渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20210405

岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 41–51.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210405

渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩岩相及储层特征

尹兴平¹, 蒋裕强^1,2, 付永红^1,2, 张雪梅³, 雷治安⁴, 陈超⁵, 张海杰⁴

1. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500;
2. 中国石油非常规重点实验室储层评价实验室, 成都 610500;
3. 四川科宏石油天然气工程有限公司, 成都 610056;
4. 重庆页岩气勘探开发有限责任公司, 重庆 610213;
5. 四川长宁天然气开发有限责任公司, 成都 610056

收稿日期:2020-08-25 修回日期:2020-11-23 出版日期:2021-08-01 发布日期:2021-08-06
通讯作者: 蒋裕强(1963-),男,硕士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气地质方面的教学与研究工作。Email:xnsyjyq3055@126.com。 E-mail:xnsyjyq3055@126.com
作者简介:尹兴平(1997-),男,西南石油大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气地质。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号西南石油大学。Email:156650050@qq.com
基金资助:
中石油-西南石油大学创新联合体项目二课题专题四“复杂地质条件下川南深层/昭通中浅层海相页岩气赋存机制及控制因素研究”（编号：2020CX020104）资助

Shale lithofacies and reservoir characteristics of Wufeng Formation-lower Long 1 submember of Longmaxi Formation in western Chongqing

YIN Xingping¹, JIANG Yuqiang^1,2, FU Yonghong^1,2, ZHANG Xuemei³, LEI Zhian⁴, CHEN Chao⁵, ZHANG Haijie⁴

1. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
2. Reservoir Evaluation Laboratory, PetroChina Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil and Gas, Chengdu 610500, China;
3. Sichuan Kehong Oil and Gas Engineering Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610056, China;
4. Chongqing Shale Gas Exploration and Development Company Limited, Chongqing 610213, China;
5. Sichuan Changing Natural Gas Development Company Limited, Chengdu 610056, China

Received:2020-08-25 Revised:2020-11-23 Online:2021-08-01 Published:2021-08-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩具有巨大的勘探开发潜力，为了明确其不同岩相的储层品质差异、纵向分布规律及其储层发育影响因素等，结合岩石薄片鉴定、岩石组分、地球化学分析等进行了岩相划分，并综合有机碳含量、纹层结构、储集空间与物性、含气量等资料确定了不同岩相的储层特征、有利岩相分布及控制因素等。结果表明：研究层段发育高碳硅质页岩、中碳硅质页岩、低碳硅质页岩、低碳钙质-硅质页岩、低碳黏土质页岩、特低碳黏土质页岩6种岩相。高碳硅质页岩沉积环境还原性强，沉积水体深，生物繁盛，生物硅含量高，泥纹层发育，为优质页岩储层，有利于连片有机质和有机质孔的发育与保存，主要发育于龙马溪组底部1小层，为页岩气富集提供了有利生储条件；中碳硅质页岩与低碳硅质页岩沉积环境还原性较强，沉积水体变浅，生物繁盛程度降低，生物硅含量偏低，粉砂纹层和泥纹层频繁交互，有机质孔主要发育于分散状有机质中，是潜在的可开发页岩气储层，主要发育于五峰组顶部、龙马溪组2小层和3小层。该研究结果深化了研究区有利页岩储层纵向分布的认识，为页岩气立体开发提供了基础数据支撑。

关键词: 页岩气, 岩相, 储层特征, 控制因素, 龙马溪组, 渝西地区

Abstract: Shale in Wufeng Formation-lower Long 1 submember of Longmaxi Formation in western Chongqing has great potential of exploration and development. In order to clarify the difference of reservoir quality,longitudinal distribution law and influencing factors of reservoir development of different lithofacies,the lithofacies was divided combined with thin section identification,rock composition and geochemistry characteristics. Based on the data of organic carbon content,laminar structure,reservoir space and physical properties,and gas content, the reservoir characteristics,favorable lithofacies distribution and controlling factors of different lithofacies were determined. The results show that there are six kinds of shale lithofacies：organic-rich siliceous shale,moderateorganic siliceous shale,low-organic siliceous shale,low-organic calcareous siliceous shale,low-organic clay shale and extra-low-organic clay shale. The organic-rich siliceous shale is a high-quality shale reservoir with its sedimentary environment characterized by strong reducibility,deep water body,abundant organisms,high biogenic silicon content and well-developed argillaceous lamination,which is conducive to the development and preservation of contiguous organic matter and organic pores. It is mainly developed in sublayer-1 of Long 1 submember of Longmaxi Formation,providing favorable source-reservoir conditions for shale gas enrichment. The moderate-organic siliceous shale and low-organic siliceous shale are deposited in strong reducibility and shallow water sedimentary environment,with decreased organisms,low biogenic silicon content,frequent interbedding of silt lamination and argillaceous lamination,and organic pores are mainly developed in dispersed organic matter with good connectivity. So,they are potential exploitable shale gas reservoirs,and mainly developed in the top of Wufeng Formation,sublayer-2 and sublayer-3 of Long 1 submember of Longmaxi Formation. The research results deepen the understanding of the vertical distribution of favorable shale reservoirs in the study area, and provide basic data support for three-dimensional development of shale gas.

Key words: shale gas, lithofacies, reservoir characteristics, controlling factors, Longmaxi Formation, western Chongqing

中图分类号:

TE122.2

尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41–51.

YIN Xingping, JIANG Yuqiang, FU Yonghong, ZHANG Xuemei, LEI Zhian, CHEN Chao, ZHANG Haijie. Shale lithofacies and reservoir characteristics of Wufeng Formation-lower Long 1 submember of Longmaxi Formation in western Chongqing[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(4): 41–51.

参考文献

[1] 王超, 张柏桥, 舒志国, 等.四川盆地涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组海相页岩岩相类型及储层特征. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3):485-497. WANG C, ZHANG B Q, SHU Z G, et al. Lithofacies types and reservoir characteristics of marine shales of the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Fuling area, the Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(3):485-497.
[2] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二).石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2):166-178. ZOU C N, DONG D Z, WANG Y M, et al. Shale gas in China:Characteristics,challenges and prospects(Ⅱ).Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2):166-178.
[3] 蒋裕强, 刘雄伟, 付永红, 等.渝西地区海相页岩储层孔隙有效性评价.石油学报, 2019, 40(10):1233-1243. JIANG Y Q, LIU X W, FU Y H, et al. Evaluation of effective porosity in marine shale reservoir, western Chongqing. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(10):1233-1243.
[4] 张成林, 张鉴, 李武广, 等.渝西大足区块五峰组-龙马溪组深层页岩储层特征与勘探前景. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(12):1794-1804. ZHANG C L, ZHANG J, LI W G, et al.Deep shale reservoir characteristics and exploration potential of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Dazu area, western Chongqing. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(12):1794-1804.
[5] 蒲泊伶, 董大忠, 王凤琴, 等.川南地区龙马溪组沉积亚相精细划分及地质意义.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(3):15-25. PU B L, DONG D Z, WANG F Q, et al. Re-division and evolution of sedimentary subfacies of Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2020, 44(3):15-25.
[6] 蒲泊伶, 董大忠, 王凤琴, 等.沉积相带对川南龙马溪组页岩气富集的影响.中国地质, 2020, 47(1):111-120. PU B L, DONG D Z, WANG F Q, et al. The effect of sedimentary facies on Longmaxi shale gas in southern Sichuan Basin. Geology in China, 2020, 47(1):111-120.
[7] 熊亮.川南威荣页岩气田五峰组-龙马溪组页岩沉积相特征及其意义.石油实验地质, 2019, 41(3):326-332. XIONG L.Characteristics and significance of sedimentary facies of Wufeng-Longmaxi formation shale in Weirong shale gas field, southern Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(3):326-332.
[8] ALLIX P, BURNHAM A, FOWLER T, et al. Coaxing oil from shale. Oilfield Review, 2010, 22(4):4-15.
[9] WANG G C, CARR T R. Marcellus shale lithofacies prediction by multiclass neural network classification in the Appalachian Basin. Mathematical Geosciences, 2012, 44(8):975-1004.
[10] 朱逸青, 王兴志, 冯明友, 等.川东地区下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相划分及其与储层关系.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):59-66. ZHU Y Q, WANG X Z, FENG M Y, et al. Lithofacies classification and its relationship with reservoir of the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):59-66.
[11] 柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, 等.陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件:以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例.石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5):828-838. LIU B, SHI J X, FU X F, et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary system:A case study of organic-rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, NE China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5):828-838.
[12] 赵建华, 金之钧, 金振奎, 等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相类型与沉积环境.石油学报, 2016, 37(5):572-586. ZHAO J H, JIN Z J, JIN Z K, et al. Lithofacies types and sedimentary environment of shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(5):572-586.
[13] 赵圣贤, 杨跃明, 张鉴, 等.四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩小层划分与储层精细对比. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3):470-487. ZHAO S X, YANG Y M, ZHANG J, et al. Micro-layers division and fine reservoirs contrast of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale,Sichuan Basin, SW China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(3):470-487.
[14] 蒋裕强, 宋益滔, 漆麟, 等.中国海相页岩岩相精细划分及测井预测:以四川盆地南部威远地区龙马溪组为例.地学前缘, 2016, 23(1):107-118. JIANG Y Q, SONG Y T, QI L, et al. Fine lithofacies of China's marine shale and its logging prediction:A case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi marine shale in Weiyuan area, southern Sichuan Basin,China. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(1):107-118.
[15] FENG J H, MOU Z H. Main factors controlling the enrichment of shale gas in Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area,Fuling shale gas field. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(3):32-39.
[16] LIANG F, ZHANG Q, CUI H Y, et al. Controlling factors of organic nanopore development:A case study on marine shale in the Middle and Upper Yangtze Region, South China.Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(4):1047-1059.
[17] 郑珊珊, 刘洛夫, 汪洋, 等.川南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及主控因素. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3):55-65. ZHENG S S, LIU L F, WANG Y, et al. Characteristics of microscopic pore structures and main controlling factors of WufengLongmaxi Formation shale in southern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3):55-65.
[18] 施振生, 董大忠, 王红岩, 等.含气页岩不同纹层及组合储集层特征差异性及其成因:以四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组一段典型井为例.石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4):829-840. SHI Z S, DONG D Z, WANG H Y, et al. Reservoir characteristics and genetic mechanisms of shale with different laminae and laminae combinations:A case study of member 1 of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale in Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4):829-840.
[19] 卢树藩, 陈厚国.黔南地区麻页1井寒武系牛蹄塘组页岩特征及页岩气勘探前景.中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(3):81-87. LU S F, CHEN H G. Shale characteristics and shale gas exploration prospect in Cambrian Niutitang Formation in well MY-l, southern Guizhou. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(3):81-87.
[20] 尉鹏飞, 张金川, 隆帅, 等.四川盆地及周缘地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构及其发育主控因素. 中国石油勘探, 2016, (5):42-51. WEI P F, ZHANG J C, LONG S, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of microscopic pore structure of Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its periphery. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(5):42-51.
[21] 沈瑞, 胡志明, 郭和坤, 等.四川盆地长宁龙马溪组页岩赋存空间及含气规律.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5):11-17. SHEN R, HU Z M, GUO H K, et al. Storage space and gas content law of Longmaxi shale in Changning area, Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(5):11-17.
[22] TANG L, SONG Y, LI Q W, et al. A quantitative evaluation of shale gas content in different occurrence states of the Longmaxi Formation:A new insight from well JY-A in the Fuling shale gas field,Sichuan Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(2):400-419.
[23] 王进, 包汉勇, 陆亚秋, 等.涪陵焦石坝地区页岩气赋存特征定量表征及其主控因素.地球科学, 2019, 44(3):1001-1011. WANG J, BAO H Y, LU Y Q, et al. Quantitative characterization and main controlling factors of shale gas occurrence in Jiaoshiba area,Fuling. Earth Science, 2019, 44(3):1001-1011.
[24] 梁兴, 陈科洛, 张廷山, 等.沉积环境对页岩孔隙的控制作用:以滇黔北地区五峰组-龙马溪组下段为例. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(10):1393-1405. LIANG X, CHEN K L, ZHANG T S, et al. The controlling factors of depositional environment to pores of the shales:Case study of Wufeng Formation-Lower Longmaxi Formation in Dianqianbei area. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(10):1393-1405.
[25] 张琴, 梁峰, 王红岩, 等.页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义:以渝东南地区五峰-龙马溪组为例.中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(2):380-390. ZHANG Q, LIANG F, WANG H Y, et al. Elements geochemistry and paleo sedimentary significance:A case study of the WufengLongmaxi shale in southeast Chongqing.Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(2):380-390.
[26] 高乔, 王兴志, 朱逸青, 等.川南地区龙马溪组元素地球化学特征及有机质富集主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4):72-84. GAO Q, WANG X Z, ZHU Y Q, et al. Elemental geochemical characteristics and main controlling factors of organic matter enrichment of Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4):72-84.
[27] 林长木, 王红岩, 梁萍萍, 等.川南地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩纹层特征及其储集意义. 地层学杂志, 2019, 43(2):133-140. LIN C M, WANG H Y, LIANG P P, et al. The characteristics of laminae and its reservoir significance in black shale:Taking the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in the Changning-Shuanghe section as an example. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2019, 43(2):133-140.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩岩相及储层特征

Shale lithofacies and reservoir characteristics of Wufeng Formation-lower Long 1 submember of Longmaxi Formation in western Chongqing

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[2]	徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[3]	向雪冰, 司马立强, 王亮, 李军, 郭宇豪, 张浩. 页岩气储层孔隙流体划分及有效孔径计算——以四川盆地龙潭组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 137-146.
[4]	丛平, 闫建平, 井翠, 张家浩, 唐洪明, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 晁静. 页岩气储层可压裂性级别测井评价及展布特征——以川南X地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 177-188.
[5]	许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[6]	李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[7]	严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[8]	李祖兵, 崔俊峰, 宋舜尧, 成亚斌, 卢异, 陈岑. 黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 81-92.
[9]	张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[10]	杨洋, 石万忠, 张晓明, 王任, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 曹沈厅, 冯芊. 页岩岩相的测井曲线识别方法——以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 135-146.
[11]	杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[12]	袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[13]	彭军, 许天宇, 于乐丹. 东营凹陷沙河街组四段湖相细粒沉积特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 1-12.
[14]	钟红利, 吴雨风, 闪晨晨. 北大巴山地区鲁家坪组页岩地球化学特征及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 13-22.
[15]	王朋飞, 金璨, 臧小鹏, 田黔宁, 刘国, 崔文娟. 渝东南地区海相页岩有机质孔隙发育特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 46-53.