岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 90–99.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200209

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

川东—川南地区茅口组岩溶储层分类识别及有效性评价

吴丰1, 习研平1, 张亚2, 陈双玲2, 姚聪1, 杨雨然2   

  1. 1. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500;
    2. 中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院, 成都 610051
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-01 修回日期:2019-10-13 出版日期:2020-03-21 发布日期:2020-01-19
  • 作者简介:吴丰(1983-),男,博士,讲师,硕士研究生导师,主要从事测井原理及地质应用方面的研究与教学工作。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号。Email:wufengzh@swpu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”（编号：2016ZX05052）资助

Classification and effectiveness evaluation of karst reservoirs of Maokou Formation in eastern and southern Sichuan Basin

WU Feng1, XI Yanping1, ZHANG Ya2, CHEN Shuangling2, YAO Cong1, YANG Yuran2   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil&Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610051, China
  • Received:2019-09-01 Revised:2019-10-13 Online:2020-03-21 Published:2020-01-19

PDF (PC)

278

摘要： 川东—川南地区中二叠统茅口组受暴露和风化淋滤的影响发育了独特的早成岩期风化壳岩溶储层，具有较大的勘探开发潜力。由于岩溶储层的孔隙结构特征、纵横向分布规律、测井响应特征等极为复杂，导致其测井有效性评价难度较大。在储层分类的基础上，结合岩溶发育模式，开展了茅口组3套典型储层的测井有效性评价方法研究。结果表明：①茅口组顶部储层的有效性与铝土质泥岩等风化残积物的充填程度密切相关，茅一段—茅三段铀含量较高储层的有效性与地层水的活跃程度密切相关，茅一段—茅二段似层状分布储层的有效性与泥质灰岩对潜水面的控制作用密切相关。②岩石放射性强度在一定程度上直接或间接反映了茅口组岩溶储层的发育和有效性，因此自然伽马和自然伽马能谱测井在岩溶储层有效性评价中具有重要作用。③受岩性、断层、岩溶侵蚀程度等因素的影响，不同构造中水平潜流带和深部缓流带的分布范围不同，因此储层的主要发育深度也不相同。该研究成果对于风化壳岩溶储层的有效性识别具有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 茅口组, 岩溶储层, 有效性评价, 测井, 四川盆地

Abstract: Influenced by exposure and weathering leaching,Maokou Formation of the middle Permian in eastern and southern Sichuan Basin has developed unique eogenetic weathering crust karst reservoirs,which has great exploration and development potential. Due to the complex characteristics of the pore structure,vertical and horizontal distribution and well logging response,it is difficult to carry out logging effectiveness evaluation. On the basis of reservoir classification,combined with karst development model,the logging effectiveness evaluation methods for three sets of typical reservoirs of Maokou Formation were studied. The results show that:(1)The effectiveness of the reservoirs developed in the top of Maokou Formation is closely related to the filling degree of weathering residual deposits such as auxetic mudstone. The effectiveness of the reservoirs with higher uranium content in Mao 1 member to Mao 3 member is closely related to the activity of the formation water,and the effectiveness of bedded reservoirs developed in Mao 1 member to Mao 2 member is closely related to the control of the argillaceous limestone on the water table.(2)The radioactive intensity of rocks directly or indirectly reflects the development and effectiveness of the karst reservoirs in Maokou Formation,so natural gamma ray logging and natural gamma ray spectral logging play important roles in the evaluation of the effectiveness of karst reservoirs.(3)Influenced by lithology,fault,karst erosion degree and other factors,the distributions of horizontal undercurrent zone and deep slow current zone vary in different structures,and the main developed depth of reservoirs is also different. The study results can be used for reference for the validity identification of karst reservoirs.

Key words: Maokou Formation, karst reservoir, effectiveness evaluation, well logging, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+5
[1] 童崇光. 四川盆地断褶构造形成机制. 天然气工业, 1992, 12(5):1-6. TONG C G. Mechanism of forming fault-folded structure in Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 1992, 12(5):1-6.
[2] 曹刚, 李其荣, 安辉. 川南地区下二叠统茅口组"岩溶型气藏" 地震、地质特征探讨. 天然气地球科学, 1999, 10(3):76-82. CAO G, LI Q R, AN H. Discussion on seismic and geological characteristics of "karst gas reservoir" in Maokou Formation of Lower Permian in south Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 1999, 10(3):76-82.
[3] 肖笛, 谭秀成, 山述娇, 等. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组古岩溶地貌恢复及其石油地质意义. 地质学报, 2014, 88(10):1992-2002. XIAO D, TAN X C, SHAN S J, et al. The restoration of Palaeokarst geomorphology of Middle Permian Maokou Formation and its petroleum geological significance in southern Sichuan Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(10):1992-2002.
[4] 施泽进, 夏文谦, 王勇, 等.四川盆地东南部茅口组古岩溶特征及识别.岩石学报, 2014, 30(3):622-630. SHI Z J, XIA W Q, WANG Y, et al. Characteristics and identification of paleokarst in the Maokou Formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(3):622-630.
[5] 沈平, 张健, 宋家荣, 等.四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新突破的意义及有利勘探方向. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(7):1-9. SHEN P, ZHANG J, SONG J R, et al. Significance of new breakthrough in and favorable targets of gas exploration in the Middle Permian system, Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(7):1-9.
[6] 张玺华, 陈聪, 张亚, 等. 川西北地区茅口组海槽相地质特征及其油气地质意义. 天然气勘探与开发, 2018, 41(3):42-50. ZHANG X H, CHEN C, ZHANG Y, et al. Geological characteristics of trough facies,Maokou Formation,northwestern Sichuan Basin:Implications for geology. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2018, 41(3):42-50.
[7] 胡东风. 四川盆地元坝地区茅口组台缘浅滩天然气勘探的突破与启示. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(3):1-10. HU D F. Breakthrough in natural gas exploration in the platform margin shoal at the Maokou Fm in the Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin, and its implications. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(3):1-10.
[8] 肖笛, 谭秀成, 山述娇, 等. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组二段沉积微相研究. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(6):1182-1191. XIAO D, TAN X C, SHAN S J, et al. Sedimentary microfacies of the second member in Maokou Formation, Middle Permian, south Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(6):1182-1191.
[9] 刘宏, 马腾, 谭秀成, 等. 表生岩溶系统中浅埋藏构造-热液白云岩成因:以四川盆地中部中二叠统茅口组为例. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6):916-927. LIU H, MA T, TAN X C, et al. Origin of structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite in epigenetic karst system during shallow burial:an example from Middle Permian Maokou Formation, central Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(6):916-927.
[10] 戴晓峰, 张明, 江青春, 等. 四川盆地中部下二叠统茅口组岩溶储集层地震预测. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1):79-88. DAI X F, ZHANG M, JIANG Q C, et al. Karst reservoirs seismic prediction of Lower Permian Maokou Formation in central Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1):79-88.
[11] 汪泽成, 江青春, 黄士鹏, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气大面积成藏的地质条件. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(1):30-38. WANG Z C, JIANG Q C, HUANG S P, et al. Geological conditions for massive accumulation of natural gas in the Mid-Permian Maokou Formation of the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(1):30-38.
[12] 黄士鹏, 江青春, 冯庆付, 等.川南地区中二叠统茅口组岩溶储集层类型与分布规律.石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(2):1-9. HUANG S P, JIANG Q C, FENG Q F, et al. Type and distribution of Mid-Permian Maokou Formation karst reservoirs in southern Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(2):1-9.
[13] 耿斌, 胡心红. 孔隙结构研究在低渗透储层有效性评价中的应用. 断块油气田, 2011, 18(2):187-190. GENG B, HU X H. Application of pore structure study in effectiveness evaluation of low permeability reservoir. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2011, 18(2):187-190.
[14] 吴丰, 黄丹, 袁龙, 等.青西油田窿六区块储层裂缝有效性研究. 特种油气藏, 2012, 19(5):42-45. WU F, HUANG D, YUAN L, et al. Study on reservoir fracture effectiveness of block Long 6 of Qingxi Oilfield. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2012, 19(5):42-45.
[15] 张兆辉, 高楚桥, 高永德. 三元耦合方法评价孔洞型储层有效性. 测井技术, 2013, 37(6):643-647. ZHANG Z H, GAO C Q, GAO Y D. Effectiveness of evaluating vuggy reservoir with ternary factors coupling approach. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(6):643-647.
[16] 陈宗清. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气勘探. 中国石油勘探, 2007, 12(5):1-11. CHEN Z Q. Exploration for natural gas in Middle Permian Maokou Formation of Sichuan Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2007, 12(5):1-11.
[17] 李凤杰, 郑荣才, 周小进, 等.中国南方晚古生代构造演化与盆地原型. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2009, 29(2):93-99. LI F J, ZHENG R C, ZHOU X J, et al. Late Palaeozoic tectonic evolution and basin prototype in southern China. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2009, 29(2):93-99.
[18] XIAO D, TAN X C, XI A H, et al. An inland facies-controlled eogenetic karst of the carbonate reservoir in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation, southern Sichuan Basin, SW China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 72:218-233.
[19] 江青春, 胡素云, 姜华, 等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组地层缺失量计算及成因探讨. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(1):21-29. JIANG Q C, HU S Y, JIANG H, et al. Calculation and inducement of lacuna in the Mid-Permian Maokou Fm of the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(1):21-29.
[20] 王珏博, 谷一凡, 陶艳忠, 等. 川中地区茅口组两期流体叠合控制下的白云石化模式. 沉积学报, 2016, 34(2):236-249. WANG J B, GU Y F, TAO Y Z, et al. The model of dolomitization jointly controlled by two-episode fluids in Maokou Formation in central Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(2):236-249.
[21] 耿晓洁, 林畅松, 吴斌. 古地貌对塔中地区鹰山组岩溶结构及分布的控制作用. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):46-55. GENG X J, LIN C S, WU B. Controlling of paleogeomorphology to characteristics and distribution of karst structures of Yingshan Formation in Tazhong area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):46-55.
[22] 田亮, 李佳玲, 焦保雷. 塔河油田12区奥陶系油藏溶洞充填机理及挖潜方向. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):52-60. TIAN L, LI J L, JIAO B L. Filling mechanism and potential tapping direction of Ordovician karst reservoirs in block-12 of Tahe Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):52-60.
[23] 司马立强, 陈志强, 王亮, 等.基于滩控岩溶型白云岩储层分类的渗透率建模方法研究:以川中磨溪高石梯地区龙王庙组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):92-102. SIMA L Q, CHEN Z Q, WANG L, et al. Permeability modeling based on the classification of beach-controlled karst dolomite reservoirs:a case from Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi-Gaoshiti area,central Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):92-102.
[24] 代冬冬, 房启飞, 万效国, 等.哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系岩溶古河道识别及其成藏意义.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):89-96. DAI D D, FANG Q F, WAN X G, et al. Identification of Ordovician karstic paleochannels and its accumulation significance in Halahatang area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):89-96.
[25] 肖笛, 谭秀成, 郗爱华, 等.四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组碳酸盐岩岩溶特征:古大陆环境下层控型早成岩期岩溶实例. 古地理学报, 2015, 17(4):457-476. XIAO D, TAN X C, XI A H, et al. Palaeokarst characteristics of carbonate rocks of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in southern Sichuan Basin:Example of strata-bound eogenetic karst in palaeo-continental settings. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2015, 17(4):457-476.
[26] 王谦.自然伽马能谱测井在塔河奥陶系地层划分中的应用. 石油物探, 2004, 43(5):504-507. WANG Q. Application of GR spectroscopy log in stratigraphic classification of the Ordovician formation in Tahe oilfield. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2004, 43(5):504-507.
[27] 彭曙光, 潘和平, 王霁霞, 等. 自然伽马能谱井在储层评价中的应用. 工程地球物理学报, 2009, 6(4):481-484. PENG S G, PAN H P, WANG J X, et, al. Application of natural gamma ray spectrometry logs in reservoir evaluation. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2009, 6(4):481-484.
[28] 李红敬, 解习农, 黄俊华, 等. 川西北二叠系茅口组海相优质烃源岩发育控制因素. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2012, 37(1):171-180. LI H J, XIE X N, HUANG J H, et al. Sichuan northwest twofold system Maokou group sea phase high-quality hydrocarbon source rock development control factors. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2012, 37(1):171-180.
[1] 杨荣军, 彭平, 张静, 叶茂, 文华国. 四川盆地奉节地区上古生界古隆起特征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 1-9.
[2] 张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20-28.
[3] 柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[4] 马乔雨, 张欣, 张春雷, 周恒, 武中原. 基于一维卷积神经网络的横波速度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 111-120.
[5] 赵军, 韩东, 何胜林, 汤翟, 张涛. 基于水气比计算的低对比度储层流体性质识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 128-136.
[6] 向雪冰, 司马立强, 王亮, 李军, 郭宇豪, 张浩. 页岩气储层孔隙流体划分及有效孔径计算——以四川盆地龙潭组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 137-146.
[7] 丛平, 闫建平, 井翠, 张家浩, 唐洪明, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 晁静. 页岩气储层可压裂性级别测井评价及展布特征——以川南X地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 177-188.
[8] 刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[9] 何绪全, 黄东, 赵艾琳, 李育聪. 川中地区大安寨段页岩油气储层测井评价指标体系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 129-137.
[10] 杨洋, 石万忠, 张晓明, 王任, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 曹沈厅, 冯芊. 页岩岩相的测井曲线识别方法——以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 135-146.
[11] 宁从前, 周明顺, 成捷, 苏芮, 郝鹏, 王敏, 潘景丽. 二维核磁共振测井在砂砾岩储层流体识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 267-274.
[12] 张鹏, 杨巧云, 范宜仁, 张云, 张海涛. 基于Xu-White模型的致密砂岩储层含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 138-145.
[13] 彭军, 褚江天, 陈友莲, 文舰, 李亚丁, 邓思思. 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区下寒武统沧浪铺组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 12-22.
[14] 戴晓峰, 谢占安, 杜本强, 张明, 唐廷科, 李军, 牟川. 高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组多次波控制因素及预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 89-97.
[15] 孙予舒, 黄芸, 梁婷, 季汉成, 向鹏飞, 徐新蓉. 基于XGBoost算法的复杂碳酸盐岩岩性测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 98-106.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇，胡明毅，刘富艳，王辉，胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙，田景春，肖玲，王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维，李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮，涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发