岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 106–116.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240310

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤东凹陷新生代伸展-走滑叠合断裂时空差异演化模式及控藏效应

董柔1,2, 李坤2, 殷际航2, 薛煜恒2, 江涛3, 徐国盛2   

  1. 1. 中国石油长庆油田分公司 第十一采油厂, 甘肃 庆阳 745000;
    2. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室(成都理工大学), 成都 610059;
    3. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司, 天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-17 修回日期:2023-03-14 出版日期:2024-05-01 发布日期:2024-04-30
  • 第一作者:董柔（1996—），男，硕士，助理工程师，主要从事石油构造解析与含油气盆地分析研究工作。地址:（745000）甘肃省庆阳市西峰区石油东路长庆油田陇东生产指挥中心。Email:1910948089@qq.com。
  • 通信作者: 李坤（1980—），男，博士，讲师，主要从事石油构造分析与含油气盆地分析方面的科研和教学工作。Email:lk1210_7758@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“中国近海富烃凹陷优选与有利勘探方向预测”（编号：2016ZX05024-002-007）资助。

Spatial-temporal differential evolution model and reservoir control effect of Cenozoic extensional and strike-slip superimposed faults in Bodong Sag

DONG Rou1,2, LI Kun2, YIN Jihang2, XUE Yuheng2, JIANG Tao3, XU Guosheng2   

  1. 1. No. 11 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Qingyang 745000, Gansu, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
    3. Tianjin Branch of China National Offshore Oil Corporation, Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2022-12-17 Revised:2023-03-14 Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-04-30

PDF (PC)

203

摘要： 以三维地震精细解释为基础，通过构造剖面恢复，系统分析了渤东凹陷新生代伸展-走滑叠合断裂的时空差异演化特征及控藏作用。研究结果表明：①渤东凹陷新生代广泛发育以 NNE 向为主干、NE向为派生、NW 向为叠加的伸展-走滑叠合断裂体系，可划分为强伸展-弱走滑断裂和强走滑-弱伸展断裂 2 类；整体具有深浅分层、南北分段的特征，纵向上，古近系主要发育强伸展-弱走滑断裂，断裂大而稀，新近系—第四系主要发育强走滑-弱伸展断裂，断裂小而密；平面上，同一断裂在不同段的构造组合样式存在差异。②研究区新生代伸展-走滑叠合断裂的演化主要表现为北部断裂活动强度“早强晚弱”，中部断裂继承性持续发育，南部断裂活动强度“早弱晚强”；演化模式分为初始断陷（孔店组—沙四段沉积期）、强烈断陷（沙三段—东营组沉积期）和走滑坳陷（馆陶组—平原组沉积期）3 个阶段，初始断陷阶段，NNE—NE 向强伸展与弱走滑叠合，NE 向强伸展-弱走滑断裂为主控，NW 向先存断裂活化，分割凹陷；强烈断陷阶段，NNE—NE 向强伸展与弱走滑叠合，NNE 向强伸展-弱走滑断裂变为主控，NW 向断裂活动减弱或停止；走滑坳陷阶段，NNE 向强走滑与弱伸展叠合，断裂不控制沉积，但对地层展布具有调整作用。③研究区伸展-走滑叠合断裂的发育演化与油气成藏密切相关，整体具有“早期伸展控源、晚期走滑控运、多期叠加控圈”的特征，东部斜坡带是油气运聚的有利区。

关键词: 伸展-走滑叠合断裂, 断裂演化, 油气运聚, 断裂控藏, 沙河街组, 东营组, 新生代, 渤东凹陷

Abstract: Based on 3D seismic interpretation, the spatial-temporal differential evolution characteristics and reservoir control effect of Cenozoic extensional and strike-slip superimposed faults in Bodong Sag were systematically analyzed through structural profile restoration. The results show that:（1）Extensional and strike-slip superimposed faults with NNE trending as the main stem, NE trending as the derivative, and NW trending as the superposition, were widely developed in Cenozoic in Bodong Sag, and these faults can be divided into two types: strong extensional and weak strike-slip faults, strong strike-slip and weak extensional faults. The superimposed fault system has obvious characteristics of deep and shallow stratification and north-south segmentation. Vertically, the Paleogene mainly developed strong extensional and weak strike-slip faults, which are large and sparse, and the Neogene-Quaternary mainly developed strong strike slip and weak extensional faults, which are small and dense. On the plane, there are differences in the structural combination styles of the same fault in different segments.（2）The evolution of the Cenozoic extensional and strike-slip superimposed faults in the study area are manifested as early strong and late weak activity of the northern faults, inherited and continuous development of the central faults, and early weak and late strong activity of the southern faults. The evolution model can be divided into three stages:initial fault depression stage（Kongdian Formation-Sha 4 sedimentary period）, strong fault depression stage （Sha 3 member-Dongying Formation sedimentary period） and strike-slip depression stage （Guantao Formation-Pingyuan Formation sedimentary period）. In the initial fault depression stage, NNE-NE trending strong extensional and weak strike-slip faults superimposed, dominated by NE trending strong extensional and weak strike-slip faults, with NW trending pre-existing fault activation, dividing the depression. In the strong fault depression stage, NNE-NE trending strong extensional and weak strike-slip faults superimposed, dominated by NNE trending strong extensional and weak strike-slip faults, with NW trending fault activity weakened or stopped. In the strike-slip depression stage, NNE trending strong strike-slip and weak extensional faults superimposed, and the faults did not control the sedimentation, but has adjustment on stratigraphic distribution.（3）The development and evolution of the extensional and strike-slip superimposed faults in the study area are closely related to hydrocarbon accumulation, with the overall characteristics of early extensional faults control source, late strikeslip faults control migration, and multi-stage superimposed faults control traps. The eastern slope zone is a favorable area for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation.

Key words: extensional and strike-slip superimposed fault, fault evolution, hydrocarbon migration and accumulation, fault control reservoir, Shahejie Formation, Dongying Formation, Cenozoic, Bodong Sag

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 吴智平,薛雁,颜世永,等. 渤海海域渤东地区断裂体系与盆地结构[J]. 高校地质学报,2013,19(3):463-471. WU Zhiping,XUE Yan,YAN Shiyong,et al. The development characteristics of the fault system and basin structures of the Bodong Sag,East China[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities,2013,19(3):463-471.
[2] 胡志伟,徐长贵,王德英,等. 渤海海域走滑断裂叠合特征与成因机制[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2019,46(2):254-267. HU Zhiwei,XU Changgui,WANG Deying,et al. Superimposed characteristics and genetic mechanism of strike-slip faults in the Bohai Sea,China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(2):254-267.
[3] 任健. 渤海海域走滑双重构造发育特征及成因机制[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2015. REN Jian. Development characteristics and genetic mechanism of strike-slip duplex in Bohai Sea[D]. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2015.
[4] 李坤,董柔,江涛,等. 渤海湾盆地渤东凹陷次级洼陷差异演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学,2022,33(6):967-978. LI Kun,DONG Rou,JIANG Tao,et al. Differential evolution characteristics of secondary depressions in the Bodong Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2022,33(6):967-978.
[5] 韩立国. 济阳坳陷构造体制转换与郯庐断裂带的关系探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏,2009,21(1):72-74. HAN Liguo. Relationship between structural regime transition of Jiyang Depression and Tan-Lu fault zone[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(1):72-74.
[6] QI Jiafu,ZHOU Xinhuai,DENG Rongjing,et al. Structural characteristics of the Tan-Lu fault zone in Cenozoic basins offshore the Bohai Sea[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2008,51(2):20-31.
[7] HUANG Lei,LIU Chiyang. Evolutionary characteristics of the sags to the east of Tan-Lu fault zone,Bohai Bay Basin(China):Implications for hydrocarbon exploration and regional tectonic evolution[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2014,79:275-287.
[8] TENG Changyu,ZOU Huayao,HAO Fang. Control of differential tectonic evolution on petroleum occurrence in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Science China Earth Sciences,2014,57(5):1117-1128.
[9] 万桂梅,周东红,汤良杰. 渤海海域郯庐断裂带对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2009,30(4):450-454. WAN Guimei,ZHOU Donghong,TANG Liangjie. Control of the Tan-Lu fault zone on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Bohai Sea waters[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30(4):450-454.
[10] 缪欢,王延斌,何川,等. 渤海湾盆地埕北断阶带断裂发育特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(2):105-115. MIAO Huan,WANG Yanbin,HE Chuan,et al. Fault development characteristics and reservoir control in Chengbei fault step zone, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(2):105-115.
[11] 苏圣民,蒋有录. 含油气盆地断裂带结构特征及其与油气运聚关系[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(4):32-41. SU Shengmin,JIANG Youlu. Fault zone structures and its relationship with hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in petroliferous basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2021,45(4):32-41.
[12] 殷秀兰,张清久. 渤海海域构造应力场演化及其在油气聚集中的作用[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2007,27(5):45-50. YIN Xiulan,ZHANG Qingjiu. Evolution of the structural stress and its function during oil/gas accumulation in Bohai sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2007,27(5):45-50.
[13] 付晓飞,李坤,董柔,等. 断层封闭性研究综述[J]. 能源技术与管理,2021,46(3):24-26. FU Xiaofei,LI Kun,DONG Rou,et al. Literature review on fault sealing[J]. Energy Technology and Management,2021,46(3):24-26.
[14] 石文龙,牛成民,杨波,等. 莱州湾凹陷东北洼"走滑-伸展"复合断裂控藏机理及勘探启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2019, 40(5):1056-1064. SHI Wenlong,NIU Chengmin,YANG Bo,et al. Mechanism of "strike-slip-extensional"composite faults-controlled hydrocarbon accumulation in the northeastern Laizhouwan Sag,and its enlightenment for exploration[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(5):1056-1064.
[15] 牛成民,杜晓峰,王启明,等. 渤海海域新生界大型岩性油气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):1-14. NIU Chengmin,DU Xiaofeng,WANG Qiming,et al. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large-scale lithologic reservoirs of Cenozoic in Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(3):1-14.
[16] TONG Hengmao,YU Fusheng,GENG Changbo. Characteristics and evolution of strike-slip tectonics of the Liaohe Western Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Science,2008,5(3):223-229.
[17] 李坤,董柔,徐国盛,等. 莱州湾凹陷新生代走滑-伸展叠合断裂体系发育演化模式[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021,48(1):12-22. LI Kun,DONG Rou,XU Guosheng,et al. The development and evolution model of Cenozoic strike slip-extension superposed fault system in Laizhou Bay Sag,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University ofTechnology(Science&Technology Edition),2021, 48(1):12-22.
[18] 宗奕,梁建设,刘丽芳. 庙西凹陷构造特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012,24(1):36-39. ZONG Yi,LIANG Jianshe,LIU Lifang. Structural characteristics of Miaoxi Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(1):36-39.
[19] 黄镜嘉,李坤,江涛,等. 渤东凹陷南部新生代断裂体系发育及演化特征[J]. 矿物岩石,2022,42(4):60-70. HUANG Jingjia,LI Kun,JIANG Tao,et al. Development and evolution of Cenozoic fault system in southern Bodong Sag[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology,2022,42(4):60-70.
[20] 李春荣. 渤海海域渤东凹陷结构特征与勘探方向[J]. 海洋石油,2015,35(4):1-7. LI Chunrong. Structural characteristics and favorable hydrocarbon exploration zone of Bodong Depression in Bohai Sea area[J]. Offshore Oil,2015,35(4):1-7.
[21] XU Guosheng,XU Zhixing,GONG Deyu,et al. Relationship between Tanlu fault and hydrocarbon accumulation in Liaozhong Sag,Bohai Bay,eastern China[J]. Journal of Earth Science,2014,25(2):324-336.
[22] YE Tao,CHEN Anqing,HOU Mingcai,et al. Characteristic of the Bodong segment of the Tanlu fault zone,Bohai Sea area, eastern China:Implications for hydrocarbon exploration and regional tectonic evolution[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,201(2):108478.
[23] 王明春,李德郁,张海义,等. 渤海西部沙北构造带断裂特征及其对沉积的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):167-171. WANG Mingchun,LI Deyu,ZHANG Haiyi,et al. Characteristics of fault and its controlling on deposition in Shabei structural zone of western Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):167-171.
[24] 张震,徐春强,张志强,等. 渤中凹陷西次洼断裂演化特征及控藏作用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2018,37(1):9-14. ZHANG Zhen,XU Chunqiang,ZHANG Zhiqiang,et al. Evolution characteristics and their controlling actions on the hydrocarbon accumulation for the faults in west subsag of Bozhong Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2018,37(1):9-14.
[25] 张江涛,吴奎,黄晓波,等. 辽西凹陷北洼新生代断裂特征及控藏作用[J]. 中国海上油气,2017,29(5):39-47. ZHANG Jiangtao,WU Kui,HUANG Xiaobo,et al. Fault system characteristics and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation of the Cenozoic in northern Liaoxi Sag,Bohai sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2017,29(5):39-47.
[26] 胡志伟,徐长贵,杨波,等. 渤海海域断裂对油气优势运移通道的影响及其控藏类型[J]. 地质科技情报,2017,36(3):38-45. HU Zhiwei,XU Changgui,YANG Bo,et al. Influences of faults on the petroleum dominant migration pathway and its controlling reservoir types in the Bohai area[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2017,36(3):38-45.
[27] 周立宏,肖敦清,蒲秀刚,等. 陆相断陷湖盆复式叠合油气成藏与优势相富集新模式:以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2010,22(1):7-11. ZHOU Lihong,XIAO Dunqing,PU Xiugang,et al. New pattern of composite superimposed reservoirs and advantageous phase accumulation in continental rifted lake basin:A case study from Qikou Sag of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(1):7-11.
[28] 武云云,马立驰,杨贵丽,等. 渤海湾盆地垦东地区新近系断裂特征及其控藏作用[J]. 石油实验地质,2017,39(1):65-70. WU Yunyun,MA Lichi,YANG Guili,et al. Fault characteristics and their controls on hydrocarbon accumulations in Neogene,Kendong area,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(1):65-70.
[29] 柴永波,李伟,刘超,等. 渤海海域古近纪断裂活动对烃源岩的控制作用[J]. 断块油气田,2015,22(4):409-414. CHAI Yongbo,LI Wei,LIU Chao,et al. Controlling effect of fault activity on source rocks during Paleogene in Bohai sea area[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(4):409-414.
[30] 蒋有录,刘培,宋国奇,等. 渤海湾盆地新生代晚期断层活动与新近系油气富集关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2015,36(4):525-533. JIANG Youlu,LIU Pei,SONG Guoqi,et al. Late Cenozoic faulting activities and their influence upon hydrocarbon accumulations in the Neogene in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(4):525-533.
[31] 邓运华,薛永安,于水,等. 浅层油气运聚理论与渤海大油田群的发现[J]. 石油学报,2017,38(1):1-8. DENG Yunhua,XUE Yong'an,YU Shui,et al. Shallow hydrocarbon migration and accumulation theory and discovery of giant oilfield group in Bohai Sea[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017, 38(1):1-8.
[32] 王德英,于娅,张藜,等. 渤海海域石臼坨凸起大型岩性油气藏成藏关键要素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2020,32(1):1-10. WANG Deying,YU Ya,ZHANG Li,et al. Key factors for reservoir formation of large lithologic reservoirs in Shijiutuo uplift,Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(1):1-10.
[33] 龚再升,蔡东升,张功成. 郯庐断裂对渤海海域东部油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 石油学报,2007,28(4):1-10. GONG Zaisheng,CAI Dongsheng,ZHANG Gongcheng. Dominating action of Tanlu fault on hydrocarbon accumulation in eastern Bohai Sea area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(4):1-10.
[1] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2] 程焱, 王波, 张铜耀, 齐玉民, 杨纪磊, 郝鹏, 李阔, 王晓东. 渤中凹陷渤中A-2区新近系明化镇组岩性油气藏油气运移特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[3] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[4] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[5] 刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[6] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[7] 聂礼尚, 马静辉, 唐小飞, 杨智, 张婉金, 李鸿蕊. 准噶尔盆地东部帐篷沟地区中新生代构造事件及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 81-91.
[8] 胡望水, 高飞跃, 李明, 郭志杰, 王世超, 李相明, 李圣明, 揭琼. 渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷古近系沙河街组油藏单元精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 92-99.
[9] 薛罗, 史忠生, 马轮, 赵艳军, 岳世俊, 洪亮, 王磊, 雷明. 南苏丹Melut盆地北部地区中—新生界稠油成藏模式及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 76-85.
[10] 宋兴国, 陈石, 杨明慧, 谢舟, 康鹏飞, 李婷, 陈九洲, 彭梓俊. 塔里木盆地富满油田FⅠ16断裂发育特征及其对油气分布的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 99-109.
[11] 贺勇, 邱欣卫, 雷永昌, 谢世文, 肖张波, 李敏. 珠江口盆地陆丰13东洼新生代构造演化与油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 74-82.
[12] 谢坤, 苏程, 刘长龙, 梅杰, 于海涛, 何欣, 卢祥国. Cr3+聚合物弱凝胶调驱剖面变化规律及改善方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 160-170.
[13] 牛成民, 杜晓峰, 王启明, 张参, 丁熠然. 渤海海域新生界大型岩性油气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 1-14.
[14] 马正武, 官大勇, 王启明, 刘尧均, 李晓辉. 辽中凹陷古近系东三段湖底扇沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 131-140.
[15] 赵笑笑, 闫建平, 王敏, 何贤, 钟光海, 王军, 耿斌, 胡钦红, 李志鹏. 沾化凹陷沙河街组湖相泥页岩夹层特征及测井识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 118-129.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[2] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[3] 李云，时志强. 四川盆地中部须家河组致密砂岩储层流体包裹体研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 27 -32 .
[4] 蒋韧，樊太亮，徐守礼. 地震地貌学概念与分析技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 33 -38 .
[5] 邹明亮，黄思静，胡作维，冯文立，刘昊年. 西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 47 -52 .
[6] 王冰洁，何生，倪军娥，方度. 板桥凹陷钱圈地区主干断裂活动性分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 75 -82 .
[7] 陈振标，张超谟，张占松，令狐松，孙宝佃. 利用NMRT2谱分布研究储层岩石孔隙分形结构[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 105 -110 .
[8] 张厚福，徐兆辉. 从油气藏研究的历史论地层-岩性油气藏勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 114 -123 .
[9] 张　霞. 勘探创造力的培养[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 16 -20 .
[10] 杨午阳, 杨文采, 刘全新, 王西文. 三维F-X域粘弹性波动方程保幅偏移方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 86 -91 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发