岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 137–144.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230413

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段湖底扇发育特征及成藏模式

满晓, 胡德胜, 吴洁, 宫立园, 柳智萱, 姜应德, 赵晔   

  1. 中海石油 (中国) 有限公司 湛江分公司, 广东 湛江 524057
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-19 修回日期:2022-09-19 出版日期:2023-07-01 发布日期:2023-07-01
  • 第一作者:满晓(1988-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事海洋石油勘探研究工作。地址:(524057) 广东省湛江市坡头区南油二区商业附楼。Email:manxiao@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中海石油（中国）有限公司重大科技项目“南海西部油田上产2000万方关键技术研究”（编号：CNOOC-KJ135ZDXM38ZJ）资助。

Development characteristics and accumulation model of sublacustrine fans of the first member of Eocene Liushagang Formation in Weixinan Sag，Beibuwan Basin

MAN Xiao, HU Desheng, WU Jie, GONG Liyuan, LIU Zhixuan, JIANG Yingde, ZHAO Ye   

  1. Zhanjiang Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Zhanjiang 524057, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2022-08-19 Revised:2022-09-19 Online:2023-07-01 Published:2023-07-01

PDF (PC)

270

摘要： 根据三维地震、录井、测井、岩心观察等资料，对北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流沙港组一段湖底扇沉积特征和主控因素进行了研究，并对该区岩性圈闭发育模式及油气成藏模式进行了刻画。研究结果表明： ①涠西南凹陷A洼在流一段低位域和湖侵域发育湖底扇沉积体，其中，低位域湖底扇发育于一号断层附近，地震上表现为连续强反射特征；湖侵域湖底扇分布于洼中，地震上具有明显的丘状反射特征。②受物源供给和古地貌两大因素的控制，A洼流一段发育2期湖底扇沉积。低位域短轴方向物源供给少，一号断层下降盘为洼陷的堆积中心，发育小规模直接入湖的近岸水下扇体，并形成向物源区方向上倾尖灭的岩性圈闭；湖侵域物源供给逐渐增大，一号断层活动性减弱，A洼堆积中心逐渐迁移至洼中，扇三角洲前缘松散沉积物发生二次搬运，在洼中形成湖底扇，并形成向南斜坡翘倾尖灭的岩性圈闭和被二号断层遮挡形成的构造-岩性复合圈闭。③垂向运移条件是研究区岩性油藏成藏的关键要素，A洼烃源层上部发育受早期断层和晚期构造差异沉降两方面因素控制的微裂缝，为油气突破泥岩盖层垂向运移至“源上”岩性圈闭内并聚集成藏提供了良好的运移通道。该区具有“超压驱动、微裂缝运移、低势区汇聚”的成藏模式。

关键词: 湖底扇, 岩性油藏, 垂向运移, 成藏模式, 流一段, 始新统, 涠西南凹陷, 北部湾盆地

Abstract: Based on the data of 3D seismic，mud-logging，wire-logging and core observation，the sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of the sublacustrine fan of the first member of Eocene Liushagang Formation in Weixinan Sag of Beibuwan Basin were studied，and the lithologic trap development model and hydrocarbon accumulation model were determined. The results show that： （1） The sublacustrine fans are developed in lowstand systems tract（LST）and transgressive systems tract （TST）of the first member of Liushagang Formation in subsag A of Weixinan Sag. The sublacustrine fans in LST are developed near the No. 1 fault，which is characterized by continuous and strong seismic reflection，while the sublacustrine fans in TST are distributed in the sag，and have obvious mound reflection.（2）Controlled by two major factors of source supply and paleogeomorphology，the first member of Liushagang Formation in subsag A developed two stages of sublacustrine fans. During the period of LST，there was little source supply in short axis direction，the footwall of No. 1 fault was the accumulation center of the sag，small scale nearshore submarine fans that directly enter the lake were developed，and lithologic traps that dip upward and pinch out toward the source area were formed. During the period of TST，the source supply gradually increased，the activity of No. 1 fault weakened，and the accumulation center of subsag A gradually migrated to the sag. The loose sediments in the fan delta front transported again into the middle of the sag and developed sublacustrine fans. Lithologic traps that dip and pinch out toward the south slope，and structurallithologic traps shielded by No. 2 fault were formed.（3）Vertical migration conditions are the key factors for lithologic reservoir accumulation in the study area. Microfractures controlled by early faults and late structural differential settlement developed in the upper part of the hydrocarbon source layer of subsag A，providing a good migration path for oil and gas to vertically migrate through mudstone caprocks to the lithologic trap above the source and accumulate to form reservoirs. This area has a reservoir accumulation model of “overpressure driving，microfractures provide migration path， and accumulation in low potential areas”.

Key words: sublacustrine fan, lithologic reservoir, vertical migration, accumulation model, the first member of Liushagang Formation, Eocene, Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 仲米虹,唐武.前陆盆地隆后坳陷区湖底扇沉积特征及主控因素:以塔北轮南地区三叠系为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5):18-28. ZHONG Mihong, TANG Wu. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of sublacustrine fans in backbulge zone of foreland basin:Triassic in Lunnan area, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(5):18-28.
[2] 马正武,官大勇,王启明,等.辽中凹陷古近系东三段湖底扇沉积特征及控制因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2):131-140. MA Zhengwu, GUAN Dayong, WANG Qiming, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of sublacustrine fans of the third member of Paleogene Dongying Formation in Liaozhong Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2):131-140.
[3] 张辉,曾小明,黄冬梅,等.北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷富砾型和富砂型湖底扇沉积特征差异分析[J].石油实验地质, 2017, 39(5):633-639. ZHANG Hui, ZENG Xiaoming, HUANG Dongmei, et al. Differences of sedimentary characteristics of sublacustrine fans between conglomerate-rich and sand-rich types in the Weixinan Sag, Beibu Gulf Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2017, 39(5):633-639.
[4] 胡德胜,张建新,金秋月,等.涠西南凹陷流一段湖底扇沉积及储层特征[J].天然气技术与经济, 2018, 12(3):5-9. HU Desheng, ZHANG Jianxin, JIN Qiuyue, et al. Sublacustrinefan sedimentary and reservoir characteristics of Liushagang 1 member, Weixinan Sag[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2018, 12(3):5-9.
[5] 何卫军,甘军,刘芳,等.涠西南凹陷流一段上亚段重力流沉积特征及发育模式[J].油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(3):31-37. HE Weijun, GAN Jun, LIU Fang, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and development of gravity flow in the upper submember of the first member of Liushagang Formation in Weixinan Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(3):31-37.
[6] 姜平,秦春雨,杨希冰,等.涠西南凹陷一号断裂陡坡带扇体沉积展布特征及主控因素[J].地球科学, 2020, 45(2):534-546. JIANG Ping, QIN Chunyu, YANG Xibing, et al. Sedimentary architecture, distribution features and genesis of steep slope fan in upper Liushagang Formation, Weixinan Sag[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(2):534-546.
[7] 金杰华,操应长,王健,等.涠西南凹陷陡坡带流一段下亚段异重流沉积新发现[J].地学前缘, 2019, 26(4):250-258. JIN Jiehua, CAO Yingchang, WANG Jian, et al. New discovery of hyperpycnal flow deposits in the El1x section of the steep slope belt in the Weixinan Sag[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(4):250-258.
[8] 谭卓,刘志国,李运振,等.北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷陡坡带砂体成因类型及其演化[J].地质调查与研究, 2015, 38(1):1-9. TAN Zhuo, LIU Zhiguo, LI Yunzhen, et al. Forming types and evolution of sand body in steep slope belt of Weixinan Sag, Beibu Gulf Basin[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2015, 38(1):1-9.
[9] 李春荣,张功成,梁建设,等.北部湾盆地断裂构造特征及其对油气的控制作用[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(2):195-203. LI Chunrong, ZHANG Gongcheng, LIANG Jianshe, et al. Characteristic of fault structure and its control on hydrocarbons in the Beibuwan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2):195-203.
[10] 徐建永,张功成,梁建设,等.北部湾盆地古近纪幕式断裂活动规律及其与油气的关系[J].中国海上油气, 2011, 23(6):362-368. XU Jianyong, ZHANG Gongcheng, LIANG Jianshe, et al. Paleogene activities of episodic rifting and their relationships with hydrocarbon in Beibuwan Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2011, 23(6):362-368.
[11] 胡望水,吴婵,梁建设,等.北部湾盆地构造迁移特征及对油气成藏的影响[J].石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(6):920-927. HU Wangshui, WU Chan, LIANG Jianshe, et al. Tectonic transport characteristics and their influences on hydrocarbon accumulation in Beibuwan Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2011, 32(6):920-927.
[12] 秦春雨,王华,姜平,等.涠西南凹陷边界断层演化及其对地层充填的控制[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(2):322-331. QIN Chunyu, WANG Hua, JIANG Ping, et al. Boundary fault evolution of Weixinan Sag and its effect on strata filling[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology, 2020, 49(2):322-331.
[13] 谢宁,操应长,王健,等.北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷古近系流三段成岩作用及对储层物性影响[J].天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(12):1743-1754. XIE Ning, CAO Yingchang, WANG Jian, et al. Diagenesis and its control on physical property of the reservoirs in the 3rd member of the Paleogene Liushagang Formation in Weixinan Depression, Beibuwan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(12):1743-1754.
[14] 裴健翔,董贵能,朱其.北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷流一段强制湖退沉积体特征及其油气地质意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(4):520-527. PEI Jianxiang, DONG Guineng, ZHU Qi. Characteristics and petroleum geological significance of lacustrine forced regressive deposits in the 1st member of Liushagang Formation in Weixinan Sag, Beibuwan Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2016, 37(4):520-527.
[15] 金杰华,操应长,王健,等.深水砂质碎屑流沉积:概念、沉积过程与沉积特征[J].地质论评, 2019, 65(3):690-702. JIN Jiehua, CAO Yingchang, WANG Jian, et al. Deep-water sandy debris flow deposits:Concepts, sedimentary processes and characteristics[J]. Geological Review, 2019, 65(3):690-702.
[16] 邹才能,赵政璋,杨华,等.陆相湖盆深水砂质碎屑流成因机制与分布特征:以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J].沉积学报, 2009, 27(6):1065-1075. ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Zhengzhang, YANG Hua, et al. Genetic mechanism and distribution of sandy debris flows in terrestrial lacustrine basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2009, 27(6):1065-1075.
[17] 厚刚福,曾德龙,牛志杰,等.准噶尔盆地砂质碎屑流砂体新发现及其油气勘探意义[J].天然气工业, 2020, 40(11):41-49. HOU Gangfu, ZENG Delong, NIU Zhijie, et al. New discovery of sandy debris flow sandbody and its implications for oil and gas exploration in the Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(11):41-49.
[18] 操应长,金杰华,刘海宁,等.中国东部断陷湖盆深水重力流沉积及其油气地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(2):247-257. CAO Yingchang, JIN Jiehua, LIU Haining, et al. Deep-water gravity flow deposits in a lacustrine rift basin and their oil and gas geological significance in eastern China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(2):247-257.
[19] 史忠生,王天琦,王建功,等.地震沉积学在不同地质条件下砂体识别中的应用:以松辽盆地西斜坡和长垣地区为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(3):5-10. SHI Zhongsheng, WANG Tianqi, WANG Jiangong, et al. Application of seismic sedimentology to sand body identification under different geological settings:A case study from the western slope and placanticline of Songliao Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(3):5-10.
[20] 苗顺德,李秋芬.地震沉积学的内涵及其在陆相断陷盆地中的应用[J].岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(4):64-69. MIAO Shunde, LI Qiufen. Concept of seismic sedimentology and its application in continental rift basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(4):64-69.
[21] 秦春雨,王华,姜平,等.断陷盆地轴向沉积体系空间展布及演化特征:以北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷为例[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(3):500-509. QIN Chunyu, WANG Hua, JIANG Ping, et al. Spacial distribution and evolution of axial deltaic systemin continental rift basin:A case study of Weixinan sag, Beibuwan Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology, 2020, 49(3):500-509.
[22] 魏然,李红阳,于斌,等.沉积盆地物源体系分析方法及研究进展[J].岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3):53-57. WEI Ran, LI Hongyang, YU Bin, et al. Approaches and prospects of provenance system analysis in sedimentary basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(3):53-57.
[23] 刘雨晴,吴智平,王毅,等.北部湾盆地古近纪断裂体系发育及其控盆作用[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(2):360-370. LIU Yuqing, WU Zhiping, WANG Yi, et al. Development of Paleogene fault systems and its control on the basin structures in the Beibuwan Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology, 2020, 49(2):360-370.
[24] 黄保家,黄合庭,吴国瑄,等.北部湾盆地始新统湖相富有机质页岩特征及成因机制[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(1):25-31. HUANG Baojia, HUANG Heting, WU Guoxuan, et al. Geochemical characteristics and formation mechanism of Eocene lacustrine organic-rich shales in the Beibuwan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(1):25-31.
[25] 赵顺兰,陈林,李才,等.涠西南凹陷碳酸盐岩潜山原油来源及成藏模式[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 16(6):1-8. ZHAO Shunlan, CHEN Lin, LI Cai, et al. Source and reservoir formation pattern of carbonate buried hill crude oil in Weixinan Sag[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 16(6):1-8.
[26] 刘化清,刘宗堡,吴孔友,等.地层岩性油气藏区带及圈闭评价技术研究新进展[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):25-36. LIU Huaqing, LIU Zongbao, WU Kongyou, et al. New progress in study of play and trap evaluation technology for lithostratigraphic reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):25-36.
[27] 祁鹏,张俊霞.伸展断层传播褶皱研究现状[J].高校地质学报, 2009, 15(3):351-357. QI Peng, ZHANG Junxia. Research status of extensional faultpropagation folding[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2009, 15(3):351-357.
[1] 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[2] 黄向胜, 闫琢玉, 张东峰, 黄合庭, 罗程飞. 琼东南盆地Ⅱ号断裂带新生界多期热流体活动与天然气运聚特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 67-76.
[3] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[4] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[5] 孙辉, 范国章, 王红平, 丁梁波, 左国平, 马宏霞, 庞旭, 许小勇. 东非鲁伍马盆地中始新统深水沉积特征及层序界面识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 106-116.
[6] 马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36.
[7] 马峰, 庞文珠, 赵文光, 张斌, 赵艳军, 薛罗, 郑茜, 陈彬滔. 南苏丹境内裂谷盆地源上构造-岩性油藏成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 92-105.
[8] 薛罗, 史忠生, 马轮, 赵艳军, 岳世俊, 洪亮, 王磊, 雷明. 南苏丹Melut盆地北部地区中—新生界稠油成藏模式及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 76-85.
[9] 杜江民, 刘泊远, 张毅, 贾志伟, 付基友, 龙鹏宇, 罗金洋, 盛军. 中国典型白云岩储集层特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 86-98.
[10] 柳忠泉, 赵乐强, 曾治平, 田继军, 李正强, 罗锦昌, 胡美玲. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系芦草沟组页岩油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 126-137.
[11] 徐壮, 石万忠, 王任, 骆福嵩, 夏永涛, 覃硕, 张晓. 塔北隆起西部地区白垩系碎屑岩油气成藏规律及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 31-46.
[12] 隋立伟, 杨文璐, 李军辉, 樊晓东, 姜洪福, 文全, 张大智, 袁勇. 断陷湖盆滩坝沉积特征及其控藏作用——以塔南凹陷白垩系铜钵庙组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 100-109.
[13] 马正武, 官大勇, 王启明, 刘尧均, 李晓辉. 辽中凹陷古近系东三段湖底扇沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 131-140.
[14] 朱志良, 高小明. 陇东煤田侏罗系煤层气成藏主控因素与模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 86-94.
[15] 杜江民, 龙鹏宇, 秦莹民, 张桐, 马宏宇, 盛军. 柴达木盆地英西地区渐新统E32储层特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 1-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广，刘博，吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良，曾溅辉，张善文，王永诗，王洪玉，刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷　明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发