岩性油气藏 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 104–114.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260510

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

东营凹陷民丰洼陷古近系沙四上亚段页岩油微运移模拟实验

陈雨茂1(), 李斌2,3(), 刘浩杰1, 杨宏伟1, 盖姗姗1, 侯庆杰1, 邓泰宇2   

  1. 1 中国石化胜利油田 物探研究院， 山东 东营 257022
    2 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院， 成都 610500
    3 天然气地质四川省重点实验室， 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-16 修回日期:2026-04-16 出版日期:2026-09-01 发布日期:2026-09-04
  • 第一作者:陈雨茂（1983—），男，博士，副研究员，主要从事油藏地球物理研究方面的工作。地址：（257022）山东东营市北一路210号。Email:chenyumao.slyt@sinopec.com。
  • 通信作者: 李斌
  • 基金资助:
    新型油气勘探开发国家科技重大专项“渤海湾超级盆地油气富集规律与新领域勘探技术”(2024ZD1400100);中国石化“十条龙”项目油藏地球物理关键技术研究及示范应用课题五“地球物理资料约束油藏建模技术研究”(P24046)

Simulation experiment on shale oil micro-migration of upper submember of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Paleogene of Minfeng Subsag, Dongying Sag

CHEN Yumao1(), LI Bin2,3(), LIU Haojie1, YANG Hongwei1, GAI Shanshan1, HOU Qingjie1, DENG Taiyu2   

  1. 1 Geophysical Research Institute, Shengli Oilfield, Sinopec, Dongying 257022, Shandong, China
    2 School of Geosicence and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    3 Natural Gas Geology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2026-03-16 Revised:2026-04-16 Online:2026-09-01 Published:2026-09-04
  • Contact: LI Bin E-mail:chenyumao.slyt@sinopec.com;lbin@swpu.edu.cn

RichHTML

18

PDF (PC)

32

摘要：

针对东营凹陷民丰洼陷沙四上亚段页岩油富集规律不清、“甜点”预测难度大的问题，通过井-震结合构建了页岩油气系统地质模型，综合运用Easy% Ro动力学模型与逾渗流法，分别模拟了沙四上亚段页岩的热演化历史与页岩油微运移过程，明确了页岩油富集模式，并对“甜点”区进行了预测。研究结果表明：①民丰洼陷沙四上亚段烃源岩自沙河街组沉积晚期进入低成熟阶段，到东营组沉积期进入成熟阶段，至馆陶组沉积期达到生烃高峰，成熟度为0.5%~1.2%，以生油为主，生烃转化率模拟值为10%~90%，沙四下亚段下部的生烃转化率明显高于上部，上部排烃潜力较小，油气以滞留吸附为主。②研究区页岩油微运移具有显著相控特征，混积相页岩油赋存量明显高于富长英质相、富灰相；区域东侧FY1-2HF井区与西侧FY1-4HF井区发育继承性低势汇聚区，与高产井产能相吻合。③研究区页岩油富集模式为“热演化控源、纹层控富、低隆控聚”，东、西梁沙四上亚段下部混积相页岩为“甜点”区。

关键词: 油气微运移, 流体势, 成藏模拟, 逾渗流, 页岩油, 页岩岩相, 地震约束, 沙四上亚段, 民丰洼陷

Abstract:

To address the unclear enrichment patterns and difficulty in sweet spot prediction of shale oil in upper submember of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation (Es4s) in Minfeng Subsag, Dongying Sag, a geological model of the shale petroleum system was constructed by integrating well-seismic data. By employing the Easy%Ro kinetic model and the percolation method, the thermal evolution history and micro-migration process of Es4s shale were simulated, respectively. And then the shale oil enrichment model was clarified and “sweet spot” zones were predicted. The results show that： （1） Source rocks of Es4s entered the low-maturity stage during the late deposition of Shahejie Formation, reached the maturity stage during the deposition of Dongying Formation, and attained the peak hydrocarbon generation stage during the deposition of Guantao Formation, with maturity of 0.5%-1.2%, indicating oil-prone characteristics. The simulated hydrocarbon generation conversion rate was 10%-90%.The hydrocarbon generation conversion rate in the lower part was significantly higher than that in the upper part of lower submember of Es4, while the upper part had lower hydrocarbon expulsion potential, with hydrocarbon primarily retained and adsorbed. （2） Shale oil micro-migration in the study area shows significant facies-controlled characteristics,with the mixed sedimentary facies zone containing considerably more shale oil than that in the feldspar-rich and lime-rich facies zones. Fluid potential simulation confirms the development of inhe-rited low-potential accumulation areas in the eastern (FY1-2HF well area) and western (FY1-4HF well area) parts of the study area, which aligns with the productivity of high-yield wells. （3） The shale oil enrichment model in the study area is characterized by “hydrocarbon source controlled by thermal evolution, enrichment controlled by laminae, and accumulation controlled by low uplifts”. The mixed sedimentary shale in the lower part of Es4s within the eastern and western salients was identified as the sweet spot.

Key words: hydrocarbon micro-migration, fluid potential, hydrocarbon accumulation simulation, percolation flow, shale oil, shale lithology, seismic constraint, upper submember of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation, Minfeng Subsag

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.1

图1

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段页岩岩相平面展布（a）和岩性地层综合柱状图（b）"

图2

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段不同页岩岩相矿物含量三元图（据文献[35]修改） 注：N为单井有效页岩样品数，个。"

表1

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段不同页岩岩相地质特征"

岩相类型 样品数/个 w（矿物）/% TOC/% S1/(mg·g-1) 孔隙度/% 渗透率/mD 结构特征
黏土矿物 长英质 灰质
富灰相 139 30~55 20~50 20~60 2.5~5.0 3~6 2~10 0.1~0.5 纹层发育
混积相 195 30~70 25~65 20~55 3.0~6.0 4~6 4~12 0.1~2.0 纹层发育
富长英质相 85 20~55 30~80 15~30 2.0~4.0 2~6 3~13 0.2~2.0 薄互层结构

图3

民丰洼陷过F112—F8井沙四上亚段地震地质解释剖面（剖面位置见图1a）"

图4

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段底部古构造演化史"

图5

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段古地表温度（a）和古热流（b）演化史图"

图6

民丰洼陷典型井沙四上亚段成熟度拟合特征"

图7

民丰洼陷典型井井沙四上亚段页岩埋藏史-热演化史"

图8

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段页岩热演化史"

图9

民丰洼陷典型井沙四上亚段页岩生烃转化率演化特征"

图10

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段页岩油达西流（a）、逾渗流（b）模拟运移结果对比"

图11

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段页岩油逾渗流法模拟油气运聚演化史 注：气油比圈中的数字为原油密度，kg/m3。"

图12

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段页岩油充注演化趋势（a）和不同岩相页岩油聚集量统计（b）"

图13

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段页岩油流体势的演化模拟"

图14

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段页岩成熟度、含油饱和度、油气运聚剖面（剖面位置见图1a）"

图15

民丰洼陷沙四上亚段页岩油富集模式（剖面位置见图1a）"

[1] 胡涛, 姜福杰, 庞雄奇, 等. 页岩油微运移识别、评价及其石油地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(1):114-126.
HU Tao, JIANG Fujie, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Identification and evaluation of shale oil micro-migration and its petroleum geological significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(1):114-126.
[2] JI Wenming, HAO Fang, GONG Fanhao, et al. Petroleum migration and accumulation in a shale oil system of the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in the Songliao Basin,northeastern China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2024, 108(8):1611-1648.
[3] 郭昱辛, 白玉彬, 赵靖舟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地志丹地区三叠系长7泥页岩非均质性及控油作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2):97-110.
GUO Yuxin, BAI Yubin, ZHAO Jingzhou, et al. Heterogeneity and oil control effects of Triassic Chang 7 shale in Zhidan area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(2):97-110.
[4] WU Songtao, LU Guanwen, YUAN Ming, et al. Oil-rock interaction controlling oil migration and accumulation in porous shale reservoir:Insights from varied lacustrine basins in China[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2026, 350:103774.
[5] GAO Zhiye, BAI Lixun, HU Qinhong, et al. Shale oil migration across multiple scales:A review of characterization methods and different patterns[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2024, 254:104819.
[6] 刘惠民, 包友书, 张守春, 等. 陆相富碳酸盐页岩结构特征与页岩油可动性:以济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组页岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(6):1150-1161.
LIU Huimin, BAO Youshu, ZHANG Shouchun, et al. Structural characteristics of continental carbonate-rich shale and shale oil movability:A case study of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation shale in Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(6):1150-1161.
[7] 汤玉平, 唐艳玲, 胡斌, 等. 荧光光谱在烃类垂向微运移研究中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2000, 21(4):370-371.
TANG Yuping, TANG Yanling, HU Bin, et al. Application of fluorescence spectrum to studies of hydrocarbon micro-migration in vertical direction[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2000, 21(4):370-371.
[8] ZHANG Yuanhao, CHANG Jiaqi, JIANG Zhenxue, et al. Visua-lization of dynamic micro-migration of shale oil and investigation of shale oil movability by NMRI combined oil charging/water flooding experiments:A novel approach[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2024, 165:106907.
[9] WANG Yingzhu, HOU Yuting, YANG Jijin. Microscopic mechanisms of intrasource micro-migration and enrichment of lacustrine shale oil:A case study of Chang 73 submember of Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2025, 52(5):1247-1261.
[10] SHI Shuyong, LIANG Tian, WANG Yunpeng, et al. Oil generation,retention and expulsion processes of the Lucaogou shale in the Junggar Basin:Constraints from improved swelling experiment and basin modelling[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2025, 289:106628.
[11] ALI M, ALI M Y, ABDELHADY A. Petroleum system analysis of the Komombo Basin,southern Egypt:Insights from basin modeling and hydrocarbon geochemistry[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2024, 167:106955.
[12] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 等. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6):110-121.
BAI Yubin, LI Mengyao, ZHU Tao, et al. Geochemical characteristics of source rocks and evaluation of shale oil “sweet spot” of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6):110-121.
[13] 张记刚, 杜猛, 陈超, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4):89-102.
ZHANG Jigang, DU Meng, CHEN Chao, et al. Quantitative characterization of pore structure of shale reservoirs of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4):89-102.
[14] 汪子祺, 吴朝容, 黄开兴, 等. 基于卷积神经网络的页岩TOC三维定量预测方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2025, 60(2):273-282.
WANG Ziqi, WU Chaorong, HUANG Kaixing, et al. 3D quantitative prediction method for shale TOC based on convolutional neural network[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2025, 60(2):273-282.
[15] 吴达, 谢小敏, 黄代, 等. 东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩油轻烃地球化学特征[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2024, 46(6):775-789.
WU Da, XIE Xiaomin, HUANG Dai, et al. Geochemical chara-cteristics of light hydrocarbon of shale oil in upper submember of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation,Dongying Sag,China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2024, 46(6):775-789.
[16] 李军, 邹友龙, 路菁. 陆相页岩油储层可动油含量测井评价方法:以苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段页岩油为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3):816-826.
LI Jun, ZOU Youlong, LU Jing. Well-log-based assessment of movable oil content in lacustrine shale oil reservoirs:A case study of the 2nd member of the Paleogene Funing Formation,Subei Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3):816-826.
[17] GUO Qiulei, YAO Yue, HOU Lianhua, et al. “sandwiched” lacustrine shale oil systems from the Chang Oil migration,retention,and differential accumulation in 7 member of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin,China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2022, 261:104077.
[18] HU Shouzhi, LI Shuifu, XIA Liuwen, et al. On the internal oil migration in shale systems and implications for shale oil accumulation:A combined petrological and geochemical investigation in the Eocene Nanxiang Basin,China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 184:106493.
[19] 钱永新, 赵毅, 刘新龙, 等. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1):115-125.
QIAN Yongxin, ZHAO Yi, LIU Xinlong, et al. Reservoir chara-cteristics and high yield control factors of Permian Fengcheng Formation shale oil reservoir in Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Re-servoirs, 2025, 37(1):115-125.
[20] 李军亮, 王民, 秦峰, 等. 陆相富碳酸盐页岩纹层组合对页岩油富集的控制作用:以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2025, 46(2):392-406.
LI Junliang, WANG Min, QIN Feng, et al. Controlling effects of lamina assemblages on shale oil enrichment for lacustrine carbonate-rich shales:A case study of shales in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation,Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2025, 46(2):392-406.
[21] 魏永波, 刘全有, 卢双舫, 等. 中国陆相页岩油富集机制:以渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷沙河街组为例[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2025, 55(7):2268-2289.
WEI Yongbo, LIU Quanyou, LU Shuangfang, et al. Accumulation mechanisms of nonmarine shale oil in China:A case study of the Shahejie Formation in Raoyang Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2025, 55(7):2268-2289.
[22] LI Yuntao, DING Wenlong, ZHANG Ruifeng, et al. Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in member 3 of the Palaeogene Shahejie formation in the Nangong sag,southern Bohai Bay Basin,eastern China:Insights from the fluid potential change rate and finite difference method[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, 235:212700.
[23] 冉君帅, 李斌, 杨素举, 等. 塔里木盆地中南部奥陶系油气成藏动态模拟与勘探潜力方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2026, 31(1):160-179.
RAN Junshuai, LI Bin, YANG Suju, et al. Dynamic simulation of hydrocarbon accumulation in the Ordovician and exploration orientation in the central-southern Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2026, 31(1):160-179.
[24] 朱景修. 泌阳凹陷流体势特征及油气运聚单元划分[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(4):507-512.
ZHU Jingxiu. Characteristics of fluid potential and classification of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation units in Biyang depression,China [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition, 2016, 43(4):507-512.
[25] 成瀚, 胡望水, 李涛, 等. 下刚果盆地A区块流体势特征及其对油气运聚的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):86-92.
CHENG Han, HU Wangshui, LI Tao, et al. Characteristics of fluid potential and its implication to hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in block A,Lower Congo Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):86-92.
[26] SONG Yan, LI Zhuo, JIANG Lin, et al. The concept and the accumulation characteristics of unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. Petroleum Science, 2015, 12(4):563-572.
[27] 缪欢, 姜振学, 吴建发, 等. 页岩气运移证据及其动态富集模式:以四川盆地南部深层页岩气为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(5):29-44.
MIAO Huan, JIANG Zhenxue, WU Jianfa, et al. Migration evidence and dynamic enrichment model of shale gas:Take the deep shale gas in the southern Sichuan Basin as an example[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(5):29-44.
[28] LI Bin, ZHONG Li, LYU Haitao, et al. Dynamic simulation of differential accumulation history of deep marine oil and gas in superimposed basin:A case study of Lower Paleozoic petroleum system of Tahe Oilfield,Tarim Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(5):1217-1231.
[29] 兰盈伯, 程东会, 项琳, 等. 逾渗理论在多孔介质渗透性能研究中的应用[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024, 49(8):41-44.
LAN Yingbo, CHENG Donghui, XIANG Lin, et al. Application of percolation theory in the study of hydraulic conductivity of porous media[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2024, 49(8):41-44.
[30] 周波, 金之钧, 罗晓容, 等. 尺度放大时逾渗模型中的油气运移路径变化规律探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2007, 28(2):175-180.
ZHOU Bo, JIN Zhijun, LUO Xiaorong, et al. Changing patterns of hydrocarbon migration pathway in a up-scaling percolation model[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2007, 28(2):175-180.
[31] 王民, 马睿, 李进步, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组湖相页岩油赋存机理[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4):789-802.
WANG Min, MA Rui, LI Jinbu, et al. Occurrence mechanism of lacustrine shale oil in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation of Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4):789-802.
[32] 黄志龙, 马剑, 吴红烛, 等. 马朗凹陷芦草沟组页岩油流体压力与初次运移特征[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(5):7-11.
HUANG Zhilong, MA Jian, WU Hongzhu, et al. Fluid pressure and primary migration characteristics of shale oil of Lucaogou Formation in Malang Sag[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2012, 36(5):7-11.
[33] 李虹霖, 蒋有录, 郭富欣, 等. 东营凹陷民丰断裂带断层活动与油气成藏[J]. 地质力学学报, 2015, 21(4):473-480.
LI Honglin, JIANG Youlu, GUO Fuxin, et al. Relationship between fault-activity and hydrocarbon accumulation in Minfeng fault zone of Dongying Sag[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2015, 21(4):473-480.
[34] 高丽明, 何登发, 桂宝玲, 等. 东营凹陷民丰洼陷边界断层三维几何学及运动学特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(5):546-553.
GAO Liming, HE Dengfa, GUI Baoling, et al. 3D geometrical and kinematic characteristics of boundary faults in Minfeng subsag,Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(5):546-553.
[35] 王伟庆, 王学军, 李政, 等. 东营凹陷低成熟页岩储集空间与分形特征:以民丰洼陷沙四段上亚段页岩为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2024, 31(6):1-11.
WANG Weiqing, WANG Xuejun, LI Zheng, et al. Reservoir space and fractal characteristics of low-maturity shale in Dong-ying Sag:A case study of upper submember of Fourth Member in Eocene Shahejie Formation in Minfeng area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2024, 31(6):1-11.
[36] 魏文宗. 断陷湖盆异重流沉积特征与沉积模式:以民丰洼陷沙河街组及滦平盆地西瓜园组为例[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2020.
WEI Wenzong. Sedimentary characteristics and depositional model of hyperpycnal flow in lacustrine rift basin:Case studies from the Shahejie Formation of Minfeng Sag and the Xiguayuan Formation of Luanping Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2020.
[37] 邵绪鹏, 张立强, 靳久强, 等. 东营凹陷民丰北带沙四上亚段砂砾岩体沉积相带边界划分[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(1):122-127.
SHAO Xupeng, ZHANG Liqiang, JIN Jiuqiang, et al. Sedimentary facies boundary division of glutenite bodies in the upper Es4 of northern Minfeng zone in Dongying Sag[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(1) :122-127.
[38] 李宇志, 周肖肖, 隋风贵, 等. 东营凹陷民丰地区沙四段下亚段烃源岩特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2023, 30(3):28-41.
LI Yuzhi, ZHOU Xiaoxiao, SUI Fenggui, et al. Characteristics of source rock of Es4x in Minfeng area,Dongying Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2023, 30(3):28-41.
[39] 蔡龙龙. 东营凹陷北带深层温压场及控藏作用研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2014.
CAI Longlong. Chacteristics of temperature-pressure field and role in deep reservior-formation in the north zone of Dongying Sag[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2014.
[40] 刘琼颖, 何丽娟. 渤海湾盆地新生代以来构造-热演化模拟研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2019, 62(1):219-235.
LIU Qiongying, HE Lijuan. Tectono-thermal modeling of the Bohai Bay Basin since the Cenozoic[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62(1):219-235.
[41] 周建林. 利津洼陷和民丰洼陷沙河街组生烃史分析[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 2004, 26(2):9-10.
ZHOU Jianlin. History of hydrocarbon generation in Shahejie Formation of Lijin Depression and Minfeng Depression[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2004, 26(2):9-10.
[42] 赵文智, 卞从胜, 李永新, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长73亚段页岩有机质转化率、排烃效率与页岩油主富集类型[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(1):12-23.
ZHAO Wenzhi, BIAN Congsheng, LI Yongxin, et al. Organic matter transformation ratio,hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and shale oil enrichment type in Chang 73 shale of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(1):12-23.
[43] 张斌, 于聪, 崔景伟, 等. 生烃动力学模拟在页岩油原位转化中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(6):1212-1219.
ZHANG Bin, YU Cong, CUI Jingwei, et al. Kinetic simulation of hydrocarbon generation and its application to in-situ conversion of shale oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(6):1212-1219.
[44] 赵文智, 刘伟, 卞从胜, 等. 保存条件对陆相中高熟页岩油富集与流动性保持的作用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2025, 52(1):1-14.
ZHAO Wenzhi, LIU Wei, BIAN Congsheng, et al. Role of pre-servation conditions on enrichment and fluidity maintenance of medium to high maturity lacustrine shale oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2025, 52(1):1-14.
[45] 张欢, 曾翔, 刘惠民, 等. 泥页岩纹层矿物—有机质特征与成因差异及其对页岩油生储意义:以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙三下亚段—沙四上亚段为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2024, 35(7):1261-1276.
ZHANG Huan, ZENG Xiang, LIU Huimin, et al. The characte-ristics and genetic differences of mineral organic matter in shale laminae and its significance to shale oil generation and storage:A case study of the lower submember of the third member and upper submember of the fourth member in Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2024, 35(7):1261-1276.
[46] 陈扬, 胡钦红, 赵建华, 等. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷湖相富有机质页岩纹层特征和储集性能[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2):307-324.
CHEN Yang, HU Qinhong, ZHAO Jianhua, et al. Lamina chara-cteristics and their influence on reservoir property of lacustrine organic-rich shale in the Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2):307-324.
[1] 张卫刚, 刘广林, 王勇, 宁凡, 马绍辉, 闫百泉. 鄂尔多斯盆地铁边城地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(5): 94-103.
[2] 谌辰, 孙玉, 张玉洁, 朱庆利, 霍飞, 曹卫东, 刘小亮, 申雨酿. 东营凹陷利津洼陷古近系沙河街组页岩油藏地层水来源及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(5): 179-190.
[3] 任佳伟, 李莉, 王德玉, 白晓虎, 康博, 白宇恩, 白建文, 陈军斌. 页岩油藏水平井四维地应力演化及重复压裂时机优化方法——以鄂尔多斯盆地庆城油田三叠系长7段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 190-200.
[4] 蒋龙, 程紫燕, 孙红霞, 刘祖鹏, 李忠新, 田选华, 彭琳雄, 朱丽. 渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷古近系沙三下亚段页岩储层特征及可动孔喉下限[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 54-66.
[5] 郭昱辛, 白玉彬, 赵靖舟, 张军, 曹丹丹. 鄂尔多斯盆地志丹地区三叠系长7泥页岩非均质性及控油作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2): 97-110.
[6] 张庆福, 张世明, 曹小朋, 吕琦, 李宗阳, 于金彪, 汪勇. 页岩油藏CO2吞吐渗流场-应力场耦合数值模拟方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(1): 172-179.
[7] 张衍君, 刘拯君, 徐豪, 贺文杰, 刘亚茹, 邢亮, 周德胜, 王祯. 页岩油储层前置CO2压裂液体滞留效应研究进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(1): 180-190.
[8] 杨杨, 王海青, 石学文, 曾玉婷, 高翔, 李金勇, 张轩昂, 闫建平. 基于FMI图像微电导率曲线时频信息识别页岩层理构造的方法及应用——以四川盆地资中地区寒武系筇竹寺组一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6): 59-70.
[9] 孙远锋, 曹爱锋, 周勇, 高晨曦, 王柯. 渤海湾盆地临南洼陷古近系沙四上亚段沉积演化特征及古地貌控砂模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6): 119-130.
[10] 刘勇, 刘永旸, 赵圣贤, 尹美璇, 李博, 陈雷, 吴帅材, 谢圣阳. 泸州—渝西地区志留系龙马溪组沉积期古地貌特征及控储作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 49-59.
[11] 梁锋, 曹哲. 鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区三叠系长7页岩油储层特征、形成环境及富集模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 24-40.
[12] 钱永新, 赵毅, 刘新龙, 刘鸿, 刘国梁, 朱涛, 邹阳, 陈方文. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 115-125.
[13] 吴佳, 赵卫卫, 刘钰晨, 李慧, 肖颖, 杨迪, 王嘉楠. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区三叠系长7页岩源储配置及油气富集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 170-181.
[14] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[15] 洪智宾, 吴嘉, 方朋, 余进洋, 伍正宇, 于佳琦. 纳米限域下页岩中可溶有机质的非均质性及页岩油赋存状态[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 160-168.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发