岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 126–137.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230311

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系芦草沟组页岩油成藏条件

柳忠泉1, 赵乐强1, 曾治平1, 田继军2, 李正强2, 罗锦昌2, 胡美玲3   

  1. 1. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 山东 东营 257015;
    2. 新疆大学 地质与矿业工程学院, 乌鲁木齐 830046;
    3. 中国石油华北油田公司 勘探开发研究院, 河北 任丘 062552
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-26 修回日期:2022-08-11 出版日期:2023-05-01 发布日期:2023-04-25
  • 作者简介:柳忠泉（1966—），男，博士，高级工程师，主要从事油气勘探综合地质研究工作。地址：（257015）山东省东营市东营区聊城路2号。Email：slliuzq@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油化工股份有限公司重大科技资助项目 “准噶尔盆地及周缘矿权战略选区及评价研究”（编号： P21086-4） 和国家重大专项 “准噶尔盆地碎屑岩层系油气富集规律与勘探评价”（编号： 2016ZX05002002） 联合资助。

Shale oil accumulation conditions of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Fukang fault zone，Junggar Basin

LIU Zhongquan1, ZHAO Leqiang1, ZENG Zhiping1, TIAN Jijun2, LI Zhengqiang2, LUO Jinchang2, HU Meiling3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257015, Shandong, China;
    2. College of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China
  • Received:2022-06-26 Revised:2022-08-11 Online:2023-05-01 Published:2023-04-25

PDF (PC)

199

摘要： 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带地处盆地前陆冲断带,构造复杂,勘探开发潜力大。通过烃源岩有机地球化学测试、铸体薄片鉴定、扫描电镜分析等对准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系芦草沟组页岩油成藏条件进行了分析。研究结果表明:①阜康断裂带二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩有机质丰度高,TOC质量分数平均为3.65%,有机质类型主要为Ⅱ1型,Ro值为0.76%~1.41%,多处于成熟-高成熟阶段,为一套好-优质烃源岩。②研究区芦草沟组储层孔隙度平均值为5.12%,渗透率为0.02~2.69 mD,为一套低孔-特低孔、特低渗储层;储层岩石类型复杂,是以泥页岩、粉砂岩、碳酸盐岩为主的一套混积岩,脆性矿物质量分数平均为82.96%;储集空间类型包括粒间孔、晶间孔、溶蚀孔、有机质孔和微裂缝。③广覆式烃源岩、大面积连续分布的优势岩相以及有利的源储组合控制了研究区芦草沟组页岩油的富集成藏,形成了"源储紧邻的夹层型"与"源储一体的基质型"共存的页岩油富集模式,大龙口地区、小龙口-奇1井地区可作为下一步勘探开发的重点区域。

关键词: 成藏条件, 混积岩, 源储一体, 成藏模式, 页岩油, 芦草沟组, 二叠系, 阜康断裂带, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: Fukang fault zone is located in the foreland thrust belt of Junggar Basin，with complex structure and great exploration and development potential. The shale oil accumulation conditions of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Fukang fault zone were analyzed through organic geochemical testing of source rocks， cast thin section identification and scanning electron microscope analysis. The results show that： （1）The source rocks of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Fukang fault zone have high organic matter abundance，with an average TOC mass fraction of 3.65%， and the organic matters are mainly type Ⅱ1 with Ro values of 0.76-1.41，mostly in the mature to high mature stage，which is a set of good to high-quality hydrocarbon source rocks.（2）The average porosity of the reservoirs of Lucaogou Formation in the study area is 5.12%， and the permeability ranges from 0.02 mD to 2.69 mD，which is a set of reservoirs with low to extra-low porosity and extra-low permeability. The reservoir rock type is complex，and it is a set of hybrid sedimentary rocks dominated by mud shale， siltstone and carbonate rocks， with an average brittle mineral mass fraction of 82.96%. The reservoir space includes intergranular pores， intercrystalline pores，dissolved pores，organic matter pores and microfractures.（3）The widely overlying hydrocarbon source rocks，the dominant lithofacies distributed continuously in a large area and the favorable sourcereservoir configuration control the shale oil enrichment and accumulation of Lucaogou Formation in the study area， forming a shale oil accumulation model of “source-reservoir adjacent interval type” and “source-reservoir integrated matrix type” coexistence. Dalongkou area and Xiaolongkou to Qi 1 well area are the key areas for the next exploration and development.

Key words: accumulation conditions, hybrid sedimentary rocks, source-reservoir integration, accumulation model, shale oil, Lucaogou Formation, Permian, Fukang fault zone, Junggar Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 张奎华,宋明水,曹忠祥,等.博格达地区中二叠统沉积环境与烃源岩特征[J].断块油气田, 2021, 28(1):9-13. ZHANG Kuihua, SONG Mingshui, CAO Zhongxiang, et al. Sedimentary environment and the characteristics of hydrocarbon source rock of the Middle Permian in Bogda area[J]. FaultBlock Oil&Gas Field, 2021, 28(1):9-13.
[2] 王圣柱.博格达山山前带芦草沟组不同岩相储集特征及含油性[J].新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(4):402-413. WANG Shengzhu. Reservoir characteristics and oil-bearing properties of different lithofacies of Lucaogou Formation in the piedmont belt of Bogda Mountain[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(4):402-413.
[3] 邱振,李建忠,吴晓智,等.国内外致密油勘探现状、主要地质特征及差异[J].岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4):119-126. QIU Zhen, LI Jianzhong, WU Xiaozhi, et al. Exploration status, main geologic characteristics and their differences of tight oil between America and China[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4):119-126.
[4] 汪新伟,汪新文,马永生.新疆博格达山的构造演化及其与油气的关系[J].现代地质, 2007, 21(1):116-124. WANG Xinwei, WANG Xinwen, MA Yongsheng. The tectonic evolution of Bogda Mountain, Xinjiang, northwest China and its relationship to oil and gas accumulation[J]. Geoscience, 2007, 21(1):116-124.
[5] 方世虎,贾承造,宋岩,等.准南地区前陆冲断带晚新生代构造变形特征与油气成藏[J].石油学报, 2007, 28(6):1-5. FANG Shihu, JIA Chengzao, SONG Yan, et al. Late Cenozoic structural deformation and its implication for petroleum accumulation in the southern Junggar thrust belt[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(6):1-5.
[6] 林会喜,宋明水,王圣柱,等.叠合盆地复杂构造带页岩油资源评价:以准噶尔盆地东南缘博格达地区中二叠统芦草沟组为例[J].油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(2):7-17. LIN Huixi, SONG Mingshui, WANG Shengzhu, et al. Shale oil resource evaluation in complex structural belt of superimposed basin:A case study of Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation in Bogda area, southeast margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(2):7-17.
[7] 郑铎.准南博格达山周缘二叠系烃源岩地化特征及生烃潜力分析[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2019. ZHENG Duo. Analysis of organic geochemistry features of Carboniferous hydrocarbon source rocks on the Periphery of Bogda Mountain[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2019.
[8] 张林,张敏,高永进,等.准噶尔盆地南缘博格达山前带二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩地球化学特征及生烃潜力研究[J].中国矿业, 2021, 30(12):183-188. ZHANG Lin, ZHANG Min, GAO Yongjin, et al. Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon generation potential of Permian Lucaogou Formation source rocks in Bogda piedmont belt, the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2021, 30(12):183-188.
[9] 王越,陈世悦,张关龙,等.咸化湖盆混积岩分类与混积相带沉积相特征:以准噶尔盆地南缘芦草沟组与吐哈盆地西北缘塔尔朗组为例[J].石油学报, 2017, 38(9):1021-1035. WANG Yue, CHEN Shiyue, ZHANG Guanlong, et al. Classifications of mixosedimentite and sedimentary facies characteristics of mixed sedimentary facies belt in saline lacustrine basin:Taking examples as the Lucaogou Formation in the south of Junggar Basin and the Taerlang Formation in the northwest of Tuha Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(9):1021-1035.
[10] 张逊,庄新国,涂其军,等.准噶尔盆地南缘芦草沟组页岩的沉积过程及有机质富集机理[J].地球科学, 2018, 43(2):538-550. ZHANG Xun, ZHUANG Xinguo, TU Qijun, et al. Depositional process and mechanism of organic matter accumulation of Lucaogou shale in southern Junggar Basin, northwest China[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43(2):538-550.
[11] 徐希旺.准东南地区平地泉组沉积相及储层特征研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2017. XU Xiwang. Study on the sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of Pingdiquan Formation in southeast area of Junggar Basin[D]. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum (East China), 2017.
[12] 邹才能,张国生,杨智,等.非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术:兼论非常规油气地质学[J].石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4):385-399. ZOU Caineng, ZHANG Guosheng, YANG Zhi, et al. Geological concepts, characteristics, resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon:On unconventional petroleum geology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4):385-399.
[13] 唐勇,宋永,何文军,等.准噶尔叠合盆地复式油气成藏规律[J].石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(1):132-148. TANG Yong, SONG Yong, HE Wenjun, et al. Characteristics of composite hydrocarbon accumulation in a superimposed basin, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1):132-148.
[14] 崔泽宏,汤良杰,王志欣.博格达南、北缘成盆过程演化及其对油气形成影响[J].沉积学报, 2007, 25(1):59-64. CUI Zehong, TANG Liangjie, WANG Zhixin. Basin-formation evolution and its effect on petroleum formation in the southern and northern Margins of Bogda[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007, 25(1):59-64.
[15] 杨有星,张君峰,张金虎,等.新疆博格达山周缘中上二叠统与中上三叠统沉积特征及其主控因素[J].石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(3):1-13. YANG Youxing, ZHANG Junfeng, ZHANG Jinhu, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of the Middle-Upper Permian and Middle-Upper Triassic around Bogda mountain of Xinjiang, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(3):1-13.
[16] 史燕青,王剑,张国一,等.新疆博格达地区中二叠世-早三叠世构造-气候-沉积演化及耦合机制[J].古地理学报, 2021, 23(2):389-404. SHI Yanqing, WANG Jian, ZHANG Guoyi, et al. Tectono-climatic-sedimentary evolution and coupling mechanism during the middle Permian-early Triassic in Bogda area, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 2021, 23(2):389-404.
[17] 吴俊军,游利萍,杨和山.准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带构造演化与油气成藏[J].新疆石油地质, 2013, 34(1):36-40. WU Junjun, YOU Liping, YANG Heshan. Structural evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation of Fukang fault zone in Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2013, 34(1):36-40.
[18] 邹会明.准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带西段构造特征及其控藏作用研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2017. ZOU Huiming. Study on structural characteristics and reservoir control of the western segment of Fukang fault zone in Junggar Basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2017.
[19] 梁世君,罗劝生,康积伦,等.准噶尔盆地吉南凹陷萨探1井风险勘探突破及意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4):72-83. LIANG Shijun, LUO Quansheng, KANG Jilun, et al. Breakthrough and significance of risk exploration in Well Satan 1 in Jinan Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4):72-83.
[20] 国家能源局.烃源岩地球化学评价方法:SY/T5735-2019[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2019:6. National Energy Administration. Methods for geochemical evaluation of source rocks:SY/T 5735-2019[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2019:6.
[21] 刘军,罗小平,李辉,等.查干凹陷下白垩统烃源岩地球化学特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(1):75-80. LIU Jun, LUO Xiaoping, LI Hui, et al. Geochemical characteristics of hydrocarbon source rocks of the Lower Cretaceous in the Chagan Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(1):75-80.
[22] 白雨,汪飞,牛志杰,等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩生烃动力学特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4):116-127. BAI Yu, WANG Fei, NIU Zhijie, et al. Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of source rocks of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4):116-127.
[23] 王大伟.准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组油气资源潜力评价[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2014. WANG Dawei. Oil and gas resource potential assessment in Permian Pingdiquan Formation of Dongdaohaizi depression in Junggar[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
[24] 吉鸿杰,邱振,陶辉飞,等.烃源岩特征与生烃动力学研究:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):34-42. JI Hongjie, QIU Zhen, TAO Huifei, et al. Source rock characteristics and hydrocarbon generation kinetics:A case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):34-42.
[25] 刘忠宝,刘光祥,胡宗全,等.陆相页岩层系岩相类型、组合特征及其油气勘探意义:以四川盆地中下侏罗统为例[J].天然气工业, 2019, 39(12):10-21. LIU Zhongbao, LIU Guangxiang, HU Zongquan, et al. Lithofacies types and assemblage features of continental shale strata and their significance for shale gas exploration:A case study of the Middle and Lower Jurassic strata in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(12):10-21.
[26] 国家能源局.油气储层评价方法:SY/T6285-2011[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2011:16. National Energy Administration. Oil and gas reservoir evaluation method:SY/T6285-2011[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011:16.
[27] 王正和,余谦.准南上二叠统芦草沟组非常规油气储层特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):28-35. WANG Zhenghe, YU Qian. Unconventional reservoir characteristics of Upper Permian Lucaogou Formation in southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):28-35.
[28] 于进,张奎华,林春明,等.准噶尔盆地柴窝堡凹陷二叠系储层成岩作用[J].岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3):95-104. YU Jin, ZHANG Kuihua, LIN Chunming, et al. Diagenesis characteristics of Permian reservoir in Chaiwopu Depression, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3):95-104.
[29] 史淼,张金川,袁野,等.上扬子黔西北地区海相与海陆过渡相页岩气储层孔隙特征差异性研究[J].特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3):9-17. SHI Miao, ZHANG Jinchuan, YUAN Ye, et al. Study on the difference of pore characteristics between marine and marinecontinental transitional shale gas reservoirs in Upper Yangtze region, northwest Guizhou[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(3):9-17.
[30] 彭雪峰,汪立今,姜丽萍.准噶尔盆地东南缘二叠系芦草沟组沉积环境分析[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 28(4):395-400. PENG Xuefeng, WANG Lijin, JIANG Liping. Analysis of sedimentary environment of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in southeastern margin of the Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Xinjiang University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 28(4):395-400.
[31] 柳忠泉,曾治平,田继军,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组"甜点"成因与分布预测[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3):15-28. LIU Zhongquan, ZENG Zhiping, TIAN Jijun, et al. Genesis and distribution prediction of sweet spots of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3):15-28.
[1] 张振华, 张小军, 钟大康, 苟迎春, 张世铭. 柴达木盆地西北部南翼山地区古近系下干柴沟组上段储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 29-39.
[2] 曾旭, 卞从胜, 沈瑞, 周可佳, 刘伟, 周素彦, 汪晓鸾. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近系沙三段页岩油储层非线性渗流特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 40-50.
[3] 薛罗, 史忠生, 马轮, 赵艳军, 岳世俊, 洪亮, 王磊, 雷明. 南苏丹Melut盆地北部地区中—新生界稠油成藏模式及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 76-85.
[4] 杜江民, 刘泊远, 张毅, 贾志伟, 付基友, 龙鹏宇, 罗金洋, 盛军. 中国典型白云岩储集层特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 86-98.
[5] 江梦雅, 王江涛, 刘龙松, 李卉, 陈海龙, 蒋中发, 王学勇, 刘海磊. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷石炭系—二叠系天然气特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 138-151.
[6] 肖玲, 陈曦, 雷宁, 易涛, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 80-93.
[7] 完颜泽, 龙国徽, 杨巍, 柴京超, 马新民, 唐丽, 赵健, 李海鹏. 柴达木盆地英雄岭地区古近系油气成藏过程及其演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 94-102.
[8] 冯明友, 高瑞琪, 王兴志, 徐亮, 赵金, 刘小洪, 尚俊鑫. 川西南宝兴地区二叠系栖霞组一段白云岩储层充填序列及流体指示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 11-20.
[9] 徐壮, 石万忠, 王任, 骆福嵩, 夏永涛, 覃硕, 张晓. 塔北隆起西部地区白垩系碎屑岩油气成藏规律及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 31-46.
[10] 马东烨, 陈宇航, 赵靖舟, 吴伟涛, 宋平, 陈梦娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部二叠系下石盒子组8段河流相砂体构型要素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 63-73.
[11] 杨跃明, 张少敏, 金涛, 明盈, 郭蕊莹, 王兴志, 韩璐媛. 川南地区二叠系龙潭组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 1-11.
[12] 曾治平, 柳忠泉, 赵乐强, 李艳丽, 王超, 高平. 准噶尔盆地西北缘哈山地区二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 25-35.
[13] 丁超, 王攀, 秦亚东, 梁向进, 郑爱萍, 李宁, 邢向荣. 基于非稳态热传导的SAGD开发指标预测模型[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 160-168.
[14] 李凌, 张照坤, 李明隆, 倪佳, 耿超, 唐思哲, 杨文杰, 谭秀成. 四川盆地威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 32-46.
[15] 文志刚, 罗雨舒, 刘江艳, 赵春雨, 李士祥, 田伟超, 樊云鹏, 高和婷. 陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 47-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张雪峰，赵彦德，张铭记. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘延长组存在差异构造运动的地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 78 -82 .
[2] 才业，樊佐春. 辽河油田边顶水超稠油油藏特征及其成因探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4): 129 -132 .
[3] 郝乐伟，王琪，唐俊. 储层岩石微观孔隙结构研究方法与理论综述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5): 123 -128 .
[4] 杨鹏飞，张丽娟，郑多明，李国会，罗浩渝，徐雷. 塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩大型缝洞集合体定量描述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(6): 89 -94 .
[5] 胡作维，李云，王海红，侯长兵，王昌勇，刘犟. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇原地区长 8 油层组超低渗储层孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(2): 15 -20 .
[6] 何建华，丁文龙，付景龙，李昂，代鹏. 页岩微观孔隙成因类型研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5): 30 -35 .
[7] 王变阳,贺永红,王康乐,王彦龙,董丽红,李爱荣. 鄂尔多斯盆地定边—安塞地区延长组下组合储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6): 64 -68 .
[8] 高长海，查 明，赵贤正，彭 浦. 冀中坳陷潜山油气藏输导体系及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2): 26 -30 .
[9] 万传治, 王 鹏, 薛建勤, 苏雪迎, 周 刚, 苟迎春 . 柴达木盆地柴西地区古近系—新近系致密油勘探潜力分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3): 26 -31 .
[10] 邱 振，李建忠，吴晓智，王社教，郑 民，郭秋麟. 国内外致密油勘探现状、主要地质特征及差异[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4): 119 -126 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发