岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 3342.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240204
牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国
NIU Chengmin, HUI Guanzhou, DU Xiaofeng, GUAN Dayong, WANG Bingjie, WANG Qiming, ZHANG Hongguo
摘要: 通过地层层序研究、古地貌恢复、锆石测年和地震资料分析等,从物源体系、古地貌、坡折体系和湖平面变化等方面探讨了辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东营组三段(东三段)湖底扇的发育模式,并对油气藏的特征及成藏模式进行了研究。研究结果表明:①辽中凹陷西斜坡东三段湖底扇砂体表现为“物源-坡折带-湖平面”控制的富砂模式;物源主要来自燕山褶皱带,其次为辽西凸起,大规模的物源供给和变质岩的母岩区为湖底扇的形成提供了碎屑物质和优质的储集砂体;沉积坡折带控制湖底扇重力流卸载位置,断裂坡折带形成的微古地貌变化控制局部砂体搬运方向和差异富集程度;湖平面变化与物源体系变化耦合形成的三角洲、湖泊和湖底扇沉积在空间上反复叠置发育,为岩性圈闭的形成提供了良好的保存条件。②旅大10-6油田湖底扇岩性主要为中—细粒长石岩屑砂岩,颗粒粒度较小,以重力流沉积为主;孔隙类型主要为原生粒间孔和溶蚀粒间孔,见少量粒内溶孔,孔隙发育一般,连通性较差;湖底扇发育具有垂向上多期叠置、平面上连片的特征,位于斜坡中部的中扇亚相具有明显的滑塌变形构造,是最有利的勘探相带。③旅大10-6油田湖底扇油藏是辽中凹陷西斜坡从构造圈闭勘探转为岩性圈闭勘探的重大发现,实现了渤海油田斜坡带古近系湖底扇型岩性油气藏勘探领域的重大突破,共发育11个油藏和9个气藏,油气藏相互独立、储量规模大、丰度高,探明油当量为3000×104t,原油物性好、探井测试产能高,为“汇聚脊-通源断层-顺向砂体”三元耦合成藏模式。
中图分类号:
[1] KUENEN P H,MIGLIORINI C I. Turbidity currents as a cause of graded bedding[J]. Journal of Geology,1950,58(2):91-127. [2] BOUMA A H. Sedimentology of some flysch deposits:A graphic approach to facies interpretation[M]. Amsterdam:Elsevier,1962. [3] WALKER R G. Deep-water sandstone facies and ancient submarine fans,models for exploration for stratigraphic traps[J]. AAPG,1978,62(6):239-263. [4] NORMARK W R. Fan valleys,channel,and depositional lobes on mordern submarine fan,characters for recognition of sandy turbidite environments[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1978,62(6):912-931. [5] 刘孟慧,赵澂林. 渤海湾地区下第三系湖底扇的沉积特征[J]. 华东石油学院学报,1984,26(3):223-235. LIU Menghui,ZHAO Zhenglin. Sedimentary features of the sublake-fan of Eogene system in Bohai Bay[J]. Journal of East China Petroleum Institute,1984,26(3):223-235. [6] 赵澂林,刘孟慧. 湖底扇相模式及其在油气预测中的应用[J]. 华东石油学院学报,1984,26(4):323-334. ZHAO Zhenglin,LIU Menghui. Facies model of the sublakefan and its application to oil and gas exploration[J]. Journal of East China Petroleum Institute,1984,26(4):323-334. [7] 操应长,杨田,王艳忠,等. 超临界沉积物重力流形成演化及特征[J]. 石油学报,2017,38(6):5-19. CAO Yingchang,YANG Tian,WANG Yanzhong,et al. Formation,evolution and sedimentary characteristics of supercritical sediment gravity-flow[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(6):5-19. [8] 谈明轩,朱筱敏,耿名扬,等. 沉积物重力流流体转化沉积-混合事件层[J]. 沉积学报,2016,34(6):1108-1119. TAN Mingxuan,ZHU Xiaomin,GENG Mingyang,et al. The flow transforming deposits of sedimentary gravity flow-hybrid event bed[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2016,34(6):1108-1119. [9] 牛成民,杜晓峰,王启明,等. 渤海海域新生界大型岩性油气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):1-14. NIU Chengmin,DU Xiaofeng,WANG Qiming,et al. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large-scale lithologic reservoirs of Cenozoic in Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022,34(3):1-14. [10] 李云,郑荣才,朱国金,等. 沉积物重力流研究进展综述[J]. 地球科学进展,2011,26(2):157-165. LI Yun,ZHENG Rongcai,ZHU Guojin,et al. Reviews on sediment gravity flow[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2011,26(2):157-165. [11] 张鹏,罗霞,苏朝光,等. 车西地区湖底扇沉积特征及储集物性[J]. 断块油气田,2009,16(5):17-19. ZHANG Peng,LUO Xia,SU Chaoguang,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir property of sublacustrine fan in Chexi area[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2009,16(5):17-19. [12] 陈广坡,王天奇,李林波,等. 箕状断陷湖盆湖底扇特征及油气勘探:以二连盆地赛汉塔拉凹陷腾格尔组二段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2010,37(1):63-69. CHEN Guangpo,WANG Tianqi,LI Linbo,et al. Characteristics of sublacustrine fan in half-graben rift lake basin and its petroleum prospecting:Case study on the second member of Tenggeer Formation,Saihantala Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(1):63-69. [13] 邱兰军,居春荣,钟思英,等. 高邮凹陷周宋油田泰州组油藏特征及分布规律研究[J]. 石油天然气学报,2003,25(增刊2):18-19. QIU Lanjun,JU Chunrong,ZHONG Siying,et al. Reservoir characteristics and its distributional rules of Taizhou Formation in Z-S oilfield in Gaoyou Depression[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2003,25(Suppl 2):18-19. [14] 董桂玉,邱旭明,刘玉瑞,等. 陆相复杂断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏砂体预测[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2013. DONG Guiyu,QIU Xuming,LIU Yurui,et al. Sand-exploring for the subtle reservoirs of continental and complexrift basins, for Gaoyou Sag,Subei Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2013. [15] 魏洪涛. 辽中凹陷北部东二下亚段湖底扇沉积数值模拟及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):183-188. WEI Hongtao. Numerical simulation of sublacustrine fan deposition of lower Ed 2 Formation and its application in northern Liaozhong Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):183-188. [16] 孙雨,向尧,马世忠,等. 辽河盆地西部凹陷曙二区大凌河油层湖底扇沉积特征与沉积模式探讨[J]. 沉积学报,2016,34(4):725-734. SUN Yu,XIANG Yao,MA Shizhong,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and model of sublacustrine fan of Dalinghe oil layer of Shu 2 area in the West Sag,Liaohe Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2016,34(4):725-734. [17] 姚威,吴冲龙. 二连盆地阿尔凹陷腾一上段湖底扇沉积特征及油气地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质,2015,37(6):737-750. YAO Wei,WU Chonglong. Sedimentary characteristics and petroleum geology of sublacustrine fan of the upper section of the first member of the Tenger Formation in the Aer Sag of the Erlian Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2015,37(6):737-750. [18] 李凤杰,李磊,魏旭,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区长6 油层组湖底扇内深水重力流沉积特征[J]. 古地理学报,2014,16(6):827-834. LI Fengjie,LI Lei,WEI Xu,et al. Characteristics of deep water gravity flows sediments in sublacustrine fan of the Chang 6 interval of Yanchang Formation in Huachi area,Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2014,16(6):827-834. [19] 王改卫,黄晓波,代黎明,等. 渤海油田富砂性湖底扇沉积模式及有利勘探目标[J]. 石油地质与工程,2017,31(3):1-4. WANG Gaiwei,HUANG Xiaobo,DAI Liming,et al. Depositional models of sand-rich sublacustrine fan and favorable exploration targets in Bohai oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2017,31(3):1-4. [20] 马正武,官大勇,王启明,等. 辽中凹陷古近系东三段湖底扇沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(2):131-140. MA Zhengwu,GUAN Dayong,WANG Qiming,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of sublacustrine fans of the third member of Paleogene Dongying Formation in Liaozhong Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(2):131-140. [21] 宫立园,胡德胜,满晓,等. 涠西南凹陷流一段高位域早期湖底扇沉积特征及有利储层预测[J]. 中国海上油气,2022,34(6):54-64. GONG Liyuan,HU Desheng,MAN Xiao,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and favorable reservoir prediction of sublacustrine fan of early high stand system tract in the first member of Liushagang Formation in the Weixinan Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2022,34(6):54-64. [22] 满晓,胡德胜,吴洁,等. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段湖底扇发育特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏,2023,35(4):137-144. MAN Xiao,HU Desheng,WU Jie,et al. Development characteristics and accumulation model of sublacustrine fans of the first member of Eocene Liushagang Formation in Weixinan Sag,Beibuwan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(4):137-144. [23] 侯庆杰,金强,牛成民,等. 辽东湾地区主力烃源岩分布特征与主控因素[J]. 地球科学,2018,43(6):2160-2171. HOU Qingjie,JIN Qiang,NIU Chengmin,et al. Distribution characteristics and main controlling factors of main hydrocarbon source rocks in Liaodong Bay area[J]. Earth Science,2018, 43(6):2160-2171. [24] 吴奎,惠冠洲,高京华,等. 辽东湾北部地区混合沉积特征及地球物理响应[J]. 地球科学,2020,45(10):3589-3602. WU Kui,HUI Guanzhou,GAO Jinghua,et al. Mixed sediment characteristics and geophysical responses in northern area of Liaodong Bay,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Earth Science,2020,45(10):3589-3602. [25] 李晓辉,杜晓峰,官大勇,等. 辽东湾坳陷东北部新近系馆陶组辫曲过渡型河流沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):93-103. LI Xiaohui,DU Xiaofeng,GUAN Dayong,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of braided-meandering transitional river of Neogene Guantao Formation in northeastern Liaodong Bay Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(3):93-103. [26] 陈欢庆,舒治睿,林春燕,等. 粒度分析在砾岩储层沉积环境研究中的应用:以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,29(6):6-12. CHEN Huanqing,SHU Zhirui,LIN Chunyan,et al. Application of grain-size analysis in research of sedimentary environment of conglomerate reservoir:Taking alluvial fan reservoir in the lower member of Kelamayi Formation in some area of the northwestern margin of Zhunger Basin as an example[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2014,29(6):6-12. |
[1] | 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155. |
[2] | 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86. |
[3] | 何文渊, 陈可洋. 哈萨克斯坦南图尔盖盆地Doshan斜坡带岩性油气藏储层预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 1-11. |
[4] | 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70. |
[5] | 王同川, 陈浩如, 温龙彬, 钱玉贵, 李玉琢, 文华国. 川东五百梯地区石炭系岩溶古地貌识别及储集意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 109-121. |
[6] | 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157. |
[7] | 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136. |
[8] | 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95. |
[9] | 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30. |
[10] | 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169. |
[11] | 邓远, 陈轩, 覃建华, 李映艳, 何吉祥, 陶鑫, 尹太举, 高阳. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组一段沉积期古地貌特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 136-144. |
[12] | 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110. |
[13] | 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77. |
[14] | 张坦, 贾梦瑶, 孙雅雄, 丁文龙, 石司宇, 范昕禹, 姚威. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 111-120. |
[15] | 马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36. |
|