吐哈盆地北缘博格达山前二叠系地层划分及其勘探意义

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20260303

岩性油气藏 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 24–37.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260303

吐哈盆地北缘博格达山前二叠系地层划分及其勘探意义

陈旋¹(), 郝彬²(), 苟红光¹, 张晶², 徐雄飞¹, 杨占龙², 胡军¹, 何昌松¹

¹ 中国石油吐哈油田公司勘探开发研究院，新疆哈密 839009
² 中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院，兰州 730020

收稿日期:2025-12-13 修回日期:2026-03-11 出版日期:2026-05-01 发布日期:2026-04-27
第一作者:陈旋（1974—），男，硕士，教授级高级工程师，主要从事油气勘探综合研究方面的工作。地址：（839009）新疆哈密市伊州区吐哈油田勘探开发研究院。Email:cx168@petrochina.com.cn。
通信作者: 郝彬（1986—），男，博士，高级工程师，主要从事石油地质综合研究方面的工作。Email:330341000@qq.com。
基金资助:
新型油气勘探开发国家科技重大专项“准噶尔盆地全油气系统与新领域勘探技术”(2025ZD1400306)

Stratigraphic division of Permian and its exploration significance of Bogda piedmont, northern margin of Tuha Basin

CHEN Xuan¹(), HAO Bin²(), GOU Hongguang¹, ZHANG Jing², XU Xiongfei¹, YANG Zhanlong², HU Jun¹, HE Changsong¹

¹ Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Tuha Oilfield Company, Hami 839009, Xinjiang, China
² Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest （NWGI）, PetroChina, Lanzhou 730020, China

Received:2025-12-13 Revised:2026-03-11 Online:2026-05-01 Published:2026-04-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过对吐哈盆地北缘博格达山前二叠系露头孢粉组合、锆石U-Pb年龄及沉积序列的综合分析，对地层归属进行了再认识，恢复了环博格达山周缘芦草沟组/塔尔朗组沉积期岩相古地理，并探讨了该区勘探潜力。研究结果表明：①吐哈盆地北缘照壁山、二塘沟等剖面原划分为塔尔朗组的孢粉组合特征与塔尔朗沟、准东地区塔尔朗组/芦草沟组差异明显，与准东梧桐沟组一致，应修正为梧桐沟组；原归于伊尔稀土组顶部的区域性暗色地层，其沉积序列及火山岩年龄与博格达山周缘芦草沟组可对比，应划分为塔尔朗组；锆石年龄显示为早二叠世，早于以往认为的中二叠世。②塔尔朗组沉积期，博格达山一带为沉积中心，山前带处于咸水半深湖—深湖相—半咸化半深湖环境中，具备形成优质烃源岩的潜力。③吐哈盆地台北凹陷二叠系烃源岩品质较好，尤其是凹陷北部，北部山前带位于生烃中心之上，剩余构造圈闭多，构造楔状体和山前带深层是吐哈老区二叠系含油气系统实现新突破的潜在领域。

关键词: 地层划分, 孢粉组合, 锆石定年, 烃源岩, 芦草沟组, 塔尔朗组, 二叠系, 博格达山, 吐哈盆地

Abstract:

Through comprehensive analysis of palynological assemblages, zircon U-Pb ages, and sedimentary sequences from Permian outcrops in Bogda piedmont on the northern margin of Tuha Basin, the stratigraphic attribution was re-evaluated, the lithofacies paleogeography during the deposition of Lucaogou Formation/Ta’erlang Formation around Bogda mountains was reconstructed, and the exploration potential of the area was discussed. The results show that: （1） The palynological assemblages originally assigned to Ta’erlang Formation in Zhaobishan and Ertanggou sections are significantly different from those of Ta’erlang Formation/Lucaogou Formation in Ta’erlanggou and eastern Junggar Basin, but consistent with those of Wutonggou Formation in eastern Junggar Basin, and thus should be revised as Wutonggou Formation. The regional dark strata originally placed at the top of Yierxitu Formation whose sedimentary sequence and volcanic rock ages can be compared with those of Lucaogou Formation around Bogda mountains, and should be classified as Ta’erlang Formation. Zircon ages indicate Early Permian, earlier than the previously considered Middle Permian. （2） During the deposition of Ta’erlang Formation, Bogda mountains served as the depositional center, and the piedmont zone was in the environment of saline semi-deep-lake to deep-lake facies to half saline semi-deep lake,with the potential to form high-quality source rocks. （3） Permian source rocks in Taibei Sag are of relatively good quality, especially those in the northern part of the sag. The northern piedmont zone lies above the hydrocarbon generation center and contains numerous untested structural traps. The wedge-shaped structures and piedmont deep layer are the prospective areas for new breakthroughs of the mature Permian petroleum system in Tuha Basin.

Key words: stratigraphic division, palynological assemblages, zircon dating, source rock, Lucaogou Formation, Ta’erlang Formation, Permian, Bogda mountains, Tuha Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.34

陈旋, 郝彬, 苟红光, 张晶, 徐雄飞, 杨占龙, 胡军, 何昌松. 吐哈盆地北缘博格达山前二叠系地层划分及其勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 24–37.

CHEN Xuan, HAO Bin, GOU Hongguang, ZHANG Jing, XU Xiongfei, YANG Zhanlong, HU Jun, HE Changsong. Stratigraphic division of Permian and its exploration significance of Bogda piedmont, northern margin of Tuha Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(3): 24–37.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

吐哈盆地北缘库莱剖面伊尔稀土组火山岩之上暗色泥岩地层中凝灰岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb同位素分析结果"

编号	同位素比值				同位素年龄/Ma				w(元素)/10^-6
编号	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	σ₁	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	σ₂	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	σ₃	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	σ₄	Th	U	Pb
1	0.324 1	0.015 6	0.046 0	0.000 6	285.00	12	290.00	4	59.5	139.0	7.33
2	0.335 5	0.013 6	0.046 9	0.000 6	294.00	10	295.00	3	89.1	189.0	10.36
3	0.333 9	0.015 7	0.047 2	0.000 6	293.00	12	297.00	3	67.8	152.0	8.27
4	0.315 0	0.013 9	0.047 1	0.000 6	278.00	11	297.00	4	82.9	180.0	9.71
5	0.333 6	0.015 4	0.047 0	0.000 6	292.00	12	296.00	4	52.0	135.0	7.19
6	0.332 6	0.015 6	0.047 4	0.000 6	292.00	12	299.00	4	64.6	160.0	8.64
7	0.306 7	0.014 0	0.045 8	0.000 5	272.00	11	288.00	3	84.0	188.0	9.85
8	0.328 4	0.015 0	0.046 3	0.000 6	288.00	11	292.00	4	62.5	155.0	8.08
9	0.345 6	0.014 5	0.046 8	0.000 5	301.00	11	295.00	3	78.2	177.0	9.47
10	0.321 9	0.014 3	0.047 0	0.000 6	283.00	11	296.00	4	55.4	142.0	7.48
11	0.316 5	0.014 4	0.046 7	0.000 6	279.00	11	294.00	3	81.7	178.0	9.55
12	0.333 6	0.015 0	0.047 2	0.000 6	292.00	11	297.00	4	59.7	149.0	7.95
13	0.304 6	0.012 8	0.046 4	0.000 5	270.00	10	292.00	3	99.6	212.0	11.29
14	0.337 9	0.013 6	0.045 8	0.000 5	296.00	10	289.00	3	93.6	210.0	11.05
15	0.328 0	0.015 6	0.047 5	0.000 7	288.00	12	299.00	4	67.4	178.0	9.54
16	0.334 2	0.018 2	0.047 8	0.000 6	293.00	14	301.00	4	63.5	152.0	8.04
17	0.323 2	0.015 0	0.046 4	0.000 6	284.00	11	292.00	4	81.9	188.0	10.02
18	0.314 5	0.014 4	0.046 9	0.000 6	278.00	11	295.00	4	73.6	161.0	8.63
19	0.350 2	0.016 9	0.047 8	0.000 6	305.00	13	301.00	4	37.9	134.0	7.19
20	0.346 3	0.016 3	0.047 3	0.000 6	302.00	12	298.00	4	72.5	171.0	9.21
21	0.357 0	0.013 5	0.047 9	0.000 6	310.00	10	301.00	4	96.0	177.0	10.04
22	0.314 1	0.015 4	0.047 3	0.000 6	277.00	12	298.00	4	59.0	156.0	8.31
23	0.327 1	0.013 9	0.046 0	0.000 6	287.00	11	290.00	4	64.9	167.0	8.74
24	0.342 9	0.013 7	0.047 5	0.000 6	299.00	10	299.00	4	63.1	160.0	8.73
25	0.331 2	0.013 4	0.047 3	0.000 6	290.00	10	298.00	4	72.2	168.0	9.15
26	0.347 8	0.015 2	0.046 0	0.000 6	303.00	11	290.00	3	81.9	186.0	10.00
27	0.326 9	0.013 7	0.045 7	0.000 6	287.00	10	288.00	3	82.3	183.0	9.75
28	0.330 7	0.016 3	0.046 8	0.000 5	290.00	12	295.00	3	79.7	179.0	9.71
29	0.316 4	0.013 8	0.046 7	0.000 5	279.00	11	294.00	3	84.4	158.0	8.79
30	0.334 8	0.015 6	0.046 2	0.000 6	293.00	12	291.00	3	80.4	171.0	9.25

表1

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表2

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 46

[1]	殷树铮, 何登发, 付国斌, 等. 博格达地区二叠纪原型盆地沉积充填与演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2026, 47(1):124-142.
	YIN Shuzheng, HE Dengfa, FU Guobin, et al. Sedimentary fil-ling and evolution of the Permian prototype basin in Bogda area,China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2026, 47(1):124-142.
[2]	郑有伟, 郭建明, 郑建京, 等. 新疆博格达构造带晚古生代构造格局与演化过程探讨[J]. 地质找矿论丛, 2015, 30(4):588-593.
	ZHENG Youwei, GUO Jianming, ZHENG Jianjing, et al. Late Paleozoic tectonic framework and evolution process of Bogda tectonic belt in Xinjiang[J]. Contributions to Geology and Mineral Resources Research, 2015, 30(4):588-593.
[3]	ZHAO Rui, ZHANG Jinyu, ZHOU Chuanmin, et al. Tectonic evolution of Tianshan-Bogda-Kelameili mountains,clastic wedge basin infill and chronostratigraphic divisions in the source-to-sink systems of Permian-Jurassic,southern Junggar Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 114:104200.
[4]	WANG Jialin, WU Chaodong, LI Zhuang, et al. The tectonic evolution of the Bogda region from Late Carboniferous to Triassic time:Evidence from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology and sandstone petrography[J]. Geological Magazine, 2018, 155(5):1063-1088.
[5]	柳益群, 冯乔, 周立发, 等. 吐哈盆地二叠系含油结核研究及生油前景分析[J]. 石油学报, 2002, 23(5):40-43.
	LIU Yiqun, FENG Qiao, ZHOU Lifa, et al. Oil-bearing nodules and oil-generation prospects of Permian in Turpan-Hami basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2002, 23(5):40-43.
[6]	杨有星, 张君峰, 张金虎, 等. 新疆博格达山周缘中上二叠统与中上三叠统沉积特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(4):670-682.
	YANG Youxing, ZHANG Junfeng, ZHANG Jinhu, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of the Middle-Upper Permian and Middle-Upper Triassic around Bogda Mountain of Xinjiang,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(4):670-682.
[7]	柳益群, 周鼎武, 冯乔, 等. 新疆北部二叠系特征及其与三叠系界线划分[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 36(4):615-622.
	LIU Yiqun, ZHOU Dingwu, FENG Qiao, et al. Characteristics of Permian and the boundary between Permian and Triassic system in the northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 36(4):615-622.
[8]	刘淑文. 新疆中二叠世叶肢介化石[J]. 古生物学报, 2001, 40(1):61-66.
	LIU Shuwen. Middle Permian conchostracans in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 2001, 40(1):61-66.
[9]	徐加林, 刘燕学, 柳永清, 等. 新疆吐鲁番—哈密盆地北部下二叠统伊尔稀土组的沉积特征与盆地演化[J]. 地质通报, 2013, 32(2/3):424-442.
	XU Jialin, LIU Yanxue, LIU Yongqing, et al. Sedimentology and basin evolution of the Early Permian Yierxitu Formation in Turpan-Hami area,Xinjiang[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(2/3):424-442.
[10]	高岗, 梁浩, 李华明, 等. 吐哈盆地石炭系—下二叠统烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(5):583-592.
	GAO Gang, LIANG Hao, LI Huaming, et al. Organic geochemi-stry of Carboniferous and Lower Permian source rocks,Turpan-Hami Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Deve-lopment, 2009, 36(5):583-592.
[11]	沈传波, 梅廉夫, 刘麟, 等. 新疆博格达山裂变径迹年龄特征及其构造意义[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2005, 27(2):11-14.
	SHEN Chuanbo, MEI Lianfu, LIU Lin, et al. Characteristics of fission track age of Bogedashan in Xinjiang and its structural significance[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2005, 27(2):11-14.
[12]	王宗秀. 博格达山链的造山活动与山体形成演化[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所, 2003.
	WANG Zongxiu. Orogeny,formation and evolution in the Bogda Mountain Chains,Northwestern China[D]. Beijing: Institute of Geology,China Earthquake Administration, 2003.
[13]	崔泽宏, 汤良杰, 王志欣. 博格达南、北缘成盆过程演化及其对油气形成影响[J]. 沉积学报, 2007, 25(1):59-64.
	CUI Zehong, TANG Liangjie, WANG Zhixin. Basin-formation evolution and its effect on petroleum formation in the southern and northern margins of Bogda[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007, 25(1):59-64.
[14]	李涛, 王宗秀, 周高志, 等. 新疆博格达山分段及深浅构造转换关系[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(3):103-114.
	LI Tao, WANG Zongxiu, ZHOU Gaozhi, et al. The segmentation and the relationship between shallow and deep structures of Bogda Mountain,Xinjiang,Northwest China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2004, 11(3):103-114.
[15]	周鼎武, 柳益群, 邢秀娟, 等. 新疆吐哈、三塘湖盆地二叠纪玄武岩形成古构造环境恢复及区域构造背景示踪[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2006, 36(2):143-153.
	ZHOU Dingwu, LIU Yiqun, XING Xiujuan, et al. Restoration of the Paleotectonic environment and implications for the regional tectonic background of Permian basalts in the Tuha and Santanghu Basins,Xinjiang[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2006, 36(2):143-153.
[16]	汪新伟, 汪新文, 马永生. 新疆博格达山晚中生代以来的差异剥露史[J]. 地质学报, 2007, 81(11):1507-1517.
	WANG Xinwei, WANG Xinwen, MA Yongsheng. Differential exhumation history of Bogda Mountain,Xinjiang,northwestern China since the Late Mesozoic[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(11):1507-1517.
[17]	张增宝. 吐哈盆地西北缘深部二叠系构造特征、盆地原型及烃源岩评价[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2014.
	ZHANG Zengbao. Deep Permian tectonic characteristics,basin prototype and source rock evaluation in the northwest Tuha Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2014.
[18]	徐希旺, 陈世悦, 王越, 等. 吐哈盆地大河沿地区塔尔朗组细粒沉积岩特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(4):705-713.
	XU Xiwang, CHEN Shiyue, WANG Yue, et al. Characteristics of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in Taerlang Formation,Daheyan area,Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(4):705-713.
[19]	YANG Wan, FENG Qiao, LIU Yiqun, et al. Depositional environments and cyclo- and chronostratigraphy of uppermost Carboni-ferous-Lower Triassic fluvial-lacustrine deposits,southern Bogda Mountains,NW China:A terrestrial paleoclimatic record of mid-latitude NE Pangea[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2010, 73(1/2):15-113.
[20]	SUN Funing, HU Wenxuan, CAO Jian, et al. Sustained and intensified lacustrine methane cycling during Early Permian climate warming[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13:4856.
[21]	袁明生, 梁世君, 燕列灿, 等. 吐哈盆地油气地质与勘探实践[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2002.
	YUAN Mingsheng, LIANG Shijun, YAN Liecan, et al. Hydrocarbon geology and exploration practice in the Turpan-Hami Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2002.
[22]	侯静鹏, 王智. 新疆北部二叠纪—第三纪地层及孢粉组合[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1990.
	HOU Jingpeng, WANG Zhi. Permian to Tertiary strata and palynological assemblages in the north of Xinjiang[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1990.
[23]	李长民. 锆石成因矿物学与锆石微区定年综述[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2009, 32(3):161-174.
	LI Changmin. A review on the minerageny and in situ microanalytical dating techniques of zircons[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2009, 32(3):161-174.
[24]	HARLEY S L, KELLY N M. Zircon tiny but timely[J]. Elements, 2007, 3(1):3-18.
[25]	王越. 新疆塔尔朗沟剖面中二叠统扇三角洲混合沉积特征及模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2019, 37(5):922-933.
	WANG Yue. Mixed sedimentary characteristics and pattern of the fan delta in the Middle Permian Taerlanggou profile,Xin-jiang province[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(5):922-933.
[26]	樊妍, 王绪龙, 向才富, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部二叠系平地泉组烃源岩富集规律与主控因素[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(4):1105-1117.
	FAN Yan, WANG Xulong, XIANG Caifu, et al. Enrichment patterns and main controlling factors of source rocks in the Permian Pingdiquan Formation,eastern Junggar Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(4):1105-1117.
[27]	经雅丽, 张克信, 林启祥, 等. 浙江长兴煤山下三叠统和龙山组、南陵湖组沉积地球化学特征与古环境意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 2005, 24(1):35-40.
	JING Yali, ZHANG Kexin, LIN Qixiang, et al. Sedimentary geochemistry characteristics and paleoenvironmental meaning of Helongshan Formation and Nanlinghu Formation in Meishan,Changxing county,Zhejiang province[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2005, 24(1):35-40.
[28]	JONES B, MANNING D A C. Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of palaeoredox conditions in ancient mudstones[J]. Chemical Geology, 1994, 111(1/4):111-129.
[29]	蒋中发, 丁修建, 王忠泉, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩沉积古环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6):109-119.
	JIANG Zhongfa, DING Xiujian, WANG Zhongquan, et al. Sedimentary paleoenvironment of source rocks of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6):109-119.
[30]	李建忠, 陈旋, 杨润泽, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部吉南凹陷二叠系油气地质条件与源下成藏特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(3):491-503.
	LI Jianzhong, CHEN Xuan, YANG Runze, et al. Petroleum geo-logy and sub-source hydrocarbon accumulation of Permian reservoirs in Jinan Sag,eastern Junggar Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(3):491-503.
[31]	罗锦昌, 田继军, 马静辉, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷吉页1井区二叠系芦草沟组沉积环境及有机质富集机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):73-85.
	LUO Jinchang, TIAN Jijun, MA Jinghui, et al. Sedimentary environment and organic matter enrichment mechanism of Per-mian Lucaogou Formation in Jiye-1 well area,Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):73-85.
[32]	刘海磊, 朱永才, 刘龙松, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带上盘二叠系芦草沟组页岩油地质特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4):90-101.
	LIU Hailei, ZHU Yongcai, LIU Longsong, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration potential of shale oil of Permian Lucaogou Formation in hanging wall of Fukang fault zone,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(4):90-101.
[33]	陈旋, 徐雄飞, 张亦婷, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系油气成藏系统及勘探潜力[J]. 地质学报, 2025, 99(12):4313-4329.
	CHEN Xuan, XU Xiongfei, ZHANG Yiting, et al. Oil and gas reservoir system and exploration potential of Permian in the Fukang fault zone of the Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2025, 99(12):4313-4329.
[34]	龚德瑜, 韩琰, 范谭广, 等. 准噶尔盆地古城凹陷中二叠统芦草沟组烃源岩生烃潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2025, 36(1):57-71.
	GONG Deyu, HAN Yan, FAN Tanguang, et al. Hydrocarbon-generating potential of the Middle Permian Lucaogou source rocks in the Gucheng Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2025, 36(1):57-71.
[35]	赵文智, 李伟, 张研. 吐哈盆地鲁克沁稠油藏成藏过程初探与勘探意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1998, 25(2):17-19.
	ZHAO Wenzhi, LI Wei, ZHANG Yan. A preliminary study on the forming process of Lukeqin heavy oil pool and its explo-ratory significance to Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1998, 25(2):17-19.
[36]	武超, 李宏伟, 盛双占, 等. 吐哈盆地鲁克沁构造带二叠系—三叠系油气成藏特征与主控因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4):137-148.
	WU Chao, LI Hongwei, SHENG Shuangzhan, et al. Characteri-stics and main controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation of Permian-Triassic in Lukeqin structural zone,Tuha Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4):137-148.
[37]	曾庆鲁, 张荣虎, 张立强, 等. 超深层储层构造裂缝促溶扩孔增渗效应:以塔里木盆地库车前陆冲断带白垩系砂岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(9):1720-1737.
	ZENG Qinglu, ZHANG Ronghu, ZHANG Liqiang, et al. Effect of structural fractures in ultra-deep reservoirs on promoting dissolution,enhancing porosity and increasing permeability:A case study of Cretaceous sandstone in Kuqa foreland thrust belt,Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2025, 46(9):1720-1737.
[38]	石玉江, 甘仁忠, 蔺敬旗, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘超深层致密碎屑岩储层油气高产机理与潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2025, 30(1):82-97.
	SHI Yujiang, GAN Renzhong, LIN Jingqi, et al. Mechanism and potential of high-yield oil and gas production in the ultra-deep tight clastic reservoirs in the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2025, 30(1):82-97.
[39]	苏勤, 李海亮, 吕彬, 等. 吐哈盆地北部山前带巴喀三维叠前地震成像处理解释技术研究及应用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2011, 16(5/6):29-40.
	SU Qin, LI Hailiang, LYU Bin, et al. 3D prestack seismic ima-ging in Baka area of northern Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2011, 16(5/6):29-40.
[40]	刘护创, 王文慧, 陈俊男. 台北凹陷西部差异逆冲推覆体系与油气聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2):45-49.
	LIU Huchuang, WANG Wenhui, CHEN Junnan. Hydrocarbon accumulation and related differential thrust system in western Taibei Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2):45-49.
[41]	李在光, 陈启林, 吕锡敏, 等. 吐哈盆地北部山前带石油地质条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3):29-34.
	LI Zaiguang, CHEN Qilin, LYU Ximin, et al. Petroleum geological conditions and exploration direction in north piedmont zone of Tuha Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3):29-34.
[42]	吴青鹏, 杨占龙, 姚军, 等. 吐哈盆地北部山前带中下侏罗统水西沟群成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):1-11.
	WU Qingpeng, YANG Zhanlong, YAO Jun, et al. Reservoir forming conditions and exploration prospect of Middle-Lower Jurassic Shuixigou group in northern piedmont belt of Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):1-11.
[43]	管树巍, 张朝军, 何登发, 等. 前陆冲断带复杂构造解析与建模:以准噶尔盆地南缘第一排背斜带为例[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(8):1131-1140.
	GUAN Shuwei, ZHANG Chaojun, HE Dengfa, et al. Complex structural analysis and modeling:The first row of anticlinal belt on the southern margin of the Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(8):1131-1140.
[44]	李本亮, 管树巍, 陈竹新, 等. 楔形构造在山前冲断构造位移量消减中的作用:以准噶尔盆地南缘为例[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(6):890-897.
	LI Benliang, GUAN Shuwei, CHEN Zhuxin, et al. The effect of wedge structure on displacement subduction of piedmont thrust structure:A case study of the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(6):890-897.
[45]	SPRATT D A, LAWTON D C. Variations in detachment levels,ramp angles and wedge geometries along the Alberta thrust front[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 1996, 44(2):313-321.
[46]	贾承造. 中国中西部前陆冲断带构造特征与天然气富集规律[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(4):9-15.
	JIA Chengzao. Foreland thrust-fold belt features and gas accumulation in Midwest China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Deve-lopment, 2005, 32(4):9-15.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

盆地	凹陷/剖面	TOC/%	(S₁ + S₂)/（mg·g^-1）	HI/（mg·g^-1）	类型	R_o/%	T_max/℃	成熟度	资料来源
准噶尔	吉木萨尔	0.30~10.90/ 3.40(122)	0.50~79.40/ 15.90(122)	48.40~782.00/ 378.10(122)	Ⅱ—Ⅰ	0.60~1.20/ 0.80(11)	430~455/ 444(122)	低熟—成熟	文献[34]
	古城	0.30~19.40/ 2.50（68）	0.30~128.80/ 7.80（68）	30.70~621.10/ 261.00	Ⅱ—Ⅲ	1.00~1.20/ 1.10(3)	439~453/ 446（68）	成熟	文献[34]
	吉南	0.61~28.17/ 5.36（135）	1.73~238.30/ 30.24	27.00~997.00/ 628.00	Ⅰ，Ⅱ₁	0.52~0.80/ 0.91（135）	439~450/ 443	低熟—成熟	文献[33]
	阜康断裂带上盘	0.80~20.08/ 4.94（18）	2.32~164.40/ 28.00（18）	30.00~805.00/ 463.00	Ⅱ—Ⅰ	1.11~1.83/ 1.56（12）	—	成熟—高成熟	文献[33]
柴窝堡		1.54~10.78	4.13~54.76	—	Ⅱ₁，Ⅱ₂	—	—	成熟—高成熟	本文
吐哈	塔尔朗沟	0.68~11.03/ 3.96（26）	0.13~45.95/ 11.97（26）	18.00~549.00/ 208.00	Ⅱ₁，Ⅱ₂	0.58~0.72/ 0.65（26）	437~466/ 441（26）	低熟—成熟	本文
	照壁山	0.58~3.75/ 2.33（5）	0.07~0.20 0.16（5）	4.20~7.80/ 5.90（5）	—	1.72~1.81	528~533/ 531（5）	高成熟	本文
	照壁山	1.10~4.38/ 2.37	0.11~0.93/ 0.34	—	Ⅱ₂，Ⅲ	—	—	—	文献[10]
	台北南缘	1.67~8.54	1.62~11.11	—	Ⅱ	1.04~1.27/	—	成熟	文献[36]
	台南	0.17~5.04/ 2.26	0.03~7.85/ 1.83	12.00~191.00/ 106.00	Ⅱ₂，Ⅲ	0.64~0.78/ 0.71	431~445/ 438	低熟—成熟	本文
	大南湖	0.50~8.25/ 2.58	0.32~18.28/ 2.51	25.00~575.00/ 112	Ⅱ₂，Ⅲ	0.61~0.73/ 0.69	435~449 441	低熟—成熟	本文

吐哈盆地北缘博格达山前二叠系地层划分及其勘探意义

Stratigraphic division of Permian and its exploration significance of Bogda piedmont, northern margin of Tuha Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	聂明龙, 刘皓源, 王兆明, 赵书茂, 于太极. 哈萨克斯坦楚-萨雷苏盆地富氦气藏特征、富集条件及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 162-172.
[2]	赵野, 许鹏, 胡贺伟, 王航, 杨娇娇. 渤海湾盆地盆缘庙西南地区构造特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2): 145-152.
[3]	肖富强, 肖卫东, 姜智东, 高磊, 赵正威, 潘晓飞, 陈富贵, 邹勇军. 下扬子地区萍乐坳陷二叠系乐平组煤系页岩储层特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(1): 100-114.
[4]	荀小全, 李宏涛, 李长平, 杨帆, 刘雄. 强非均质性气藏压裂水平井分段产量劈分新方法——以鄂尔多斯盆地东胜气田二叠系盒1段气藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(1): 191-200.
[5]	姚嘉禹, 曹文杰, 王文强, 毛礼鑫, 罗斌. 黔西北中部地区二叠系龙潭组煤层气成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(1): 67-77.
[6]	刘冠伯, 陈世加, 李世宏, 邹阳, 李勇. 玛湖凹陷玛中构造带二叠系风城组烃源岩生气潜力及成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 83-96.
[7]	叶慧, 朱峰, 王贵重, 石万忠, 康晓宁, 董国宁, 娜孜依曼, 王任. 准噶尔盆地二叠纪—侏罗纪古地貌恢复及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 122-132.
[8]	詹淋, 范存辉, 唐雯, 杨西燕, 刘冬玺, 李博, 杨昕睿. 四川盆地东部南雅地区二叠系吴家坪组构造特征及其控藏机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 133-144.
[9]	王青, 田冲, 罗超, 张景缘, 杨雪, 吴伟, 陶夏妍. 四川盆地遂宁—合江地区二叠系龙潭组煤岩气储层特征及勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 26-37.
[10]	王敬朝, 金玮, 常立朋, 董忠良, 王高文. 川中合川—潼南地区二叠系茅三段岩溶储层特征及油气成藏过程[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 63-72.
[11]	李振明, 贾存善, 王斌, 宋振响, 邱岐, 王继远, 徐陈杰, 崔钰瑶. 准噶尔盆地东部石钱滩凹陷石炭系石钱滩组烃源岩特征及资源潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 115-126.
[12]	邓高山, 董雪梅, 余海涛, 张洁, 岳喜伟, 任军民, 姜涛. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组油气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 59-72.
[13]	杨雪, 杨雨然, 张景缘, 田鹤, 王青, 宋芳, 张赛柯, 陈瑶. 川北地区开江—梁平海槽二叠系海相页岩特征及优质储层形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 108-119.
[14]	陈怀毅, 李龙, 白冰, 岳军培, 康荣, 张兴强. 渤海湾盆地莱州湾凹陷古近系沙四段走滑盐拱带特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 120-128.
[15]	赵艾琳, 赖强, 樊睿琦, 吴煜宇, 陈杰, 严双栏, 张家伟, 廖广志. 基性火山岩核磁共振响应机理及孔隙结构评价方法——以四川盆地西南部二叠系峨眉山玄武岩组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 153-164.