岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 12–24.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240402

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望

包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天   

  1. 中国石油化工股份有限公司 江汉油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 武汉 430223
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-31 修回日期:2024-03-29 出版日期:2024-07-01 发布日期:2024-07-04
  • 第一作者:包汉勇(1965—),男,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事石油地质学方面的研究工作。地址:(430223)湖北省武汉市中石化江汉油田勘探开发研究院。Email:baohy.jhyt@sinopec.com。
  • 通信作者: 赵帅(1992—),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事石油地质学方面的研究工作。Email:zhaoshuai@cug.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石化股份公司科研项目“川东地区重点层系页岩气成藏条件与评价技术研究”(编号:P23077)资助。

Exploration achievements and prospects for shale gas of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area,eastern Sichuan Basin

BAO Hanyong, ZHAO Shuai, ZHANG Li, LIU Haotian   

  1. Exploration achievements and prospects for shale gas of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area, eastern Sichuan Basin BAO Hanyong, ZHAO Shuai, ZHANG Li, LIU Haotian (Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430223, China
  • Received:2023-07-31 Revised:2024-03-29 Online:2024-07-01 Published:2024-07-04

摘要: 基于构造、岩心、测井等资料,采用电镜扫描、低温 N2吸附实验、高压压汞实验、盆地模拟等手段,系统分析了川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩的沉积演化、储层特征及页岩气富集模式,明确了勘探有利区,总结了勘探成果及意义。研究结果表明:①红星地区中上二叠统的沉积演化表现为:栖霞组—茅口组三段为开阔台地相;茅四段底部为台地-陆棚相,相带变化快,茅四段顶部为斜坡-陆棚相,地层被剥蚀、南厚北薄;吴家坪组一段(吴一段)底部为海陆过渡滨岸沼泽-潟湖相,吴一段顶部为台地-斜坡-陆棚相,斜坡-陆棚相带分布范围小、相变快;吴二段为斜坡-陆棚相沉积,从早至晚依次受控于古气候、火山活动和古气候、火山活动,沉积中—晚期古生产力较高,TOC 均值大于 8.00%。②研究区茅四段及吴二段陆棚相区发育 2 套优质页岩,具有“高有机碳-高灰质”的特征,富有机质页岩厚度分别为 19 m 和25 m,孔隙类型以有机孔为主,结构以微孔和介孔为主;富碳凝灰岩薄夹层混合质页岩岩相、高碳凝灰岩薄夹层硅质页岩为优质岩相,孔隙度分别为 6.27% 和 6.43%,TOC 值分别为 10.11% 和 9.35%,含气饱和度分别为 92.59% 和 91.81%,脆性指数分别为 55.24% 和 61.19%,是地质和工程的双“甜点”段。③研究区二叠系广泛发育的层状藻为主要有机质来源;在侏罗纪主排烃期,其构造稳定、二叠系烃源岩排烃较少,中侏罗纪—早白垩纪早期为主生气期,构造活动较弱,页岩气的保存条件好,现今已完成生气过程,处于成熟—过成熟阶段,Ro值约 2.1%,勘探潜力巨大。④建南、龙驹坝、三星区块为有利勘探区,其中建南区块潜力最大;茅四段③小层及吴二段③小层为优质层系的靶窗层段。

关键词: 深层页岩气, 沉积演化, 有机孔, 斜坡-陆棚, “高有机碳-高灰质”页岩, 吴家坪组, 茅口组, 中上二叠统, 川东红星地区

Abstract: Based on tectonic,core and logging data,a systematic analysis was conducted on the sedimentary evolution,reservoir characteristics and shale gas enrichment models of Middle-Upper Permian shale in Hongxing area of eastern Sichuan Basin by means of electron microscope scanning,low-temperature N2 adsorption experiments,high-pressure mercury pressure experiments and basin simulation,the favorable exploration areas were identified,the exploration results and significance were summarized. The results show that:(1)The sedimentary evolution of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area is characterized by open platform facies in QixiaMaokou Formation;platform-shelf facies at the bottom of the fourth member of Maokou Formation,with fast facies change,while slope-shelf facies at the top of the fourth member of Maokou Formation,with strata denuded, thicker in the south and thinner in the north;marine-terrestrial transitional coastal swamp-lagoon facies at the bottom of the first member of WujiapingFormation,while platform-slope-shelf facies at the top of the first member of WujiapingFormation,with small distribution and fast facies change;slope-shelf facies in the second member of WujiapingFormation,which was controlled by paleoclimate,volcanic activity,paleoclimate,and volcanic activity from early to late,with high paleoproductivity during the middle to late sedimentary periods and average TOC greater than 8.00%.(2)Two sets of high-quality shales were developed in the shelf facies areas in the fourth member of Maokou Formation and the second member of Wujiaping Formation,with high organic carbon and high calcite content. Their thicknesses of organic-rich shales are 19 m and 25 m,respectively. The pores are dominated by organic pores,and the structures are mainly micropores and mesopores. The thinly interbedded mixed shale phases of carbon-rich tuff and the thinly interbedded siliceous shale phases of high carbon tuff are high-quality phases,with porosity of 6.27% and 6.43%,TOC of 10.11% and 9.35%,gas saturation 92.59% and 91.81%,and brittleness index of 55.24% and 61.19%,respectively. They are the dual“sweet spots”of geology and engineering.(3)The widely developed Permian stratified algae in the study area are the main source of organic matters. During the mian hydrocarbon expulsion period of Jurassic,the tectonic was stable,with less hydrocarbon expulsion of Permian hydrocarbon source rocks. Middle Jurassic to the early stage of Early Cretaceous was the main gas generation period,with weak tectonic activity and good preservation conditions for shale gas. The gas generation process has been completed and is currently in the mature to over mature stage,with a Ro value of about 2.1%,indicating huge exploration potential.(4)Jiannan,Longjuba and Sanshing blocks are favourable exploration areas,with Jiannan block having the greatest potential. The third sublayer of the fourth member of Maokou Formation and the third layer of the second member of Wujiaping Formation are target-window layer segments of high-quality layers.

Key words: deep shale gas, sedimentary evolution, organic pore, slope-shelf, high organic carbon-high calcite content shale, Wujiaping Formation, Maokou Formation, Middle-Upper Permian, Hongxing area in eastern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 张金川,陶佳,李振,等.中国深层页岩气资源前景和勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2021,41(1):15-28. ZHANG Jinchuan,TAO Jia,LI Zhen,et al. Prospect of deep shale gas resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(1):15-28.
[2] 董大忠,邹才能,戴金星,等.中国页岩气发展战略对策建议[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(3):397-406. DONG Dazhong,ZOU Caineng,DAI Jinxing,et al. Suggestions on the development strategy of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(3):397-406.
[3] 杨玉茹,孟凡洋,白名岗,等.世界最古老页岩气层储层特征与勘探前景分析[J].中国地质,2020,47(1):14-28. YANG Yuru,MENG Fanyang,BAI Minggang,et al. An analysis of reservoir characteristics,resources and exploration prospects of the oldest shale gas in the world[J]. Geology in China, 2020,47(1):14-28.
[4] 管宏林,蒋小琼,王恕一,等.普光气田与建南气田长兴组,飞仙关组储层对比研究[J].石油实验地质,2010,32(2):130-135. GUAN Honglin,JIANG Xiaoqiong,WANG Shuyi,et al. A comparative study of reservoirs of the Changxing and Feixianguan Formation between Puguang gasfield and Jiannan gasfield in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2010,32(2):130-135.
[5] 刘光祥,金之钧,邓模,等.川东地区上二叠统龙潭组页岩气勘探潜力[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(3):481-487. LIU Guangxiang,JIN Zhijun,DENG Mo,et al. Exploration potential for shale gas in the Upper Permian Longtan Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2015,36(3):481-487.
[6] 包汉勇,赵帅,梁榜,等.川东红星地区二叠系吴家坪组页岩气富集高产主控因素与勘探启示[J].中国石油勘探,2023,28(1):71-82. BAO Hanyong,ZHAO Shuai,LIANG Bang,et al. Enrichment and high yield of shale gas in the Permian Wujiaping Formation in Hongxing area of eastern Sichuan and its exploration implications[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(1):71-82.
[7] 闫建平,罗静超,石学文,等.川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J].岩性油气藏, 2022,34(6):60-71. YAN Jianping,LUO Jingchao,SHI Xuewen,et al. Fracture development models and significance of Ordovician WufengSilurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(6):60-71.
[8] 邱晨,闫建平,钟光海,等.四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):117-130. QIU Chen,YAN Jianping,ZHONG Guanghai,et al. Sedimentary microfacies division and logging identification of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(3):117-130.
[9] 何文渊,云建兵,钟建华.川东北二叠系长兴组碳酸盐岩云化成储机制[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(5):1-25. HE Wenyuan,YUN Jianbing,ZHONG Jianhua. Reservoirforming mechanism of carbonate dolomitization of Permian Changxing Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(5):1-25.
[10] 肖威,张兵,姚永君,等.川东二叠系龙潭组页岩岩相特征与沉积环境[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(2):152-162. XIAO Wei,ZHANG Bing,YAO Yongjun,et al. Lithofacies and sedimentary environment of shale of Permian Longtan Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022, 34(2):152-162.
[11] 邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理,地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653. ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Shejiao,et al. Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.
[12] 梁狄刚,郭彤楼,陈建平,等.中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(一):南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的分布[J].海相油气地质,2008,13(2):1-16. LIANG Digang,GUO Tonglou,CHEN Jianping,et al. Some progresses on studies of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation in marine sedimentary regions,southern China (Part 1):Distribution of four suits of regional marine source rocks[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2008,13(2):1-16.
[13] 刘小平,潘继平,董清源,等.苏北地区古生界页岩气形成地质条件[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(6):1100-1108. LIU Xiaoping,PAN Jiping,DONG Qingyuan,et al. Geological conditions of shale gas forming in Paleozoic Subei area[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(6):1100-1108.
[14] 郭旭升,胡东风,刘若冰,等.四川盆地二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气地质条件及勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2018,38(10):11-18. GUO Xusheng,HU Dongfeng,LIU Ruobing,et al. Geological conditions and exploration potential of Permian marinecontinent transitional facies shale gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(10):11-18.
[15] 余江浩,王登,王亿,等.湖北西部上二叠统大隆组页岩气资源潜力评价[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(4):84-90. YU Jianghao,WANG Deng,WANG Yi,et al. Evaluation of shale gas resource potential of Late Permian Dalong Formation in western Hubei province[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(4):84-90.
[16] 黄思静,王春梅,佟宏鹏,等.四川盆地东北部二叠系长兴组礁岩中的放射轴状纤维状胶结物[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(3):9-15. HUANG Sijing,WANG Chunmei,TONG Hongpeng,et al. Radiaxial fibrous cement of reefal framestone of Permian Changxing Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(3):9-15.
[17] 尹赞勋,徐道一,浦庆余.中国地壳运动名称资料汇编[J].地质论评,1965,23(增刊1):82. YIN Zanxun,XU Daoyi,PU Qingyu. A compilation of names of crustal movements in China[J]. Geological Review,1965, 23(Suppl 1):82.
[18] 胡世忠.论东吴运动构造事件与二叠系分统界线问题[J].地层学杂志,1994,18(4):309-315. HU Shizhong. On the event of Dongwu Movement and its relation with Permian subdivision[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 1994,18(4):309-315.
[19] 何治亮,聂海宽,李双建,等.特提斯域板块构造约束下上扬子地区二叠系龙潭组页岩气的差异性赋存[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(1):1-15. HE Zhiliang,NIE Haikuan,LI Shuangjian,et al. Differential occurence of shale gas in the Permian Longtan Formation of Upper Yangtze region constrained by plate tectonics in the Tethyan domain[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2021,42(1):1-15.
[20] 沈树忠,张华,张以春,等.中国二叠纪综合地层和时间框架[J].中国科学(地球科学),2019,49(1):160-193. SHEN Shuzhong,ZHANG Hua,ZHANG Yichun,et al. Permian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae),2019,49(1):160-193.
[21] 何登发,李德生,童晓光,等.中国沉积盆地油气立体综合勘探论[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(2):265-284. HE Dengfa,LI Desheng,TONG Xiaoguang,et al. Integrated 3D hydrocarbon exploration in sedimentary basins of China[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2021,42(2):265-284.
[22] 刘树根,孙玮,钟勇,等.四川海相克拉通盆地显生宙演化阶段及其特征[J].岩石学报,2017,33(4):1058-1072. LIU Shugen,SUN Wei,ZHONG Yong,et al. Evolutionary episodes and their characteristics within the Sichuan marine craton basin during Phanerozoic Eon,China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2017,33(4):1058-1072.
[23] 黄涵宇,何登发,李英强,等.四川盆地及邻区二叠纪梁山-栖霞组沉积盆地原型及其演化[J].岩石学报,2017,33(4):1317-1337. HUANG Hanyu,HE Dengfa,LI Yingqiang,et al. The prototype and its evolution of the Sichuan sedimentary basin and adjacent areas during Liangshan and Qixia stages in Permian[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2017,33(4):1317-1337.
[24] 梁新权,周云,蒋英,等.二叠纪东吴运动的沉积响应差异:来自扬子和华夏板块吴家坪组或龙潭组碎屑锆石LA-ICPMS U-Pb年龄研究[J].岩石学报,2013,29(10):3592-3606. LIANG Xinquan,ZHOU Yun,JIANG Ying,et al. Difference of sedimentary response to Dongwu movement:Study on LAICPMS U-Pb ages of detrital zircons from Upper Permian Wujiaping or Longtan Formation from the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2013,29(10):3592-3606.
[25] 梁西文,李乐.鄂西渝东区上二叠统吴家坪组页岩气地质条件及勘探潜力[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(3):386-394. LIANG Xiwen,LI Le. Geological conditions and exploration potential for shale gas in Upper Permian Wujiaping Formation in the region of western Hubei-eastern Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2021,43(3):386-394.
[26] 袁玉松,周雁,邱登峰,等.埋藏过程中泥页岩非构造裂缝的形成演化模式[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(5):822-827. YUAN Yusong,ZHOU Yan,QIU Dengfeng,et al. Evolutionary patterns of non-tectonic fracture in shale during burial[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2015,36(5):822-827.
[27] 王鹏威,刘忠宝,李雄,等.川东红星地区上二叠统吴家坪组页岩发育特征及其页岩气富集意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 2022,43(5):1102-1114. WANG Pengwei,LIU Zhongbao,LI Xiong,et al. Development of the Upper Permian Wujiaping shale in Hongxing area,eastern Sichuan Basin,and its significance to shale gas enrichment[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2022,43(5):1102-1114.
[28] 张梦琳,李郭琴,何嘉,等.川西南缘天宫堂构造奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2022,34(2):141-151. ZHANG Menglin,LI Guoqin,HE Jia,et al. Main controlling factors of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale gas enrichment in Tiangongtang structure,southwestern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(2):141-151.
[29] 王登,周豹,冷双梁,等.鄂西咸丰地区五峰组-龙马溪组硅质岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(1):52-62. WANG Deng,ZHOU Bao,LENG Shuangliang et al. Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of siliceous rocks of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Xianfeng area, Western Hubei[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(1):52-62.
[1] 孙汉骁, 邢凤存, 谢武仁, 钱红杉. 四川盆地及周缘地区晚奥陶世岩相古地理演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 121-135.
[2] 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[3] 张坦, 贾梦瑶, 孙雅雄, 丁文龙, 石司宇, 范昕禹, 姚威. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 111-120.
[4] 温思宇, 张兵, 姚永君, 马恺, 王艳, 杨凯. 川东地区二叠系吴家坪组页岩中黄铁矿形态及其对大洋缺氧事件的指示意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 71-80.
[5] 闫建平, 罗静超, 石学文, 钟光海, 郑马嘉, 黄毅, 唐洪明, 胡钦红. 川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[6] 邱晨, 闫建平, 钟光海, 李志鹏, 范存辉, 张悦, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
[7] 张文文, 韩长城, 田继军, 张治恒, 张楠, 李正强. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组层序地层划分及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 45-58.
[8] 王素英, 张翔, 田景春, 彭明鸿, 郑潇宇, 夏永涛. 塔里木盆地顺北地区柯坪塔格组沉积演化及沉积分异模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 81-94.
[9] 王欢, 刘波, 石开波, 刘航宇, 韩波. 伊拉克-伊朗地区侏罗纪—白垩纪构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 39-53.
[10] 王航, 杨海风, 黄振, 白冰, 高雁飞. 基于可容纳空间变化的河流相演化新模式及其控藏作用——以莱州湾凹陷垦利A构造为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 73-83.
[11] 张亚, 陈双玲, 张晓丽, 张玺华, 谢忱, 陈聪, 杨雨然, 高兆龙. 四川盆地茅口组岩溶古地貌刻画及油气勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 44-55.
[12] 吴丰, 习研平, 张亚, 陈双玲, 姚聪, 杨雨然. 川东—川南地区茅口组岩溶储层分类识别及有效性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 90-99.
[13] 李佳思, 付磊, 张金龙, 陈静, 牛斌, 张顺存. 准噶尔盆地乌夏地区中上二叠统碎屑岩成岩作用及次生孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 54-66.
[14] 王宏波, 郭玮, 章贵松, 井向辉, 李相博, 王菁. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘下寒武统地层划分及沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 13-20.
[15] 洪亮, 陈彬滔, 刘雄志, 惠学智, 房乃珍, 苏玉平. Muglad盆地Kaikang槽西斜坡沉积演化及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 8-15.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇,胡明毅,刘富艳,王辉,胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙,田景春,肖玲,王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维,李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮,涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .