area, southern margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[8] XIONG Bo, ZHU Dongxue, FANG Chaohe, WANG Shejiao, DU Guanglin, XUE Yafei, MO Shaoyuan, XIN Fudong. Heat transfer prediction of medium and deep coaxial casing based on BP algorithm [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 15-22.
[9] YANG Bowei, SHI Wanzhong, ZHANG Xiaoming, XU Xiaofeng, LIU Yuzuo, BAI Luheng, YANG Yang, CHEN Xianglin. Pore structure characteristics and gas-bearing properties of shale gas reservoirs of Lower Carboniferous Dawuba Formation in southern Guizhou [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 45-58.
[10] WEI Quanchao, LI Xiaojia, LI Feng, HAO Jingyu, DENG Shuanglin, WU Juan, DENG Bin, WANG Daojun. Development characteristics and significance of fracture veins of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Wangcang area at Micang Mountain front, Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 62-70.
[11] YANG Yueming, ZHANG Shaomin, JIN Tao, MING Ying, GUO Ruiying, WANG Xingzhi, HAN Luyuan. Characteristics and exploration potential of shale reservoirs of Permian Longtan Formation in southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1): 1-11.
[12] YAN Jianping, LUO Jingchao, SHI Xuewen, ZHONG Guanghai, ZHENG Majia, HUANG Yi, TANG Hongming, HU Qinhong. Fracture development models and significance of Ordovician WufengSilurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[13] QIU Chen, YAN Jianping, ZHONG Guanghai, LI Zhipeng, FAN Cunhui, ZHANG Yue, HU Qinhong, HUANG Yi. Sedimentary microfacies division and logging identification of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
[14] ZHANG Menglin, LI Guoqin, HE Jia, HENG De. Main controlling factors of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale gas enrichment in Tiangongtang structure, southwestern margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 141-151.
[15] WEN Kang, YAN Jianping, ZHONG Guanghai, JING Cui, TANG Hongming, WANG Min, WANG Jun, HU Qinhong, LI Zhipeng. New method of shale gas evaluation of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Changning area, southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1): 95-105.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] DUAN Tianxiang,LIU Xiaomei,ZHANG Yajun,XIAO Shuqin. Discussion on geologic modeling with Petrel[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] ZHANG Liqiu. Optimization of upward strata combination of second class oil layer in eastern south Ⅱ area of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] ZHANG Di,HOU Zhongjian,WANG Yahui,WANG Ying,WANG Chunlian. Sedimentary characteristics of lacustrine carbonate rocks of the first member of Shahejie Formation in Banqiao-Beidagang area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] FAN Huaicai, LI Xiaoping, DOU Tiancai, WU Xinyuan. Study on stress sensitivity effect on flow dynamic features of gas wells[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] TIAN Shufang,ZHANG Hongwen. Application of life cycle theory to predict increasing trend of proved oil reserves in Liaohe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] YANG Kai,GUO Xiao. Numerical simulation study of three-dimensional two-phase black oil model in fractured low permeability reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] ZHAI Zhongxi, QINWeijun, GUO Jinrui. Quantitative relations between oil-gas filling degree and channel seepage flow capacity of the reservoir:Example of Shuanghe Oilfield in Biyang Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] QI Minghui,LU Zhengyuan,YUAN Shuai,LI Xinhua. The analysis on the sources of water body and characteristic of water breakthough at Block 12 in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] LI Xiangbo,CHEN Qi,lin,LIU Huaqing,WAN Yanrong,MU Jingkui,LIAO Jianbo,WEI Lihua. Three types of sediment gravity flows and their petroliferous features of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] LIU Yun,LU Yuan,YI Xiangyi, ZHANG Junliang, ZHANG Jinliang,WANG Zhenxi. Gas hydrate forecasting model and its influencing factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .
TRENDMD: