Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 161-168.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190618

• PETROLEUM ENGINEERING • Previous Articles    

Influencing factors of fracture geometry in deep shale gas wells

BIAN Xiaobing1,2, HOU Lei1,2, JIANG Tingxue1,2, GAO Dongwei3, ZHANG Chi3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Beijing 100101, China;
    3. Chongqing Fuling Shale Gas Exploration and Development Company, Sinopec, Chongqing 408014, China
  • Received:2019-05-07 Revised:2019-07-09 Online:2019-11-21 Published:2019-09-28

Abstract: There are abundant deep shale gas resources in China. For deep shale gas wells,the casing pressure is usually very high and it is difficult to pump proppants during hydraulic fracturing treatment,however,the production is low as well. How to generate effective fracture system remains an urgent and unresolved issue in deep shale gas wells. Thus,based on lab experiments together with microseismic monitoring data,a fracture propagation model was established using discrete fracture network model of Meyer,especially for deep shale gas wells in southeast Sichuan Basin,and the simulation accuracy is above 85%. Through orthogonal design and variance analysis,it is defined that fracturing fluid viscosity is the main controlling factor affecting fracture geometry especially for fracture width and SRV in deep shale gas wells,and there are two stages for the fracture propagation progress:the rapid growth stage in the early 1/5-1/4 pump time,and the following moderate growth stage. The fracturing design principle was put forward for the target block:fine field control with larger fluid displacement and moderate operation scale,hybrid hydraulic fluid with various viscosity to achieve fully fracture propagation, and continuous smaller proppant loading mode with lower concentration to prop fracture effectively. The fracturing parameters were optimized such as fracturing fluid volume,proppant volume and fluid displacement. A sample horizontal well buried more than 3 900 m was fractured with comprehensive sand-liquid ratio up to 3.51% and maximum sand volume per stage up to 80.6 m3,and the testing production was 11.4×104m3. The research could provide fracturing references for similar horizontal wells in deep shale gas play.

Key words: deep shale, numerical simulation, fracture geometry, SRV, main controlling factors

CLC Number: 

  • TE357.1
[1] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景.石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136. JIA C Z,ZHENG M,ZHANG Y F. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
[2] 邹才能,翟光明,张光亚,等.全球常规-非常规油气形成分布、资源潜力及趋势预测.石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):13-25. ZOU C N,ZHAI G M,ZHANG G Y,et al. Formation,distribution,potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(1):13-25.
[3] 邹才能,赵群,董大忠,等.页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景.天然气地球科学,2017,28(12):1781-1796. ZOU C N,ZHAO Q,DONG D Z,et al. Geological characteristics, mail challenges and future prospect of shale gas. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(12):1781-1796.
[4] 蒋廷学,卞晓冰,王海涛,等.深层页岩气水平井体积压裂技术.天然气工业,2017,37(1):90-96. JIANG T X,BIAN X B,WANG H T,et al. Volume fracturing of deep shale gas horizontal wells. Natural Gas Industry,2017, 37(1):90-96.
[5] 冯国强,赵立强,卞晓冰,等.深层页岩气水平井多尺度裂缝压裂技术.石油钻探技术,2017,45(6):77-82. FENG G Q,ZHAO L Q,BIAN X B,et al. Multi-scale hydraulic fracturing of horizontal wells in deep shale gas plays. Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2017,45(6):77-82.
[6] FAN L,THOMPSON J W,ROBINSON J R. Understanding gas production mechanism and effectiveness of well stimulation in the Haynesville shale through reservoir simulation. CSUG/SPE 136696,2010.
[7] GULEN G,IKONNIKOVA S,BROWNING J,et al. Fayetteville shale-production outlook. SPE Economics & Management,2014:1-13.
[8] 蒋廷学,王海涛,卞晓冰,等. 水平井体积压裂技术研究与应用.岩性油气藏,2018,30(2):1-11. JIANG T X,WANG H T,BIAN X B,et al. Volume fracturing technology for horizontal well and its application. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(2):1-11.
[9] 曾义金,陈作,卞晓冰.川东南深层页岩气分段压裂技术的突破与认识.天然气工业,2016,36(1):61-67. ZENG Y J,CHEN Z,BIAN X B,et al. Breakthrough in staged fracturing technology for deep shale gas reservoirs in SE Sichuan Basin and its implications. Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(1):61-67.
[10] 杜洋,雷炜,李莉,等. 页岩气井压裂后焖排模式. 岩性油气藏,2019,31(3):145-151. DU Y,LEI W,LI L,et al. Shut-in and flow-back pattern of fractured shale gas wells. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(3):145151.
[11] 陈作,曾义金.深层页岩气分段压裂技术现状及发展建议.石油钻探技术,2016,44(1):6-11. CHEN Z,ZENG Y J. Present situations and prospects of multistage fracturing technology for deep shale gas development. Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2016,44(1):6-11.
[12] 张驰. 涪陵页岩气田平桥区块深层气井压裂工艺优化与应用.岩性油气藏,2018,30(6):160-168. ZHANG C. Optimization and application of deep gas well fracturing in Pingqiao block of Fuling shale gas field. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(6):160-168.
[13] MSALLI A,JENNIFER M. Slickwater proppant transport in hydraulic fractures:New experimental findings & scalable correlation. SPE 174828,2015.
[1] CUI Chuanzhi, LI Jing, WU Zhongwei. Simulation of microscopic seepage characteristics of CO2 immiscible flooding under the effect of diffusion and adsorption [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 181-188.
[2] BAO Hanyong, ZHAO Shuai, ZHANG Li, LIU Haotian. Exploration achievements and prospects for shale gas of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area,eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[3] LIU Renjing, LU Wenming. Mechanism and field practice of enhanced oil recovery by injection-production coupling in fault block reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[4] BAO Hanyong, LIU Chao, GAN Yuqing, XUE Meng, LIU Shiqiang, ZENG Lianbo, MA Shijie, LUO Liang. Paleotectonic stress field and fracture characteristics of shales of Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southern Fuling area,Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[5] LI Fengfeng, NI Xiaowei, XU Sihui, WEI Xinlu, LIU Diren. Response characteristics and correction of LWD laterolog in anisotropic formations and deviated boreholes [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3): 161-168.
[6] Lü Dongliang, YANG Jian, LIN Liming, ZHANG Kaili, CHEN Yanhu. Characterization model of oil-water relative permeability curves of sandstone reservoir and its application in numerical simulation [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1): 145-159.
[7] YAN Jianping, LUO Jingchao, SHI Xuewen, ZHONG Guanghai, ZHENG Majia, HUANG Yi, TANG Hongming, HU Qinhong. Fracture development models and significance of Ordovician WufengSilurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[8] LUO Qun, ZHANG Zeyuan, YUAN Zhenzhu, XU Qian, QIN Wei. Connotation,evaluation and optimization of tight oil sweet spots: A case study of Cretaceous Xiagou Formation in Qingxi Sag,Jiuquan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4): 1-12.
[9] QIU Chen, YAN Jianping, ZHONG Guanghai, LI Zhipeng, FAN Cunhui, ZHANG Yue, HU Qinhong, HUANG Yi. Sedimentary microfacies division and logging identification of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale in Luzhou area,Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
[10] ZHANG Wei, LI Lei, QIU Xinwei, GONG Guangchuan, CHENG Linyan, GAO Yifan, YANG Zhipeng, YANG Lei. A/S control on spatiotemporal evolution of deltas in rifted lacustrine basin and its numerical simulation: A case study of Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Lufeng 22 subsag,Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 131-141.
[11] ZHANG Menglin, LI Guoqin, HE Jia, HENG De. Main controlling factors of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale gas enrichment in Tiangongtang structure, southwestern margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 141-151.
[12] DONG Min, GUO Wei, ZHANG Linyan, WU Zhonghai, MA Licheng, DONG Hui, FENG Xingqiang, YANG Yuehui. Characteristics of paleotectonic stress field and fractures of WufengLongmaxi Formation in Luzhou area, southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1): 43-51.
[13] SHAO Xiaozhou, WANG Miaomiao, QI Yalin, HE Tongtong, ZHANG Xiaolei, PANG Jinlian, GUO Yixuan. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Chang 8 reservoir in northern Pingliang area,Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6): 59-69.
[14] ZHANG Haoyu, LI Mao, KANG Yongmei, WU Zemin, WANG Guang. Reservoir architecture and fine characterization of remaining oil of Chang 3 reservoir in Zhenbei oilfield,Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6): 177-188.
[15] ZHANG Zhiheng, TIAN Jijun, HAN Changcheng, ZHANG Wenwen, DENG Shouwei, SUN Guoxiang. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag,Jungger Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] DUAN Tianxiang,LIU Xiaomei,ZHANG Yajun,XIAO Shuqin. Discussion on geologic modeling with Petrel[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] ZHANG Liqiu. Optimization of upward strata combination of second class oil layer in eastern south Ⅱ area of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] ZHANG Di,HOU Zhongjian,WANG Yahui,WANG Ying,WANG Chunlian. Sedimentary characteristics of lacustrine carbonate rocks of the first member of Shahejie Formation in Banqiao-Beidagang area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] FAN Huaicai, LI Xiaoping, DOU Tiancai, WU Xinyuan. Study on stress sensitivity effect on flow dynamic features of gas wells[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] TIAN Shufang,ZHANG Hongwen. Application of life cycle theory to predict increasing trend of proved oil reserves in Liaohe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] YANG Kai,GUO Xiao. Numerical simulation study of three-dimensional two-phase black oil model in fractured low permeability reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] ZHAI Zhongxi, QINWeijun, GUO Jinrui. Quantitative relations between oil-gas filling degree and channel seepage flow capacity of the reservoir:Example of Shuanghe Oilfield in Biyang Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] QI Minghui,LU Zhengyuan,YUAN Shuai,LI Xinhua. The analysis on the sources of water body and characteristic of water breakthough at Block 12 in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] LI Xiangbo,CHEN Qi,lin,LIU Huaqing,WAN Yanrong,MU Jingkui,LIAO Jianbo,WEI Lihua. Three types of sediment gravity flows and their petroliferous features of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] LIU Yun,LU Yuan,YI Xiangyi, ZHANG Junliang, ZHANG Jinliang,WANG Zhenxi. Gas hydrate forecasting model and its influencing factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .
TRENDMD: