岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 49–59.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250205

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    

泸州—渝西地区志留系龙马溪组沉积期古地貌特征及控储作用

刘勇1, 刘永旸2,3, 赵圣贤2,3, 尹美璇2,3, 李博2,3, 陈雷4, 吴帅材4, 谢圣阳2,3   

  1. 1. 中国石油西南油气田公司 气田开发管理部 成都 610051;
    2. 中国石油西南油气田公司页岩气研究院 成都 610051;
    3. 页岩气评价与开采四川省重点实验室 成都 610213;
    4. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-21 修回日期:2024-09-16 发布日期:2025-03-06
  • 第一作者:刘勇(1981—),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事页岩气的勘探开发研究工作。地址:(610051)四川省成都市府青路一段3号。Email:castledream@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 通信作者: 刘永旸(1993—),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事页岩气开发地质研究工作。Email:liuyy93@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“沉积期水下地貌对海相优质页岩发育的差异控制作用”(编号:42372173)与中国石油攻关性应用性科技专项“页岩气规模增储上产与勘探开发技术研究”(编号:2023ZZ21)联合资助。

Paleogeomorphological characteristics and reservoir control of the sedimentary period of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Luzhou-Yuxi area

LIU Yong1, LIU Yongyang2,3, ZHAO Shengxian2,3, YIN Meixuan2,3, LI Bo2,3, CHEN Lei4, WU Shuaicai4, XIE Shengyang2,3   

  1. 1. Gas Field Development Management Department, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu 610051, China;
    2. Shale Gas Research Institute of PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu 610051, China;
    3. Sichuan Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Evaluation and Exploitation, Chengdu 610213, China;
    4. School of Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2024-08-21 Revised:2024-09-16 Published:2025-03-06

摘要: 泸州—渝西地区志留系龙马溪组页岩为中国非常规油气资源勘探的重点区块之一。通过全岩X射线衍射分析、岩矿鉴定、地震资料解释及钻井资料研究,运用印模法重建了研究区的沉积古地貌,并探讨其对优质页岩储层分布的影响机制。研究结果表明:①泸州—渝西地区志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积时期,泸州—渝西地区为“一隆起、一洼陷、两缓坡”的古地貌格局,沉积区可划分为水下隆起区、水下斜坡带和水下低洼区。②页岩的矿物组成以硅质矿物为主,黏土矿物、碳酸盐矿物及黄铁矿次之。可识别出10种页岩岩相类型,主要发育硅质页岩相组合(S)和混合质页岩相组合(M),其中硅质页岩相组合(S)在水下隆起区更为发育,且纵向上更具连续性,是优质岩相组合。③不同地貌单元的页岩岩相的发育程度及储层参数(TOC、孔隙度、含气量)存在明显差异,水下隆起区页岩TOC值为3.03%~5.06%,平均值为4.25%;孔隙度为4.81%~6.30%,平均值为5.46%;含气量为1.70%~7.62%,平均值为5.05%,其页岩储层品质优于水下斜坡带和水下低洼区。平面上,优质页岩具有高TOC、高孔隙度和高含气量的特征,呈带状分布于水下隆起区及其周缘。

关键词: 印模法, 硅质页岩岩相, 储层品质, 水下隆起区, 水下斜坡带, 水下低洼区, 沉积古地貌, 龙马溪组, 志留系, 泸州—渝西地区

Abstract: The Silurian Longmaxi Formation shales in Luzhou-Yuxi area is one of the key blocks for unconventional oil and gas resource exploration in China. Based on whole rock X-ray diffraction analysis,rock mineral identification,seismic data interpretation and drilling data research,the sedimentary paleogeomorphology of the study area was reconstructed using the impression method,and its influence on the distribution of high-quality shale reservoirs was analyzed. The results show that:(1)During the deposition of Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale,the Luzhou-Yuxi area exhibited a paleogeomorphological pattern characterized by“one uplift,one depression,and two gentle slopes”.The sedimentary area can be subdivided into underwater uplift zones,underwater slope belts and underwater depression areas.(2)The mineral composition of shale is mainly composed of siliceous minerals,followed by clay minerals,carbonate minerals and pyrite. Ten types of shale lithofacies can be identified,mainly consisting of siliceous shale facies association(S)and mixed shale facies association(M). With the siliceous shale facies association(S)being more prevalent and continuous in the underwater uplift zones,make it the high-quality lithofacies in the area.(3)Significant differences in the development of shale lithofacies and reservoir parameters(TOC,porosity and gas content)were observed across different geomorphic units. In the underwater uplift zones,the TOC value of the shale ranges from 3.03% to 5.06%,with an average of 4.25%;the porosity ranges from 4.81% to 6.30%,with an average of 5.46%;and gas content ranges from 1.70% to 7.62%,with an average of 5.05%. The shale reservoir quality in this zone is significantly superior to that of underwater slope belts and underwater depression areas. Horizontally,high-quality shales,characterized by high TOC,high porosity and high gas content,are distributed in a banded pattern across the underwater uplift zone and its periphery.

Key words: impression method, siliceous shale lithofacies, reservoir quality, underwater uplift zones, underwater slope belts, underwater depression areas, sedimentary paleogeomorphology, Longmaxi Formation, Silurian, Luzhou-Yuxi area

中图分类号: 

  • TE121
[1] 郭伟,李熙喆,张晓伟,等.深水陆棚富有机质页岩沉积微相-微地貌及其对储层的控制作用:以四川盆地南部五峰组-龙马溪组页岩为例[J].石油学报,2022,43(8):1089-1106. GUO Wei,LI Xizhe,ZHANG Xiaowei,et al. Sedimentary mi-crofacies and microrelief of organic-rich shale in deep-water shelf and their control on reservoirs:A case study of shale from Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(8):1089-1106.
[2] 聂海宽,李沛,党伟,等.四川盆地及周缘奥陶系-志留系深层页岩气富集特征与勘探方向[J].石油勘探与开发,2022, 49(4):648-659. NIE Haikuan,LI Pei,DANG Wei,et al. Enrichment characteris-tics and exploration directions of deep shale gas in the OrdovicianSilurian in the Sichuan Basin and its surrounding areas,China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(4):648-659.
[3] 聂海宽,党伟,张珂,等.中国页岩气研究与发展20年:回顾与展望[J].天然气工业,2024,44(3):20-52. NIE Haikuan,DANG Wei,ZHANG Ke,et al. Two decades of shale gas research&development in China:Review and pros-pects[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2024,44(3):20-52.
[4] 梁兴,单长安,张磊,等.四川盆地渝西地区大安深层页岩气田的勘探发现及成藏条件[J].石油学报,2024,45(3):477-499. LIANG Xing,Shan Chang'an,Zhang Lei,et al. Exploration discovery and accumulation conditions of Da'an deep shale gas field in western Chongqing,Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(3):477-499.
[5] 杨洪志,赵圣贤,刘勇,等.泸州区块深层页岩气富集高产主控因素[J].天然气工业,2019,39(11):55-63. YANG Hongzhi,ZHAO Shengxian,LIU Yong,et al. Main con-trolling factors of enrichment and high-yield of deep shale gas in the Luzhou Block,southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2019,39(11):55-63.
[6] 罗超,李彦佑,李怡,等.四川盆地泸州区块优质页岩段的矿物组成特征[J].天然气工业,2022,42(增刊1):16-25. LUO Chao,LI Yanyou,LI Yi,et al. Mineral composition characteristics of high-quality shale sections in Luzhou block,Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(suppl 1):16-25.
[7] WU Jing,LIANG Chao,YANG Chaoren,et al.The genetic relationship between paleoenvironment,mineral compositions and lithofacies in the Ordovician-Silurian Wufeng-Longmaxi sedimentary succession in the Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2022,236:105334.
[8] 金之均,胡宗全,高波,等.川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):1-10. JIN Zhijun,HU Zongquan,Gao Bo,et al. Controlling factors on the enrichment and high productivity of shale gas in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):1-10.
[9] 闫建平,罗静超,石学文,等.川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J].岩性油气藏, 2022,34(6):60-71. YAN Jianping,LUO Jingchao,SHI Xuewen,et al. Fracture development models and significance of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(6):60-71.
[10] 杨学锋,赵圣贤,刘勇,等.四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2024,36(5):99-110. YANG Xuefeng,ZHAO Shengxian,LIU Yong,et al. Main con-trolling factors of shale gas enrichment of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Ningxi area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(5):99-110.
[11] 郭旭升.南方海相页岩气"二元富集"规律:四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识[J].地质学报,2014,88(7):1209-1218. GUO Xusheng. Rules of Two-factor enrichment for marine shale gas in Southern China:Understanding from the Longmaxi Formation shale gas in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding area[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2014,88(7):1209-1218.
[12] 邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一)[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):689-701. ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Yuman,et al. Shale gas in China:Characteristics,challenges and prospects (Ⅰ)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):689-701.
[13] 姜振学,宋岩,唐相路,等.中国南方海相页岩气差异富集的控制因素[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(3):617-628. JIANG Zhenxue,SONG Yan,TANG Xianglu,et al. Control-ling factors of marine shale gas differential enrichment in south-ern China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020, 47(3):617-628.
[14] 聂海宽,张金川,金之钧,等.论海相页岩气富集机理:以四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].地质学报,2024,98(3):975-991. NIE Haikuan,ZHANG Jinchuan,JIN Zhijun,et al. Enrichment mechanism of marine shale gas:A case study of the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan basin,SW China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2024,98(3):975-991.
[15] 施振生,袁渊,赵群,等.川南地区五峰组-龙马溪组沉积期古地貌及含气页岩特征[J].天然气地球科学,2022,33(12):1969-1985. SHI Zhensheng,YUAN Yuan,ZHAO Qun,et al. Paleogeomor-phology and oil-bearing shale characteristics of the WufengLongmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Natural Gas Earth Science,2022,33(12):1969-1985.
[16] 张廷山,陈雷,梁兴,等.昭通国家级页岩气示范区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集地质主控因素[J].天然气工业,2023, 43(4):93-102. ZHANG Tingshan,CHEN Lei,LIANG Xing,et al. Geological control factors of shale gas enrichment in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of the Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2023,43(4):93-102.
[17] 计玉冰,郭冰如,梅珏,等.四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J].岩性油气藏, 2024,36(3):137-145. JI Yubing,GUO Bingru,MEI Jue,et al. Fracture modeling of shale reservoirs of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Luobu syn-cline in Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Area, southern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024,36(3):137-145.
[18] 王同,张克银,熊亮,等.四川自贡地区五峰组-龙马溪组下段古地貌刻画及其油气意义[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(6):764-770. WANG Tong,ZHANG Keyin,XIONG Liang,et al. Paleogeo-morphology restoration of Wufeng Formation-Lower Member of Longmaxi Formation in Zigong area of Sichuan Province and its oil and gas significance[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2018,40(6):764-770
[19] 施振生,王红岩,林长木,等.威远-自贡地区五峰期-龙马溪期古地形及其对页岩储层品质的控制[J].地层学杂志, 2020,44(2):163-173. SHI Zhensheng,WANG Hongyan,LIN Changmu,et al. Paleo-topography of Weiyuan-Zigong area in Wufengian-Lungmachian stages (Ordovician-Silurian transition) and its effect on the qual-ity of shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy,2020,44(2):163-173.
[20] 王红岩,董大忠,施振生,等.川南海相页岩岩石相类型及"甜点"分布:以长宁双河剖面五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].油气藏评价与开发,2022,12(1):68-81. WANG Hongyan,DONG Dazhong,SHI Zhensheng,et al. Lith-facies and "sweet spot" interval of marine shale in southern Sichuan:A case study of Shuanghe Outcrop in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Changning[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2022,12(1):68-81.
[21] 邱晨,闫建平,钟光海,等.四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):117-130. QIU Chen,YAN Jianping,ZHONG Guanghai,et al. Sedimentary microfacies division and logging identification of Ordovi-cian Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(3):117-130.
[22] 陈旭,张元动,樊隽轩,等.广西运动的进程:来自生物相和岩相带的证据[J].中国科学:地球科学,2012,42(11):1617-1626. CHEN Xu,ZHANG Yuandong,FAN Junxuan,et al. The pro-cess of Guangxi Movement:Evidence from biological and lithofacies zones[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae),2012,42(11):1617-1626.
[23] WU Shuaicai,CHEN Lei,XIONG Min,et al. Depositional con-ditions of shale lithofacies during the Late Ordovician-Early Silurian in the Upper Yangtze area,SW China:Responses to sea-level changes[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2024, 161:106696.
[24] ZHAO Jianhua,JIN Zhijun,JIN Zhenkui,et al. Depositional en-vironment of shale in Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Research,2017,2(3):209-221.
[25] 张素荣,董大忠,廖群山,等.四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气地质特征及资源前景[J].天然气工业,2021,41(9):35-45. ZHANG Surong,DONG Dazhong,LIAO Qunshan,et al. Geological characteristics and resource prospects of deep marine shale gas in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Indus-try,2021,41(9):35-45.
[26] 韦国栋,谭秀成,刘睿,等.长宁地区龙马溪组页岩沉积古地貌与页岩气差异富集的耦合机制[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2024,44(2):253-266. WEI Guodong,TAN Xiucheng,LIU Rui,et al. The coupling mechanism between geomorphology of shale sedimentary and differential enrichment of shale gas in Longmaxi Formation in Changning area[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2024,44(2):253-266.
[27] 蒋婵,张海杰,周亚东,等.渝西大足区块五峰组-龙马溪组古地貌特征及其对优质页岩发育的影响[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2022,53(9):3628-3640. JIANG Chan,ZHANG Haijie,ZHOU Yadong,et al. Paleogeo-morphic characteristics of Wufeng-Formation and its influence on development of high-quality shale in Dazu area,Western Chongqing[J]. Journal of Central South University (Natural Science Edition),2022,53(9):3628-3640.
[28] 王滢,寇一龙,钟思存,等.川中古隆起南缘龙马溪组富有机质页岩沉积主控因素[J].地质论评,2024,70(增刊1):241-243. WANG Ying,KOU Yilong,ZHONG Sicun,et al.The main sedimentary controlling factors of organic matter-rich shale in the Longmaxi Formation in southern margin of the middle Sichuan ancient uplift[J]. Geological Review,2024,70(Suppl 1):241-243.
[29] FENG Yue,XIAO Xianming,GAO Ping,et al. Restoration of sedimentary environment and geochemical features of deep ma-rine Longmaxi shale and its significance for shale gas:A case study of the Dingshan area in the Sichuan Basin,South China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2023,151:106186.
[30] CHEN Lei,XIONG Min,TAN Xiucheng,et al. Coupling mecha-nism between sea level changes and pore heterogeneity of ma-rine shale reservoirs driven by astronomical orbital cycles:Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale in the Upper Yangtze area, South China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2024,160:106590.
[31] XIAO Bin,LIU Shugen,LI Zhiwu,et al. Geochemical characteristics of marine shale in the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in the northern Sichuan Basin,South China and its implications for depositional controls on organic matter[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,203:108618.
[32] XU Lulu,HUANG Saipeng,WANG Yang,et al. Palaeoenvironment evolution and organic matter enrichment mechanisms of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales of Yuanán block in western Hubei, middle Yangtze:Implications for shale gas accumulation potential[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2023,152:106242.
[33] 吴蓝宇,胡东风,陆永潮,等.四川盆地涪陵气田五峰组-龙马溪组页岩优势岩相[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):189-197. WU Lanyu,HU Dongfeng,LU Yongchao,et al. Advantageous shale lithofacies of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Fuling gas field of Sichuan Basin,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):189-197.
[34] 王同川,陈浩如,温龙彬,等.川东五百梯地区石炭系岩溶古地貌识别及储集意义[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(4):109-121. WANG Tongchuan,CHEN Haoru,WEN Longbin,et al. Identi-fication and reservoir significance of Carboniferous karst pa-leogeomorphology in Wubaiti area,eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(4):109-121.
[35] 邓远,陈轩,覃建华,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组一段沉积期古地貌特征及有利储层分布[J].岩性油气藏,2024, 36(1):136-144. DENG Yuan,CHEN Xuan,QIN Jianhua,et al. Paleogeomor-phology and favorable reservior distribution of the first member of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Litho-logic Reservoirs,2024,36(1):136-144.
[1] 吴松, 冯冰, 于继良, 蓝宝锋, 李龙, 王胜, 沈家宁, 李刚权. 黔北正安地区安场向斜奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 182-193.
[2] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[3] 邱玉超, 李亚丁, 文龙, 罗冰, 姚军, 许强, 文华国, 谭秀成. 川东地区寒武系洗象池组构造特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 122-132.
[4] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[5] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[6] 包汉勇, 刘超, 甘玉青, 薛萌, 刘世强, 曾联波, 马诗杰, 罗良. 四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[7] 闫建平, 罗静超, 石学文, 钟光海, 郑马嘉, 黄毅, 唐洪明, 胡钦红. 川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[8] 邱晨, 闫建平, 钟光海, 李志鹏, 范存辉, 张悦, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
[9] 张梦琳, 李郭琴, 何嘉, 衡德. 川西南缘天宫堂构造奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 141-151.
[10] 王登, 周豹, 冷双梁, 温雅茹, 刘海, 张小波, 余江浩, 陈威. 鄂西咸丰地区五峰组—龙马溪组硅质岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 52-62.
[11] 杨占伟, 姜振学, 梁志凯, 吴伟, 王军霞, 宫厚健, 李维邦, 苏展飞, 郝绵柱. 基于2种机器学习方法的页岩TOC含量评价——以川南五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 130-138.
[12] 李小佳, 邓宾, 刘树根, 吴娟, 周政, 焦堃. 川南宁西地区五峰组—龙马溪组多期流体活动[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 135-144.
[13] 张兵, 唐书恒, 郗兆栋, 蔺东林, 叶亚培. 湘西北地区五峰组—龙马溪组生物地层特征及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 11-21.
[14] 王素英, 张翔, 田景春, 彭明鸿, 郑潇宇, 夏永涛. 塔里木盆地顺北地区柯坪塔格组沉积演化及沉积分异模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 81-94.
[15] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!