岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 25–34.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240403

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段致密油成藏主控因素及模式

杨为华   

  1. 中国石油大庆油田公司 采油五厂, 黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-06 修回日期:2023-07-24 出版日期:2024-07-01 发布日期:2024-07-04
  • 第一作者:杨为华(1977—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事石油地质与油藏研究方面科研工作。地址:(163712)黑龙江省大庆市红岗区杏南街道第五采油厂。Email:yweihua@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“岩性地层油气藏成藏规律、关键技术及目标评价”(编号:2016ZX05001)资助。

Hydrocarbon accumulation model and main controlling factors of tight oil of the fourth member of Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Shuangcheng fault depression,Songliao Basin

YANG Weihua   

  1. No. 5 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company, Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2023-07-06 Revised:2023-07-24 Online:2024-07-01 Published:2024-07-04

摘要: 综合利用地震资料和岩心分析测试资料如包裹体均一温度、岩石热解和储层物性等,对松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段(营四段)致密油藏类型、分布特征、成藏期次进行了分析,并从烃源岩评价、储层特征、构造活动和输导体系 4 个方面对致密油成藏的主控因素进行了研究。研究结果表明:①松辽盆地双城断陷营四段致密油藏的类型及分布规律为,自中部洼槽向两侧斜坡依次发育源内岩性油藏、近源断层-岩性、地层油藏和远源构造油藏,油藏为一期成藏,主成藏期为晚白垩世姚家组沉积末期—嫩江组沉积初期(80~78 Ma)。②研究区营四下亚段发育的湖相泥岩、油页岩的生烃潜力较大,中部洼槽为生、排烃中心,生、排烃强度均较高,分别为(20~300)×104 t/km2和(5~53)×104 t/km2;营四上亚段发育的扇三角洲相含砾砂岩储层厚度大、连续性好,前缘砂体延伸入湖,平均孔隙度为 11.4%,平均渗透率为 0.95 mD,其中孔隙度大于 8.0%、渗透率高于 0.85 mD 的相对优质储层是致密油富集的有利目标;深层各类圈闭在早白垩世泉头组沉积末期即已形成,而主成藏期时研究区构造活动较弱,有利于油藏的形成和保存;由断裂、不整合和连通砂体组成的多类型立体输导体系是油气运移主要通道,促进油气向两侧斜坡汇聚。③研究区致密油成藏受“源-扇-体”耦合控制,围绕生烃洼槽呈环带状分布,具有大面积分布、局部富集的特点,中部洼槽为源内“源-储叠置、网毯连接、扇体聚集”成藏模式,东部斜坡为近源“源-储紧邻、断-砂匹配、阶梯运移”成藏模式,西部陡坡为远源“源-储分离、‘Y’型运聚、高点富集”成藏模式。被泥岩包裹或与泥岩互层式接触的扇体、油源断裂附近的断层-岩性圈闭和地层圈闭、靠近油源断裂的背斜和断背斜圈闭分别是中部洼槽、东部斜坡和西部斜坡的有利勘探目标。

关键词: 深层致密油, 断陷盆地, 源内自生自储, 近源岩性地层油藏, 远源构造油藏, 输导体系, 营城组四段, 白垩系, 双城断陷, 松辽盆地

Abstract: By comprehensively utilizing seismic data and core analysis testing data such as inclusion homogenization temperature,rock pyrolysis,and reservoir properties,the types,distribution characteristics,and accumulation stages of tight oil reservoirs of the fourth member of Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation(Ying-4 member) in Shuangcheng fault depression of Songliao Basin were analyzed,and the main controlling factors for tight oil accumulation were studied from four aspects:source rock evaluation,reservoir characteristics,tectonic activities,and transport system. The results show that:(1)The distribution pattern of tight oil reservoirs of Ying-4 member in Shuangcheng fault depression of Songliao Basin is as follows:from the central trough to the slopes on both sides,there are lithologic reservoirs within the source,near source fault-lithologic reservoirs,stratigraphic reservoirs,and far source structural reservoirs. The reservoir is one-stage hydrocarbon accumulation, and the main accumulation satge is from the late sedimentary period of Yaojia Formation in Late Cretaceous to the early sedimentary period of Nenjiang Formation(80-78 Ma).(2)The lacustrine mudstone and oil shale developed in the lower submember of Ying-4 member(K1yc4)in the study area have great potential for oil and gas generation. The central depression is the center of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion,with high hydrocarbon generation and expulsion intensities of(20-300)×104 t/km2 and(5-53)×104 t/km2,respectively. The fan delta conglomerate sandstone reservoirs developed in the upper K1yc4 has a large thickness and good continuity. The front sand bodies extend into the lake,with an average porosity of 11.4% and an average permeability of 0.95 mD. Among them,relatively high-quality reservoirs with porosity greater than 8.0% and permeability higher than 0.85 mD are favorable targets for tight oil enrichment. Deep traps of various types formed at the end of Quantou Formation in Early Cretaceous,structure during the main accumulation stage was weak,which is conducive to the formation and preservation of oil reservoirs. The multi type three-dimensional transport system composed of faults,unconformities,and connected sand bodies is the main pathway for oil and gas migration, promoting the convergence of oil and gas towards the slopes on both sides.(3)The tight oil reservoir accumulation in the study area is controlled by the coupling of“source rock-fan delta sandbody-transport system”,and is distributed in a ring-shaped pattern around hydrocarbon generating troughs,with characteristics of large-scale distribution and local enrichment. Three reservoir accumulation models are developed,including“reservoir overriding source rock,and they connect with reticular-blanket transportations,oil accumulate within the fan delta” in center depression,“source and reservoir close proximity,fault sandstone matching,and migration along the fault step”in eastern slope,and“source and reservoir separation,“Y”- shaped migration and accumulation,and enrichment in tectonic highs”in western steep slope. Fan bodies enclosed by mudstone or in contact with mudstone interlayers,fault-lithologic and stratigraphic traps near oil source faults,and anticline and fault anticline traps near oil source faults are favorable exploration targets for the central depression,eastern slope,and western steep slope,respectively.

Key words: tight oil in deep layer, faulted basin, self-souce and self-reservoir within source, near source lithologic-stratigraphic reservoir, far source structural reservoir, transport system, the fourth member of Yingcheng Formation, Cretaceous, Shuangcheng fault depression, Songliao Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.1
[1] 贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等.中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):343-350. JIA Chengzao,ZOU Caineng,LI Jianzhong,et al. Assessment criteria,main types,basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):343-350.
[2] 田景春,梁庆韶,王峰,等.陆相湖盆致密油储集砂体成因及发育模式:以鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统长6油层组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(4):877-888. TIAN Jingchun,LIANG Qingshao,WANG Feng,et al. Genesis and development model of tight oil reservoir sand body in continental lacustrine basin:A case study on the Upper Triassic Chang 6 pay zone,Ordos Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2022, 43(4):877-888.
[3] WU Songtao,ZHU Rukai,YAN Zhi,et al. Distribution and characteristics of lacustrine tight oil reservoirs in China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2019,178:20-36.
[4] 罗群,高阳,张泽元,等.中国与美国致密油形成条件对比研究[J].石油实验地质,2022,44(2):199-209. LUO Qun,GAO Yang,ZHANG Zeyuan,et al. A comparative study of geological conditions of tight oils in China and USA[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2022,44(2):199-209.
[5] 邵晓州,王苗苗,齐亚林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地平凉北地区长8油藏特征及成藏主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(6):59-69. SHAO Xiaozhou,WANG Miaomiao,QI Yalin,et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Chang 8 reservoir in northern Pingliang area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021,33(6):59-69.
[6] SONG Yan,LUO Qun,JIANG Zhenxue,et al. Enrichment of tight oil and its controlling factors in central and western China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(2):492-506.
[7] 罗群,张泽元,袁珍珠,等.致密油甜点的内涵、评价与优选:以酒泉盆地青西凹陷白垩系下沟组为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2022,34(4):1-12. LUO Qun,ZHANG Zeyuan,YUAN Zhenzhu,et al. Connotation,evaluation and optimization of tight oil sweet spots:A case study of Cretaceous Xiagou Formation in Qingxi Sag,Jiuquan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(4):1-12.
[8] 孙龙德,邹才能,贾爱林,等.中国致密油气发展特征与方向[J].石油勘探与开发,2019,46(6):1015-1026. SUN Longde,ZOU Caineng,JIA Ailin,et al. Development characteristics and orientation of tight oil and gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(6):1015-1026.
[9] 刘宗堡,李雪,郑荣华,等.浅水三角洲前缘亚相储层沉积特征及沉积模式:以大庆长垣萨北油田北二区萨葡高油层为例[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(1):1-13. LIU Zongbao,LI Xue,ZHENG Ronghua,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and models of shallow water delta front subfacies reservoirs:A case study of Sapugao oil layer in north-Ⅱ block of Sabei oilfield,Daqing placanticline[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(1):1-13.
[10] 杨海风,徐长贵,牛成民,等.渤海湾盆地黄河口凹陷新近系油气富集模式与成藏主控因素定量评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2020,41(2):259-269. YANG Haifeng,XU Changgui,NIU Chengmin,et al. Quantitative evaluation of hydrocarbon accumulation pattern and the controlling factors in the Neogene of Huanghekou sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2020,41(2):259-269.
[11] 牛成民,杜晓峰,王启明,等.渤海海域新生界大型岩性油气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):1-14. NIU Chengmin,DU Xiaofeng,WANG Qiming,et al. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large-scale lithologic reservoirs of Cenozoic in Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(3):1-14.
[12] 邓守伟.松辽盆地德惠断陷火石岭组天然气成藏机理[J].沉积学报,2019,37(2):432-442. DENG Shouwei. Accumulation mechanism for natural gas in the Huoshiling Formation of the Dehui fault depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2019,37(2):432-442.
[13] 白雪峰,梁江平,张文婧,等.松辽盆地北部深层天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2018,29(1):1443-1454. BAI Xuefeng,LIANG Jiangping,ZHANG Wenjing,et al. Geologic conditions,resource potential and exploratory direction of deep gas in the northern Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2018,29(1):1443-1454.
[14] 孙立东,印长海,刘超,等.松辽盆地营城组优质烃源岩地质特征及勘探意义[J].石油学报,2019,40(10):1171-1179. SUN Lidong,YIN Changhai,LIU Chao,et al. Geological characteristics and exploration significance of high-quality source rocks in Yingcheng Formation,Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(10):1171-1179.
[15] 张姣,辛朝坤,张军勇.火山喷发机构、期次及其控藏作用:以松辽盆地北部莺山凹陷营一段为例[J].石油与天然气地质, 2018,39(2):291-299. ZHANG Jiao,XIN Chaokun,ZHANG Junyong. A study on volcanic eruption edifices and stages and their control over hydrocarbon accumulation:A case study of the first member of the Yingcheng Formation in Yingshan Sag,northern Songliao Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2018,39(2):291-299.
[16] 印长海,绪磊,杨亮,等.莺山凹陷营城组火山岩储层特征及成因[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2014,33(5):92-96. YIN Changhai,XU Lei,YANG Liang,et al. Characteristics and origins of Yingcheng Formation volcanic reservoir in Yingshan Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2014,33(5):92-96.
[17] 印长海,孙立东,刘超,等.松辽盆地双城地区原油成藏条件与主控因素[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2018,37(6):1-6. YIN Changhai,SUN Lidong,LIU Chao,et al. Conditions and master controlling factors for the petroleum accumulation in Shuangcheng area of Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing,2018,37(6):1-6.
[18] 孙立东,周翔,杨亮,等.松辽盆地莺山地区深层天然气地球化学特征与成藏模式[J].石油学报,2023,44(2):285-298. SUN Lidong,ZHOU Xiang,YANG Liang,et al. Geochemical characteristics and accumulation model of deep gas in Yingshan area,Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(2):285-298.
[19] 魏新,唐建云,宋红霞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区上古生界烃源岩地球化学特征及生烃潜力[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(6):92-100. WEI Xin,TANG Jianyun,SONG Hongxia,et al. Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon generation potential of Upper Paleozoic source rocks in Ganquan area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(6):92-100.
[20] 李博,崔军平,李莹,等.伊陕斜坡吴起地区延长组油气成藏期次分析[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(6):21-28. LI Bo,CUI Junping,LI Ying,et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation phases of Yanchang Formation in Wuqi area,Yishan slope[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(6):21-28.
[21] 杨智,唐振兴,陈旋,等. "进源找油":致密油主要类型及地质工程一体化进展[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(2):73-83. YANG Zhi,TANG Zhenxing,CHEN Xuan,et al. "Exploring oil inside source kitchen":Main types of tight oil and progress of geology-engineering integration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(2):73-83.
[22] 刘化清,刘宗堡,吴孔友,等.岩性地层油气藏区带及圈闭评价技术研究新进展[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(1):25-36. LIU Huaqing,LIU Zongbao,WU Kongyou,et al. New progress in study of play and trap evaluation technology for lithostratigraphic reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(1):25-36.
[23] 易士威,李明鹏,徐淑娟,等.松辽盆地双城断陷结构特征及控藏模式[J].天然气地球科学,2020,31(6):761-772. YI Shiwei,LI Mingpeng,XU Shujuan,et al. Structural characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation models of Shuangcheng Sag,Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,31(6):761-772.
[24] 陈棡,卞保力,李啸,等.准噶尔盆地腹部中浅层油气输导体系及其控藏作用[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(1):46-56. CHEN Gang,BIAN Baoli,LI Xiao,et al. Transport system and its control on reservoir formation of Jurassic-Cretaceous in hinterland of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(1):46-56.
[1] 冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[2] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[3] 肖博雅. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 135-148.
[4] 王洪星, 韩诗文, 胡佳, 潘志浩. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 35-45.
[5] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[6] 何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[7] 史卜庆, 丁梁波, 马宏霞, 孙辉, 张颖, 许小勇, 王红平, 范国章. 东非海域大型深水沉积体系及油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 10-17.
[8] 马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36.
[9] 范蕊, 刘卉, 杨沛广, 孙星, 马辉, 郝菲, 张珊珊. 阿曼盆地A区白垩系泥岩充填型碳酸盐岩溶蚀沟谷识别技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 72-81.
[10] 罗贝维, 尹继全, 胡广成, 陈华, 康敬程, 肖萌, 朱秋影, 段海岗. 阿联酋西部地区白垩系森诺曼阶高孔渗灰岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[11] 刘计国, 周鸿璞, 秦雁群, 邹荃, 郑凤云, 李早红, 肖高杰. 非洲Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩系AG组岩性油气藏勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 82-91.
[12] 齐育楷, 郭景祥, 罗亮, 骆福嵩, 周学文, 姚威, 张坦, 林会喜. 库车坳陷南部斜坡带隐蔽圈闭发育模式及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 108-119.
[13] 杜长鹏. 松辽盆地莺山-双城断陷白垩系致密火山岩天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 115-124.
[14] 韩云浩, 姜振学, 张志遥, 朱光有. 含油气盆地超高油气柱形成的有利地质条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 125-135.
[15] 隋立伟, 杨文璐, 李军辉, 樊晓东, 姜洪福, 文全, 张大智, 袁勇. 断陷湖盆滩坝沉积特征及其控藏作用——以塔南凹陷白垩系铜钵庙组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 100-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇,胡明毅,刘富艳,王辉,胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙,田景春,肖玲,王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维,李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮,涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .