岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 151158.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190217
未志杰1,2, 康晓东1,2, 刘玉洋1,2, 曾杨1,2
WEI Zhijie1,2, KANG Xiaodong1,2, LIU Yuyang1,2, ZENG Yang1,2
摘要: 为准确表征煤层复杂的地质力学效应,根据多重孔隙介质力学特征和多过程运移特点,来构建煤层气藏三孔双渗全流固耦合数学模型,并基于所研发的全隐式有限体积数值模拟器,进一步研究地质力学效应对孔渗参数和煤层气产能的影响。结果表明,有效应力效应与基质收缩作用均可影响裂缝渗透率,且作用方向相反:有效应力效应的作用强度在开发初期大于基质收缩作用,但在后期发生逆转,导致渗透率先减小后增大,最终值甚至可达初始值的数倍;随着煤岩杨氏模量增大,有效应力效应减弱,煤层气日产量增大,产气高峰出现时机提前,随着Langmuir体应变量增大,基质收缩作用增强,同样煤层气日产量增大,产气高峰出现时机提前。全流固耦合数学模型能够更准确地刻画煤层复杂流固耦合作用,这对煤层气产能预测具有重要意义。
中图分类号:
[1] CLARKSON C R, PAN Z, PALMER I D, et al. Predicting sorption-induced strain and permeability increase with depletion for coalbed-methane reservoirs. SPE Journal, 2010, 15(1):152-159. [2] WEI Z J,ZHANG D X. A fully coupled multiphase multicomponent flow and geomechanics model for enhanced coalbedmethane recovery and CO2 storage. SPE Journal, 2013, 18(3):448-467. [3] 孙超群, 李术才, 李华銮, 等. 煤层气藏应力-渗流流固耦合模型及SPH求解. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2):305-312. SUN C Q, LI S C, LI H L, et al. Stress-seepage hydro-mechanical coupling model of coal-bed methane reservoir and its SPH analysis. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(2):305-312. [4] 倪冬, 王延斌, 韩文龙, 等. 沁水南部柿庄南区块3号煤层现今地应力特征及其与渗透率的关系研究. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 38(1):68-75. NI D, WANG Y B, HAN W L, et al. Characteristic of in-situ stress in No. 3 coal seams of southern Shizhuang block, southern Qinshui Basin,and its influence on permeability. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University(Natural Science), 2019, 38(1):68-75. [5] PEKOT L J, REEVES S R. Modeling the effects of matrix shrinkage and differential swelling on coalbed methane recovery and carbon sequestration. Proceedings of the 2003 International Coalbed Methane Symposium. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 2003. [6] PALMER I. Permeability changes in coal:Analytical modeling. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2009, 77(2):119-126. [7] SHI J Q,DURUCAN S. Exponential growth in San Juan Basin Fruitland coalbed permeability with reservoir drawdown:Model match and new insights. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2010, 13(6):914-925. [8] WARREN J E, ROOT P J. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE Journal, 1963, 3(3):245-255. [9] 李传亮, 朱苏阳, 彭朝阳, 等. 煤层气井突然产气机理分析. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):145-149. LI C L, ZHU S Y, PENG C Y, et al. Mechanism of gas production rate outburst in coalbed methane wells. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):145-149. [10] WARPINSKI N R, TEUFEL L W. Determination of the effective-stress law for permeability and deformation in low-permeability rocks. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1992, 7(2):123-131. [11] SHI J Q, DURUCAN S. A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane recovery. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2005, 8(4):291-299. [12] 张海茹,李昊. 煤层气峰值产量拟合及产量动态预测方法研究. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(4):116-118. ZHANG H R, LI H. Study on coalbed methane peak production fitting and production forecast by different dynamic analysis methods. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(4):116-118. [13] 吴雅琴, 邵国良, 徐耀辉, 等.煤层气开发地质单元划分及开发方式优化:以沁水盆地郑庄区块为例. 岩性油气藏, 2016,28(6):125-133. WU Y Q, SHAO G L, XU Y H, et al. Geological unit division and development model optimization of coalbed methane:a case study from Zhengzhuang block in Qinshui Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(6):125-133. [14] 高为, 金军, 易同生, 等. 黔北小林华矿区高阶煤层气藏特征及开采技术. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):140-147. GAO W, JIN J, YI T S, et al. Enrichment mechanism and mining technology of high rank coalbed methane in Xiaolinhua coal mine, northern Guizhou. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):140-147. [15] SAKAI H, KURIHARA M. Development of double-permeability type compositional simulator for predicting enhanced coalbed methane recovery. The 24th Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan, Chiba, 2018. [16] ZIMMERMAN R W. Coupling in poroelasticity and thermoelasticity. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2000, 37(2):79-87. [17] KLINKENBERG L J. The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases. API Drilling and Production Practices, 1941:200-213. [18] CHEN H Y, TEUFEL L W. Coupling fluid-flow and geomechanics in dual-porosity modeling of naturally fractured reservoirs-model description and comparison. SPE 59043, 2000. [19] CARMAN P C, MALHERBE P R. Routine measurement of surface of paint pigments and other fine powders. I. Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, 1950, 69(5):134-143. [20] HARPALANI S, CHEN G. Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1997, 15(4):303-325. [21] 李国庆, 孟召平, 王保玉. 高煤阶煤层气扩散-渗流机理及初期排采强度数值模拟. 煤炭学报, 2014, 39(9):1919-1926. LI G Q, MENG Z P, WANG B Y. Diffusion and seepage mechanisms of high rank coal-bed methane reservoir and its numerical simulation at early drainagerate. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(9):1919-1926. [22] 尹帅, 丁文龙, 高敏东. 樊庄北部3号煤层现今应力场分布数值模拟.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4):81-89. YIN S, DING W L, GAO M D. The in-situ stress field distribution numerical simulation of No.3 coal seam in the north of Fanzhuang CBM well blocks. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 39(4):81-89. [23] 张益, 沈磊, 田喜军, 等.考虑采动影响的煤层气储层数值模拟方法研究. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(6):61-65. ZHANG Y, SHEN L, TIAN X J, et al. Research on numerical simulation method of coal bed gas reservoir under mining condition. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 32(6):61-65. [24] 孙政, 李相方, 徐兵祥, 等.一种表征煤储层压力与流体饱和度关系的数学模型.中国科学:技术科学, 2018, 48(5):457-464. SUN Z, LI X F, XU B X, et al. A mathematic model for characterizing the relationship between coal reservoir pressure and fluid saturation. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2018, 48(5):457-464. [25] 颜志丰, 琚宜文, 唐书恒, 等. 沁水盆地南部煤层气储层压裂过程数值模拟研究. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(5):1734-1744. YAN Z F, JU Y W, TANG S H, et al. Numerical simulation study of fracturing process in coalbed methane reservoir in southern Qinshui Basin. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(5):1734-1744. [26] 杨新乐, 任常在, 张永利, 等.低渗透煤层气注热开采热-流-固耦合数学模型及数值模拟. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(6):1044-1049. YANG X L, REN C Z, ZHANG Y L, et al. Numerical simulation of the coupled thermal-fluid-solid mathematical models during extracting methane in low-permeability coal bed by heat injection. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(6):1044-1049. [27] 吴金涛, 侯健, 陆雪皎, 等. 注气驱替煤层气数值模拟. 计算物理, 2014, 31(6):681-689. WU J T, HOU J, LU X J, et al. Numerical simulation of coalbed methane displacement with gas injection. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 31(6):681-689. [28] 范超军, 李胜, 罗明坤, 等. 基于流-固-热耦合的深部煤层气抽采数值模拟. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(12):3076-3085. FAN C J, LI S, LUO M K, et al. Deep CBM extraction numerical simulation based on hydraulic-mechanical-thermal coupled model. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(12):3076-3085. |
[1] | 刘明明, 王全, 马收, 田中政, 丛颜. 基于混合粒子群算法的煤层气井位优化方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 164-171. |
[2] | 苏朋辉, 夏朝辉, 刘玲莉, 段利江, 王建俊, 肖文杰. 澳大利亚M区块低煤阶煤层气井产能主控因素及合理开发方式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 121-128. |
[3] | 淮银超, 张铭, 谭玉涵, 王鑫. 澳大利亚东部S区块煤层气储层特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 49-56. |
[4] | 高为, 金军, 易同生, 赵凌云, 张曼婷, 郑德志. 黔北小林华矿区高阶煤层气藏特征及开采技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 140-147. |
[5] | 艾林, 周明顺, 张杰, 梁霄, 钱博文, 刘迪仁. 基于煤岩脆性指数的煤体结构测井定量判识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 139-144. |
[6] | 李传亮, 朱苏阳, 彭朝阳, 王凤兰, 杜庆龙, 由春梅. 煤层气井突然产气机理分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 145-149. |
[7] | 张廷山, 何映颉, 伍坤宇, 林丹, 张朝. 筠连地区上二叠统宣威组沉积相及聚煤控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1): 1-10. |
[8] | 吴雅琴,邵国良,徐耀辉,王 乔,刘振兴,帅 哲. 沁水盆地郑庄区块煤层气开发地质单元划分及开发方式优化研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(6): 125-133. |
[9] | 冯小英,秦凤启,唐钰童,刘 慧,王 亚 . 沁水盆地煤层含气后的 AVO 响应特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4): 103-108. |
[10] | 伊 伟1,熊先钺1,王 伟1,刘 玲2. 鄂尔多斯盆地合阳地区煤层气赋存特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2): 38-45. |
[11] | 闫 霞,李小军,赵 辉,张 伟,王泽斌,毛得雷. 煤层气井井间干扰研究及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2): 126-132. |
[12] | Yuriy Tyapkin, Iana Mendrii. 改进的地震相干体算法及其应用———以乌克兰顿涅茨盆地裂缝型储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5): 8-12. |
[13] | 张海茹,李 昊. 煤层气峰值产量拟合及产量动态预测方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(4): 116-118. |
[14] | 李传亮,彭朝阳,朱苏阳. 煤层气其实是吸附气[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(2): 112-115. |
[15] | 李传亮,彭朝阳. 煤层气的开采机理研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4): 9-11. |
|