岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 74–82.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230107

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

珠江口盆地陆丰13东洼新生代构造演化与油气成藏特征

贺勇, 邱欣卫, 雷永昌, 谢世文, 肖张波, 李敏   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司, 广东 深圳 518054
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-03 修回日期:2021-08-23 出版日期:2023-01-01 发布日期:2023-01-06
  • 第一作者:贺勇(1986-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事油气勘探方面的研究工作。地址:(518054)广东省深圳市南山区后海滨路3168号中海油大厦A座。Email:heyong2@cnooc.com.cn
  • 通信作者: 邱欣卫(1982-),男,博士,工程师,主要从事油气勘探方面研究及管理工作。Email:qiuxw2@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项“南海深水区油气资源潜力与大中型油气田勘探方向”(编号: 2016ZX05024-004)和中海石油(中国)有限公司勘探生产科研重大项目“珠江口盆地(东部)浅水区古近系油气成藏条件及勘探突破方向”(编号: SCKY-2020-SZ-21)联合资助

Tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics of Cenozoic in eastern Lufeng 13 subsag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

HE Yong, QIU Xinwei, LEI Yongchang, XIE Shiwen, XIAO Zhangbo, LI Min   

  1. Shenzhen Branch of CNOOC China Limited, Shenzhen 518054, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2021-06-03 Revised:2021-08-23 Online:2023-01-01 Published:2023-01-06

摘要: 陆丰13东洼是珠江口盆地油气勘探的重点区域。结合区域构造背景,在精细解释高品质三维地震资料的基础上,对陆丰13东洼的洼陷结构和构造特征进行综合分析,并运用平衡剖面技术对洼陷的构造演化进行了恢复与研究,探讨了构造演化对圈闭形成与成藏的影响。研究结果表明: ①陆丰13东洼新生代构造演化可划分为早-中始新世断陷、晚始新世断坳转换、渐新世-第四纪区域热沉降坳陷等3个阶段,其中断陷阶段具有完整的断陷旋回,根据断陷活动的强弱可进一步划分为断陷初始期、断陷高峰期、断陷萎缩期,断陷初始期和断陷萎缩期储层较为发育,断陷高峰期烃源岩较为发育。②在多期次构造活动的影响下,陆丰13东洼新生代形成了多种类型的圈闭,包括披覆背斜圈闭、断背斜圈闭、断块圈闭、断鼻圈闭、构造-地层圈闭 (削截、超覆) 、构造-岩性圈闭。众多的圈闭类型表明研究区油气勘探潜力巨大,特别是断陷阶段与断坳转换阶段沉积的文昌组和恩平组均发育大量各类型圈闭,且邻近优质烃源岩,成藏条件优越,是陆丰13东洼油气勘探的重点层系;平面上,南部缓坡带发育圈闭类型及数量最多,其次是中央隆起带与低凸起,均是研究区油气勘探的重要区带。

关键词: 构造演化, 油气成藏, 圈闭, 新生代, 陆丰13东洼, 珠江口盆地

Abstract: The eastern Lufeng 13 subsag is a key area for oil and gas exploration in the Pearl River Mouth Basin. Combined with regional tectonic background,and based on the fine interpretation of high-quality 3 D seismic data, the structure and structural features of the eastern Lufeng 13 subsag were analyzed,the tectonic evolution of the subsag was restored by using balanced section technology,and the influences of tectonic evolution on trap formation and hydrocarbon accumulation were discussed. The results show that: (1) The Cenozoic tectonic evolution in eastern Lufeng 13 subsag can be divided into three stages: Early-Middle Eocene fault depression,Late Eocene fault depression transition,Oligocene-Quaternary regional thermal subsidence depression. The fault depression stage has a complete fault depression cycle. According to the strength of the fault depression activity,it can be further divided into the initial stage,peak stage and shrinkage stage of the fault depression. The reservoirs were relatively developed in the initial stage and shrinkage stage of the fault depression,and the source rocks were relatively developed in the peak stage of the fault depression. (2) Under the influence of multi-stage tectonic activities,many types of traps were formed in Cenozoic in eastern Lufeng 13 subsag,including drape anticline traps, fault anticline traps,fault block traps,fault nose traps,structural-stratigraphic traps (truncation,overlap) and structural-lithologic traps. So many trap types show great potential for hydrocarbon exploration in this area,in particularly,the Wenchang Formation and Enping Formation,which are deposited in the fault depression stage and fault depression transition stage,have developed a large number of traps of various types. Those traps are close to high-quality source rocks and have favorable conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation,which are the key formations for oil and gas exploration in eastern Lufeng 13 subsag. In plane,the southern gentle slope zone has the most types and numbers of traps,followed by the central uplift zone and low uplift zone,which are the most important zones for hydrocarbon exploration in the study area.

Key words: tectonic evolution, hydrocarbon accumulation, trap, Cenozoic, eastern Lufeng 13 subsag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.2
[1] 余海波,程秀申,漆家福,等. 东濮凹陷古近纪断裂活动对沉积的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2019,31 (5): 12-23. YU Haibo,CHENG Xiushen,QI Jiafu,et al. Control of fault activity on sedimentation of Paleogene in Dongpu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31 (5): 12-23.
[2] 梁建设,张功成,王璞珺,等. 南海陆缘盆地构造演化与烃源岩特征[J]. 吉林大学学报,2013,43 (5): 1309-1319. LIANG Jianshe,ZHANG Gongcheng,WANG Pujun,et al. Tectonic evolution of epicontinental basins in South China Sea and their feature of source rocks[J]. Journal of Jilin University, 2013,43 (5): 1309-1319.
[3] 牛成民. 渤海南部海域莱州湾凹陷构造演化与油气成藏[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2012,33 (3): 424-431. NIU Chengmin. Tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation of Laizhouwan Depression in southern Bohai Sea[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33 (3): 424-431.
[4] 能源,漆家福,张春峰,等. 金湖凹陷石港断层构造演化及油气聚集特征[J]. 石油学报,2009,30 (5): 667-671. NENG Yuan,QI Jiafu,ZHANG Chunfeng,et al. Structural evolution of Shigang fault and features of hydrocarbon accumulation in Jinhu Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30 (5): 667-671.
[5] HAYES D E,NISSEN S S. The South China Sea margins: Implications for rifting contrasts[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2005,237 (3/4): 601-616.
[6] 王明健,张训华,肖国林,等. 南黄海盆地南部坳陷三叠纪以来的构造演化与油气成藏[J]. 天然气地球科学,2014,25 (7): 991-998. WANG Mingjian,ZHANG Xunhua,XIAO Guolin,et al. Tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation since Triassic of the southern depression in south Yellow Sea Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25 (7): 991-998.
[7] 高阳,张文萍,孙学栋,等. 长沙岭转换带构造演化特征及其与油气的关系[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2020,55 (2): 426-434. GAO Yang,ZHANG Wenping,SUN Xuedong,et al. Tectonic evolution in Changshaling transfer zone and its relation with hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2020, 55 (2): 426-434.
[8] 朱珍君,黄光明,邱津,等. 哈萨克斯坦斋桑盆地构造特征及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏,2020,32 (4): 23-35. ZHU Zhenjun,HUANG Guangming,QIU Jin,et al. Structural characteristics and its impacts on hydrocarbon accumulation in Zaysan Basin,Kazakhstan[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32 (4): 23-35.
[9] 覃阳亮,何幼斌,蔡俊,等. 东非海岸Davie构造带的构造演化特征及其成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏,2021,33 (2): 104-115. QIN Yangliang,HE Youbin,CAI Jun,et al. Tectonic evolution and formation mechanism of Davie fracture zone in East Africa coast[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33 (2): 104-115.
[10] 卢恩俊,柳少波,于志超,等. 柴达木盆地英雄岭南带断裂活动特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2021,33 (1): 161-174. LU Enjun,LIU Shaobo,YU Zhichao,et al. Characteristics of fault activity and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation in southern Yingxiongling area,Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33 (1): 161-174.
[11] 吕宝凤,殷征欣,蔡周荣,等. 南海北部新生代构造演化序列及其油气成藏意义[J].地质学报,2012,86 (8): 1249-1261. LÜ Baofeng,YIN Zhengxin,CAI Zhourong,et al. Cenozoic tectonic evolution sequence in northern South China Sea and its oil/gas significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86 (8): 1249-1261.
[12] 谢锦龙,黄冲,向峰云. 南海西部海域新生代构造古地理演化及其对油气勘探的意义[J]. 地质科学,2008,43 (1): 133-153. XIE Jinlong,HUANG Chong,XIANG Fengyun. Evolution of Cenozoic tectono-palaeogeography and its petroleum significance in the western South China Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2008,43 (1): 133-153.
[13] 张功成. 南海北部陆坡深水区构造演化及其特征[J]. 石油学报,2010,31 (4): 528-541. ZHANG Gongcheng. Tectonic evolution of deep water area of northern continental margin in South China Sea[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31 (4): 528-541.
[14] 解习农,张成,任建业,等. 南海南北大陆边缘盆地构造演化差异性对油气成藏条件控制[J]. 地球物理学报,2011,54 (12): 3280-3291. XIE Xinong,ZHANG Cheng,REN Jianye,et al. Effects of distinct tectonic evolutions on hydrocarbon accumulation in northern and southern continental marginal basins of South China Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2011,54 (12): 3280-3291.
[15] 柳广弟,牛子铖,陈哲龙,等. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷在洼陷迁移控制下的油气成藏规律[J]. 石油学报,2019,40 (1): 26-40. LIU Guangdi,NIU Zicheng,CHEN Zhelong,et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation patterns controlled by the migrated subsags in Lufeng sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019,40 (1): 26-40.
[16] 汪旭东,张向涛,林鹤鸣,等. 珠江口盆地陆丰13洼陷中央背斜带地质构造特征及对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2019,40 (1): 56-66. WANG Xudong,ZHANG Xiangtao,LIN Heming,et al. Geological structure characteristics of central anticline zone in Lufeng 13 subsag,Pearl River Mouth Basin and its control effect of hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40 (1): 56-66.
[17] 葛家旺,朱筱敏,雷永昌,等. 多幕裂陷盆地构造: 沉积响应及陆丰凹陷实例分析[J]. 地学前缘,2021,28 (1): 77-89. GE Jiawang,ZHU Xiaomin,LEI Yongchang,et al. Tectonosedimentary development of multiphase rife basins: An example of the Lufeng Depression[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2021,28 (1): 77-89.
[18] 高阳东,汪旭东,林鹤鸣,等. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷恩平组内部构造-沉积转换面识别及意义[J]. 天然气地球科学,2021, 32 (7): 961-970. GAO Yangdong,WANG Xudong,LIN Heming,et al. Characteristics and significances of the tectono-sedimentary transitional unconformity in Enping Formation of Lufeng Sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2021,32 (7): 961-970.
[19] 邵磊,孟晓捷,张功成,等. 白云凹陷断裂特征对构造与沉积的控制作用[J]. 同济大学学报 (自然科学版),2013,41 (9): 1435-1441. SHAO Lei,MENG Xiaojie,ZHANG Gongcheng,et al. Feature of faults system and its influence on tectonic and sedimentary history of Baiyun Sag[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science),2013,41 (9): 1435-1441.
[20] 孙龙涛,周蒂,陈长民,等. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷断裂构造特征及其活动期次[J]. 热带海洋学报,2008,27 (2): 25. SUN Longtao,ZHOU Di,CHEN Changmin,et al. Fault structure and evolution of Baiyun Sag in Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography,2008,27 (2): 25.
[21] 陈锋,朱筱敏,葛家旺,等. 珠江口盆地陆丰南地区文昌组层序地层及沉积体系研究[J]. 岩性油气藏,2016,28 (4): 67-94. CHEN Feng,ZHU Xiaomin,GE Jiawang,et al. Sequence stratigraphy and depositional systems of Wenchang Formation in the southern Lufeng area,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28 (4): 67-94.
[22] 王家豪,刘丽华,陈胜红,等. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷珠琼运动二幕的构造-沉积响应及区域构造意义[J]. 石油学报,2011, 32 (4): 588-595. WANG Jiahao,LIU Lihua,CHEN Shenghong,et al. Tectonicsedimentary responses to the second episode of the Zhu-Qiong movement in the Enping Depression,Pear River Mouth Basin and its regional tectonic significance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011,32 (4): 588-595.
[23] 朱伟林,张功成,高乐. 南海北部大陆边缘盆地油气地质特征与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报,2008,29 (1): 1-9. ZHU Weilin,ZHANG Gongcheng,GAO Le. Geological characteristics and exploration objectives of hydrocarbons in the northern continental margin basin of South China Sea[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29 (1): 1-9.
[24] 漆家福,吴景富,马兵山,等. 南海北部珠江口盆地中段伸展构造模型及其动力学[J]. 地学前缘,2019,26 (2): 203-221. QI Jiafu,WU Jingfu,MA Bingshan,et al. The structural model and dynamics concerning middle section,Pearl River Mouth Basin in north margin of South China Sea[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2019,26 (2): 203-221.
[25] 张远泽,漆家福,吴景富. 南海北部新生代盆地断裂系统及构造动力学影响因素[J]. 地球科学,2019,44 (2): 603-625. ZHANG Yuanze,QI Jiafu,WU Jingfu. Cenozoic faults systems and its geodynamics of the continental margin basins in the northern of South China Sea[J]. Earth Science,2019,44 (2): 603-625.
[26] 汪旭东,张向涛,何敏,等. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷南部文昌组储层发育特征及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2017, 38 (6): 1147-1155. WANG Xudong,ZHANG Xiangtao,HE Min,et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of reservoir development in the Wenchang Formation,southern Lufeng Sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38 (6): 1147-1155.
[27] 张向涛,汪旭东,舒誉,等. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷大中型油田地质特征及形成条件[J]. 中南大学学报,2017,48 (11): 2979-2989. ZHANG Xiangtao,WANG Xudong,SHU Yu,et al. Geological characteristics and forming condition of large and medium oilfields in Lufeng Sag of eastern Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University,2017,48 (11): 2979-2989.
[28] 贺勇,张向涛,雷永昌,等.珠江口盆地陆丰13东洼文二段沉积特征及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 中国海上油气,2021,33 (5): 40-50. HE Yong,ZHANG Xiangtao,LEI Yongchang,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the second member of Wenchang Formation in Lufeng 13 eastern sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin and its influence on hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2021,33 (5): 40-50.
[29] 施和生,于水明,梅廉夫,等.珠江口盆地惠州凹陷古近纪幕式裂陷特征[J].天然气工业,2009,29 (1): 35-40. SHI Hesheng,YU Shuiming,MEI Lianfu,et al. Features of Paleogene episodic rifting in Huizhou fault depression in the Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2009,29 (1): 35-40.
[1] 邱玉超, 李亚丁, 文龙, 罗冰, 姚军, 许强, 文华国, 谭秀成. 川东地区寒武系洗象池组构造特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 122-132.
[2] 何文渊, 陈可洋. 哈萨克斯坦南图尔盖盆地Doshan斜坡带岩性油气藏储层预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 1-11.
[3] 董柔, 李坤, 殷际航, 薛煜恒, 江涛, 徐国盛. 渤东凹陷新生代伸展-走滑叠合断裂时空差异演化模式及控藏效应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 106-116.
[4] 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[5] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[6] 史卜庆, 丁梁波, 马宏霞, 孙辉, 张颖, 许小勇, 王红平, 范国章. 东非海域大型深水沉积体系及油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 10-17.
[7] 聂礼尚, 马静辉, 唐小飞, 杨智, 张婉金, 李鸿蕊. 准噶尔盆地东部帐篷沟地区中新生代构造事件及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 81-91.
[8] 齐育楷, 郭景祥, 罗亮, 骆福嵩, 周学文, 姚威, 张坦, 林会喜. 库车坳陷南部斜坡带隐蔽圈闭发育模式及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 108-119.
[9] 何雁兵, 肖张波, 郑仰帝, 刘君毅, 易浩, 赵庆, 张月霞, 贺勇. 珠江口盆地陆丰13洼转换带中生界陆丰7-9潜山成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 18-28.
[10] 薛罗, 史忠生, 马轮, 赵艳军, 岳世俊, 洪亮, 王磊, 雷明. 南苏丹Melut盆地北部地区中—新生界稠油成藏模式及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 76-85.
[11] 徐壮, 石万忠, 王任, 骆福嵩, 夏永涛, 覃硕, 张晓. 塔北隆起西部地区白垩系碎屑岩油气成藏规律及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 31-46.
[12] 黄军立, 张伟, 刘力辉, 蔡国富, 曾有良, 孟庆友, 刘浩. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组三元地震构形解释技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 103-112.
[13] 谢瑞, 张尚锋, 周林, 刘皓天, 姚明君, 蒋雪桂. 川东地区侏罗系自流井组大安寨段致密储层油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 108-119.
[14] 余海波. 东濮凹陷构造特征及古生界有利勘探区带评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 72-79.
[15] 张卫卫, 刘军, 刘力辉, 张晓钊, 白海军, 杨登锋. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组岩性预测技术及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 118-125.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇,胡明毅,刘富艳,王辉,胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙,田景春,肖玲,王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维,李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮,涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .