四川盆地元坝地区上三叠统须家河组三段致密砂岩气甜点类型与分布

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20230203

岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 21–30.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230203

四川盆地元坝地区上三叠统须家河组三段致密砂岩气甜点类型与分布

黄彦庆, 刘忠群, 王爱, 肖开华, 林恬, 金武军

中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2022-04-30 修回日期:2022-06-17 出版日期:2023-03-01 发布日期:2023-03-07
第一作者:黄彦庆(1980-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事油气藏评价工作。地址:(102206)北京市昌平区百沙路197号中国石化石油勘探开发研究院。Email:huangyq.syky@sinopec.com。
基金资助:
中国石化科研项目“川东北须家河组储层评价与甜点预测技术”（编号：P19012-2）资助。

Types and distribution of tight sandstone gas sweet spots of the third member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

HUANG Yanqing, LIU Zhongqun, WANG Ai, XIAO Kaihua, LIN Tian, JIN Wujun

Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Production, Sinopec, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2022-04-30 Revised:2022-06-17 Online:2023-03-01 Published:2023-03-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过岩心观察、薄片鉴定、测井分析等方法，结合其他地球物理技术，对四川盆地元坝地区上三叠统须家河组三段致密砂岩储层特征进行了研究，结合研究区气井产能特征及主控因素分析，归纳了气藏的甜点类型和成因，并对甜点的分布进行了预测。研究结果表明： ①元坝地区须三段砂岩类型多样，其中中粗粒钙质岩屑砂岩和细砾岩为优质储层；裂缝类型多样，以低角度剪切缝和成岩收缩缝为主。②研究区须三段气藏发育中粗粒钙质岩屑砂岩型和细砾岩型等两大类甜点，结合裂缝特征，可进一步细分为六小类；各类甜点的地质特征、测试方式和试采特征均存在差异。③甜点的形成主要受沉积、成岩和构造作用控制，中粗粒钙质岩屑砂岩和细砾岩多分布于三角洲平原和前缘亚相界线附近的分流河道；差异重结晶是砾缘缝形成的原因；构造活动产生的断层和地层挠曲控制了裂缝的分布。④中粗粒钙质岩屑砂岩和细砾岩均表现为低GR、低CNL、中—高R_d、中等AC值的特征，优质储层的横波阻抗和μρ（μ为剪切模量，ρ为密度）均表现为中—高值，中粗粒钙质岩屑砂岩孔隙型、细砾岩和穿砾缝叠加型甜点呈条带状广泛分布，其他4类甜点零星分布。

关键词: 多属性融合, 致密砂岩气, 甜点区块, 须家河组, 上三叠统, 元坝地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: Through core observation, thin section identification and logging analysis and other geophysical technologies, the characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs of the third member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in western Yuanba area of Sichuan Basin were studied. Combined with gas well productivity characteristics and main controlling factors in the study area, the types and causes of gas reservoir sweet spots were summarized, and the distribution of the sweet spots was predicted. The results show that:(1) There are various sandstones of the third member of Xujiahe Formation, among which medium-coarse-grained calcareous lithic sandstone and fine conglomerate are high-quality reservoirs. There are various types of fractures, mainly low angle shearing cracks and diagenetic contraction joints.(2) There are two types of sweet spots, such as medium-coarse-grained calcareous lithic sandstone type and fine conglomerate type, which can be further subdivided into six types combined with fracture characteristics. There are differences in geological characteristics, test methods and trial mining characteristics of various sweet spots.(3) The formation of sweet spots is mainly controlled by sedimentation, diagenesis and tectonism. The medium-coarse-grained calcareous lithic sandstone and fine conglomerate are mostly distributed in the distributary channel near the boundary between delta plain and front. Differential recrystallization is the reason for the formation of gravel-edge fractures. The distribution of fractures is controlled by faults and stratum flexure caused by tectonic activity.(4) The medium-coarse-grained calcareous lithic sandstone and fine conglomerate are characterized by low GR, low CNL, medium-high R_d and medium AC values. The S-wave impedance of high-quality reservoirs and μρ(μ stands for shear modulus, ρ stands for density) are medium-high, and the sweet spots of medium-coarse-grained calcareous lithic sandstone, fine conglomerate and superimposed through gravel cracks are widely distributed in strip shape, while the other four types of sweet spots are sporadically distributed.

Key words: multi-attribute fusion, tight sandstone gas, sweet spot, Xujiahe Formation, Upper Triassic, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

黄彦庆, 刘忠群, 王爱, 肖开华, 林恬, 金武军. 四川盆地元坝地区上三叠统须家河组三段致密砂岩气甜点类型与分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 21–30.

HUANG Yanqing, LIU Zhongqun, WANG Ai, XIAO Kaihua, LIN Tian, JIN Wujun. Types and distribution of tight sandstone gas sweet spots of the third member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2): 21–30.

参考文献

[1] 康玉柱.中国非常规油气勘探重大进展和资源潜力[J].石油科技论坛, 2018, 37(4):1-7. KANG Yuzhu. Significant exploration progress and resource potential of unconventional oil and gas in China[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2018, 37(4):1-7.
[2] 邹才能, 翟光明, 张光亚, 等.全球常规-非常规油气形成分布、资源潜力及趋势预测[J].石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(1):13-25. ZOU Caineng, ZHAI Guangming, ZHANG Guangya, et al. Formation, distribution, potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1):13-25.
[3] 张大智, 张晓东, 杨步增.徐家围子断陷沙河子组致密气地质甜点综合评价[J].岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5):98-103. ZHANG Dazhi, ZHANG Xiaodong, YANG Buzeng. Comprehensive evaluation of geological sweet point of tight gas of Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi fault depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(5):98-103.
[4] 淡永.川东北须家河组物源分析与沉积体系研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2011. DAN Yong. Analyses of the provenance and the depositional systems of Xujiahe Formation in northeast of Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
[5] 郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 等.川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3):13-26. ZHENG Rongchen, LI Hongtao, SHI Yunqing, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and diagenesis of the third member of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(3):13-26.
[6] 王浩, 周文, 张冲.元坝气藏须家河组三段储层特征与主控因素[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4):19-26. WANG Hao, ZHOU Wen, ZHANG Chong. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factor of the third member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(4):19-26.
[7] 张冲, 谢润成, 周文, 等.川东北元坝地区须三段致密储集层裂缝特征[J].新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(4):395-398. ZHANG Chong, XIE Runcheng, ZHOU Wen, et al. Fractures characteristics in tight reservoir of the 3rd member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(4):395-398.
[8] 唐自成, 钟大康, 王威, 等.川东北元坝地区须家河组三段钙屑砂岩孔隙类型及地质意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5):1115-1125. TANG Zicheng, ZHONG Dakang, WANG Wei, et al. Pore types and geological significance of calcarenaceous sandstones in the 3rd member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5):1115-1125.
[9] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 黄仁春, 等.四川盆地深层-超深层天然气勘探进展与展望[J].天然气工业, 2020, 40(5):1-14. GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, HUANG Renchun, et al. Deep and ultra-deep natural gas exploration in the Sichuan Basin:Progress and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(5):1-14.
[10] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 等.川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):134-139. ZHANG Hui, GUAN Da, XIANG Xuemei, et al. Prediction for fractured tight sandstone reservoir of Xu 4 member in eastern Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):134-139.
[11] 陈龙博, 何登发, 王贝, 等.川东北地区通南巴背斜中三叠世以来构造变形时间厘定及其地质意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2017, 41(3):433-445. CHEN Longbo, HE Dengfa, WANG Bei, et al. Dating the tectonic deformation since the Middle Triassic for the Tongnanba anticline in the northeastern Sichuan Basin and its geological implications[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2017, 41(3):433-445.
[12] 金惠, 张俊, 马石玉.四川盆地上三叠统遗迹化石及其沉积环境[J].岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(1):24-28. JIN Hui, ZHANG Jun, MA Shiyu. Trace fossils and sedimentary environment of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(1):24-28.
[13] 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华, 等.元坝气田须三段气藏层序沉积与储层特征[J].天然气工业, 2016, 36(9):20-34. LI Hongtao, SHI Yunqing, XIAO Kaihua, et al. Sequence, sedimentary and reservoir characteristics of Xu 3 gas reservoir in the Yuanba gas field, NE Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(9):20-34.
[14] 黄彦庆, 刘忠群, 林恬, 等.川东北元坝地区须家河组三段基于相控的相对优质储层预测[J].石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(4):863-872. HUANG Yanqing, LIU Zhongqun, LIN Tian, et al. Lithofaciesbased prediction of relatively high-quality reservoirs of the Xu 3 member in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4):863-872.
[15] 刘冬冬, 杨东旭, 张子亚, 等.基于常规测井和成像测井的致密储层裂缝识别方法:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3):76-85. LIU Dongdong, YANG Dongxu, ZHANG Ziya, et al. Fracture identification for tight reservoirs by conventional and imaging logging:A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3):76-85.
[16] LAW B E. Basin-centered gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11):1891-1919.
[17] 杨升宇, 张金川, 黄卫东, 等.吐哈盆地柯柯亚地区致密砂岩气储层"甜点" 类型及成因[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(2):272-282. YANG Shengyu, ZHANG Jinchuan, HUANG Weidong, et al. "Sweet spot" types of reservoirs and genesis of tight sandstone gas in Kekeya area, Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2):272-282.
[18] 赵仲祥, 董春梅, 林承焰, 等. 西湖凹陷深层低渗-致密气藏"甜点" 类型划分及成因探讨[J].石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4):778-790. ZHAO Zhongxiang, DONG Chunmei, LIN Chengyan, et al. Classification and origin of "sweet spots" in deep low permeability tight gas reservoirs, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4):778-790.
[19] 蔡勋育, 邱桂强, 孙冬胜, 等.中国中西部大型盆地致密砂岩油气"甜点" 类型与特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4):684-695. CAI Xunyu, QIU Guiqiang, SUN Dongsheng, et al. Types and characteristics of tight sandstone sweet spots in large basins of central-western China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4):684-695.
[20] 苟启洋, 徐尚, 郝芳, 等.基于成像测井的泥页岩裂缝研究:以焦石坝区块为例[J].地质科技通报, 2020, 39(6):193-200. GOU Qiyang, XU Shang, HAO Fang, et al. Research on mud shale fractures based on image logging:A case study of Jiaoshiba area[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(6):193-200.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

四川盆地元坝地区上三叠统须家河组三段致密砂岩气甜点类型与分布

Types and distribution of tight sandstone gas sweet spots of the third member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[2]	周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[3]	张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[4]	杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[5]	陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[6]	邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[7]	计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[8]	白雪峰, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智, 卢双舫, 隋立伟, 王继平, 董忠良. 四川盆地仪陇—平昌地区侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征及富集条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 52-64.
[9]	岑永静, 梁锋, 王立恩, 刘倩虞, 张鑫哲, 丁熊. 四川盆地蓬莱—中江地区震旦系灯影组二段成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 89-98.
[10]	薄尚尚, 田继先, 李曜良, 王晔桐, 王昊, 孙国强. 川东北地区上三叠统须家河组物源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 99-112.
[11]	张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
[12]	包汉勇, 刘超, 甘玉青, 薛萌, 刘世强, 曾联波, 马诗杰, 罗良. 四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[13]	张坦, 贾梦瑶, 孙雅雄, 丁文龙, 石司宇, 范昕禹, 姚威. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 111-120.
[14]	孙汉骁, 邢凤存, 谢武仁, 钱红杉. 四川盆地及周缘地区晚奥陶世岩相古地理演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 121-135.
[15]	李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.