岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 81–94.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210508

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

塔里木盆地顺北地区柯坪塔格组沉积演化及沉积分异模式

王素英1, 张翔1,2, 田景春1,2, 彭明鸿1, 郑潇宇1, 夏永涛3   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 沉积地质研究院, 成都 610059;
    2. 成都理工大学 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 成都 610059;
    3. 中国石化西北油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 乌鲁木齐 830011
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-14 修回日期:2021-04-08 出版日期:2021-10-01 发布日期:2021-09-30
  • 第一作者:王素英(1992-),女,成都理工大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为沉积学。地址:(610059)四川省成都市成华区二仙桥东三路1号成都理工大学。Email:2038542775@qq.com
  • 通信作者: 张翔(1978-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事沉积学、沉积地球化学方面的教学科研工作。Email:zhangxiang06@cdut.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油化工股份有限公司科技开发项目“塔中—顺北地区志留系圈闭发育模式与有利目标评价”（编号：ky-2019-s-035）和中国石油化工股份有限公司科技开发项目“塔里木盆地奥陶纪—志留纪沉积体系及岩相古地理研究”（编号：33550007-19-ZC0613-0076）联合资助

Sedimentary evolution and sedimentary differentiation model of Kepingtage Formation in Shunbei area,Tarim Basin

WANG Suying1, ZHANG Xiang1,2, TIAN Jingchun1,2, PENG Minghong1, ZHENG Xiaoyu1, XIA Yongtao3   

  1. 1. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Sinopec Northwest Oilfield Company, Urumqi 830011, China
  • Received:2020-12-14 Revised:2021-04-08 Online:2021-10-01 Published:2021-09-30

PDF (PC)

314

摘要： 为研究塔里木盆地顺北地区柯坪塔格组潮坪-陆棚沉积体系在不同阶段沉积格局存在的显著差异，利用普通薄片鉴定、岩心观察与详细描述、地震、测井、单井等资料，在井下地层岩性段的划分对比研究基础上进行综合分析。结果表明：①顺北地区柯坪塔格组受古隆起控制，发育"三段式"（底砂岩段、泥岩段与砂岩段均发育）和"一段式"（缺失底砂岩段、泥岩段或泥岩段中下部）2类地层结构。②顺北地区柯坪塔格组发育海侵背景下受古隆起控制的潮坪-陆棚沉积体系。在早、晚沉积期沉积格局存在显著差异，早期受古隆起控制，沉积相带具有东西向分异特征，且沿古隆起呈环带状展布；晚期古隆起被淹没，不再控制沉积相带的展布，受盆地边界影响，沉积格局由前期的东西分异演化为南北分异，沉积相带整体具有东西延伸、南北分带，并沿陆棚沉积区向南北两侧呈对称展布的特征。③柯坪塔格组经历了水体"浅-深-浅-深-浅"的海平面升降演化过程，垂向上发育多套储盖组合，潮下砂坪与潮间-潮下潮汐水道为有利的储集砂体。该研究成果将为海相碎屑岩油气勘探提供有利目标区和勘探方向。

关键词: 沉积演化, 沉积分异模式, 岩性圈闭, 志留系, 柯坪塔格组, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: In order to study the significant differences of sedimentary patterns in different stages in tidal flat-shelf sedimentary system of Kepingtage Formation in Shunbei area of Tarim Basin, by using common section identification, core observation and description, the data of seismic, well logging and single well, a comprehensive analysis was carried out on the basis of the division and comparison of lithologic sections. The results show that:(1) The Kepingtage Formation in Shunbei area is controlled by palaeo-uplift, and there are two types of stratigraphic structures: "three-section" (lower sandstone interval, mudstone interval and sandstone interval are all developed) and "one-section" (lack of lower sandstone interval, mudstone interval or middle and lower part of mudstone interval).(2) Tidal flat-shelf depositional system controlled by palaeo-uplift in the background of transgression is developed in Kepingtage Formation in Shunbei area. The depositional pattern is significantly different in the early and late depositional periods. In the early stage, it was controlled by palaeo-uplift, and the sedimentary facies zones were differentiated in the east-west direction and distributed in a ring along the palaeo-uplift. In the late stage, the paleo-uplift was submerged and no longer controlled the distribution of sedimentary facies zones. Due to the influence of basin boundary, the sedimentary pattern evolved from east-west differentiation to north-south differentiation. The sedimentary facies zones extended from east-west to north-south as a whole, and distributed symmetrically along the continental shelf sedimentary area.(3) Kepingtage Formation has experienced the water by the "shallow-deep, shallow and deep-shallow" evolution of sea-level change, several sets of reservoir-cap assemblages are developed vertically, and subtidal sand flat and tidal-subtidal tidal channel are favorable reservoir sand bodies. The research results can provide favorable target area and exploration direction for oil and gas exploration of marine clastic rocks.

Key words: sedimentary evolution, sedimentary differentiation model, lithologic trap, Silurian, Kepingtage Formation, Tarim Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 朱如凯, 罗平, 何东博, 等.塔里木盆地塔中地区志留系柯坪塔格组沉积相与沉积模式.古地理学报, 2005, 7(2):197-206. ZHU R K, LUO P, HE D B, et al. Sedimentary facies and models of the Kepingtage Formation of Silurian in Tazhong area, Tarim Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2005, 7(2):197-206.
[2] 陈强路, 范明, 尤东华.塔里木盆地志留系沥青砂岩储集性非常规评价.石油学报, 2006, 27(1):30-33. CHEN Q L, FAN M, YOU D H. Non-traditional method for evaluating physical property of Silurian bitumen sandstone reservoirs in Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(1):30-33.
[3] 尚凯, 郭娜, 张睿.塔里木盆地S1井区志留系柯坪塔格组下沥青砂岩段沉积相新认识.沉积与特提斯地质, 2016, 36(4):14-20. SHANG K, GUO N, ZHANG R. Sedimentary facies of the lower bitumen-bearing sandstone member of the Silurian Kepingtage Formation in the S1 well area, Tarim Basin. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2016, 36(4):14-20.
[4] 张翔.塔里木盆地志留系层序地层学研究及意义.成都:成都理工大学, 2009. ZHANG X. Studying and significance of sequence stratigraphy of Silurian in the Tarim Basin. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2009.
[5] 孙乃泉, 云露, 蒲仁海, 等.塔里木盆地顺9井区柯坪塔格组下段沉积微相与储层展布. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(6):1716-1725. SUN N Q, YUN L, PU R H, et al. The microfacies and reservoir distribution of the lower member of Kepingtage Formation in Shun 9 well area in Tarim Basin. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(6):1716-1725.
[6] 张雄, 王晓之, 郭天魁, 等.顺北油田缝内转向压裂暂堵剂评价实验.岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):170-176. ZHANG X, WANG X Z, GUO T K, et al. Experiment on evaluation of temporary plugging agent for in-fracture steering fracturing in Shunbei oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5):170-176.
[7] 王建新.塔里木盆地志留系柯坪塔格组潮坪沉积特征分析. 西北地质, 2018, 51(2):69-74. WANG J X. Tidal flat sedimentary characteristics of Silurian Kepingtage Formation in Tarim Basin. Northwestern Geology, 2018, 51(2):69-74.
[8] 曾庆鲁, 王力宝, 王朝锋, 等.塔中地区志留系柯坪塔格组上3亚段沉积体系类型及分布规律. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(1):95-104. ZENG Q L, WANG L B, WANG C F, et al. Sedimentary system types and distribution of the 3rd upper sub-member of Silurian Kepingtage Formation in Tazhong area, Tarim Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(1):95-104.
[9] 刘群利, 杜伟维.塔河油田TP16-1井区志留系柯坪塔格组下段沉积相研究.西部探矿工程, 2014, 26(9):29-31. LIU Q L, DU W W. Sedimentary facies of the lower member of Silurian Kepingtage formation in TP16-1 well area, Tahe Oilfield. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2014, 26(9):29-31.
[10] 尚凯, 夏永涛, 马中远, 等.塔中北斜坡柯坪塔格组沉积相分析.新疆地质, 2013, 31(增刊1):40-43. SHANG K, XIA Y T, MA Z Y, et al. Analysis on sedimentary facies of Kepingtage Formation of Silurian in the northern slope of Tazhong area. Xinjiang Geology, 2013, 31(Suppl 1):40-43.
[11] 尚静.塔北地区志留系柯坪塔格组沉积体系分析.武汉:长江大学, 2018. SHANG J. Analysis of depositional system of Silurian Kepingtage Formation in northern Tarim Basin. Wuhan:Yangtze University, 2018.
[12] 孙佳珺, 辛仁臣.塔北南坡志留系柯坪塔格组下段底部砂岩亚段沉积体系分析.新疆地质, 2016, 34(2):240-244. SUN J J, XIN R C. Analysis of depositional system of bottom sandstone sub-member in lower member of Kepingtage Formation, Silurian in southern slope of Tabei uplift. Xinjiang Geology, 2016, 34(2):240-244.
[13] 张少华, 蒲仁海, 云露, 等.塔北地区柯坪塔格组下段储层特征.岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(6):76-81. ZHANG S H, PU R H, YUN L, et al. Reservoir characteristics of lower Kepingtage Formation in Tabei area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(6):76-81.
[14] 苏炳睿.塔里木盆地中央隆起带志留系柯坪塔格组层序地层格架内砂体时空分布规律研究.成都:成都理工大学, 2015. SU B R. The study of sequence stratigraphic framework of the space-time distribution of sand of Kepingtage Formation Silurian of Tarim Basin. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2015.
[15] 郝雷, 傅恒, 钱程, 等.塔里木盆地志留系柯坪塔格组沉积相特征.石油化工应用, 2015, 34(4):74-78. HAO L, FU H, QIAN C, et al. Depositional features of Kepingtage Formation of Silurianin in Tarim Basin. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2015, 34(4):74-78.
[16] 陶碧娥, 傅恒.塔河地区志留系沉积体系及储层纵向分布特征.岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1):40-45. TAO B E, FU H. Vertical distribution characteristics of reservoir and sedimentary system of Silurian in Tahe area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(1):40-45.
[17] 马晓娟, 张忠民, 陈占坤.塔河南部志留系柯坪塔格组层序地层及沉积相.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(3):35-40. MA X J, ZHANG Z M, CHEN Z K. Stratigraphic sequence and sedimentary facies of Kepingtage Formation in the Silurian at the south area of Tahe oilfield. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33(3):35-40.
[18] 刘若涵, 王明, 姜在兴.塔河地区志留系柯坪塔格组下段沉积相研究.沉积学报, 2016, 34(2):326-335. LIU R H, WANG M, JIANG Z X. Development of sedimentary facies type in Silurian lower Kepingtage Formation, Tahe area. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(2):326-335.
[19] 高日丽.塔里木盆地中央隆起带志留系沉积相及砂体展布特征.北京:中国地质大学, 2011. GAO R L. Analysis of sedimentary facies and sand distribution of Silurian in the central uplift of Tarim Basin. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2011.
[20] 陈楠.塔中地区志留系柯坪塔格组沉积相与砂体展布规律. 成都:成都理工大学, 2014. CHEN N. The study of Silurian sedimentation feature and regularities of sand body distribution in Tazhong area. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
[21] 谷茸, 云露, 朱秀香, 等.塔里木盆地顺北油田油气来源研究. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(2):248-254. GU R, YUN L, ZHU X X, et al. Oil and gas sources in Shunbei Oilfield, Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020, 42(2):248-254.
[22] 吴鲜, 曹自成, 路清华, 等.塔里木盆地顺北地区白垩系原油成因类型与来源.石油实验地质, 2020, 42(2):255-262. WU X, CAO Z C, LU Q H, et al. Genetic types and sources of Cretaceous crude oil in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020, 42(2):255-262.
[23] 刘宝增.塔里木盆地顺北地区油气差异聚集主控因素分析:以顺北1号、顺北5号走滑断裂带为例.中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3):83-95. LIU B Z. Analysis of main controlling factors of oil and gas differential accumulation in Shunbei area, Tarim Basin:Taking Shunbei No. 1 and No. 5 strike slip fault zones as examples. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3):83-95.
[24] DALRYMPLE R W, ZAITLIN B A, BOYD R. Estuarine facies models, conceptual basis and stratigraphic implications. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1992, 62(6):1130-1146.
[25] 漆立新, 李宗杰, 吕海涛.塔里木叠合盆地构造沉积演化与油气勘探图集.北京:科学出版社, 2020:1-224. QI L X, LI Z J, LYU H T. Atlas of tectonic sedimentary evolution and oil and gas exploration in the Tarim Superposed Basin. Beijing:Science Press, 2020:1-224.
[26] 何登发, 贾承造, 李德生, 等.塔里木多旋回叠合盆地的形成与演化.石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(1):64-77. HE D F, JIA C Z, LI D S, et al. Formation and evolution of polycyclic superimposed Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2005, 26(1):64-77.
[27] 贾进华, 张宝民, 朱世海, 等.塔里木盆地志留纪地层、沉积特征与岩相古地理.古地理学报, 2006, 8(3):339-352. JIA J H, ZHANG B M, ZHU S H, et al. Stratigraphy, sedimentary characteristics and lithofacies palaeogeography of the Silurian in Tarim Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2006, 8(3):339-352.
[28] 王莹莹.塔里木盆地志留系层序地层与沉积相研究.成都:成都理工大学, 2017. WANG Y Y. The study of sequence stratigraphy and depositional facies of Silurian in the Tarim Basin. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2017.
[29] 冯增昭.单因素分析多因素综合作图法:定量岩相古地理重建.古地理学报, 2004, 6(1):3-19. FENG Z Z. Single factor analysis and multifactor comprehensive mapping method:Reconstruction of quantitative lithofacies Palaeogeography. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2004, 6(1):3-19.
[30] 林森虎, 汪梦诗, 袁选俊.大型坳陷湖盆定量化沉积相编图新方法:以鄂尔多斯盆地中部长7油层组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):10-17. LIN S H, WANG M S, YUAN X J. A new quantitative method of sedimentary facies mapping of large lacustrine depression:A case from Chang 7 reservoir in central Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):10-17.
[1] 易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[2] 孟庆昊, 张昌民, 张祥辉, 朱锐, 向建波. 塔里木盆地现代分支河流体系形态、分布及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 44-56.
[3] 何文渊, 陈可洋. 哈萨克斯坦南图尔盖盆地Doshan斜坡带岩性油气藏储层预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 1-11.
[4] 包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[5] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[6] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[7] 陈叔阳, 何云峰, 王立鑫, 尚浩杰, 杨昕睿, 尹艳树. 塔里木盆地顺北1号断裂带奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层结构表征及三维地质建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 124-135.
[8] 孙汉骁, 邢凤存, 谢武仁, 钱红杉. 四川盆地及周缘地区晚奥陶世岩相古地理演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 121-135.
[9] 史卜庆, 丁梁波, 马宏霞, 孙辉, 张颖, 许小勇, 王红平, 范国章. 东非海域大型深水沉积体系及油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 10-17.
[10] 朱秀香, 赵锐, 赵腾. 塔里木盆地顺北1号断裂带走滑分段特征与控储控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 131-138.
[11] 卜旭强, 王来源, 朱莲花, 黄诚, 朱秀香. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田奥陶系断控缝洞型储层特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 152-160.
[12] 宋兴国, 陈石, 杨明慧, 谢舟, 康鹏飞, 李婷, 陈九洲, 彭梓俊. 塔里木盆地富满油田FⅠ16断裂发育特征及其对油气分布的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 99-109.
[13] 倪新锋, 沈安江, 乔占峰, 郑剑锋, 郑兴平, 杨钊. 塔里木盆地奥陶系缝洞型碳酸盐岩岩溶储层成因及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 144-158.
[14] 陈袁, 廖发明, 吕波, 贾伟, 宋秋强, 吴燕, 亢鞠, 鲜让之. 塔里木盆地迪那2气田古近系离散裂缝表征与建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 104-116.
[15] 邱晨, 闫建平, 钟光海, 李志鹏, 范存辉, 张悦, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭　林,王　波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉，郑荣才，肖玲，马国富，窦世杰，田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发