岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 103–114.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250210

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    

东海西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区始新统平湖组中段沉积特征

陈生华1, 王健伟2, 刘舒2, 严曙梅2, 韩建辉1, 傅恒1, 谢才铸1, 孙莉2   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 能源学院, 成都 610059;
    2. 中国石化上海海洋油气分公司 勘探开发研究院, 上海 200120
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-10 修回日期:2024-10-28 发布日期:2025-03-06
  • 第一作者:陈生华(1997—),男,成都理工大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为矿产普查与勘探。地址:四川省成都市成华区二仙桥东三路1号(610059)。Email:1780025864@qq.com。
  • 通信作者: 王健伟(1979—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事油气田开发方面的研究工作。Email:wjw.shhy@sinopec.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石化上海海洋油气分公司科研项目“孔雀亭气田始新统宝石组—平湖组沉积微相及有利区分布研究”(编号:34000002-22-ZC0613-0008)资助。

Sedimentary characteristics of the middle member Pinghu Formation of Eocene in Kongqueting area, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin

CHEN Shenghua1, WANG Jianwei2, LIU Shu2, YAN Shumei2, HAN Jianhui1, FU Heng1, XIE Caizhu1, SUN Li2   

  1. 1. College of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Sichuan, Chengdu, 610059, China;
    2. Exploration and Development Research Institute of Sinopec Shanghai Ocean Oil & Gas Breach, Shanghai, 200120, China
  • Received:2024-07-10 Revised:2024-10-28 Published:2025-03-06

摘要: 根据钻井岩心、测井、高精度三维地震等资料,利用古地貌恢复、地震相识别、数学逐步回归模型融合属性等方法,对东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷始新统平湖组中段沉积体系及砂体展布特征进行详细研究。研究结果表明:①西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区平湖组可识别出1个二级层序,5个三级层序,古地貌呈北西—南东向阶梯式加深格局,沉积物源来自西北部的海礁凸起;②研究区平湖组中段位于三级层序的高位体系域,主要发育辫状河三角洲—有障壁滨海沉积体系,可细分为三角洲平原、三角洲前缘、前三角洲及潮坪4个亚相;③研究区砂体主要发育于三角洲平原分流河道、三角洲前缘水下分流河道及河口坝3个微相中,平湖组中段主要发育P8,P7,P6共3个砂层组,对应于平湖组中段高位体系域内的3个四级旋回,从最大海泛面开始发育P8砂层组,高位体系域中期发育P7砂层组,高位体系域末期发育P6砂层组。

关键词: 层序地层, 分流河道, 水下分流河道, 河口坝, 地震属性, 平湖组, 始新统, 孔雀亭地区, 西湖凹陷, 东海陆架盆地

Abstract: The middle member Pinghu Formation in the Eocene strata on the western slope of the Xihu Sag within the East China Sea Shelf Basin,specifically within the Kongqueting Block,is the primary oil and gas reservoir. However,systematic studies of the detailed sedimentary evolution and sand body distribution within the third-order sequence framework in this block remain lacking,limiting the effectiveness of oilfield development. By integrating lithology,well logs,and high-resolution 3D seismic data,the sedimentary system and sand body distribution of middle member Pinghu Formation in the Eocene strata on the western slope of the Xihu Sag within the East China Sea Shelf Basin were characterized using methods such as paleo-geomorphology restoration,seismic facies identification,and attribute integration through a stepwise regression model. The results show that: (1)In terms of sequence stratigraphy,a secondary sequence and five tertiary sequences can be identified within the Pinghu Formation. The ancient topography within this sequence framework was characterized by a northwestsoutheast gradient of stepped deepening,and sediments in the study area were derived from the northwestern continental margin uplift.(2)The middle member Pinghu Formation is located in the highstand systems tract(HST) of a third-order sequence,primarily developing a braided river delta-barrier coastal depositional system. This system can be further subdivided into four sub-facies—delta plain,delta front,prodelta,and tidal flat.(3)The macroscopic boundaries of sand body distribution,showing that sand bodies primarily develop within three microfacies:delta plain distributary channels,delta front subaqueous distributary channels,and mouth bars. The middle member Pinghu Formation primarily develops three sand layers,P8,P7,and P6,corresponding to three fourth-order cycles within the highstand systems tract(SQE2p3)of the middle Pinghu section. The development sequence begins with P8 at the maximum flooding surface,followed by P7 in the mid-highstand phase,and then P6 in the late highstand phase.

Key words: sequence stratigraphy, distributary channel, subaqueous distributary channels, mouth bars, seismic attributes, Pinghu Formation, Eocene, Kongqueting area, Xihu sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 吴峰,任培罡,谈明轩,等.东海西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区平湖组沉积相演变及其主控因素分析[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2022,42(2):119-130. WU Feng,REN Peigang,TAN Mingxuan,et al. Facies evolution and its controlling factors of the Pinghu Formation in the Kongqueting area of Xihu Depression[J]. Marine Geology&Qua-ternary Geology,2022,42(2):119-130.
[2] 吴嘉鹏,万丽芬,张兰,等.西湖凹陷平湖组岩相类型及沉积相分析[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(1):27-34. WU Jiapeng,WAN Lifen,ZHANG Lan,et al. Lithofacies types and sedimentary facies of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Depression[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(1):27-34.
[3] 李盛谦,曾溅辉,刘亚洲,等.东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].岩性油气藏, 2023,35(5):49-61. LI Shengqian,ZENG Jianhui,LIU Yazhou,et al. Reservoir diagenesis and pore evolution of Paleogene Pinghu Formation in Kongqueting area of Xihu Sag,East China Sea Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(5):49-61.
[4] 江东辉,蒲仁海,苏思羽,西湖凹陷平湖组沉积背斜强振幅成因与沉积相和储层识别[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2023,53(1):116-127. JIANG Donghui,PU Renhai,SU Siyu,et al. Distribution sedimentary system multi-controlled by palaeo-geomorphology, water system and break during the deposition of Pinghu Formation,Baochu slope belt,Xihu Sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2023,53(1):116-127.
[5] 杨彩虹,周兴海,金璨,等.河控-潮控三角洲体系地球物理识别表征及其油气地质意义:以东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平北地区为例[J].石油实验地质,2022,44(5):761-770. YANG Caihong,ZHOU Xinghai,JIN Can,et al. Geophysical identification of river-tide controlled deltaic sedimentation and its implication for petroleum geology:A case study of Pingbei area,Xihu Sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin[J],Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2022,44(5):761-770.
[6] 秦兰芝,李宁,徐东浩,等.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷渐新统花港组河湖交互沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(2):178-188. QIN Lanzhi,LI Ning,XU Donghao,et al. Fluvial to lacustrine alternating sedimentary characteristics of the Oligocene Huagang Formation in Xihu Sag,East China Sea shelf Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2025,37(2):178-188.
[7] 刘英辉,蔡华,段冬平,等.西湖凹陷平湖地区平湖组海侵体系域潮控三角洲-潮坪沉积特征及模式[J].海洋地质前沿, 2022,38(1):33-40. LIU Yinghui,CAI Hua,DUAN Dongping,et al. The sedimentary characteristics of tidal delta and tidal flat in transgressive system tract of Pinghu Formation in Pinghu area,Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2022,38(1):33-40.
[8] 张兰,何贤科,段冬平,等.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带平湖组煤系地层地震沉积学研究[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2023,43(4):140-149. ZHANG Lan,HE Xianke,DUAN Dongping,et al. Seismic sedimentological analysis of coal stratigraphy of Pinghu Formation in the Pinghu slope belt,Xihu Sag,EastChina Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Geology&Quaternary Geology,2023,43(4):140-149.
[9] 董鑫旭,周兴海,李昆,等.海上稀疏井区高精度地层格架约束下的地震沉积学刻画:以东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带X区块古近系花港组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2024,45(1):293-308. DONG Xinxu,ZHOU Xinghai,LI Kun,et al. Seismic sedimen-tological characterization of an offshore area with sparse well control under the constraint of a high-resolution stratigraphic framework:A case study of the Paleogene Huagang Formation in block X of the central anticlinal zone in the Xihu Sag,East China Sea Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2024,45(1):293-308.
[10] 刘化清,苏明军,倪长宽,等.薄砂体预测的地震沉积学研究方法[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(2):1-11. LIU Huaqing,SU Mingjun,NI Changkuan,et al. Thin bed prediction from interbeded background:Revised seismic sedimen-tological method[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(2):1-11.
[11] 吕鹏,雷蕾,孙莉,等.东海盆地西湖凹陷W气田平湖组煤系潮控砂体储层地震预测[J].海洋地质前沿,2023,39(10):66-76. LYU Peng,LEI Lei,SUN Li,et al. Seismic prediction of tidecontrolled sand reservoir in Pinghu Formation coal seam,W Gas Field,Xihu Sag,East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2023,39(10):66-76.
[12] 张坤,刘宏,谭磊,等.川中北部蓬莱地区灯影组二段地震沉积学特征[J].岩性油气藏,2025,37(2):189-200. ZHANG Kun,LIU Hong,TAN Lei,et al. Seismic sedimentology characteristics of the second member of Dengying Formation in Penglai area,central-northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Litho-logic Reservoirs,2025,37(2):189-200.
[13] 李帅,俞伟哲,秦兰芝,等.西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带物源-坡折耦合控砂模式[J].海洋地质前沿,2024,40(7):36-44. LI Shuai,YU Weizhe,QIN Lanzhi,et al. Sand-controlling model of source-slope-break coupling in Pinghu Slope Belt, Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2024,40(7):36-44.
[14] 刘成鑫.东海平湖油气田平湖组沉积相研究[J].海洋石油, 2010,30(2):9-13. LIU Chengxin. Study on sedimentary facies for Pinghu Formation in Pinghu oil and gas field in East China Sea Basin[J]. Off-shore Oil,2010,30(2):9-13.
[15] 江为为,宋海斌,郝天珧,等.东海陆架盆地及其周边海域地质、地球物理场特征[J].地球物理学进展,2001,16(2):18-27. JIANG Weiwei SONG Haibin HAO Tianyao et al. The characters of geology and geophysics of shell basins of East China Sea and adjacent sea area[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2001,16(2):18-27.
[16] 蒋一鸣,邵龙义,李帅,等.西湖凹陷平湖构造带平湖组沉积体系及层序地层研究[J].现代地质,2020,34(1):141-153. JIANG Yiming,SHAO Longyi,LI Shuai,et al. Deposition system and stratigraphy of Pinghu Formation in Pinghu Tectonic Belt,Xihu Sag[J]. Geoscience,2020,34(1):141-153.
[17] HAQ B U,HARDENBOL J,VAIL P R. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic[J]. Science. 1987,235(4793):1156-1167.
[18] 闫建平,言语,彭军,等.天文地层学与旋回地层学的关系、研究进展及其意义[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(1):147-156. YAN Jianping,YAN Yu,PENG Jun,et al. The research prog-ress,significance and relationship of astrostratigraphy with cy-clostratigraphy[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(1):147-156.
[19] 李晓辉,杜晓峰,官大勇,等.辽东湾坳陷东北部新近系馆陶组辫曲过渡型河流沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):93-103. LI Xiaohui,DU Xiaofeng,GUAN Dayong,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of braided-meandering transitional river of Neogene Guantao Formation in northeastern Liaodong Bay Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(3):93-103.
[20] 韦振权,张莉,帅庆伟,等.平衡剖面技术在台湾海峡盆地西部构造演化研究中的应用[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2018,38(5):193-201. WEI Zhenquan,ZHANG Li,SHUAI Qingwei,et al. Application of balanced cross section technique to the study of tectonic evolution of western Taiwan Strait Basin[J]. Marine Geology&Quaternary Geology,2018,38(5):193-201.
[21] 刘成林,刘伟新,顾振宇,等.珠江口盆地陆丰A油田恩平组浅水辫状河三角洲砂体构型研究[J].海相油气地质,2022, 27(3):236-248. LIU Chenglin,LIU Weixin,GU Zhenyu,et al. Sand body con-figuration of shallow braided river delta of Enping Formation in Lufeng A Oilfield,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2022,27(3):236-248.
[22] 葛海波.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷天外天-黄岩地区平湖-花港组层序地层及沉积相研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2014. GE Haibo. The study of Pinghu and Huagang Formation se-quence stratigraphy and sedimentation facies feature In Tian-waitian and Huangyan region of Xihu Sag,Eas[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2014.
[23] 邓宏文,郑文波.珠江口盆地惠州凹陷古近系珠海组近海潮汐沉积特征[J].现代地质,2009,23(5):767-775. DENG Hongwen,ZHENG Wenbo,et al. Depositional characteristics of offshore tidal Deposits in the lower tertiary Zhuhai Formation,Huizhou Depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Geoscience,2009,23(5):767-775.
[24] 邓孝亮,张迎朝,陆江,等.文昌B凹陷北坡珠海组潮汐沉积特征及演化[J].沉积学报,2020,38(6):1313-1326. DENG Xiaoliang,ZHANG Yingzhao,LU Jiang,et al. Tidal Sedimentary characteristics and evolution of the Zhuhai Formation,northern slope of the Wenchang B Sag[J]. Acta Sedimen-tologica Sinica,2020,38(6):1313-1326.
[25] 冯晗,薛成,段健,等.浅水辫状河三角洲前缘砂体分布特征研究及应用:以南堡凹陷X油田东一段为例[J].石油地质与工程,2023,37(1):10-15. FENG Han,XUE Cheng,DUAN Jian,et al. Sand body distribution characteristics and it sapplication in shallow braided river delta front-an example from the first member of Dongyi for-mation of X oilfield in Nanpu sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2023,37(1):10-15.
[26] 宋传春.地震-地质综合研究方法述评[J].岩性油气藏, 2010,22(2):133-139. SONG Chuanchun. Review of comprehensive study methods for seismics-geology[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(2):133-139.
[27] 尚文亮,徐少华,蔡默仑,等.沉积过路现象的地震识别特征及控制因素探讨[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(6):85-96. SHANG Wenliang,XU Shaohua,CAI Molun,et al Discussion on seismic identification characteristics and controlling factors of sediment bypass[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(6):85-96.
[28] 徐君,张美,谢军,等.三塘湖油田湖218地区地震多属性与地震相在沉积相预测中的应用[J].河北工程大学学报(自然科学版),2023,40(4):95-105. XU Jun,ZHANG Mei,XIE Jun,et al. Application of seismic multi attributes and seismic facies in sedimentary facies prediction in Hu 218 Area of Santanghu Oilfield[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Engineering (Natural Science Edition),2023,40(4):95-105.
[29] 曹卿荣,李佩,孙凯,等.应用地震属性分析技术刻画河道砂体[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):93-96. CAO Qingrong,LI Pei,SUN Kai,et al. Using seismic attri-butes to identify channel sand body[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007,19(2):93-96.
[30] 陈康,戴隽成,魏玮,等.致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法:以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(5):111-121. CHEN Kang,DAI Juncheng,WEI Wei,et al. Lithofacies classi-fication of tight sandstone based on Bayesian Facies-AVO attri-butes:A case study of the first member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024,36(5):111-121.
[31] 史浩,刘小波,杨桂茹,等.神经网络特征属性反演在煤系地层致密储层预测中的应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘神府木瓜区为例[J].天然气地球科学,2024,35(10):1886-1896. SHI Hao,LIU Xiaobo,YANG Guiru,et al. Application of neural network feature attribute inversion in the prediction of tight reservoirs in coal-bearing strata:A case study in the Shengfu Mugua area on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2024,35(10):1886-1896.
[32] 周闯,张琦锦,郭映映,等.主成分分析法在合肥市空气质量评估中的应用[J].大气与环境光学学报,2024,19(4):479-488. ZHOU Chuang,ZHANG Qijin,GUO Yingying,et al. Application of principal component analysis in air quality assessment of Hefei City[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics,2024,19(4):479-488.
[1] 廖新武, 杨庆红, 李超, 郭诚, 赵大林. 渤海湾盆地垦利6-1油田新近系明化镇组下段浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 1-11.
[2] 尹艳树, 黄圣斌, 黄奇志, 谢鹏飞, 王立鑫, 吴伟. 尼日尔Termit盆地Koulele油田始新统浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及成因模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 12-25.
[3] 李想, 付磊, 魏璞, 李俊飞, 徐港, 曹倩倩, 钟杨, 王振鹏. 沉积古地貌恢复及古地貌对沉积体系的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地石西地区三叠系百口泉组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 38-48.
[4] 薛煜恒, 李坤, 尚娅敏, 陈秋佟, 盛烈豪, 刘建斌. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭区断裂体系特征及控藏效应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 161-169.
[5] 易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[6] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[7] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[8] 罗贝维, 尹继全, 胡广成, 陈华, 康敬程, 肖萌, 朱秋影, 段海岗. 阿联酋西部地区白垩系森诺曼阶高孔渗灰岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[9] 孙辉, 范国章, 王红平, 丁梁波, 左国平, 马宏霞, 庞旭, 许小勇. 东非鲁伍马盆地中始新统深水沉积特征及层序界面识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 106-116.
[10] 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[11] 尹艳树, 丁文刚, 安小平, 徐振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田塞160井区三叠系长611储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 37-49.
[12] 满晓, 胡德胜, 吴洁, 宫立园, 柳智萱, 姜应德, 赵晔. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段湖底扇发育特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 137-144.
[13] 李凌, 张照坤, 李明隆, 倪佳, 耿超, 唐思哲, 杨文杰, 谭秀成. 四川盆地威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 32-46.
[14] 刘永立, 李国蓉, 何钊, 田家奇, 李肖肖. 塔北地区寒武系层序地层格架与台缘带展布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 80-91.
[15] 米伟伟, 谢小飞, 曹红霞, 马强, 杜永慧, 张琼, 邓长生, 宋珈萱. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部二叠系山2—盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 101-117.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!