岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 84–95.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240308

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建

冯斌1, 黄晓波2, 何幼斌1, 李华1, 罗进雄1, 李涛1, 周晓光2   

  1. 1. 长江大学 地球科学学院, 武汉 430100;
    2. 中国海洋石油总公司 天津分公司, 天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-10 修回日期:2023-09-22 出版日期:2024-05-01 发布日期:2024-04-30
  • 第一作者:冯斌(1993—),男,长江大学在读博士研究生,主要研究方向为沉积学。地址:(430100)湖北省武汉市蔡甸区大学路 111 号长江大学地球科学学院。Email:201672157@yangtze.edu.cn。
  • 通信作者: 何幼斌(1964—),男,博士,教授,主要从事沉积学方面的科研和教学工作。Email:100709@yangtzeu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金“内蒙古乌海地区奥陶系深水复合型及迁移型重力流水道形成机理”(编号:42272115)资助。

Reconstruction of source-to-sink system of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Miaoxibei area,Bohai Bay Basin

FENG Bin1, HUANG Xiaobo2, HE Youbin1, LI Hua1, LUO Jinxiong1, LI Tao1, ZHOU Xiaoguang2   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China;
    2. Tianjin Branch of CNOOC, Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2023-07-10 Revised:2023-09-22 Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-04-30

摘要: 基于钻井岩心和三维地震资料,从物源岩性、分水岭和古水系、搬运通道3个方面对渤海湾盆地庙西北地区物源特征和沉积相展布进行了分析,并通过沉积区古地貌恢复和剥蚀物源区古地貌回溯重建了古近系沙河街组三段(沙三段)沉积时期的源-汇系统。研究结果表明:①渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙三段发育一个完整的近源搬运型源-汇系统,庙西北凸起为物源区,渤东凹陷为主要沉积区;庙西北凸起物源岩性包括中生界花岗岩、下元古界石英片岩及下元古界角砾岩;主分水岭沿凸起长轴呈近南北向展布,古水系散布其间,搬运通道主要为5个古沟谷和2个古断槽;渤东凹陷沙三段主要发育快速堆积的扇三角洲—湖泊相沉积,岩性主要为含砾砂岩、细砂岩及泥岩,分选性和磨圆度均较差,岩石成分及矿物组合均与庙西北凸起石英片岩及花岗岩较为匹配,扇三角洲沉积体呈近东西向展布,在渤东凹陷北部以连片朵状扇三角洲为主,南部为孤立朵状。②沙三段沉积期,庙西北凸起剥蚀作用具有“西强东弱”的特征,古分水岭逐渐向西迁移,凸起中部及北部物源面积大、垂向高差大,物源供给能力更强;渤东凹陷沙三段厚度为100~600 m,具有东南薄、西北厚的特征,沉积中心位于区域北部,且北部地层剥蚀作用更强,向东部延伸长度可达3.2 km;扇三角洲的发育位置受控于物源区搬运通道,其发育规模则受控于物源区域面积,渤东凹陷北部及中部扇三角洲沉积体规模更大,是勘探有利区。

关键词: 源-汇系统, 分水岭, 古水系, 古地貌恢复, 扇三角洲, 古沟谷和古断槽, 沙河街组三段, 古近系, 庙西北地区, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: Based on drilling cores and 3D seismic data, the provenance characteristics and sedimentary facies distribution in Miaoxibei area in the Bohai Bay Basin were comprehensively analyzed from three aspects:source lithology identification, reconstruction of watershed river paleo-system and transport pathways, and the sourceto-sink system for the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation was reconstructed through the restoration of both paleo-geomorphological features within the sedimentary area and those within the denudation source area. The results show that:(1)A complete source-to-sink system of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation has developed in Miaoxibei area, Bohai Bay Basin, with the provenance area located at Miaoxibei uplift and Bodong sag serving as the main sedimentary area. The source lithologies in Miaoxibei uplift comprise Mesozoic granite, Lower Proterozoic quartz schist, and Lower Proterozoic breccia. The primary watershed is distributed from south to north along the long axis of the uplift, with ancient water systems scattered within it. The main transport pathways consist of five ancient valleys and two ancient fault troughs. Fan delta-lacustrine facies deposits of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Miaoxibei area are mainly characterized by rapid accumulation, mainly composed of gravel-bearing sandstone, fine sandstone and mudstone, with poor sorting and grinding degree. Rock composition and mineral association relatively match those found in quartz schist and granite located in Miaoxibei uplift. In northern Bodong sag, contiguous fan-shaped deltas dominate while isolated ones prevail in its southern part.(2)The denudation during the sedimentary period of Sha 3 member was pronounced in western Miaoxibei uplift and comparatively weaker in the eastern region, resulting in a gradual westward migration of the paleo-divide. The central and northern parts of Miaoxibei uplift exhibited a larger provenance area, significant vertical elevation differences, and a stronger supply capacity from the provenance. The thickness of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Bodong sag varies between 100 to 600 m, with thinner deposits observed in the east and south, while thicker deposits are found in the west and north. The depositional center is located in the northern part of Bodong sag, where strata have undergone more extensive denudation reaching up to 3.2 km towards the east. The development location of fan delta is controlled by transport channels originating from provenance areas, while its scale is influenced by provenance size. Notably, fan delta deposition on a larger scale predominantly occurs in the northern and middle regions of Bodong sag which represent favorable areas for exploration.

Key words: source-to-sink system, watershed, ancient water system, paleogeomorphic restoration, fan delta, ancient valleys and ancient fault troughs, the third member of Shahejie Formation, Paleogene, Miaoxibei area, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 李铁刚,曹奇原,李安春,等. 从源到汇:大陆边缘的沉积作用[J]. 地球科学进展,2003,18(5):713-721. LI Tiegang,CAO Qiyuan,LI Anchun,et al. Source to sink:Sedimentation in the continental margins[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences,2003,18(5):713-721.
[2] 高抒. 美国《洋陆边缘科学计划2004》述评[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2005,25(1):119-123. GAO Shu. Comments on the"NSF Margins Program Science Plans 2004"[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2005, 25(1):119-123.
[3] 汪品先. 穿凿地球系统的时间隧道[J]. 中国科学D辑:地球科学,2009,39(10):1313-1338. WANG Pinxian. Digging a time tunnel through the earth system[J]. Science China Series D:Earth Sciences,2009,39(10):1313-1338.
[4] 徐长贵,龚承林. 从层序地层走向源-汇系统的储层预测之路[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2023,44(3):521-538. XU Changgui,GONG Chenglin. Predictive stratigraphy:From sequence stratigraphy to source-to-sink system[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(3):521-538.
[5] 朱红涛,徐长贵,杜晓峰,等. 陆相盆地古源-汇系统定量重建、级次划分及耦合模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2023,44(3):539-552. ZHU Hongtao,XU Changgui,DU Xiaofeng,et al. Quantitative reconstruction,hierarchical division and coupling mode establishment for ancient source-to-sink systems in continental Basins[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(3):539-552.
[6] 朱红涛,朱筱敏,刘强虎,等. 层序地层学与源-汇系统理论内在关联性与差异性[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2022,43(4):763-776. ZHU Hongtao,ZHU Xiaomin,LIU Qianghu,et al. Sequence stratigraphy and source-to-sink system:Connections and distinctions[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(4):763-776.
[7] LIU Hao,LOON A J,XU Jie,et al. Relationships between tectonic activity and sedimentary source-to-sink system parameters in a lacustrine rift basin:A quantitative case study of the Huanghekou Depression(Bohai Bay Basin,eastern China)[J]. Basin Research,2020,32(4):587-612.
[8] 杨丽莎,陈彬滔,马轮,等. 陆相湖盆坳陷期源-汇系统的要素特征及耦合关系:以南苏丹Melut盆地北部坳陷新近系Jimidi组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2021,33(3):27-38. YANG Lisha,CHEN Bintao,MA Lun,et al. Element feature and coupling model of source-to-sink system in depression lacustrine basin:A case study of the Neogene Jimidi Formation in Melut Basin,South Sudan[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021, 33(3):27-38.
[9] 冯斌,李华,何幼斌,等. 陆相湖盆"源-汇"系统要素定量关系:以渤海湾盆地庙西北地区为例[J]. 地球科学与环境学报,2023,45(3):680-695. FENG Bin,LI Hua,HE Youbin,et al. Quantitative relationships among source-to-sink system parameters in a lacustrine basin:Taking Miaoxibei area in Bohai Bay Basin,China as an example[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2023, 45(3):680-695.
[10] 刘豪,徐长贵,高阳东,等. 断陷湖盆低勘探区源-汇系统与烃源岩预测:以珠江口盆地珠一坳陷北部洼陷区为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2023,44(3):565-583. LIU Hao,XU Changgui,GAO Yangdong,et al. Source-to-sink system and hydrocarbon source rock prediction of underexplored areas in rifted lacustrine basins:A case study on northern lows in Zhu Ⅰ Depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(3):565-583.
[11] 聂银兰,朱筱敏,董艳蕾,等. 陆相断陷盆地源-汇系统要素表征及研究展望[J]. 地质论评,2022,68(5):1881-1896. NIE Yinlan,ZHU Xiaomin,DONG Yanlei,et al. Characterization and research prospect of source-to-sink system elements in continental rift basin[J]. Geological Review,2022,68(5):1881-1896.
[12] 胡贺伟,李慧勇,于海波,等. 渤海湾盆地埕北低凸起及围区古近系"源-汇"系统控砂原理定量分析[J]. 古地理学报, 2020,22(2):266-277. HU Hewei,LI Huiyong,YU Haibo,et al. Quantitative analysis of source-to-sink system controls on sand-body distribution of the Paleogene in Chengbei low uplift and surrounding areas, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2020,22(2):266-277.
[13] 赵汉卿,温慧芸,穆朋飞,等. 垦利A油田沙三上段近源辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2019,31(3):37-44. ZHAO Hanqing,WEN Huiyun,MU Pengfei,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of near-source braided river delta of the upper third member of Shahejie Formation in Kenli A oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(3):37-44.
[14] 缪欢,王延斌,何川,等. 渤海湾盆地埕北断阶带断裂发育特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(2):105-115. MIAO Huan,WANG Yanbin,HE Chuan,et al. Fault development characteristics and reservoir control in Chengbei fault step zone,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(2):105-115.
[15] 朱红涛,徐长贵,朱筱敏,等. 陆相盆地源-汇系统要素耦合研究进展[J]. 地球科学,2017,42(11):1851-1870. ZHU Hongtao,XU Changgui,ZHU Xiaomin,et al. Advances of the source-to-sink units and coupling model research in continental basin[J]. Earth Science,2017,42(11):1851-1870.
[16] 谈明轩,朱筱敏,张自力,等. 古"源-汇"系统沉积学问题及基本研究方法简述[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2020,41(5):1107-1118. TAN Mingxuan,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHANG Zili,et al. Summary of sedimentological issues and fundamental approaches in terms of ancient"source-to-sink"systems[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2020,41(5):1107-1118.
[17] 杜晓峰,庞小军,黄晓波,等. 辽西凹陷北部古近系沙河街组二段源-汇系统及其对滩坝砂体的控制[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2023,44(3):662-674. DU Xiaofeng,PANG Xiaojun,HUANG Xiaobo,et al. Characteristics of the source-to-sink system for the Paleogene Sha 2 member of northern Liaoxi Sag,offshore Bohai Bay Basin and its control on beach bar sands[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(3):662-674.
[18] 邵龙义,王学天,李雅楠,等. 深时源-汇系统古地理重建方法评述[J]. 古地理学报,2019,21(1):67-81. SHAO Longyi,WANG Xuetian,LI Yanan,et al. Review on palaeogeographic reconstruction of deep-time source-to-sink systems[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2019, 21(1):67-81.
[19] 李春荣.渤海海域渤东凹陷结构特征与勘探方向[J]. 海洋石油,2015,35(4):1-7. LI Chunrong. Structure characteristics and favorable hydrocarbon exploration zone of Bodong Depression in Bohai Sea area[J]. Offshore Oil,2015,35(4):1-7.
[20] 周毅,张通彩,何仕斌,等. 渤中、渤东凹陷结构认识及有利勘探方向[J]. 中国海上油气地质,1997,11(6):48-54. ZHOU Yi,ZHANG Tongcai,HE Shibin,et al. Geological configuration and potential exploration areas of Bozhong and Bodong Sags[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,1997,11(6):48-54.
[21] 刘长海,魏文艳,任志勇,等. 渤海海域渤东凹陷沙河街组四段古生物组合的发现及其意义[J]. 微体古生物学报,2011, 28(3):67-74. LIU Changhai,WEI Wenyan,REN Zhiyong,et al. The paleontological assemblage from the Es4 of the Bodong Depression in the Bohai Sea and its significance[J]. Acta Micropaleontological Sinia,2011,28(3):67-74.
[22] 刘朋波,王昕,官大勇,等. 渤海东部庙北地区古近系层序与沉积特征[J]. 地质科技情报,2012,31(3):1-7. LIU Pengbo,WANG Xin,GUAN Dayong,et al. Sequence and sedimentary characteristics of Paleogene in Miaobei area,east Bohai Bay[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2012,31(3):1-7.
[23] 张参,牛成民,官大勇,等. 渤东凹陷东南斜坡构造变换带识别及其石油地质意义[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2017,33(1):36-42. ZHANG Can,NIU Chengmin,GUAN Dayong,et al. Identification of structural transfer zones on southeast slope of Bodong Sag and its implications for hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2017,33(1):36-42.
[24] 杨景春. 地貌学教程[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,1985:67-72. YANG Jingchun. Geomorphology tutorial[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press,1985:67-72.
[25] 华南农学院. 地质学基础[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1980:121-123. South China Agricultural University. Foundation of geology[M]. Beijing:Agricultural Press,1980:121-123.
[26] SOMME T O,HELLAND-HANSEN W,MARTINSEN O J,et al. Relationships between morphological and sedimentological parameters in source-to-sink systems:A basis for predicting semi-quantitative characteristics in subsurface systems[J]. Basin Research,2009,21(4):361-387.
[27] HELLAND-HANSEN W,SOMME T O,MARTINSEN O J, et al. Deciphering earth's natural hourglasses:Perspectives on source-to-sink analysis[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2016,86(9):1008-1033.
[28] WALSH J P,WIBERG P L,AALTO R,et al. Source-to-sink research:Economy of the earth's surface and its strata[J]. EarthScience Reviews,2016,153:1-6.
[29] 牛成民,杜晓峰,王启明,等. 渤海海域新生界大型岩性油气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):1-14. NIU Chengmin,DU Xiaofeng,WANG Qiming,et al. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large-scale lithologic reservoirs of Cenozoic in Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(3):1-14.
[30] 刘震,陈艳鹏,赵阳,等. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):121-127. LIU Zhen,CHEN Yanpeng,ZHAO Yang,et al. Distribution and controlling factors of hydrocarbon reservoirs in continental fault basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(2):121-127.
[31] 周立宏,肖敦清,蒲秀刚,等. 陆相断陷湖盆复式叠合油气成藏与优势相富集新模式:以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2010,22(1):7-11. ZHOU Lihong,XIAO Dunqing,PU Xiugang,et al. New pattern of composite superimposed reservoirs and advantageous phaseaccumulation in continental rifted lake basin:A case study from Qikou Sag of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(1):7-11.
[32] 于兴河,姜辉,李胜利,等. 中国东部中、新生代陆相断陷盆地沉积充填模式及其控制因素:以济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):39-45. YU Xinghe,JIANG Hui,LI Shengli,et al. Depositional filling models and controlling factors on Mesozoic and Cenozoic fault basins of terrestrial in eastern China:A case study of Dongying Sag of Jiyang Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(1):39-45.
[33] 拜文华,吕锡敏,李小军,等. 古岩溶盆地岩溶作用模式及古地貌精细刻画:以鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系风化壳为例[J]. 现代地质,2002,16(3):292-298. BAI Wenhua,LYU Ximin,LI Xiaojun,et al. The mode of paleokarstification and the fine reconstruction of the palaeogeomorphology in the Karst Basin:Taking Ordovician karst in eastern Ordos Basin for example[J]. Geoscience,2002,16(3):292-298.
[34] 夏日元,唐健生,关碧珠,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系古岩溶地貌及天然气富集特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质,1999,20(2):133-136. XIA Riyuan,TANG Jiansheng,GUAN Bizhu,et al. Ordovician palaeokarst landform in Ordos Basin and gas enrichment characteristics[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,1999,20(2):133-136.
[35] 姜正龙,邓宏文,林会喜,等. 古地貌恢复方法及应用:以济阳坳陷桩西地区沙二段为例[J]. 现代地质,2009,23(5):865-871. JIANG Zhenglong,DENG Hongwen,LIN Huixi,et al. Methods and application of paleo-geomorphologies rebuilding an example of the second member of Shahejie Formafion Zhuangxi area,Jiyang Depression[J]. Geoscience,2009,23(5):865-871.
[36] 何江,沈昭国,方少仙,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部前石炭纪岩溶古地貌恢复[J]. 海相油气地质,2007,12(2):8-16. HE Jiang,SHEN Zhaoguo,FANG Shaoxian,et al. Restoration of Pre-Carboniferous palaeokarst landform in central Ordos Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2007,12(2):8-16.
[37] 李坤,赵锡奎,沈忠民,等."趋势厚度法"在塔里木盆地阿克库勒凸起地层剥蚀量恢复中的应用[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 2007,29(5):415-419. LI Kun,ZHAO Xikui,SHEN Zhongmin,et al. Application of trend thickness method in denudation recovery in the akekule lobe of tarim basin[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2007,29(5):415-419.
[38] 吴亚军. 东部地区箕状断陷盆地构造演化与沉积充填特征[J]. 天然气工业,2004,24(3):28-31. WU Yajun. Tectonic evolution and sedimentation-filling characteristics of the half-graben-like rift-subsidence basins in east China[J]. Nature Gas Industry,2004,24(3):28-31.
[39] 张志杰,周川闽,袁选俊,等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系源-汇系统与古地理重建[J]. 地质学报,2023,97(9):3006-3023. ZHANG Zhijie,ZHOU Chuanmin,YUAN Xuanjun,et al.Source-to-sink system and palaeogeographic reconstruction of Permian in the Junggar Basin,northwestern China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2023,97(9):3006-3023.
[40] 朱红涛,徐长贵,朱筱敏,等. 陆相盆地源-汇系统要素耦合研究进展[J]. 地球科学,2017,42(11):1851-1870. ZHU Hongtao,XU Changgui,ZHU Xiaomin,et al. Advances of the source-to-sink nnits and coupling model research in continental basin[J]. Earth Science,2017,42(11):1851-1870.
[41] 刘强虎,朱筱敏,李顺利,等. 沙垒田凸起前古近系基岩分布及源-汇过程[J]. 地球科学,2016,41(11):1935-1949. LIU Qianghu,ZHU Xiaomin,LI Shunli,et al. Pre-Palaeogene distribution and source-to-sink system analysis in the Shaleitian Uplift[J]. Earth Science,2016,41(11):1935-1949.
[42] 朱筱敏,董艳蕾,刘成林,等. 中国含油气盆地沉积研究主要科学问题与发展分析[J]. 地学前缘,2021,28(1):1-11. ZHU Xiaomin,DONG Yanlei,LIU Chenglin,et al. Major challenges and development in Chinese sedimentological research on petroliferous basins[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2021,28(1):1-11.
[43] 黄军立,张伟,刘力辉,等. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组三元地震构形解释技术[J]. 岩性油气藏,2023,35(2):103-112. HUANG Junli,ZHANG Wei,LIU Lihui,et al. Ternary seismic configuration interpretation technology of Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Panyu 4 Depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(2):103-112.
[44] MARTINSEN O J,LIEN T,JACKSON C. Cretaceous and Palaeogene turbidite systems in the North Sea and Norwegian Sea Basins:Source,staging area,and basin physiography controls on reservoir development[C]// DORE'A G,VINING B A. Petroleum geology:North-West Europe and global perspectives. London:Geological Society,2005:1147-1164.
[45] LIN Heming,LIU Hao,WANG Xudong,et al. Basin-filling processes and hydrocarbon source rock prediction of lowexploration degree areas in rift lacustrine basins:A case from the Wenchang Formation in low-exploration degree areas, northern Zhu I Depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin,E China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2022,11(2):286-313.
[46] 杜晓峰,王清斌,庞小军,等. 渤中凹陷石南陡坡带东三段源汇体系定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2018,30(5):1-10. DU Xiaofeng,WANG Qingbin,PANG Xiaojun,et al. Quantitative characterization of source-sink system of Ed3 in Shinan steep slope zone,Bozhong Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(5):1-10.
[47] 庞小军,王清斌,解婷,等. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏,2020,32(2):1-13. PANG Xiaojun,WANG Qingbin,XIE Ting,et al. Paleogene provenance and its control on high-quality reservoir in the northern margin of Huanghekou Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020,32(2):1-13.
[48] 杨立铮. 中国南方地下河分布特征[J]. 中国岩溶,1985,4(增刊1):98-106. YANG Lizheng. Distribution of subterranean rivers in south China[J]. Carsological Sinica,1985,4(Suppl 1):98-106.
[49] 裴建国,梁茂珍,陈阵. 西南岩溶石山地区岩溶地下水系统划分及其主要特征值统计[J]. 中国岩溶,2008,27(1):6-10. PEI Jianguo,LIANG Maozhen,CHEN Zhen. Classification of karst groundwater system and statistics of the maincharacteristic values in southwest China karst mountain[J]. Carsological Sinica,2008,27(1):6-10.
[50] 李明琴,张竹如,王智勇,等. 用岩-土显微特征示踪碳酸盐岩母岩的成土过程:以贵阳市大山洞岩-土剖面为例[J]. 地球与环境,2005,33(4):81-86. LI Mingqin,ZHANG Zhuru,WANG Zhiyong,et al. Tracing the pedogenic process to carbonate rocks in light of maceral and microfabric characteristics of clay and carbonate rocks:A case study of Dashandong at Guiyang rock-clay profile[J]. Earth and Enviroment,2005,33(4):81-86.
[51] 冯志刚,王世杰,刘秀明,等. 酸不溶物对碳酸盐岩风化壳发育程度的影响[J]. 地质学报,2009,83(6):885-893. FENG Zhigang,WANG Shijie,LIU Xiuming,et al. Impact of acid-insoluble residua of carbonate rocks on developing intensities of their weathering crusts[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2009, 83(6):885-893.
[52] 韩云浩,姜振学,张志遥,等. 含油气盆地超高油气柱形成的有利地质条件[J]. 岩性油气藏,2023,35(2):125-135. HAN Yunhao,JIANG Zhenxue,ZHANG Zhiyao,et al. Favorable geological conditions for the formation of ultra-high petroleum columns in petroliferous basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(2):125-135.
[53] 阮伏水,周伏建. 花岗岩侵蚀坡地重建植被的几个关键问题[J]. 水土保持学报,1995,9(2):19-25. RUAN Fushui,ZHOU Fujian. Several key problems about rebuilding vegetation on eroded granite slope[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1995,9(2):19-25.
[54] 向巧维,李小平,丁琳,等. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷古近系高自然伽马砂岩形成机制及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021,33(2):93-103. XIANG Qiaowei,LI Xiaoping,DING Lin,et al. Formation mechanism and petroleum geological significance of paleogene sandstone with high natural gamma value in Zhuyi Depression, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(2):93-103.
[1] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[2] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[3] 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[4] 田亚, 李军辉, 陈方举, 李跃, 刘华晔, 邹越, 张晓扬. 海拉尔盆地中部断陷带下白垩统南屯组致密储层特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 136-146.
[5] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[6] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[7] 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[8] 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[9] 刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[10] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[11] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[12] 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[13] 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[14] 张坦, 贾梦瑶, 孙雅雄, 丁文龙, 石司宇, 范昕禹, 姚威. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 111-120.
[15] 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广,刘博,吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,王永诗,王洪玉,刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .