岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 101–117.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220609

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    

鄂尔多斯盆地东南部二叠系山2—盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素

米伟伟1, 谢小飞1, 曹红霞1, 马强1, 杜永慧1, 张琼2, 邓长生1, 宋珈萱1   

  1. 1. 陕西延长石油集团研究院, 西安 710065;
    2. 陕西延长石油集团油气勘探公司采气一厂, 陕西 延安 716005
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-15 修回日期:2022-05-07 发布日期:2022-11-09
  • 作者简介:米伟伟(1987-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事沉积、储层、烃源岩评价等方面的研究工作。地址:(710065)陕西省西安市雁塔区唐延路61号。Email:miwei622826@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发计划项目“致密气藏产水气井产量优化技术研究”（编号： 2021GY-167）、陕西延长石油（集团）有限责任公司“揭榜挂帅”项目“延气2井区提高采收率关键开发技术研究”（编号： ycsy2021jbgs-A-05）和陕西延长石油（集团）有限责任公司研究院科研项目“延安气田西南部上石炭统本溪组沉积规律与控砂机理研究”（编号： ycsy2022jcts-B-21）联合资助

Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoirs of Permian Shan 2 to He 8 members in southeastern Ordos Basin

MI Weiwei1, XIE Xiaofei1, CAO Hongxia1, MA Qiang1, DU Yonghui1, ZHANG Qiong2, DENG Changsheng1, SONG Jiaxuan1   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum(Group)Co., Ltd., Xi' an 710065, China;
    2. No. 1 Gas Production Plant, Shaanxi Yanchang Oil and Gas Exploration Company, Yan' an 716005, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2021-11-15 Revised:2022-05-07 Published:2022-11-09

PDF (PC)

175

摘要： 利用铸体薄片、岩心物性、扫描电镜、恒速压汞等分析测试资料，对鄂尔多斯盆地东南部二叠系山2—盒8段致密砂岩储集层的微观孔喉特征进行了定性、定量评价，并分析了砂岩储层致密化的主要成因。研究结果表明：①鄂尔多斯盆地东南部二叠系山2—盒8段砂岩储层主要以石英砂岩、岩屑石英砂岩、岩屑砂岩为主，孔隙类型主要为残余粒间孔、（颗粒、胶结物）溶孔、自生黏土矿物晶间孔和少量微裂缝。②研究区不同渗透率级别砂岩孔隙半径相差不大，而喉道半径差异明显；随着渗透率增大，致密砂岩喉道半径分布范围变宽，粗喉道所占比例增大，表明渗透率主要受控于相对含量较低的大喉道数量。③研究区砂岩孔隙结构的非均质性受沉积微相控制，三角洲前缘水下分流河道砂体的物性最好，远沙坝、三角洲前缘席状砂等物性较差。④成岩作用是研究区目的层段储集层微观孔隙结构复杂化的主控因素，长期持续的埋藏压实作用造成了颗粒接触紧密，部分在压溶作用下转变为线状—凹凸接触，致使孔喉大量减少；而多期石英次生加大、不同类型的黏土矿物和碳酸盐胶结物充填堵塞孔喉，进一步加剧了渗透率的降低和储集层的致密化。

关键词: 致密砂岩, 恒速压汞, 微观孔喉结构, 水下分流河道, 山2—盒8段, 二叠系, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Based on the analysis and test data of casting thin section， core physical properties， scanning electron microscope，constant-rate mercury intrusion， the micro pore and throat characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs of Permian Shan 2 to He 8 members in southeastern Ordos Basin were quantitatively and quantitatively evaluated， and the main reasons for the densification of sandstone reservoirs were analyzed. The results show that： （1）The sandstone reservoirs of Permian Shan 2 to He 8 members in southeastern Ordos Basin are mainly composed of quartz sandstone，lithic quartz sandstone and lithic sandstone. The reservoir pores mainly include residual intergranular pores，（particles， cements），dissolved pores， authigenic clay-mineral intercrystalline pores and a small number of microcracks.（2）The pore radius of sandstone with different permeability has little difference， but the throat radius is obviously different. With the increase of permeability， the distribution range of the throat radius becomes wider，and the proportion of the large throat increases， indicating that the permeability is mainly controlled by a relatively small number of large throats.（3）The heterogeneity of the pore structure of the sandstone in the study area is controlled by sedimentary microfacies. The underwater distributary channel sand bodies of delta front have the best physical properties， while distal bar and delta front sheet sand have poor physical properties.（4）Diagenesis is the main controlling factor for the complexity of the microscopic pore structure of the reservoirs in the study area. Long-term continuous burial and compaction resulted in close contact of particles， and part of them were transformed into linear-concave-convex contact under pressure solution，resulting in a large reduction of pore throats. Multi-phase quartz secondary enlargement，and the filling of pores with different types of clay minerals and carbonate cements，further aggravated the decrease in permeability and the densification of the reservoir.

Key words: tight sandstone, constant-rate mercury intrusion, micro pore and throat structure, underwater distributary channel, Shan 2 to He 8 members, Permian, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 刘晓鹏, 赵会涛, 闫小雄, 等.克拉通盆地致密气成藏地质特征与勘探目标优选:以鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3):331-343. LIU Xiaopeng, ZHAO Huitao, YAN Xiaoxiong, et al. The geological characteristics of tight sandstone gas and exploration target evaluation in the craton basin:Case study of the Upper Palaeozoic of Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(3):331-343.
[2] 王永骁, 付斯一, 张成弓, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部山西组2 段致密砂岩储层特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):12-20. WANG Yongxiao, FU Siyi, ZHANG Chenggong, et al. Characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs of the second member of Shanxi Formation in eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):12-20.
[3] 齐荣, 何发岐, 王付斌, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部长探1井上古生界勘探突破及意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(3):68-78. QI Rong, HE Faqi, WANG Fubin, et al. Exploration breakthrough of Upper Paleozoic of well Changtan 1 in southern Ordos Basin and its significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(3):68-78.
[4] 王香增, 乔向阳, 张磊, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部致密砂岩气勘探开发关键技术创新及规模实践[J].天然气工业, 2022, 42(1):102-113. WANG Xiangzeng, QIAO Xiangyang, ZHANG Lei, et al. Innovation and scale practice of key technologies for the exploration and development of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Yan' an gas field of southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(1):102-113.
[5] 周进松, 乔向阳, 王若谷, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地延安气田山西组致密砂岩气有效储层发育模式[J].天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(2):195-206. ZHOU Jinsong, QIAO Xiangyang, WANG Ruogu, et al. Effective reservoir development model of tight sandstone gas in Shanxi Formation of Yan' an gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(2):195-206.
[6] 杨华, 刘显阳, 张才利, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组低渗透岩性油藏主控因素及其分布规律[J].岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3):1-6. YANG Hua, LIU Xianyang, ZHANG Caili, et al. The main controlling factors and distribution of low permeability lithologic reservoirs of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3):1-6.
[7] 赵靖舟, 付金华, 曹青, 等. 致密油气成藏理论与评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2017. ZHAO Jingzhou, FU Jinhua, CAO Qing, et al. Accumulation theory andevaluation technology of tight oil and gas[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2017.
[8] 姚泾利, 邓秀芹, 赵彦德, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密油特征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(2):150-158. YAO Jingli, DENG Xiuqin, ZHAO Yande, et al. Characteristics of tight oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(2):150-158.
[9] 王猛, 曾明, 陈鸿傲, 等.储层致密化影响因素分析与有利成岩相带预测:以马岭油田长8 油层组砂岩储层为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):59-70. WANG Meng, ZENG Ming, CHEN Hong' ao, et al. Influencing factors of tight reservoirs and favorable diagenetic facies:A case study of Chang 8 reservoir of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Maling Oilfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):59-70.
[10] 王维斌, 朱静, 马文忠, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地周家湾地区长8 致密砂岩储层特征及影响因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):51-58. WANG Weibin, ZHU Jing, MA Wenzhong, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of Chang 8 tight sandstone reservoir of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Zhoujiawan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):51-58.
[11] 肖晖, 王浩男, 杨引弟, 等.致密砂岩孔隙演化特征及其成岩作用对储层质量的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地马岭南延长组长8 储层为例[J].石油实验地质, 2019, 41(6):800-811. XIAO Hui, WANG Haonan, YANG Yindi, et al. Influence of diagenetic evolution on tight sandstone reservoir flow capacity:Chang 8 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in southern Maling, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(6):800-811.
[12] 张玉晔, 高建武, 赵靖舟, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部长6 油层组致密砂岩成岩作用及其孔隙度定量恢复[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):29-38. ZHANG Yuye, GAO Jianwu, ZHAO Jingzhou, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Chang 6 tight sandstone reservoir in southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):29-38.
[13] 王香增, 张丽霞, 于波, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长油气区山西组山 2段储层砂岩成岩作用[J]. 地质科技情报, 2013, 32(1):114-119. WANG Xiangzeng, ZHANG Lixia, YU Bo, et al. Diagenesis of Shan-2 member of Shanxi Formation in Yanchang oil-gas field in Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(1):114-119.
[14] 陈灼华, 向芳, 王誉婉, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界储集砂岩的成岩作用[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 44(6):718-726. CHEN Zhuohua, XIANG Fang, WANG Yuwan, et al. The diagenesis of Upper Paleozoic reservoir sandstones in the southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 44(6):718-726.
[15] 肖子亢, 刘宝平, 高小平, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素分析[J].科技通报, 2017, 33(8):48-56. XIAO Zihang, LIU Baoping, GAO Xiaoping, et al. Analyses on characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir on the Upper Paleozoic in southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2017, 33(8):48-56.
[16] 尚婷, 曹红霞, 郭艳琴, 等.致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征及物性影响因素分析:以延长探区上古生界山西组为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 47(6):877-882. SHANG Ting, CAO Hongxia, GUO Yanqin, et al. Microscopic pore structure characteristics and its effects on reservoir quality:A case study from Shanxi Formation of Upper Paleozoic in Yanchang exploration area in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 47(6):877-882.
[17] 郭英海, 刘焕杰.陕甘宁地区晚古生代沉积体系[J].古地理学报, 2000, 2(1):19-30. GUO Yinghai, LIU Huanjie. Late Paleozoic sedimentary system in Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia area[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2000, 2(1):19-30.
[18] 陈全红.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界沉积体系及油气富集规律研究[D].西安:西北大学, 2007. CHEN Quanhong. Research on sedimentary systems and hydrocarbons enrichment of the Upper Palaeozoic of the Ordos Basin[D]. Xi' an:Northwest University, 2007.
[19] 王若谷, 李文厚, 廖友运, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地子洲气田上古生界山西组、下石盒子组储集层特征对比研究[J]. 地质科学, 2015, 50(1):249-261. WANG Ruogu, LI Wenhou, LIAO Youyun, et al. Study on the characteristics of the Upper Paleozoic Shanxi and Xiashihezi Formation in Zizhou gas field, Ordos Basin[J].Chinese Journal of Geology, 2015, 50(1):249-261.
[20] 王香增, 任来义.鄂尔多斯盆地延长探区油气勘探理论与实践进展[J].石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊1):79-86. WANG Xiangzeng, REN Laiyi. Advances in theory and practice of hydrocarbon exploration in Yanchang exploration in Yanchang area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(Suppl 1):79-86.
[21] 屈红军, 马强, 高胜利, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部二叠系物源分析[J].地质学报, 2011, 85(6):979-986. QU Hongjun, MA Qiang, GAO Shengli, et al. On Provenance of the Permian in the southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2011, 85(6):979-986.
[22] 赵谦平, 王若谷, 高飞, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长探区上古生界物源分析[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 45(6):933-941. ZHAO Qianping, WANG Ruogu, GAO Fei, et al. Provenance analysis of Upper Paleozoic in Yanchang blocks, the southeast Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 45(6):933-941.
[23] 王香增, 王念喜, 于兴河, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界沉积储层与天然气富集规律[M].北京:科学出版社, 2017:59-79. WANG Xiangzeng, WANG Nianxi, YU Xinghe, et al. Sedimentary reservoir and natural gas enrichment law on Upper Paleozoic in southeastern of Ordos Basin[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2017:59-79.
[24] 韩宗元, 苗建宇, 许威, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地子洲-清涧地区上古生界山23段储层砂岩成岩作用[J].地质科技情报, 2008, 27(2):49-55. HAN Zongyuan, MIAO Jianyu, XU Wei, et al. Diagenesis of sandstones reservoir in the Upper Paleozoic Shan23 of ZizhouQingjian area, Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2008, 27(2):49-55.
[25] 王瑞飞, 沈平平, 宋子齐, 等.特低渗透砂岩油藏储层微观孔喉特征[J].石油学报2009, 30(4):560-563. WANG Ruifei, SHEN Pingping, SONG Ziqi, et al. Characteristics of micro-pore throat in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4):560-563.
[26] 高辉, 朱耿博仑, 王泫懿, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密砂岩储层微观孔喉特征差异及其成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2):302-311. GAO Hui, ZHUGENG Bolun, WANG Xuanyi, et al. Difference and origin of micro -pore throat characteristics for tight sandstone reservoir of Yangchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2):302-311.
[27] 赖锦, 王贵文, 罗官幸, 等.基于岩石物理相约束的致密砂岩气储层渗透率解释建模[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(3):1173-1182. LAI Jin, WANG Guiwen, LUO Guanxing, et al. A fine logging interpretation model of permeability confined by petrophysical facies of tight gas sandstone reservoirs[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(3):1173-1182.
[28] 刘翰林, 杨友运, 王凤琴, 等.致密砂岩储集层微观结构特征及成因分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长6 段和长8 段为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(2):223-234. LIU Hanlin, YANG Youyun, WANG Fengqin, et al. Micro pore and throat characteristics and origin of tight sandstone reservoirs:A case study of the Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 members in Longdong area, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(2):223-234.
[29] 彭军, 韩浩东, 夏青松, 等.深埋藏致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构的分形表征及成因机理:以塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区柯坪塔格组为例[J].石油学报, 2018, 39(7):775-791. PENG Jun, HAN Haodong, XIA Qingsong, et al. Fractal characterization and genetic mechanism of micro-pore structure in deeply buried tight sandstone reservoirs:A case study of Kalpintag Formation in Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(7):775-791.
[30] 赵晨帆, 于兴河, 付超, 等.曲流河三角洲-辫状河三角洲控制因素及演化过程探讨[J].沉积学报, 2019, 37(4):768-784. ZHAO Chenfan, YU Xinghe, FU Chao, et al. Control factors and evolution progress of depositional system transition from meandering river delta to braided river delta[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(4):768-784.
[31] 李亚龙, 于兴河, 周进松, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部山2 段物源与曲流河三角洲沉积体系[J].沉积学报, 2017, 35(3):540-551. LI Yalong, YU Xinghe, ZHOU Jinsong, et al. The study on provenance and meandering river system of Shan 2 member in southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(3):540-551.
[32] 肖建新, 孙粉锦, 何乃祥, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系山西组及下石盒子组盒8 段南北物源沉积汇水区与古地理[J].古地理学报, 2008, 10(4):341-354. XIAO Jianxin, SUN Fenjin, HE Naixiang, et al. Permian Shanxi Formation and member 8 of Xiashihezi Formation in Ordos Basin:Palaeogeography and catchment area for sediments derived from north and south provenances[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2008, 10(4):341-354.
[33] 杨勇, 黄有根, 冯炎松, 等.致密砂岩填隙物特征及其对储层的影响[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(5):1-8. YANG Yong, HUANG Yougen, FENG Yansong, et al. Characteristics of interstitial material in tight standstone and its effects on reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 37(5):1-8.
[34] 郑浚茂, 吴仁龙.黄花坳陷砂岩储层的成岩作用与孔隙分带性[J].石油与天然气地质, 1996, 17(4):268-275. ZHENG Junmao, WU Renlong. Diagenesis and pore zonation of sandstone reservoirs in Huanghua Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1996, 17(4):268-275.
[35] 王华超, 韩登临, 欧阳传湘, 等.库车凹陷北部阿合组致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):115-123. WANG Huachao, HAN Denglin, OUYANG Chuanxiang, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):115-123.
[36] 赖锦, 王贵文, 柴毓, 等.致密砂岩储层孔隙结构成因机理分析及定量评价:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8 油层组为例[J].地质学报:2014, 88(11):2119-2130. LAI Jin, WANG Guiwen, CHAI Yu, et al. Mechanism analysis and quantitative assessment of pore structure for tight sandstone reservoirs:An example from Chang 8 oil layer in Jiyuan area of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(11):2119-2130.
[37] 李艳霞, 张华, 田毓峰.煤系烃源岩与石英次生加大边的形成机理探讨:以鄂尔多斯盆地东部山西组为例[J].地质科技情报, 2015, 34(6):66-69. LI Yanxia, ZHANG Hua, TIAN Yufeng. Formation mechanism of coal source rocks and quartz overgrowths:An example of Shanxi Formation in Eastern Ordos Basin[J].Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(6):66-69.
[38] 王昌勇, 王成玉, 梁小伟, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区上三叠统延长组长8 油层组成岩相[J].石油学报, 2011, 32(4):596-604. WANG Changyong, WANG Chengyu, LIANG Xiaowei, et al. Diagenetic facies of the Chang 8 oil-bearing layer of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(4):596-604.
[39] 李阳, 李树同, 牟炜卫, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬源地区长6 段致密砂岩中黏土矿物对储层物性的影响[J].天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7):1043-1053. LI Yang, LI Shutong, MOU Weiwei, et al. Influences of clay minerals on physical properties of Chang 6 tight sandstone reservoir in Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(7):1043-1053.
[40] 王琪, 郝乐伟, 陈国俊, 等.白云凹陷珠海组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物的形成机理[J].石油学报, 2010, 31(4):553-565. WANG Qi, HAO Lewei, CHEN Guojun, et al. Forming mechanism of carbonate cements in siliciastic sandstone of Zhuhai Formation in Baiyun Sag[J]. Acta petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(4):553-565.
[41] 邹明亮, 黄思静, 胡作维, 等.西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1):47-52. ZOU Mingliang, HUANG Sijing, HU Zuowei, et al. The origin of carbonate and the influence on reservoir quality of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1):47-52.
[42] 姚泾利, 王琪, 张端, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地中部延长组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物成因与分布规律研究[J].天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(6):943-950. YAO Jingli, WANG Qi, ZHANG Rui, et al. Origin and spatial distribution of carbonate cements in Yangchang Fm.(Triassic) sandstones within the lacustrine center of Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(6):943-950.
[1] 李凌, 张照坤, 李明隆, 倪佳, 耿超, 唐思哲, 杨文杰, 谭秀成. 四川盆地威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 32-46.
[2] 文志刚, 罗雨舒, 刘江艳, 赵春雨, 李士祥, 田伟超, 樊云鹏, 高和婷. 陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 47-59.
[3] 魏新, 唐建云, 宋红霞, 陈玉宝. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区上古生界烃源岩地球化学特征及生烃潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 92-100.
[4] 张凤奇, 李宜浓, 罗菊兰, 任小锋, 张兰馨, 张芥瑜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西部奥陶系乌拉力克组页岩微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 50-62.
[5] 杨帆, 卞保力, 刘慧颖, 姚宗全, 尤新才, 刘海磊, 卫延召. 玛湖凹陷二叠系夏子街组限制性湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 63-72.
[6] 罗锦昌, 田继军, 马静辉, 闫嘉启, 梁雅菲, 胡卓浩. 吉木萨尔凹陷吉页1井区二叠系芦草沟组沉积环境及有机质富集机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 73-85.
[7] 苏亦晴, 杨威, 金惠, 王志宏, 崔俊峰, 朱秋影, 武雪琼, 白壮壮. 川西北地区三叠系须家河组深层储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 86-99.
[8] 何文渊, 云建兵, 钟建华. 川东北二叠系长兴组碳酸盐岩云化成储机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 1-25.
[9] 吕正祥, 廖哲渊, 李岳峰, 宋修章, 李响, 何文军, 黄立良, 卿元华. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖云质岩储层成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 26-37.
[10] 张岩, 侯连华, 崔景伟, 罗霞, 林森虎, 张紫芸. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7富有机质段岩石热膨胀系数随温度演化特征及启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 32-41.
[11] 阴钰毅, 姚志纯, 郭小波, 王乐立, 陈思谦, 余小雷, 岑向阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘二叠系隐伏构造特征及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 79-88.
[12] 张记刚, 杜猛, 陈超, 秦明, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 丁振华, 向勇. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 89-102.
[13] 白雨, 汪飞, 牛志杰, 金开来, 李沛毅, 许多年, 陈刚强. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩生烃动力学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 116-127.
[14] 柳忠泉, 曾治平, 田继军, 李艳丽, 李万安, 张文文, 张治恒. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组“甜点”成因与分布预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 15-28.
[15] 雷海艳, 郭佩, 孟颖, 齐婧, 刘金, 张娟, 刘淼, 郑雨. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 142-153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发