岩性油气藏 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 14–20.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.01.002

• 专家论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷油气成藏模式及其主控因素

付 广,吴 伟   

  1. 东北石油大学 地球科学学院,黑龙江 大庆 163318
  • 出版日期:2015-02-03 发布日期:2015-02-03
  • 作者简介:付广( 1962- ),男,博士,教授,主要从事油气藏形成与保存方面的教学与科研工作。 地址:( 163318 )黑龙江省大庆市高新技术开发区发展路 199 号东北石油大学地球科学学院。 电话:( 0459 ) 6504024 。 E-mail : fuguang2008@126.com 。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目"油源断裂转换带优势输导运移油气条件研究"(编号: 41372153 )资助

Oil-gas accumulation models and their main controlling factors in Wuerxun-Beier Depression

FU Guang, WU Wei   

  1. College of Earth Sciences , Northeast Petroleum University , Daqing 163318 , Heilongjiang , China
  • Online:2015-02-03 Published:2015-02-03

摘要: 在油气藏类型及分布特征研究的基础上,通过油气分布与成藏条件空间配置关系分析,对乌尔逊-贝尔凹陷油气成藏模式及其主控因素进行了研究。 结果表明:乌尔逊-贝尔凹陷主要存在 4 种油气成藏模式: ① 源内断层圈闭油气成藏模式,主要分布于次凹南一段地层中,油气成藏主控因素为南一段烃源岩内发育扇三角洲前缘砂体; ② 源外侧断层圈闭油气成藏模式,主要分布于斜坡带上南屯组地层中,油气成藏主控因素为发育连接斜坡带上的断层圈闭与次凹南一段烃源岩的砂体输导体系; ③ 源外侧基岩裂缝圈闭油气成藏模式,主要分布于与次凹南一段油源区侧接的古潜山基岩中,油气成藏主控因素为发育与次凹油源区侧接的基岩潜山; ④ 源上断层圈闭油气成藏模式,主要分布于次凹南一段油源区之上的大磨拐河组和部分南二段地层中,油气成藏主控因素为次凹南一段油源区长期发育与大磨拐河组及部分南二段地层连接的断裂。

关键词: 芦草沟组, 致密油, 覆压孔隙度, 覆压渗透率, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: Based on the research of reservoir types and their distribution characteristics, oil-gas accumulation models and their main controlling factors in Wuerxun-Beier Depression were studied by analyzing the space allocation relation between oil-gas distribution and their accumulation conditions. The result shows that there are four kinds of oil-gas accumulation models in Wuerxun-Beier Depression: ①oil-gas accumulation model of fault trap in source area,mainly distributed in K1n1 of subdepression, and the main controlling factor of oil-gas accumulation is the development of fan delta front sand bodies K1n1 of the source area in subdepression; ②oil-gas accumulation model of fault trap out of source area,mainly distributed in K1n1of slope belt, and the main controlling factor of oil-gas accumulation is the development of sandstone pathway system connecting fault traps in slope belt and K1n1 source area in subdepression; ③oil gas accumulation model of bedrock cracks trap out of source area,mainly distributed in bedrock of paleo-buried hill flanking with K1n1 oil sources, and the main controlling factor of oil-gas accumulation is the development of bedrock of buried hill flanking with subdepression; ④oil-gas accumulation model of fault trap above source area,mainly distributed in K1d and part of K1n2 above K1n1 source area in subdepression, and the main controlling factor of oil-gas accumulation is the development of long-term development fault connecting fault traps in K1d and part of K1n2 with underlying K1n1 source area in subdepression.

Key words:  Lucaogou Formation, tight oil , overburden pressure porosity, overburden pressure permeability , Junggar Basin

[1]平贵东,吕延防,范立民,等.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷油气富集规律及主控因素分析[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,44(10):4167-4178.

Ping Guidong,Lü Yanfang,Fan Limin,et al. Rules and main controlling factors of hydrocarbon enrichment of Urxun-Beier Depression, Hailar basin[J]. Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2013,44(10):4167-4178.

[2]付广,李海丽.贝尔凹陷油藏形成过程及油富集的主控因素[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2012,43(12):4850-4858.

Fu Guang,Li Haili. Forming procession of oil and gas reservoirs and main controlling factors of oil accumulation in Beier Depression [J]. Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2012,43(12):4850-4858. 


[3]孙永河,韩钰萍,冯志鹏,等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷断裂系统及其对油气运聚的控制作用[J].地质论评,2011,57(1):89-100.

Sun Yonghe,Han Yuping,Feng Zhipeng,et al. Fault systems and its control on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in Beier Sag, Hailar basin[J]. Geological Review,2011,57(1):89-100.

[4]张君龙,蒙启安,漆家福.断陷盆地多期构造变形特征与油气聚集———以海拉尔—塔木察格盆地南贝尔凹陷为例[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(4):368-375.

Zhang Junlong,Meng Qi’an,Qi Jiafu. Multi-stage structural deformation features and hydrocarbon accumulation in faulted basin:A case study in Nanbeier Sag of Hailar-Tamtsag basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2012,34(4):368-375.

[5]李占东,李阳,张海翔,等.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷大磨拐河组油气成藏条件[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(5):480-487.

Li Zhandong,Li Yang,Zhang Haixiang,et al. Petroleum accumulation conditions of Damoguaihe Formation in Urxun-Beier Sags,Hailaer basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2011,33(5):480-487.

[6]魏建设,庞雄奇,卢进才,等.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷油气成藏条件及有利勘探区预测[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2008,23(4):19-25.

Wei Jianshe,Pang Xiongqi,Lu Jincai,et al. Study on oil and gas reservoir formation conditions of Wuerxun-Beier sags in Hailaer basin and prediction of the favorable exploration areas in the sags [J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Natural Science Edition, 2008,23(4):19-25.

[7]张海军.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷油气分布规律及主控因素研究[J].中国石油勘探,2012,17(2):8-11.

Zhang Haijun. Study on hydrocarbon distribution and control factors of Beier Sag in Hailar basin [J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2012,17(2):8-11.

[8]杜春国,付广.乌尔逊凹陷南二段油气成藏与分布主控因素[J].天然气工业,2007,27(10):24-27.

Du Chunguo,Fu Guang. Main factors controlling hydrocarbon accumulation and distribution in the second member of Nantun Formation,Wuerxun Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2007, 27(10):24-27.

[9]付广,康德江.贝尔凹陷布达特群潜山油气成藏模式及有利区预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34 (2):165-169.

Fu Guang,Kang Dejiang. Hydrocarbon accumulating model and forecasting of favorable prospecting areas in buried hill of Budate Group,Beier Sag [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(2):165-169.

[10]付广,孟庆芬,徐琴.乌尔逊凹陷南二段油气成藏与分布主控因素及有利区预测[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2004,34(3):377-382.Fu Guang,Meng Qingfen,Xu Qin. Main factors controlling oil or gas accumulation and distribution and forecasting for favorable exploration areas of K1n2 in Wuerxun Depression [J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2004,34(3):377-382.

[11]康德江,庞雄奇,付广,等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷潜山油气成藏特征[J].天然气工业,2008,28(9):28-31.

Kang Dejiang,Pang Xiongqi,Fu Guang,et al. Characteristics of hydrocarbon pooling in buried hill of Beier Sag in the Hailaer basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(9):28-31.

[12]付晓飞,董晶,吕延防,等.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷断裂构造特征及控藏机理[J]. 地质学报,2012,86(6):877-889.

Fu Xiaofei,Dong Jing,Lü Yanfang,et al. Fault structural characteristics of Wuerxun-Beier Depression in the Hailar basin and their reservoir-controlling mechanism[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2012, 86(6):877-889.

[13]李明刚,庞雄奇,马中振,等.乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷油气成藏主控因素分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(5):1-4.

Li Minggang,Pang Xiongqi,Ma Zhongzhen,et al. Analysis of dominant factors to hydrocarbon accumulation in Wuerxun-Beier Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2007,26(5):1-4.

[14]赵荣,于瑶函,姜文亚.贝尔凹陷源圈空间配置的输导通道与油成藏特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,2011,35(2):34-37.

Zhao Rong,Yu Yaohan,Jiang Wenya. Transporting pathways of space matching between source rocks and traps and oil accumulation feature in Beier Depression[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2011,35(2):34-37.

[15]魏建设,庞雄奇,卢进才,等.乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷油气分布规律及其主控因素[J].天然气工业,2008,28(9):24-27.

Wei Jianshe,Pang Xiongqi,Lu Jincai,et al. distribution patterns of oil and gas and their major controlling factors in Wuerxun and Beier Sags[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(9):24-27.

[16]揭异新,袁月琴,王斌.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷白垩系原油地球化学特征及油源对比[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):82-87.

Jie Yixin,Yuan Yueqin,Wang Bin. Geochemical characteristics of the Cretaceous oil and correlation of oil to source rock in Wuerxun and Beier Depression,the Hailaer basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2007,29(1):82-87.

[17]李明诚.石油与天然气运移[M].第 3 版.北京:石油工业出版社,2004:177-185.

Li Mingcheng. Migration of oil and gas[M]. 3rd Edition. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,2004:177-185 .

[18]雷裕红,罗晓容,张立宽,等.东营凹陷南斜坡东段沙河街组砂岩输导层连通性量化表征[J].石油学报,2013,34(4):692-700.

Lei Yuhong,Luo Xiaorong,Zhang Likuan,et al. Quantitative characterization of Shahejie Formation sandstone carrier connectivity of the eastern part of the south slope in Dongying sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(4):692-700.

[19]付广,牟敦山.贝尔凹陷油成藏要素空间匹配关系及对油成藏 的控制作用[J].沉积学报,2012,30(6):1149-1155.

Fu Guang,Mu Dunshan. Spatial matching relation of oil reservoir forming factors and its control effect on reservoir formation in Beir Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(6):1149-1155.

[1] 张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[2] 王付勇, 杨坤. 致密油藏孔喉分布特征对渗吸驱油规律的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 155-162.
[3] 郭秋麟, 吴晓智, 卫延召, 柳庄小雪, 刘继丰, 陈宁生. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系油气运移路径模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 37-45.
[4] 陈棡, 卞保力, 李啸, 刘刚, 龚德瑜, 曾德龙. 准噶尔盆地腹部中浅层油气输导体系及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 46-56.
[5] 陈静, 陈军, 李卉, 努尔艾力·扎曼. 准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系—三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 71-80.
[6] 余兴, 尤新才, 白雨, 李鹏, 朱涛. 玛湖凹陷南斜坡断裂识别及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 81-89.
[7] 关新, 潘树新, 曲永强, 许多年, 张寒, 马永平, 王国栋, 陈雪珍. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷滩坝砂的发现及油气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 90-98.
[8] 杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[9] 曹思佳, 孙增玖, 党虎强, 曹帅, 刘冬民, 胡少华. 致密油薄砂体储层预测技术及应用实效——以松辽盆地敖南区块下白垩统泉头组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[10] 李树博, 郭旭光, 郑孟林, 王泽胜, 刘新龙. 准噶尔盆地东部西泉地区石炭系火山岩岩性识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 258-266.
[11] 冯越, 黄志龙, 李天军, 张华, 李宏伟, 周亚东. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷七克台组二段致密油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 97-108.
[12] 蒋中发, 丁修建, 王忠泉, 赵辛楣. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩沉积古环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 109-119.
[13] 黄健玲, 傅强, 邱旭明, 赵世杰, 李林祥. 咸化断陷湖盆混积岩特征及沉积模式——以金湖凹陷阜二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 54-66.
[14] 胡潇, 曲永强, 胡素云, 潘建国, 尹路, 许多年, 滕团余, 王斌. 玛湖凹陷斜坡区浅层油气地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 67-77.
[15] 吴家洋, 吕正祥, 卿元华, 杨家静, 金涛. 致密油储层中自生绿泥石成因及其对物性的影响——以川中东北部沙溪庙组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 76-85.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[2] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[3] 李云,时志强. 四川盆地中部须家河组致密砂岩储层流体包裹体研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 27 -32 .
[4] 蒋韧,樊太亮,徐守礼. 地震地貌学概念与分析技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 33 -38 .
[5] 邹明亮,黄思静,胡作维,冯文立,刘昊年. 西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 47 -52 .
[6] 王冰洁,何生,倪军娥,方度. 板桥凹陷钱圈地区主干断裂活动性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 75 -82 .
[7] 陈振标,张超谟,张占松,令狐松,孙宝佃. 利用NMRT2谱分布研究储层岩石孔隙分形结构[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 105 -110 .
[8] 张厚福,徐兆辉. 从油气藏研究的历史论地层-岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 114 -123 .
[9] 张 霞. 勘探创造力的培养[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 16 -20 .
[10] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .