岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 32–46.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220603

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及有利储层分布

李凌1,2,3, 张照坤1,2, 李明隆1,2,3, 倪佳4, 耿超4, 唐思哲1,2, 杨文杰1,2, 谭秀成1,2,3   

  1. 1. 中国石油集团碳酸盐岩储层重点实验室 西南石油大学分室, 成都 610500;
    2. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 成都 610500;
    3. 西南石油大学 天然气地质四川省重点实验室, 成都 610500;
    4. 中国石油西南油气田分公司 蜀南气矿, 四川 泸州 646000
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-22 修回日期:2022-04-25 出版日期:2022-11-01 发布日期:2022-11-09
  • 第一作者:李凌(1973-),女,教授,主要从事储层沉积学方面的研究工作。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号。Email:lilinglily@163.com
  • 通信作者: 张照坤(1997-),男,西南石油大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为沉积学与储层地质学。Email:1937414007@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油集团公司上游领域基础性前瞻性项目“残留型海相盆地构造-岩相古地理重建技术研究”(编号2021DJ0501)资助

Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and favorable reservoirs distribution of Permian Qixia Stage in Weiyuan-Gaoshiti area, Sichuan Basin

LI Ling1,2,3, ZHANG Zhaokun1,2, LI Minglong1,2,3, NI Jia4, GENG Chao4, TANG Sizhe1,2, YANG Wenjie1,2, TAN Xiucheng1,2,3   

  1. 1. Southwest Petroleum University Division of CNPC Key Laboratory of Carbonate Reservoirs, Chengdu 610500, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu 610500, China;
    3. Sichuan Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Geology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    4. Southern Sichuan Gas field, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2022-02-22 Revised:2022-04-25 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-09

摘要: 通过岩心、岩屑和测录井资料,对四川盆地威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征进行了综合分析,指明了有利储层分布及控制因素。研究结果表明:①威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶可识别出2个Ⅰ型层序界面(梁山组底界面和栖霞组顶界面)和2个Ⅱ型层序界面(栖一段顶界面和栖二b段顶界面),据此将栖霞阶划分为层序SQ1,SQ2和SQ3,分别对应梁山组+栖一段、栖二b段、栖二a段。②研究区栖霞阶层序格架和平面分布特征显示,底部地层(SQ1)具有向沉积前古地貌高地超覆的特征,中上部地层(SQ2和SQ3)由沉积期地貌高地不断向低处迁移,呈现出“底超、中上部迁移”的层序充填规律。③研究区SQ2和SQ3高位体系域沉积时期,古地貌高地和坡折带发育厚度大、横向连续性较好的丘滩复合体,奠定了储层发育的物质基础,该时期海平面频繁升降,丘滩复合体发生高频暴露岩溶作用,使得储集性能得到改善,叠加白云岩化作用后形成抗压溶骨架,有利储层发育。④沉积相和岩溶作用控制了白云岩薄储层的发育和分布,栖霞阶沉积期高地和坡折带为下一步勘探的潜力区。

关键词: 层序地层, 古地貌高地, 坡折带, 相控, 岩溶作用, 白云岩薄储层, 栖霞阶, 二叠系, 威远—高石梯地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: Based on cores,cuttings and logging data,the sequence stratigraphic characteristics of Permian Qixia Stage in Weiyuan-Gaoshiti area of Sichuan Basin were comprehensively analyzed, and favorable reservoir distribution and controlling factors were pointed out. The results show that: (1)Two type Ⅰ sequence boundaries (bottom boundary of Liangshan Formation and top boundary of Qixia Formation)and two type Ⅱ sequence boundaries(top boundary of Qi 1 member and top boundary of Qi 2b member)were identified in Permian Qixia Stage in Weiyuan-Gaoshiti area. Accordingly, the Qixia Stage was divided into SQ1, SQ2 and SQ3,corresponding to Liangshan Formation and Qi 1 member,Qi 2b member and Qi 2a member,respectively.(2)The sequence filling framework and sequence plane distribution characteristics of Qixia Stage show that the bottom stratum (SQ1)has the characteristics of onlapping to the pre-depositional palaeogeomorphology highland, and the middle and upper strata(SQ2 and SQ3)continuously migrate from the sedimentary geomorphic highland to the lowland, showing the sequence filling pattern of onlapping at the bottom and migration at the middle-upper.(3)During the sedimentary period of SQ2 and SQ3 highstand systems tracts in the study area,mound-shoal complexes with large thickness and good lateral continuity were developed in the paleogeomorphology highlands and slope breaks, which laid material foundation for reservoir development. During that period,the sea level was in high-frequency change. The mound-shoal complexes high-frequency exposure karstification,improving the reservoir properties, and the pressure-soluble skeleton formed after the early dolomitization, which is beneficial to the development of the reservoir.(4)The development and distribution of thin dolomite reservoirs are controlled by sedimentary facies and karstification. The highlands and slope breaks in Qixia Stage are potential areas for next exploration.

Key words: sequence stratigraphy, palaeogeomorphology highland, slope break, sedimentary facies control, karstification, thin dolomite reservoir, Qixia Stage, Permian, Weiyuan-Gaoshiti area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3+4
[1] 李明隆, 谭秀成, 苏成鹏, 等. 四川盆地西北部中二叠统栖霞组砂糖状白云岩特征及成因机制:以广元上寺剖面为例[J]. 地质论评, 2020, 66(3):591-610. LI Minglong, TAN Xiucheng, SU Chengpeng, et al. Characteristics and genesis of sucrosic dolomite in Middle Permian Chihsia Formation, northwest Sichuan Basin:A case study from Shangsi section[J]. Geological Review, 2020, 66(3):591-610.
[2] 杨跃明, 杨雨, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新进展与前景展望[J].天然气工业, 2020, 40(7):10-22. YANG Yueming, YANG Yu, WEN Long, et al. New exploration progress and prospect of Middle Permian natural gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(7):10-22.
[3] 郝毅, 谷明峰, 韦东晓, 等. 四川盆地二叠系栖霞组沉积特征及储层分布规律[J].海相油气地质, 2020, 25(3):193-201. HAO Yi, GU Mingfeng, WEI Dongxiao, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir distribution of the Permian Qixia Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25(3):193-201.
[4] 申博恒, 沈树忠, 侯章帅, 等. 中国二叠纪岩石地层划分和对比[J].地层学杂志, 2021, 45(3):319-339. SHEN Boheng, SHEN Shuzhong, HOU Zhangshuai, et al. Permian lithostratigraphic subdivision and correlation of China[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2021, 45(3):319-339.
[5] 张健, 周刚, 张光荣, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统天然气地质特征与勘探方向[J].天然气工业, 2018, 38(1):10-20. ZHANG Jian, ZHOU Gang, ZHANG Guangrong, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration orientation of Mid-Permian natural gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(1):10-20.
[6] 芦飞凡, 谭秀成, 王利超, 等. 川中地区中二叠统栖霞组滩控岩溶型白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(2):456-469. LU Feifan, TAN Xiucheng, WANG Lichao, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of dolomite reservoirs within shoalcontrolled Karst in the Middle Permian Qixia Formation, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(2):456-469.
[7] 许国明, 谢刚平, 隆轲, 等. 四川盆地西南部中二叠统沉积特征与勘探目标[J].天然气工业, 2015, 35(7):27-33. XU Guoming, XIE Gangping, LONG Ke, et al. Sedimentary features and exploration targets of Middle Permian reservoirs in the Southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(7):27-33.
[8] 陈宗清. 论四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组天然气勘探[J].天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(3):325-334. CHEN Zongqing. Discussion on gas exploration of Middle Permian Qixia Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009, 20(3):325-334.
[9] 白晓亮, 郗诚, 和源, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组层序地层特征及沉积演化模式[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2020, 44(6):33-42. BAI Xiaoliang, XI Cheng, HE Yuan, et al. Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and sedimentary evolution model of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2020, 44(6):33-42.
[10] 魏国齐, 杨威, 万怡平, 等. 扬子地块西北缘二叠系-中三叠统层序地层与沉积相展布[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(3):741-748. WEI Guoqi, YANG Wei, WAN Yiping, et al. Stratigraphic sequence and sedimentary facies distribution of the Permian-Middle Triassic in the northwestern margin of the Yangtze block[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(3):741-748.
[11] 胡明毅, 魏国齐, 胡忠贵, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组层序- 岩相古地理[J].古地理学报, 2010, 12(5):515-526. HU Mingyi, WEI Guoqi, HU Zhonggui, et al. Sequence-lithofacies palaeogeography of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2010, 12(5):515-526.
[12] 厚刚福, 周进高, 谷明峰, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组、茅口组岩相古地理及勘探方向[J]. 海相油气地质, 2017, 22(1):25-31. HOU Gangfu, ZHOU Jingao, GU Mingfeng, et al. Lithofacies paleogeography and exploration realms of Middle Permian Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2017, 22(1):25-31.
[13] 黎荣, 胡明毅, 杨威, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统沉积相模式及有利储集体分布[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2):369-379. LI Rong, HU Mingyi, YANG Wei, et al. Sedimentary facies model and favorable reservoir distribution of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2):369-379.
[14] 田景春, 林小兵, 张翔, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组滩相白云岩多重成因机理及叠加效应[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(3):679-686. TIAN Jingchun, LIN Xiaobing, ZHANG Xiang, et al. The genetic mechanism of shoal facies dolomite and its additive effect of Permian Qixia Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(3):679-686.
[15] 胡安平, 潘立银, 郝毅, 等. 四川盆地二叠系栖霞组、茅口组白云岩储层特征、成因和分布[J].海相油气地质, 2018, 23(2):39-52. HU Anping, PAN Liyin, HAO Yi, et al. Origin, characteristics and distribution of dolostone reservoir in Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2018, 23(2):39-52.
[16] 王海真, 池英柳, 赵宗举, 等. 四川盆地栖霞组岩溶储层及勘探选区[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(5):833-842. WANG Haizhen, CHI Yingliu, ZHAO Zongju, et al. Karst reservoirs developed in the Middle Permian Qixia Formation of Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(5):833-842.
[17] XIAO Di, CAO Jian, LUO Bing, et al. On the dolomite reservoirs formed by dissolution:Differential eogenetic versus hydrothermal in the lower Permian Sichuan Basin, southwestern China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2020, 104(7):1405-1438.
[18] 苏成鹏, 谭秀成, 王小芳, 等. 四川盆地东部中二叠统茅口组眼球状石灰岩储层特征及成因[J]. 海相油气地质, 2020, 25(1):55-62. SU Chengpeng, TAN Xiucheng, WANG Xiaofang, et al. Characteristics of eyeball-shaped limestone reservoir and its genesis of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in East Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25(1):55-62.
[19] 张亚, 陈双玲, 张晓丽, 等. 四川盆地茅口组岩溶古地貌刻画及油气勘探意义[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):44-55. ZHANG Ya, CHEN Shuangling, ZHANG Xiaoli, et al. Restoration of paleokarst geomorphology of Lower Permian Maokou Formation and its petroleum exploration implication in Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):44-55.
[20] 胡笙, 谭秀成, 罗冰, 等. 四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及地质意义[J].古地理学报, 2020, 22(6):1109-1126. HU Sheng, TAN Xiucheng, LUO Bing, et al. Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and geological significance of the Permian Qixia Stage in northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2020, 22(6):1109-1126.
[21] 杨帅, 陈安清, 张玺华, 等. 四川盆地二叠纪栖霞-茅口期古地理格局转换及勘探启示[J].沉积学报, 2021, 39(6):1466-1477. YANG Shuai, CHEN Anqing, ZHANG Xihua, et al. Paleogeographic transition of the Permian Chihsia-Maokou period in the Sichuan Basin and indications for oil-gas exploration[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(6):1466-1477.
[22] 黄涵宇, 何登发, 李英强, 等. 四川盆地及邻区二叠纪梁山- 栖霞组沉积盆地原型及其演化[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(4):1317-1337. HUANG Hanyu, HE Dengfa, LI Yingqiang, et al. The prototype and its evolution of the Sichuan sedimentary basin andadjacent areas during Liangshan and Qixia stages in Permian[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(4):1317-1337.
[23] 张本健.川西北部地区中二叠统栖霞组砂糖状白云岩储层特征及成因机制[D].成都:西南石油大学, 2019. ZHANG Benjian. The origin and reservoir characteristics of Middle Permian chihsia sucrosic dolomite in the Northwestern Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2019.
[24] 陈思聪. 川中南部二叠系栖霞组层序及沉积特征研究[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2016. CHEN Sicong. The study of sedimentary and sequence stratigraphy characteristics for Permian Qixia Formation of the Midsouth Part of Sichuan province[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2016.
[25] 周进高, 姚根顺, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地栖霞组-茅口组岩相古地理与天然气有利勘探区带[J].天然气工业, 2016, 36(4):8-15. ZHOU Jingao, YAO Genshun, YANG Guang, et al. Lithofacies palaeogeography and favorable gas exploration zones of Qixia and Maokou Fms in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(4):8-15.
[26] 苏旺, 陈志勇, 汪泽成, 等. 川西地区中二叠统栖霞组沉积特征[J].东北石油大学学报, 2016, 40(3):41-50. SU Wang, CHEN Zhiyong, WANG Zecheng, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the western Sichuan area[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2016, 40(3):41-50.
[27] 关新, 陈世加, 苏旺, 等. 四川盆地西北部栖霞组碳酸盐岩储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):67-76. GUAN Xin, CHEN Shijia, SU Wang, et al. Carbonate reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in NW Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):67-76.
[28] 张运波. 四川盆地中二叠统层序地层及沉积模式[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2011. ZHANG Yunbo. Sequence stratigraphy and Depositional models of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2011.
[29] 吴联钱, 胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统层序地层学研究[J].石油地质与工程, 2010, 24(6):10-13. WU Lianqian, HU Mingyi, HU Zhonggui, et al. Study on the Middle Permian sequence stratigraphy of Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2010, 24(6):10-13.
[30] VAIL P R, AUDEMARD F, BOWMAN S A. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustasy and sedimentology:An overview[M]?EISELE G, RIEKEN W, SEILACHER A. Cycles and events in stratigraphy. Berlin:Springer, 1991:617-659.
[31] 曾德铭, 石新, 王兴志, 等. 川西北地区下二叠统栖霞组滩相储层特征及其分布[J].天然气工业, 2010, 30(12):25-28. ZENG Deming, SHI Xin, WANG Xingzhi, et al. Features and distribution of shoal facies reservoirs in the Lower Permian Qixia Formation, northwest Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(12):25-28.
[32] 梁宁, 郑荣才, 邓吉刚, 等. 川西北地区中二叠统栖霞组沉积相与缓斜坡模式[J].岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(6):58-67. LIANG Ning, ZHENG Rongcai, DENG Jigang, et al. Sedimentary facies and gentle slope model of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(6):58-67.
[33] LU Feifan, TAN Xiucheng, ZHONG Yuan, et al. Origin of the penecontemporaneous sucrosic dolomite in the Permian Qixia Formation, northwestern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6):1218-1234.
[34] 李明隆, 谭秀成, 罗冰, 等. 四川盆地西北部中二叠统栖霞组相控早期高频暴露岩溶特征及启示[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3):66-82. LI Minglong, TAN Xiucheng, LUO Bing, et al. Characteristics of facies-controlled and early high-frequency exposed karstification in the Qixia Formation of Middle Permian in the northwest of Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3):66-82.
[35] 全子婷, 谭秀成, 张本健, 等. 川西北下二叠统栖霞组微生物丘的发现及地质意义[J].古地理学报, 2021, 23(6):1110-1124. QUAN Ziting, TAN Xiucheng, ZHANG Benjian, et al. Discovery of microbial mounds of the Lower Permian Qixia Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin and its geological significance[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2021, 23(6):1110-1124.
[36] 刘治成, 杨巍, 王炜, 等. 四川盆地中二叠世栖霞期微生物丘及其对沉积环境的启示[J].中国地质, 2015, 42(4):1009-1023. LIU Zhicheng, YANG Wei, WANG Wei, et al. The microbial mud mound of the Middle Permian Qixia period in Sichuan Basin and its indication significance to sedimentary environment[J]. Geology in China, 2015, 42(4):1009-1023.
[37] 江文剑, 侯明才, 邢凤存, 等. 川东南地区娄山关群白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):44-51. JIANG Wenjian, HOU Mingcai, XING Fengcun, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of dolomite reservoirs of Cambrian Loushanguan Group in the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):44-51.
[38] 吴丰, 习研平, 张亚, 等. 川东-川南地区茅口组岩溶储层分类识别及有效性评价[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2):90-99. WU Feng, XI Yanping, ZHANG Ya, et al. Classification and effectiveness evaluation of karst reservoirs of Maokou Formation in eastern and southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(2):90-99.
[1] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[2] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[3] 闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[4] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[5] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[6] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[7] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[8] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[9] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[10] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[11] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[12] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[13] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[14] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[15] 邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .