岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 95–104.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220209

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

恩平凹陷南带中新统河流-波浪联控沉积体系及其意义

张晓钊1, 吴静1, 彭光荣1, 许新明1, 郑小波2   

  1. 1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司 深圳分公司, 广东 深圳 518054;
    2. 中国地质大学(武汉)资源学院, 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-12 修回日期:2021-12-22 出版日期:2022-04-01 发布日期:2022-03-14
  • 作者简介:张晓钊(1986-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事储层预测和地震沉积方面的研究工作。地址:(518054)广东省深圳市南山区后海滨路3168号。Email:zhangxzh31@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项“南海东部海域勘探新领域及关键技术”（编号：2016ZX05024-004）、中海油深圳分公司生产性科研项目“珠江口盆地（东部）浅水区早—中中新世（T60—T35）精细沉积相及多成因岩性圈闭潜力”（编号：SCKY-2021-SZ-05）联合资助

Miocene river-wave dominated sedimentary system in south belt of Enping Sag and its significance

ZHANG Xiaozhao1, WU Jing1, PENG Guangrong1, XU Xinming1, ZHENG Xiaobo2   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Branch, CNOOC China Limited, Shenzhen 518054, Guangdong, China;
    2. Faculty of Resources, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2021-08-12 Revised:2021-12-22 Online:2022-04-01 Published:2022-03-14

PDF (PC)

104

摘要： 恩平凹陷南带是油气有利富集区，具有发育岩性圈闭的沉积背景，但由于该区岩性油藏勘探起步较晚，对其形成的岩性圈闭条件的研究不够深入，制约了岩性圈闭勘探进展。为了落实恩平凹陷南带岩性圈闭的发育条件及勘探潜力，在高精度层序格架和沉积充填序列的基础上，应用测井、岩心和地震资料，对该区河流-波浪联控体系沉积特征、沉积相展布及演化规律进行了分析，进而解剖河流-波浪联控体系下砂体的识别标志、分布规律及岩性圈闭发育特征。结果表明：恩平凹陷南带中新统发育河流-波浪联控的三角洲沉积体系，EP1，EP2和EP3油区为岩性圈闭发育有利区，韩江组五、六段和珠江组一段为岩性圈闭发育的有利层段，波浪改造砂岩为岩性圈闭的主要储集体。该研究成果对恩平凹陷南带岩性勘探具有指导作用。

关键词: 河流-波浪联控体系, 高精度层序, 岩性圈闭, 韩江组, 珠江组, 中新统, 恩平凹陷

Abstract: The south belt of Enping Sag is a favorable oil and gas enrichment area with a sedimentary background of developing lithologic traps. However, the exploration of lithologic reservoirs in this area stared relatively late, the understanding of lithologic traps is not enough, which restricts the progress of lithologic trap exploration. In Sag, based on high-precision sequence framework and sedimentary filling sequence, the sedimentary characteristics, sedimentary facies distribution and evolution law of river-wave dominated system were analyzed by using logging, core and seismic data, and then the identification marks, distribution law and development characteristics of lithologic traps of sand bodies under river-wave dominated system were dissected. The results show that river-wave dominated delta sedimentary system is developed in the Miocene in the south belt of Enping Sag, EP1, EP2 and EP3 oil areas are favorable areas for lithologic trap development, the fifth and sixth members of Hanjiang Formation and the first member of Zhujang Formation are favorable zones for lithologic trap development, and wave-reformed sandstone is the main reservoir of lithologic traps. The research results play a guiding role in lithologic exploration in south belt of Enping Sag.

Key words: river-wave dominated system, high-precision sequence, lithologic trap, Hanjiang Formation, Zhujiang Formation, Miocene, Enping Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 李维禄, 徐怀民, 高思宇, 等.三角洲改造背景的浪控滨岸砂体成因类型及展布特征:以塔里木盆地东河塘地区"东河砂岩"为例[J].中国海洋大学学报, 2017, 47(9):86-95.LI Weilu, XU Huaimin, GAO Siyu, et al.Genetic types and distribution features of wave-dominated shore deposits with reworked-delta background:A case of "Donghe sandstones" in Donghetang Oilfield, Tarim Basin[J].Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2017, 47(9):86-95.
[2] 李文静, 王英民, 何敏, 等.珠江口盆地中中新世陆架边缘三角洲的类型及控制因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):1-9.LI Wenjing, WANG Yingmin, HE Min, et al.Types and controlling factors of shelf margin delta of Middle Miocene in Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):1-9.
[3] 李小平, 柳保军, 丁琳, 等.海相三角洲沉积单元划分及其对勘探砂体对比的意义:基于现代珠江三角洲沉积水动力综合研究[J].沉积学报, 2016, 34(3):555-562.LI Xiaoping, LIU Baojun, DING Lin, et al.Depositional elements definition of marine delta and significance to sand body correlation in petroleum exploration:From hydrodynamic analysis on modern Pearl River Delta[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(3):555-562.
[4] 秦国省, 王友净, 刘辉, 等.伊拉克哈法亚油田古近系海相三角洲沉积特征及成藏主控因素[J].油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(3):25-34.QIN Guosheng, WANG Youjing, LIU Hui, et al.Sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of Paleogene marine delta reservoir in Halfaya Oilfield, Iraq[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(3):25-34.
[5] 高阳东, 张向涛, 李智高, 等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷北带下-中中新统层序构型及其差异性分析:对岩性圈闭发育的启示[J].地球科学, 2021, 46(5):1758-1770.GAO Yangdong, ZHANG Xiangtao, LI Zhigao, et al.Variability in sequence stratigraphic architectures of Lower-Middle Miocene Pearl River delta, northern Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin:Implications for lithological trap development[J].Earth Science, 2021, 46(5):1758-1770.
[6] 许新明, 陈胜红, 王福国, 等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷断层特征及其对新近系油气成藏的影响[J].现代地质, 2014, 28(3):543-550.XU Xinming, CHEN Shenghong, WANG Fuguo, et al.Structural features and impacts on hydrocarbon accumulation of Neogene in Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Geoscience, 2014, 28(3):543-550.
[7] 王维, 杨香华, 叶加仁, 等.恩平凹陷珠江组盖层的沉积学评价思路与方法[J].石油实验地质, 2014, 36(2):249-256.WANG Wei, YANG Xianghua, YE Jiaren, et al.Ideas and methods of sedi-mentologic evaluation on caprocks in Zhujiang Formation, Enping Sag[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2014, 36(2):249-256.
[8] 何清吟, 叶加仁, 舒誉.恩平凹陷南部断裂带油气成藏特征及主控因素[J].石油天然气学报, 2014, 36(9):43-48.HE Qingyin, YE Jiaren, SHU Yu.The characteristics and main controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation in the southern fault zone of Enping Depression[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014, 36(9):43-48.
[9] 傅宁, 丁放, 何仕斌, 等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷烃源岩评价及油气成藏特征分析[J].中国海上油气, 2007, 19(5):295-305.FU Ning, DING Fang, HE Shibin, et al.Source rock evaluation and reservoir characteristics analysis in Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2007, 19(5):295-305.
[10] 吕成福, 陈国俊, 王天琦, 等.恩平凹陷第三系文昌组异常岩性体特征[J].石油学报, 2008, 29(3):368-371.LYU Chengfu, CHEN Guojun, WANG Tianqi, et al.Characteristics of litho-logy anomalous body in Tertiary Wenchang Formation of Enping Sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008, 29(3):368-371.
[11] 李明刚, 禚喜准, 陈刚, 等.恩平凹陷珠海组储层的孔隙度演化模型[J].石油学报, 2009, 30(6):862-868.LI Minggang, ZHUO Xizhun, CHEN Gang, et al.Application of porosity evolution model to reservoir assessment of Zhuhai Formation in Enping Sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(6):862-868.
[12] 王家豪, 刘丽华, 陈胜红, 等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷珠琼运动二幕的构造沉积响应及区域构造意义[J].石油学报, 2011, 32(4):588-595.WANG Jiahao, LIU Lihua, CHEN Shenghong, et al.Tectonicsedimentary responses to the second episode of the Zhu-Qiong Movement in the Enping Depression, Pearl River Mouth Basin and its regional tectonic significance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(4):588-595.
[13] 彭兴平, 张昌民, 张尚锋, 等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷A-1井区珠江组沉积相研究及其演化分析[J].石油天然气学报, 2011, 33(2):32-38.PENG Xingping, ZHANG Changmin, ZHANG Shangfeng, et al.Sedimentary facies analysis and evolution of well block A-1 in Zhujiang Formation of Enping Depression in the Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2011, 33(2):32-38.
[14] 刘丽华, 陈胜红, 于水明, 等.恩平凹陷成藏条件分析及商业性突破[J].中国海上油气, 2011, 23(2):76-80.LIU Lihua, CHEN Shenghong, YU Shuiming, et al.Analyzing conditions of hydrocarbon accumulation and a commercial breakthrough in Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2011, 23(2):76-80.
[15] 刘强虎, 朱红涛, 杨香华, 等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷古近系文昌组地震层序地层单元定量识别[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(3):1076-1082.LIU Qianghu, ZHU Hongtao, YANG Xianghua, et al.Quantitative recognition of seismic sequence stratigraphic units in Wenchang Formation, Paleogene, Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(3):1076-1082.
[16] 吴哲, 吴婷婷, 王文勇, 等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷断裂控藏研究[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 17(5):18-24.WU Zhe, WU Tingting, WANG Wenyong, et al.The study on fault controlling petroleum accumulation in Enping Sag of Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Journal of Yangtze University (Science and Technology), 2020, 17(5):18-24.
[17] 谢飞, 吴智平, 颜世永, 等.恩平凹陷南部隆起带油气成藏模式[J].地质力学学报, 2015, 21(4):481-491.XIE Fei, WU Zhiping, YAN Shiyong, et al.Reservoir-forming pattern of the south uplift in Enping Sag[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2015, 21(4):481-491.
[18] 熊万林, 朱俊章, 杨兴业, 等.恩平凹陷北部隆起构造带油气成因来源及成藏过程研究[J].中国海上油气, 2020, 32(1):54-65.XIONG Wanlin, ZHU Junzhang, YANG Xingye, et al.Study on the genetic sources and accumulation processes of oil and gas in the north uplift structural belt of Enping Sag[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2020, 32(1):54-65.
[19] 吴静, 张晓钊, 白海军, 等.珠江口盆地阳江凹陷中新统潮控体系及其岩性圈闭勘探意义[J].地球科学, 2021, 46(10):3673-3689.WU Jing, ZHANG Xiaozhao, BAI Haijun, et al.Miocene tidal control system and its exploration significance of lithologic trap in Yangjiang Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Earth Science, 2021, 46(10):3673-3689.
[20] HUANG C, HESSELBO S P, HINNOV L.Astrochronology of the Late Jurassic Kimmeridge clay (Dorset, England) and implications for earth system processes[J].Earth&Planetary Science Letters, 2010, 289(1):242-255.
[21] 石巨业, 金之钧, 刘全有, 等.基于米兰科维奇理论的高精度旋回识别与划分:以南图尔盖盆地Ary301井中侏罗统为例[J].沉积学报, 2017, 35(3):436-448.SHI Juye, JIN Zhijun, LIU Quanyou, et al.Recognition and division of high-resolution sequences based on the Milankovitch theory:A case study from the Middle Jurassic of well Ary301 in the south Turgay Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(3):436-448.
[22] 杨雪, 柳波, 张金川, 等.古龙凹陷青一段米兰科维奇旋回识别及其沉积响应[J].沉积学报, 2019, 37(4):661-673.YANG Xue, LIU Bo, ZHANG Jinchuan, et al.Identification of sedimentary responses to the Milankovitch cycles in the K2qn1 formation, Gulong Depression[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(4):661-673.
[23] 杨占龙, 沙雪梅, 魏立花, 等.地震隐性层序界面识别、高频层序格架建立与岩性圈闭勘探:以吐哈盆地西缘侏罗系-白垩系为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6):1-13.YANG Zhanlong, SHA Xuemei, WEI Lihua, et al.Seismic subtle sequence boundary identification, high-frequency sequence framework estab-lishment and lithologic trap exploration:A case study of Jurassic to Cretaceous in the western margin of Turpan-Kumul Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6):1-13.
[24] 许新明, 刘丽华, 陈胜红, 等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷新近系油气成藏主控因素分析[J].地质科技情报, 2015, 34(1):100-106.XU Xinming, LIU Lihua, CHEN Shenghong, et al.Analysis of the main control factors on Neogene hydrocarbon accumulation in Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(1):100-106.
[25] 芮志锋, 林畅松, 杜家元, 等.关键层序界面识别及其在岩性油气藏勘探中的意义:以惠州凹陷珠江组为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1):96-105.RUI Zhifeng, LIN Changsong, DU Jiayuan, et al.Key sequence surfaces identification and its significance in the exploration of lithologic reservoirs:A case of Zhujiang Formation in Huizhou Depression[J].Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1):96-105.
[26] 王德英, 于娅, 张藜, 等.渤海海域石臼坨凸起大型岩性油气藏成藏关键要素[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1):1-10.WANG Deying, YU Ya, ZHANG Li, et al.Key factors for reservoir formation of large lithologic reservoirs in Shijiutuo uplift, Bohai Sea[J].Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(1):1-10.
[1] 熊加贝, 何登发. 全球碳酸盐岩地层-岩性大油气田分布特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 187-200.
[2] 王素英, 张翔, 田景春, 彭明鸿, 郑潇宇, 夏永涛. 塔里木盆地顺北地区柯坪塔格组沉积演化及沉积分异模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 81-94.
[3] 王德英, 于娅, 张藜, 史盼盼. 渤海海域石臼坨凸起大型岩性油气藏成藏关键要素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 1-10.
[4] 罗泽, 谢明英, 涂志勇, 卫喜辉, 陈一鸣. 一套针对高泥质疏松砂岩薄储层的识别技术——以珠江口盆地X油田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 95-101.
[5] 杨占龙, 沙雪梅, 魏立花, 黄军平, 肖冬生. 地震隐性层序界面识别、高频层序格架建立与岩性圈闭勘探——以吐哈盆地西缘侏罗系—白垩系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 1-13.
[6] 芮志锋, 林畅松, 杜家元, 丁琳, 李潇. 关键层序界面识别及其在岩性油气藏勘探中的意义——以惠州凹陷珠江组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 96-105.
[7] 吴 倩，方小宇， 王 玉， 吴玉坤，甘永年，郇金来. 南海 A 油田珠江组钙质层成因与控制因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3): 68-73.
[8] 王付斌，马 超,安 川. 南华北盆地通许地区上古生界天然气勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2): 33-40.
[9] 侯国伟，刘金水，周瑞华，叶 芳，李 帅. 丽水凹陷低位扇群沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 240-244.
[10] 陈嵘，李奎，何胜林，胡向阳，罗威. 珠江口盆地文昌地区珠江组一段低阻成因分析与饱和度评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5): 97-101.
[11] 王俊怀，吴俊军，尹昌霞，吴涛，卞保力. 准噶尔盆地东部阜东斜坡区侏罗系岩性圈闭识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(6): 62-66.
[12] 郑荣才，郑哲，高博禹，胡晓庆，王昌勇. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷珠江组海底扇深水重力流沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(2): 1-8.
[13] 王波，王玉环，左玉杰. 渤海湾SZ36-1S 地区高精度层序约束下储层预测与岩性油藏勘探潜力分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 39-41.
[14] 王芝尧，苏俊青，钱茂路，杨冰，刘志英. 断块区岩相古地理对岩性油气藏形成的影响———以歧口凹陷滨海斜坡区古近纪为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 1-6.
[15] 潘伟. 辽河滩海笔架岭—岭南斜坡带油气勘探潜力分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 7-9.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发