岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 90–99.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200209

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

川东—川南地区茅口组岩溶储层分类识别及有效性评价

吴丰1, 习研平1, 张亚2, 陈双玲2, 姚聪1, 杨雨然2   

  1. 1. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500;
    2. 中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院, 成都 610051
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-01 修回日期:2019-10-13 出版日期:2020-03-21 发布日期:2020-01-19
  • 第一作者:吴丰(1983-),男,博士,讲师,硕士研究生导师,主要从事测井原理及地质应用方面的研究与教学工作。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号。Email:wufengzh@swpu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”（编号：2016ZX05052）资助

Classification and effectiveness evaluation of karst reservoirs of Maokou Formation in eastern and southern Sichuan Basin

WU Feng1, XI Yanping1, ZHANG Ya2, CHEN Shuangling2, YAO Cong1, YANG Yuran2   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil&Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610051, China
  • Received:2019-09-01 Revised:2019-10-13 Online:2020-03-21 Published:2020-01-19

PDF (PC)

341

摘要： 川东—川南地区中二叠统茅口组受暴露和风化淋滤的影响发育了独特的早成岩期风化壳岩溶储层，具有较大的勘探开发潜力。由于岩溶储层的孔隙结构特征、纵横向分布规律、测井响应特征等极为复杂，导致其测井有效性评价难度较大。在储层分类的基础上，结合岩溶发育模式，开展了茅口组3套典型储层的测井有效性评价方法研究。结果表明：①茅口组顶部储层的有效性与铝土质泥岩等风化残积物的充填程度密切相关，茅一段—茅三段铀含量较高储层的有效性与地层水的活跃程度密切相关，茅一段—茅二段似层状分布储层的有效性与泥质灰岩对潜水面的控制作用密切相关。②岩石放射性强度在一定程度上直接或间接反映了茅口组岩溶储层的发育和有效性，因此自然伽马和自然伽马能谱测井在岩溶储层有效性评价中具有重要作用。③受岩性、断层、岩溶侵蚀程度等因素的影响，不同构造中水平潜流带和深部缓流带的分布范围不同，因此储层的主要发育深度也不相同。该研究成果对于风化壳岩溶储层的有效性识别具有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 茅口组, 岩溶储层, 有效性评价, 测井, 四川盆地

Abstract: Influenced by exposure and weathering leaching,Maokou Formation of the middle Permian in eastern and southern Sichuan Basin has developed unique eogenetic weathering crust karst reservoirs,which has great exploration and development potential. Due to the complex characteristics of the pore structure,vertical and horizontal distribution and well logging response,it is difficult to carry out logging effectiveness evaluation. On the basis of reservoir classification,combined with karst development model,the logging effectiveness evaluation methods for three sets of typical reservoirs of Maokou Formation were studied. The results show that:(1)The effectiveness of the reservoirs developed in the top of Maokou Formation is closely related to the filling degree of weathering residual deposits such as auxetic mudstone. The effectiveness of the reservoirs with higher uranium content in Mao 1 member to Mao 3 member is closely related to the activity of the formation water,and the effectiveness of bedded reservoirs developed in Mao 1 member to Mao 2 member is closely related to the control of the argillaceous limestone on the water table.(2)The radioactive intensity of rocks directly or indirectly reflects the development and effectiveness of the karst reservoirs in Maokou Formation,so natural gamma ray logging and natural gamma ray spectral logging play important roles in the evaluation of the effectiveness of karst reservoirs.(3)Influenced by lithology,fault,karst erosion degree and other factors,the distributions of horizontal undercurrent zone and deep slow current zone vary in different structures,and the main developed depth of reservoirs is also different. The study results can be used for reference for the validity identification of karst reservoirs.

Key words: Maokou Formation, karst reservoir, effectiveness evaluation, well logging, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+5
[1] 童崇光. 四川盆地断褶构造形成机制. 天然气工业, 1992, 12(5):1-6. TONG C G. Mechanism of forming fault-folded structure in Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 1992, 12(5):1-6.
[2] 曹刚, 李其荣, 安辉. 川南地区下二叠统茅口组"岩溶型气藏" 地震、地质特征探讨. 天然气地球科学, 1999, 10(3):76-82. CAO G, LI Q R, AN H. Discussion on seismic and geological characteristics of "karst gas reservoir" in Maokou Formation of Lower Permian in south Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 1999, 10(3):76-82.
[3] 肖笛, 谭秀成, 山述娇, 等. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组古岩溶地貌恢复及其石油地质意义. 地质学报, 2014, 88(10):1992-2002. XIAO D, TAN X C, SHAN S J, et al. The restoration of Palaeokarst geomorphology of Middle Permian Maokou Formation and its petroleum geological significance in southern Sichuan Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(10):1992-2002.
[4] 施泽进, 夏文谦, 王勇, 等.四川盆地东南部茅口组古岩溶特征及识别.岩石学报, 2014, 30(3):622-630. SHI Z J, XIA W Q, WANG Y, et al. Characteristics and identification of paleokarst in the Maokou Formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(3):622-630.
[5] 沈平, 张健, 宋家荣, 等.四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新突破的意义及有利勘探方向. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(7):1-9. SHEN P, ZHANG J, SONG J R, et al. Significance of new breakthrough in and favorable targets of gas exploration in the Middle Permian system, Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(7):1-9.
[6] 张玺华, 陈聪, 张亚, 等. 川西北地区茅口组海槽相地质特征及其油气地质意义. 天然气勘探与开发, 2018, 41(3):42-50. ZHANG X H, CHEN C, ZHANG Y, et al. Geological characteristics of trough facies,Maokou Formation,northwestern Sichuan Basin:Implications for geology. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2018, 41(3):42-50.
[7] 胡东风. 四川盆地元坝地区茅口组台缘浅滩天然气勘探的突破与启示. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(3):1-10. HU D F. Breakthrough in natural gas exploration in the platform margin shoal at the Maokou Fm in the Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin, and its implications. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(3):1-10.
[8] 肖笛, 谭秀成, 山述娇, 等. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组二段沉积微相研究. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(6):1182-1191. XIAO D, TAN X C, SHAN S J, et al. Sedimentary microfacies of the second member in Maokou Formation, Middle Permian, south Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(6):1182-1191.
[9] 刘宏, 马腾, 谭秀成, 等. 表生岩溶系统中浅埋藏构造-热液白云岩成因:以四川盆地中部中二叠统茅口组为例. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6):916-927. LIU H, MA T, TAN X C, et al. Origin of structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite in epigenetic karst system during shallow burial:an example from Middle Permian Maokou Formation, central Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(6):916-927.
[10] 戴晓峰, 张明, 江青春, 等. 四川盆地中部下二叠统茅口组岩溶储集层地震预测. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1):79-88. DAI X F, ZHANG M, JIANG Q C, et al. Karst reservoirs seismic prediction of Lower Permian Maokou Formation in central Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1):79-88.
[11] 汪泽成, 江青春, 黄士鹏, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气大面积成藏的地质条件. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(1):30-38. WANG Z C, JIANG Q C, HUANG S P, et al. Geological conditions for massive accumulation of natural gas in the Mid-Permian Maokou Formation of the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(1):30-38.
[12] 黄士鹏, 江青春, 冯庆付, 等.川南地区中二叠统茅口组岩溶储集层类型与分布规律.石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(2):1-9. HUANG S P, JIANG Q C, FENG Q F, et al. Type and distribution of Mid-Permian Maokou Formation karst reservoirs in southern Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(2):1-9.
[13] 耿斌, 胡心红. 孔隙结构研究在低渗透储层有效性评价中的应用. 断块油气田, 2011, 18(2):187-190. GENG B, HU X H. Application of pore structure study in effectiveness evaluation of low permeability reservoir. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2011, 18(2):187-190.
[14] 吴丰, 黄丹, 袁龙, 等.青西油田窿六区块储层裂缝有效性研究. 特种油气藏, 2012, 19(5):42-45. WU F, HUANG D, YUAN L, et al. Study on reservoir fracture effectiveness of block Long 6 of Qingxi Oilfield. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2012, 19(5):42-45.
[15] 张兆辉, 高楚桥, 高永德. 三元耦合方法评价孔洞型储层有效性. 测井技术, 2013, 37(6):643-647. ZHANG Z H, GAO C Q, GAO Y D. Effectiveness of evaluating vuggy reservoir with ternary factors coupling approach. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(6):643-647.
[16] 陈宗清. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气勘探. 中国石油勘探, 2007, 12(5):1-11. CHEN Z Q. Exploration for natural gas in Middle Permian Maokou Formation of Sichuan Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2007, 12(5):1-11.
[17] 李凤杰, 郑荣才, 周小进, 等.中国南方晚古生代构造演化与盆地原型. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2009, 29(2):93-99. LI F J, ZHENG R C, ZHOU X J, et al. Late Palaeozoic tectonic evolution and basin prototype in southern China. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2009, 29(2):93-99.
[18] XIAO D, TAN X C, XI A H, et al. An inland facies-controlled eogenetic karst of the carbonate reservoir in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation, southern Sichuan Basin, SW China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 72:218-233.
[19] 江青春, 胡素云, 姜华, 等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组地层缺失量计算及成因探讨. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(1):21-29. JIANG Q C, HU S Y, JIANG H, et al. Calculation and inducement of lacuna in the Mid-Permian Maokou Fm of the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(1):21-29.
[20] 王珏博, 谷一凡, 陶艳忠, 等. 川中地区茅口组两期流体叠合控制下的白云石化模式. 沉积学报, 2016, 34(2):236-249. WANG J B, GU Y F, TAO Y Z, et al. The model of dolomitization jointly controlled by two-episode fluids in Maokou Formation in central Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(2):236-249.
[21] 耿晓洁, 林畅松, 吴斌. 古地貌对塔中地区鹰山组岩溶结构及分布的控制作用. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):46-55. GENG X J, LIN C S, WU B. Controlling of paleogeomorphology to characteristics and distribution of karst structures of Yingshan Formation in Tazhong area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):46-55.
[22] 田亮, 李佳玲, 焦保雷. 塔河油田12区奥陶系油藏溶洞充填机理及挖潜方向. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):52-60. TIAN L, LI J L, JIAO B L. Filling mechanism and potential tapping direction of Ordovician karst reservoirs in block-12 of Tahe Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):52-60.
[23] 司马立强, 陈志强, 王亮, 等.基于滩控岩溶型白云岩储层分类的渗透率建模方法研究:以川中磨溪高石梯地区龙王庙组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):92-102. SIMA L Q, CHEN Z Q, WANG L, et al. Permeability modeling based on the classification of beach-controlled karst dolomite reservoirs:a case from Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi-Gaoshiti area,central Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):92-102.
[24] 代冬冬, 房启飞, 万效国, 等.哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系岩溶古河道识别及其成藏意义.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):89-96. DAI D D, FANG Q F, WAN X G, et al. Identification of Ordovician karstic paleochannels and its accumulation significance in Halahatang area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):89-96.
[25] 肖笛, 谭秀成, 郗爱华, 等.四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组碳酸盐岩岩溶特征:古大陆环境下层控型早成岩期岩溶实例. 古地理学报, 2015, 17(4):457-476. XIAO D, TAN X C, XI A H, et al. Palaeokarst characteristics of carbonate rocks of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in southern Sichuan Basin:Example of strata-bound eogenetic karst in palaeo-continental settings. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2015, 17(4):457-476.
[26] 王谦.自然伽马能谱测井在塔河奥陶系地层划分中的应用. 石油物探, 2004, 43(5):504-507. WANG Q. Application of GR spectroscopy log in stratigraphic classification of the Ordovician formation in Tahe oilfield. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2004, 43(5):504-507.
[27] 彭曙光, 潘和平, 王霁霞, 等. 自然伽马能谱井在储层评价中的应用. 工程地球物理学报, 2009, 6(4):481-484. PENG S G, PAN H P, WANG J X, et, al. Application of natural gamma ray spectrometry logs in reservoir evaluation. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2009, 6(4):481-484.
[28] 李红敬, 解习农, 黄俊华, 等. 川西北二叠系茅口组海相优质烃源岩发育控制因素. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2012, 37(1):171-180. LI H J, XIE X N, HUANG J H, et al. Sichuan northwest twofold system Maokou group sea phase high-quality hydrocarbon source rock development control factors. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2012, 37(1):171-180.
[1] 赵军, 李勇, 文晓峰, 徐文远, 焦世祥. 基于斑马算法优化支持向量回归机模型预测页岩地层压力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 12-22.
[2] 闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[3] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[4] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[5] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[6] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[7] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[8] 包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[9] 卢科良, 吴康军, 李志军, 孙永河, 徐少华, 梁锋, 刘露, 李爽. 川中古隆起北斜坡寒武系龙王庙组油气成藏特征及演化模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 159-168.
[10] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[11] 白雪峰, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智, 卢双舫, 隋立伟, 王继平, 董忠良. 四川盆地仪陇—平昌地区侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征及富集条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 52-64.
[12] 岑永静, 梁锋, 王立恩, 刘倩虞, 张鑫哲, 丁熊. 四川盆地蓬莱—中江地区震旦系灯影组二段成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 89-98.
[13] 张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
[14] 孙汉骁, 邢凤存, 谢武仁, 钱红杉. 四川盆地及周缘地区晚奥陶世岩相古地理演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 121-135.
[15] 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣，侯中健，王亚辉，王莹，王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才，李晓平，窦天财，吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳，张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯，郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜，秦伟军，郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉，陆正元，袁帅，李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云， 卢渊，伊向艺，张俊良，张锦良，王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发