辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20240204

岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 33–42.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240204

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现

牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国

中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司, 天津 300459

收稿日期:2023-02-12 修回日期:2023-04-17 发布日期:2024-03-06
作者简介:牛成民（1966—），男，教授级高级工程师，主要从事勘探地质综合研究与管理工作。地址：（300459）天津市滨海新区海川路2121号渤海石油管理局B座。Email：Niuchm@cnooc.com.cn。
基金资助:
中海石油（中国）有限公司“七年行动计划”科技重大专项课题“渤海油田上产4000万吨新领域勘探关键技术”（编号：CNOOC-KJ 135 ZDXM 36 TJ 08 TJ）资助。

Sedimentary model of sublacustrine fan of the third member of Paleogene Dongying Formation and large-scale oilfield discovered in western slope of Liaozhong Sag

NIU Chengmin, HUI Guanzhou, DU Xiaofeng, GUAN Dayong, WANG Bingjie, WANG Qiming, ZHANG Hongguo

Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Limited, Tianjin 300459, China

Received:2023-02-12 Revised:2023-04-17 Published:2024-03-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过地层层序研究、古地貌恢复、锆石测年和地震资料分析等，从物源体系、古地貌、坡折体系和湖平面变化等方面探讨了辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东营组三段（东三段）湖底扇的发育模式，并对油气藏的特征及成藏模式进行了研究。研究结果表明：①辽中凹陷西斜坡东三段湖底扇砂体表现为“物源-坡折带-湖平面”控制的富砂模式；物源主要来自燕山褶皱带，其次为辽西凸起，大规模的物源供给和变质岩的母岩区为湖底扇的形成提供了碎屑物质和优质的储集砂体；沉积坡折带控制湖底扇重力流卸载位置，断裂坡折带形成的微古地貌变化控制局部砂体搬运方向和差异富集程度；湖平面变化与物源体系变化耦合形成的三角洲、湖泊和湖底扇沉积在空间上反复叠置发育，为岩性圈闭的形成提供了良好的保存条件。②旅大10-6油田湖底扇岩性主要为中—细粒长石岩屑砂岩，颗粒粒度较小，以重力流沉积为主；孔隙类型主要为原生粒间孔和溶蚀粒间孔，见少量粒内溶孔，孔隙发育一般，连通性较差；湖底扇发育具有垂向上多期叠置、平面上连片的特征，位于斜坡中部的中扇亚相具有明显的滑塌变形构造，是最有利的勘探相带。③旅大10-6油田湖底扇油藏是辽中凹陷西斜坡从构造圈闭勘探转为岩性圈闭勘探的重大发现，实现了渤海油田斜坡带古近系湖底扇型岩性油气藏勘探领域的重大突破，共发育11个油藏和9个气藏，油气藏相互独立、储量规模大、丰度高，探明油当量为3000×10⁴t，原油物性好、探井测试产能高，为“汇聚脊-通源断层-顺向砂体”三元耦合成藏模式。

关键词: 湖底扇, 古地貌, 坡折体系, 沉积模式, 油气成藏模式, 斜坡带, 东营组三段, 古近系, 辽中凹陷

Abstract: Through stratigraphic sequence research，paleogeomorphological restoration，zircon dating and seismic data analysis，the sublacustrine fan development model of the third member of Paleogene Dongying Formation（Ed₃）in western slope of Liaozhong Sag was discussed from the aspects of source system，paleogeomorphology and slope break system and lake level change，and the reservoir characteristics and accumulation model were studied. The results show that：（1）The sand bodies of the sublacustrine fan in the western slope of Liaozhong Sag are characterized by a sand-rich model controlled by“source-slope break zone-lake level”. The sources are mainly from Yanshan fold belt，followed by Liaoxi uplift. Large-scale source supply and parent rock area of metamorphic rocks provide clastic materials and high-quality reservoir sand bodies for the formation of the sublacustrine fan. Sedimentary slope break zones control the unloading position of gravity flow in the sublacustrine fan， and the micro paleogeomorphic changes formed by the fault slope break zones control the direction of local sand body transport and the degree of differential enrichment. The coupling of lake level changes and source system changes has resulted in the repeated stacking and development of delta，lake，and sublacustrine fan sediments in space，providing good preservation conditions for the formation of lithologic traps.（2）The lithologies of the sublacustrine fan in Lvda10-6oilfield are mainly medium to fine grained feldspar lithic sandstone，with smaller particle size and mainly composed of gravity flow sedimentation. The pore types are mainly primary intergranular pores and dissolved intergranular pores，with a small amount of intragranular dissolved pores. The pore development is average and the connectivity is poor. The development of the sublacustrine fan has the characteristics of vertical multi-stage overlap and planar continuity. The middle fan subfacies of the sublacustrine fan located in the middle of the slope have obvious collapse deformation structures，making them the most favorable exploration facies zone.（3）The sublacustrine fan reservoir in Lvda 10-6 oilfield is a major discovery in the western slope of Liaozhong Sag shifted from structural trap exploration to lithological trap exploration，achieving a significant breakthrough in the exploration field of Paleogene sublacustrine fan type lithologic reservoirs in the slope zone of Bohai Oilfield，with 11 oil reservoirs and 9 gas reservoirs developed. The oil and gas reservoirs are mutually independent，with large reserves，high abundance，a proven oil equivalent of 3 000×10⁴ t，good physical properties of crude oil and high production capacity for exploratory well testing. The reservoir accumulation model is a ternary coupling of“convergence ridge-source fault-parallel sand body”.

Key words: sublacustrine fan, paleogeomorphology, slope break system, sedimentary model, hydrocarbon accumulation model, slope zone, the third member of Dongying Formation, Paleogene, Liaozhong Sag

中图分类号:

TE122.1

牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33–42.

NIU Chengmin, HUI Guanzhou, DU Xiaofeng, GUAN Dayong, WANG Bingjie, WANG Qiming, ZHANG Hongguo. Sedimentary model of sublacustrine fan of the third member of Paleogene Dongying Formation and large-scale oilfield discovered in western slope of Liaozhong Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 33–42.

参考文献

[1] KUENEN P H,MIGLIORINI C I. Turbidity currents as a cause of graded bedding[J]. Journal of Geology,1950,58(2):91-127.
[2] BOUMA A H. Sedimentology of some flysch deposits:A graphic approach to facies interpretation[M]. Amsterdam:Elsevier,1962.
[3] WALKER R G. Deep-water sandstone facies and ancient submarine fans,models for exploration for stratigraphic traps[J]. AAPG,1978,62(6):239-263.
[4] NORMARK W R. Fan valleys,channel,and depositional lobes on mordern submarine fan,characters for recognition of sandy turbidite environments[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1978,62(6):912-931.
[5] 刘孟慧,赵澂林. 渤海湾地区下第三系湖底扇的沉积特征[J]. 华东石油学院学报,1984,26(3):223-235. LIU Menghui,ZHAO Zhenglin. Sedimentary features of the sublake-fan of Eogene system in Bohai Bay[J]. Journal of East China Petroleum Institute,1984,26(3):223-235.
[6] 赵澂林,刘孟慧. 湖底扇相模式及其在油气预测中的应用[J]. 华东石油学院学报,1984,26(4):323-334. ZHAO Zhenglin,LIU Menghui. Facies model of the sublakefan and its application to oil and gas exploration[J]. Journal of East China Petroleum Institute,1984,26(4):323-334.
[7] 操应长,杨田,王艳忠,等. 超临界沉积物重力流形成演化及特征[J]. 石油学报,2017,38(6):5-19. CAO Yingchang,YANG Tian,WANG Yanzhong,et al. Formation,evolution and sedimentary characteristics of supercritical sediment gravity-flow[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(6):5-19.
[8] 谈明轩,朱筱敏,耿名扬,等. 沉积物重力流流体转化沉积-混合事件层[J]. 沉积学报,2016,34(6):1108-1119. TAN Mingxuan,ZHU Xiaomin,GENG Mingyang,et al. The flow transforming deposits of sedimentary gravity flow-hybrid event bed[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2016,34(6):1108-1119.
[9] 牛成民,杜晓峰,王启明,等. 渤海海域新生界大型岩性油气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):1-14. NIU Chengmin,DU Xiaofeng,WANG Qiming,et al. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large-scale lithologic reservoirs of Cenozoic in Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022,34(3):1-14.
[10] 李云,郑荣才,朱国金,等. 沉积物重力流研究进展综述[J]. 地球科学进展,2011,26(2):157-165. LI Yun,ZHENG Rongcai,ZHU Guojin,et al. Reviews on sediment gravity flow[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2011,26(2):157-165.
[11] 张鹏,罗霞,苏朝光,等. 车西地区湖底扇沉积特征及储集物性[J]. 断块油气田,2009,16(5):17-19. ZHANG Peng,LUO Xia,SU Chaoguang,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir property of sublacustrine fan in Chexi area[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2009,16(5):17-19.
[12] 陈广坡,王天奇,李林波,等. 箕状断陷湖盆湖底扇特征及油气勘探:以二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷腾格尔组二段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2010,37(1):63-69. CHEN Guangpo,WANG Tianqi,LI Linbo,et al. Characteristics of sublacustrine fan in half-graben rift lake basin and its petroleum prospecting:Case study on the second member of Tenggeer Formation,Saihantala Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(1):63-69.
[13] 邱兰军,居春荣,钟思英,等. 高邮凹陷周宋油田泰州组油藏特征及分布规律研究[J]. 石油天然气学报,2003,25(增刊2):18-19. QIU Lanjun,JU Chunrong,ZHONG Siying,et al. Reservoir characteristics and its distributional rules of Taizhou Formation in Z-S oilfield in Gaoyou Depression[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2003,25(Suppl 2):18-19.
[14] 董桂玉,邱旭明,刘玉瑞,等. 陆相复杂断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏砂体预测[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2013. DONG Guiyu,QIU Xuming,LIU Yurui,et al. Sand-exploring for the subtle reservoirs of continental and complexrift basins, for Gaoyou Sag,Subei Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2013.
[15] 魏洪涛. 辽中凹陷北部东二下亚段湖底扇沉积数值模拟及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):183-188. WEI Hongtao. Numerical simulation of sublacustrine fan deposition of lower Ed 2 Formation and its application in northern Liaozhong Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):183-188.
[16] 孙雨,向尧,马世忠,等. 辽河盆地西部凹陷曙二区大凌河油层湖底扇沉积特征与沉积模式探讨[J]. 沉积学报,2016,34(4):725-734. SUN Yu,XIANG Yao,MA Shizhong,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and model of sublacustrine fan of Dalinghe oil layer of Shu 2 area in the West Sag,Liaohe Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2016,34(4):725-734.
[17] 姚威,吴冲龙. 二连盆地阿尔凹陷腾一上段湖底扇沉积特征及油气地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质,2015,37(6):737-750. YAO Wei,WU Chonglong. Sedimentary characteristics and petroleum geology of sublacustrine fan of the upper section of the first member of the Tenger Formation in the Aer Sag of the Erlian Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2015,37(6):737-750.
[18] 李凤杰,李磊,魏旭,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区长6 油层组湖底扇内深水重力流沉积特征[J]. 古地理学报,2014,16(6):827-834. LI Fengjie,LI Lei,WEI Xu,et al. Characteristics of deep water gravity flows sediments in sublacustrine fan of the Chang 6 interval of Yanchang Formation in Huachi area,Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2014,16(6):827-834.
[19] 王改卫,黄晓波,代黎明,等. 渤海油田富砂性湖底扇沉积模式及有利勘探目标[J]. 石油地质与工程,2017,31(3):1-4. WANG Gaiwei,HUANG Xiaobo,DAI Liming,et al. Depositional models of sand-rich sublacustrine fan and favorable exploration targets in Bohai oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2017,31(3):1-4.
[20] 马正武,官大勇,王启明,等. 辽中凹陷古近系东三段湖底扇沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(2):131-140. MA Zhengwu,GUAN Dayong,WANG Qiming,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of sublacustrine fans of the third member of Paleogene Dongying Formation in Liaozhong Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(2):131-140.
[21] 宫立园,胡德胜,满晓,等. 涠西南凹陷流一段高位域早期湖底扇沉积特征及有利储层预测[J]. 中国海上油气,2022,34(6):54-64. GONG Liyuan,HU Desheng,MAN Xiao,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and favorable reservoir prediction of sublacustrine fan of early high stand system tract in the first member of Liushagang Formation in the Weixinan Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2022,34(6):54-64.
[22] 满晓,胡德胜,吴洁,等. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段湖底扇发育特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏,2023,35(4):137-144. MAN Xiao,HU Desheng,WU Jie,et al. Development characteristics and accumulation model of sublacustrine fans of the first member of Eocene Liushagang Formation in Weixinan Sag,Beibuwan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(4):137-144.
[23] 侯庆杰,金强,牛成民,等. 辽东湾地区主力烃源岩分布特征与主控因素[J]. 地球科学,2018,43(6):2160-2171. HOU Qingjie,JIN Qiang,NIU Chengmin,et al. Distribution characteristics and main controlling factors of main hydrocarbon source rocks in Liaodong Bay area[J]. Earth Science,2018, 43(6):2160-2171.
[24] 吴奎,惠冠洲,高京华,等. 辽东湾北部地区混合沉积特征及地球物理响应[J]. 地球科学,2020,45(10):3589-3602. WU Kui,HUI Guanzhou,GAO Jinghua,et al. Mixed sediment characteristics and geophysical responses in northern area of Liaodong Bay,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Earth Science,2020,45(10):3589-3602.
[25] 李晓辉,杜晓峰,官大勇,等. 辽东湾坳陷东北部新近系馆陶组辫曲过渡型河流沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):93-103. LI Xiaohui,DU Xiaofeng,GUAN Dayong,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of braided-meandering transitional river of Neogene Guantao Formation in northeastern Liaodong Bay Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(3):93-103.
[26] 陈欢庆,舒治睿,林春燕,等. 粒度分析在砾岩储层沉积环境研究中的应用:以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,29(6):6-12. CHEN Huanqing,SHU Zhirui,LIN Chunyan,et al. Application of grain-size analysis in research of sedimentary environment of conglomerate reservoir:Taking alluvial fan reservoir in the lower member of Kelamayi Formation in some area of the northwestern margin of Zhunger Basin as an example[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2014,29(6):6-12.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现

Sedimentary model of sublacustrine fan of the third member of Paleogene Dongying Formation and large-scale oilfield discovered in western slope of Liaozhong Sag

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[2]	李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[3]	邓远, 陈轩, 覃建华, 李映艳, 何吉祥, 陶鑫, 尹太举, 高阳. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组一段沉积期古地貌特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 136-144.
[4]	张坦, 贾梦瑶, 孙雅雄, 丁文龙, 石司宇, 范昕禹, 姚威. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 111-120.
[5]	马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36.
[6]	罗贝维, 尹继全, 胡广成, 陈华, 康敬程, 肖萌, 朱秋影, 段海岗. 阿联酋西部地区白垩系森诺曼阶高孔渗灰岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[7]	刘计国, 周鸿璞, 秦雁群, 邹荃, 郑凤云, 李早红, 肖高杰. 非洲Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩系AG组岩性油气藏勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 82-91.
[8]	张昌民, 张祥辉, 朱锐, 冯文杰, 尹太举, 尹艳树, Adrian J. HARTLEY. 分支河流体系研究进展及应用前景展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 11-25.
[9]	刘国勇, 许多年, 胡婷婷, 潘树新, 潘拓, 王国栋, 马永平, 关新. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷侏罗系八道湾组滩砂的发现及石油地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 1-10.
[10]	李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[11]	胡望水, 高飞跃, 李明, 郭志杰, 王世超, 李相明, 李圣明, 揭琼. 渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷古近系沙河街组油藏单元精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 92-99.
[12]	齐育楷, 郭景祥, 罗亮, 骆福嵩, 周学文, 姚威, 张坦, 林会喜. 库车坳陷南部斜坡带隐蔽圈闭发育模式及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 108-119.
[13]	满晓, 胡德胜, 吴洁, 宫立园, 柳智萱, 姜应德, 赵晔. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段湖底扇发育特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 137-144.
[14]	付文俊, 张昌民, 冀东升, 娄林, 刘家乐, 王绪龙. 准噶尔盆地南安集海河剖面中侏罗统头屯河组浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 145-160.
[15]	何雁兵, 肖张波, 郑仰帝, 刘君毅, 易浩, 赵庆, 张月霞, 贺勇. 珠江口盆地陆丰13洼转换带中生界陆丰7-9潜山成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 18-28.