岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 1–11.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210101

• 论坛与综述 •    下一篇

坳陷湖盆大型浅水三角洲沉积特征与生长模式

袁选俊1,2, 周红英1, 张志杰1,2, 王子野1, 成大伟1, 郭浩3, 张友焱1, 董文彤1   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石油天然气集团公司油气储层重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    3. 中国石油南方石油勘探开发有限责任公司 勘探开发研究中心, 海口 570100
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-10 修回日期:2020-12-18 出版日期:2021-02-01 发布日期:2021-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 张志杰(1977-),女,博士,高级工程师,主要从事沉积与石油地质评价方面的研究工作。Email:zhzhijie@petrochina.com.cn。 E-mail:zhzhijie@petrochina.com.cn
  • 作者简介:袁选俊(1963-),男,博士,教授级高级工程师,博士生导师,主要从事沉积与石油地质评价方面的研究工作。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路20号实验研究中心。Email:yxj@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家油气重大专项“岩性地层油气藏成藏规律、关键技术及目标评价”（编号：2017ZX05001）和中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技项目“大中型岩性地层油气藏富集规律与关键技术”（编号：2019B-0307）联合资助

Depositional features and growth pattern of large shallow-water deltas in depression basin

YUAN Xuanjun1,2, ZHOU Hongying1, ZHANG Zhijie1,2, WANG Ziye1, CHENG Dawei1, GUO Hao3, ZHANG Youyan1, DONG Wentong1   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir, CNPC, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. Research Center of Exploration and Development, PetroChina South Exploration & Production Company, Haikou 570100, China
  • Received:2020-10-10 Revised:2020-12-18 Online:2021-02-01 Published:2021-01-25

PDF (PC)

352

摘要： 坳陷湖盆大型浅水三角洲是目前中国陆上岩性油气藏规模储量增长的主体。通过对松辽盆地南部上白垩统保乾三角洲和现代鄱阳湖赣江三角洲解剖，重点探讨湖盆浅水三角洲形成的地质背景、沉积特征与生长模式。结果表面：①坳陷湖盆具有形成大型浅水三角洲的沉积背景，敞流型湖盆导致的湖平面频繁升降控制了浅水三角洲的纵横向发育规模。②松辽盆地南部上白垩统发育2种不同类型的三角洲，深湖型三角洲一般呈朵叶状，沉积亚相展布清晰，沉积微相以分流河道、河口坝和分流河道间为主；浅湖型三角洲一般呈鸟足状或树枝状，沉积亚相分异不明显，沉积微相以分流河道和分流河道间为主，河口坝不发育；③通过现代沉积遥感定量分析，刻画了鄱阳湖赣江中支三角洲近50年的发育特征和演化规律，揭示了分流河道从分散树枝状到闭合结网状的生长过程。④坳陷湖盆大型浅水三角洲是不断发育的多期朵叶体在平面上拼接而成的复合体，其中分流河道是最重要的储集砂体类型，在平面上呈结网状分布，控制了大面积岩性油气藏的分布与富集。

关键词: 坳陷湖盆, 浅水三角洲, 沉积特征, 生长模式, 岩性油气藏, 松辽盆地, 鄱阳湖

Abstract: Large shallow-water deltas in depression basin contribute to the main potential increase of onshore lithologic reservoirs in China. The Baoqian delta of the Upper Cretaceous in southern Songliao Basin and the modern Ganjiang delta in Poyang Lake were analyzed. The particular focus was put on the paleo-environment, depositional features and growth pattern of this type of delta.(1)Depression basins are favorable for large shallow-water deltas. Unconfined morphology results in the frequent rise and fall of lake-level,which controls the delta dimension in dip direction.(2)There are two different types of deltas in the Upper Cretaceous of southern Songliao Basin. One is deep-water delta characterized by lobe shape and easily-identified depositional facies, mainly including distributary channels,mouth bars,and interdistributary bays. Another is shallow-water delta characterized by bird's foot shape and obscure boundaries between depositional facies,mainly including distributary channels and interdistributary bays,with mouth bar less developed.(3)The remote sensing for modern sedimentary systems reveals the evolution of Ganjiang middle delta in Poyang Lake in recent 50 years,showing the transition from disperse branch shape to connective network shape.(4)Large shallow-water delta in depression basins is a complex consisting of several deltas formed in multi-scenarios. The sand-bodies of distributary channels are the most significant reservoir and carry massive lithologic reservoirs. They are distributed horizontally in a net pattern and control the distribution of lithologic reservoirs.

Key words: depression basin, shallow-water delta, depositional feature, growth pattern, lithologic reservoirs, Songliao Basin, Poyang Lake

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] FISK H N. Sedimentary framework of the modern Mississippi delta. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1954,24(2):76-99.
[2] DONALDSONAC. Pennsylvanian sedimentation of centralAppalachians. Geological Society of America,1974,148:47-48.
[3] POSTMA G. An analysis of the variation in delta architecture. Terra Nova,1990,2(2):124-130.
[4] CORNEL O,JANOK P B. Terminal distributary channels and delta front architecture of river-dominated delta systems. Journal of Sedimentary Research,2006,76:212-233.
[5] 裘亦楠,肖敬修,薛培华. 湖泊三角洲分类的探讨. 石油勘探与开发,1982,9(1):1-11. QIU Y N,XIAO J X,XUE P H. Discussion on the classification of lacustrine deltas. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1982,9(1):1-11.
[6] 裘亦楠,薛叔浩,应凤祥. 中国陆相油气储集层. 北京:石油工业出版社,1997:1-145. QIU Y N,XUE S H,YING F X. Terrestrial oil and gas reservoirs in China. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997:1-145.
[7] 楼章华,袁笛,金爱民. 松辽盆地北部浅水三角洲前缘砂体类型、特征与沉积动力学过程分析. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2004,31(2):211-215. LOU Z H,YUAN D,JIN A M. Types,characteristics of sandbodies in shallow-water delta front and sedimentary models in northern Songliao Basin,China. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition),2004,31(2):211-215.
[8] 楼章华,兰翔,卢庆梅,等. 地形、气候与湖面波动对浅水三角洲沉积环境的控制作用:以松辽盆地北部东区葡萄花油层为例. 地质学报,1999,73(1):83-92. LOU Z H,LAN X,LU Q M,et al. Controls of the topography, climate and lake level fluctuation on the depositional environment of a shallow-water delta:a case study of the Cretaceous Putaohua reservoir in the northern part of Songliao Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica,1999,73(1):83-92.
[9] 王建功,王天琦,卫平生,等. 大型坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲沉积模式:以松辽盆地北部葡萄花油层为例. 岩性油气藏,2007, 19(2):28-34. WANG J G,WANG T Q,WEI P S,et al. Sedimentary model of shallow lacustrine delta of large continental basin:an example from Putaohua Formation in northern Songliao Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(2):28-34.
[10] 邹才能,赵文智,张兴阳,等. 大型敞流坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲与湖盆中心砂体的形成与分布.地质学报,2008,82(6):813-825. ZOU C N,ZHAO W Z,ZHANG X Y,et al. Formation and distribution of shallow-water deltas and central-basin sandbodies in large open depression lake basins.Acta Geologica Sinica,2008, 82(6):813-825.
[11] 朱筱敏,钟大康,袁选俊,等. 中国含油气盆地沉积地质学进展. 石油勘探与开发,2016,42(5):820-829. ZHU X M,ZHONG D K,YUAN X J,et al. Development of sedimentary geology of petroliferous basins in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,42(5):820-829.
[12] 吴崇筠,薛叔浩. 中国含油气盆地沉积学. 北京:石油工业出版社,1993. WU C J,XUE S H. Sedimentology of petroliferous basins in China. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1993.
[13] 薛叔浩,刘雯林,薛良清,等. 湖盆沉积地质与油气勘探. 北京:石油工业出版社,2002. XUE S H,LIU W L,XUE L Q,et al. Lake basin sedimentary geology and petroleum exploration. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2002.
[14] 邓秀芹,蔺昉晓,刘显阳,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组沉积演化及其与早印支运动关系的探讨. 古地理学报,2008,10(2):159-166. DENG X Q,LIN F X,LIU X Y,et al. Discussion on relationship between sedimentary evolution of the Triassic Yanchang Formation and the early Indosinian Movement in Ordos Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography,2008,10(2):159-166.
[15] 付金华,郭正权,邓秀芹. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南地区上三叠统延长组沉积相及石油地质意义. 古地理学报,2005,7(1):34-44. FU J H,GUO Z Q,DENG X Q. Sedimentary facies of the Yanchang Formation of Upper Triassic and petroleum geological implication in southwestern Ordos Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2005,7(1):34-44.
[16] 高瑞祺,乔秀云. 松辽盆地非海相沟鞭藻化石的发现及其对陆相生油环境的新解释. 大庆石油地质与开发,1989,8(3):35-41. GAO R Q,QIAO X Y. Discovery of non-marine dinoflagellate fossils in Songliao Basin and its contribution to renewing the interpretation of continental oil generation environment. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,1989,8(3):35-41.
[17] 曹文心,席党鹏,黄清华,等. 松辽盆地海侵事件:松科1井钙质超微化石新证据.地质通报,2016,35(6):866-871. CAOWX,XI D P,HUANG Q H,et al. Seawater incursion event in Songliao Basin:New evidence from calcareous nannofossils of SK-1. Geologic Bulletin of China,2016,35(6):866-871.
[18] 袁选俊,薛良清,池英柳,等. 坳陷型湖盆层序地层特征与隐蔽油气藏勘探:以松辽盆地为例.石油学报,2001,24(3):11-15. YUAN X J,XUE L Q,CHI Y L,et al. Sequence stratigraphic and subtle trap characteristics of lacustrine depression basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2001,24(3):11-15.
[19] 赵文智,邹才能,汪泽成,等. 富油气凹陷"满凹含油"论——内涵与意义.石油勘探与开发,2004,31(2):5-13. ZHAO W Z,ZOU C N,WANG Z C,et al. The intension and signification of "sag-wide oil-bearing theory" in the hydrocarbon-rich depression with terrestrial origin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004,31(2):5-13.
[20] 赵文智,汪泽成,王红军,等. 中国中、低丰度大油气田基本特征及形成条件.石油勘探与开发,2008,35(6):641-650. ZHAO W Z,WANG Z C,WANG H J,et al. Principal characteristics and forming conditions for medium-low abundance large scale oil/gas fields in China. Petroleum Explor-ation and Development, 2008,35(6):641-650.
[21] 李相搏,刘化清,完颜容,等. 鄂尔多斯晚三叠世盆地构造属性及后期改造.石油实验地质,2012,34(4):376-394. LI X B,LIU H Q,WANYAN R,et al. Tectonic properties and postreformation in Late Triassic,Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2012,34(4):376-394.
[22] 杨晓东,吴中海,张海军. 鄱阳湖盆地的地质演化、新构造运动及其成因机制探讨.地质力学学报,2016,22(3):667-684. YANG X D,WU Z H,ZHANG H J. Geological evolution,Neotectonics and genetic mechanism of the Poyang lake basin. Journal of Geomechanics,2016,22(3):667-684.
[23] 尹太举,李宣玥,张昌民,等. 现代浅水湖盆三角洲沉积砂体形态特征:以洞庭湖和鄱阳湖为例. 石油天然气学报,2012, 34(10):1-7. YIN T J,LI X Y,ZHANG C M,et al. Sandbody shape of modern shallow lake basin delta sediments:by taking Dongting Lake and Poyang Lake for example. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2012,34(10):1-7.
[24] 朱海虹,郑长苏,王云飞,等. 鄱阳湖现代三角洲沉积相研究. 石油与天然气地质,1981,2(2):89-102. ZHU H H,ZHENG C S,WANG Y F,et al. A study of the sedimentary facies of the deltas in Poyang Lake. Oil & Gas Geology, 1981,2(2):89-102.
[25] 党淑青,韩志勇,李徐生,等. 鄱阳湖湖滨沙山线性风蚀地貌的发育模式. 第四纪研究,2013,33(2):388-397. DANG S Q,HAN Z Y,LI X S,et al. Evolution mode of linear wind eroded landform son sand hills on the shore of the Poyang Lake. Quaternary Sciences,2013,33(2):388-397.
[26] 冯增昭. 中国沉积学. 2版. 北京:石油工业出版社,2013:832-838. FENG Z Z. China seimentology. 2nd ed. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2013:832-838.
[27] 成国栋. 黄河三角洲现代沉积作用及模式. 北京:地质出版社,1991. CHENG G D. Sedimentation and sedimentary model of the modern Yellow River Delta. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1991.
[1] 张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20-28.
[2] 刘化清, 冯明, 郭精义, 潘树新, 李海亮, 洪忠, 梁苏娟, 刘彩燕, 徐云泽. 坳陷湖盆斜坡区深水重力流水道地震响应及沉积特征——以松辽盆地LHP地区嫩江组一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 1-12.
[3] 杨丽莎, 陈彬滔, 马轮, 史忠生, 薛罗, 王磊, 史江龙, 赵艳军. 陆相湖盆坳陷期源—汇系统的要素特征及耦合关系——以南苏丹Melut盆地北部坳陷新近系Jimidi组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 27-38.
[4] 马永平, 张献文, 朱卡, 王国栋, 潘树新, 黄林军, 张寒, 关新. 玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 57-70.
[5] 符勇, 李忠诚, 万谱, 阙宜娟, 王振军, 吉雨, 黄礼, 罗静兰, 鲍志东. 三角洲前缘滑塌型重力流沉积特征及控制因素——以松辽盆地大安地区青一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 198-208.
[6] 曹思佳, 孙增玖, 党虎强, 曹帅, 刘冬民, 胡少华. 致密油薄砂体储层预测技术及应用实效——以松辽盆地敖南区块下白垩统泉头组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[7] 梁志凯, 李卓, 李连霞, 姜振学, 刘冬冬, 高凤琳, 刘晓庆, 肖磊, 杨有东. 松辽盆地长岭断陷沙河子组页岩孔径多重分形特征与岩相的关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 22-35.
[8] 吴青鹏, 吕锡敏, 陈娟, 周在华, 袁成. 酒泉盆地营尔凹陷下白垩统下沟组沉积特征及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 54-62.
[9] 杨文杰, 胡明毅, 苏亚拉图, 刘昌, 元懿, 李金池. 松辽盆地苏家屯次洼初始裂陷期扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 59-68.
[10] 薛辉, 韩春元, 肖博雅, 王芳, 李玲. 蠡县斜坡高阳地区沙一下亚段浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 69-80.
[11] 李宏涛, 马立元, 史云清, 胡向阳, 高君, 李浩. 基于井-震结合的水下分流河道砂岩储层展布分析与评价——以什邡气藏JP35砂组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 78-89.
[12] 张家强, 李士祥, 周新平, 梁益财, 郭睿良, 闫灿灿, 陈俊霖, 李树同. 志丹地区长82砂层组缓坡浅水三角洲前缘砂体发育模式及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 36-50.
[13] 赵汉卿, 温慧芸, 穆朋飞, 李超, 吴穹螈. 垦利A油田沙三上段近源辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 37-44.
[14] 刘桂珍, 高伟, 张丹丹, 陈龙, 李爱荣. 姬塬地区长81亚油层组浅水型三角洲砂体结构及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 16-23.
[15] 杨帆, 曹正林, 卫延召, 路琳琳, 吴爱成, 马丽亚, 王瑞菊. 玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 30-39.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元，赵贤正，金凤鸣，王权，李先平，王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践（IV）——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成，郑荣才，文华国，张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树，张尚峰，尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰，杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦，胡望水，李瑞升，关键，李涛，聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发