Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2014, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 120-125.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2014.06.020

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of non-Darcy flow on deliverability of gas-water producing horizontal well in low permeability gas reservoirs

ZHANG Jiqiang1, LI Xiaoping1, YUAN Lin1, WANG Wenbin2, WANG Chaowen1   

  1.  1. State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploration , Southwest Petroleum University , Chengdu 610500 , China ; 2. Research Institute of Natural Gas , PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field , Luzhou 610213 , Sichuan , China
  • Online:2014-11-20 Published:2014-11-20

Abstract:

When water drive gas reservoir is exploited to a certain extent, the water will be produced, and then gas and water two-phase flow will increase the resistance of gas flow, which leads a sharp decline on gas well production. The determination of reasonable gas well deliverability is the foundation of scientific development of gas field and has very important guiding significance. According to the change of gas and water two-phase seepage rule, based on stable percolation theory, this paper introduced pseudopressure and threshold pressure gradient of gas and water two-phase, and established a new gas well productivity prediction model for gas-water producing horizontal wells, taking the influences of threshold pressure gradient, slippage effect, stress sensitivity, formation damage and high-speed nonDarcy into account. Studies show that the water/gas ratio has a rather greater impact on the deliverability of gas well, so water breakthrough must be controlled during the gas production. With the increasing of threshold pressure gradient, stress sensitivity and water/gas ratio, the deliverability of gas well decreases, while with the decreasing of slippage effect, the deliverability of gas well increases. The gas phase threshold pressure gradient plays a more important influence on the gas deliverability than water phase threshold pressure gradient.

Key words:  buried hill, reservoir, migration system, hydrocarbon accumulation model, Jizhong Depression

[1]王晓琴,吴聚,冉艳,等.非线性渗流对异常高压气藏产能的影响[J].岩性油气藏,2012,24(4):125-128.
[2]李传亮.油藏工程原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011:124.
[3]高海红,程林松,冯儒勇.考虑启动压力梯度的低渗气藏水平井产能计算[J].天然气工业,2008,28(7):75-77.
[4]李华,刘双琪,朱绍鹏.气井及凝析气井产能影响因素综合研究[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(3):111-113.
[5]陈凤,李晓平,王子天,等.非均匀污染下水平气井产能新模型[J].岩性油气藏,2012,24(1):121-124.
[6]刘启国,王瑞,李邗,等.考虑启动压力梯度和高速非达西效应的低渗透气藏水平井产能[J].油气地质与采收率,2010,17(5):53-56.
[7]郭平,任俊杰,汪周华.非达西渗流效应对低渗透气藏水平井产能的影响[J].天然气工业,2011,31(1):55-58.
[8]刘启国,蒋艳芳,张烈辉.低渗透气藏水平井产能计算新公式[J].特种油气藏,2011,18(5):71-74.
[9]郭康良,郭旗,程时清.凝析气藏水平井产能计算模型及方法研究[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):120-123.
[10]姜必武,丘陵.含水气藏合理产能新方法研究[J].天然气工业,2005,25(12):80-82.
[11]朱光亚,刘先贵,高树生,等.低渗透气藏气水两相渗流模型及其产能分析[J].天然气工业,2009,29(9):67-70.
[12]Joshi S D. Augmentation of well productivity with slant and horizontal wells [J]. JPT,1988, 40(6):729-739.
[13]李晓平.地下油气渗流力学[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2007:27-28.
[14]Klinkenberg L J. The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases[J]. API Drilling and Production Practice,1941,(2):200-213.
[15]George D V. Application of stress-dependent rock properties in reservoir studies[R]. SPE 86979,2004.
[16]Forchheimer P H. Wasserbewegun durch Boden[J]. Zeitsch-rift desVereines Deutscher Ingenieure,1901,49:1781-1788.
[1] ZHANG Tianze, WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, ZHANG Wenqi, XIE Mingxian, LEI Ming, GUO Qiang, ZHANG Xuerui. Application of ray-path elastic impedance inversion in carbonate gas reservoir prediction of the right bank of Amu Darya River [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 56-65.
[2] RAN Yixuan, WANG Jian, ZHANG Yi. Favorable exploration area and formation condition of bedrock reservoir in the of central paleo-uplift,northern Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[3] Guan Yunwen, Su Siyu, Pu Renhai, Wang Qichao, Yan Sujie, Zhang Zhongpei, Chen Shuo, Liang Dongge. Palaeozoic gas reservoir-forming conditions and main controlling factors in Xunyi area,southern Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[4] XIAO Boya. Characteristics and favorable zone distribution of tuff reservoirt of Cretaceous in A’nan sag,Erlian Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 135-148.
[5] WANG Yifeng, TIAN Jixian, LI Jian, QIAO Tong, LIU Chenglin, ZHANG Jingkun, SHA Wei, SHEN Xiaoshuang. Geochemical characteristics of Permian condensate oil and gas and phase types in southwest of Mahu Sag [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[6] QIAO Tong, LIU Chenglin, YANG Haibo, WANG Yifeng, LI Jian, TIAN Jixian, HAN Yang, ZHANG Jingkun. Characteristics and genetic mechanism of condensate oil and gas of the Jurassic Sangonghe Formation in western well Pen-1 sag,Junggar Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[7] YAN Xueying, SANG Qin, JIANG Yuqiang, FANG Rui, ZHOU Yadong, LIU Xue, LI Shun, YUAN Yongliang. Main controlling factors for the high yield of tight oil in the Jurassic Da’anzhai Section in the western area of Gongshanmiao, Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[8] YANG Haibo, FENG Dehao, YANG Xiaoyi, GUO Wenjian, HAN Yang, SU Jiajia, YANG Huang, LIU Chenglin. Characteristics of source rocks and thermal evolution simulation of Permian Pingdiquan Formation in Dongdaohaizi Sag,Junggar Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[9] SU Hao, GUO Yandong, CAO Liying, YU Chen, CUI Shuyue, LU Ting, ZHANG Yun, LI Junchao. Natural depletion characteristics and pressure maintenance strategies of faultcontrolled fracture-cavity condensate gas reservoirs in Shunbei Oilfield [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 178-188.
[10] YIN Hu, QU Hongjun, SUN Xiaohan, YANG Bo, ZHANG Leigang, ZHU Rongxing. Characteristics of deep-water deposits and evolution law of Triassic Chang 7 reservoir in southeastern Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[11] QIU Yuchao, LI Yading, WEN Long, LUO Bing, YAO Jun, XU Qiang, WEN Huaguo, TAN Xiucheng. Structural characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation model of Cambrian Xixiangchi Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 122-132.
[12] KONG Lingfeng, XU Jiafang, LIU Ding. Pore structure characteristics and dehydration evolution of lignite reservoirs of Jurassic Xishanyao Formation in Santanghu Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[13] WANG Hongxing, HAN Shiwen, HU Jia, PAN Zhihao. Prediction and main controlling factors of tuff reservoirs of Cretaceous Huoshiling Formation in Dehui fault depression,Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 35-45.
[14] CHENG Yan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Tongyao, QI Yumin, YANG Jilei, HAO Peng, LI Kuo, WANG Xiaodong. Oil and gas migration characteristics of lithologic reservoirs of Neogene Minghuazhen Formation in Bozhong A-2 area,Bozhong Sag [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[15] YI Zhenli, SHI Fang, YIN Taiju, LI Bin, LI Meng, LIU Liu, WANG Zhukun, YU Ye. Provenance transformation and sedimentary filling response of Mesozoic in Halahatang-Hade area,Tarim Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] DUAN Tianxiang,LIU Xiaomei,ZHANG Yajun,XIAO Shuqin. Discussion on geologic modeling with Petrel[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] ZHANG Liqiu. Optimization of upward strata combination of second class oil layer in eastern south Ⅱ area of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] ZHANG Di,HOU Zhongjian,WANG Yahui,WANG Ying,WANG Chunlian. Sedimentary characteristics of lacustrine carbonate rocks of the first member of Shahejie Formation in Banqiao-Beidagang area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] FAN Huaicai, LI Xiaoping, DOU Tiancai, WU Xinyuan. Study on stress sensitivity effect on flow dynamic features of gas wells[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] TIAN Shufang,ZHANG Hongwen. Application of life cycle theory to predict increasing trend of proved oil reserves in Liaohe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] YANG Kai,GUO Xiao. Numerical simulation study of three-dimensional two-phase black oil model in fractured low permeability reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] ZHAI Zhongxi, QINWeijun, GUO Jinrui. Quantitative relations between oil-gas filling degree and channel seepage flow capacity of the reservoir:Example of Shuanghe Oilfield in Biyang Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] QI Minghui,LU Zhengyuan,YUAN Shuai,LI Xinhua. The analysis on the sources of water body and characteristic of water breakthough at Block 12 in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] LI Xiangbo,CHEN Qi,lin,LIU Huaqing,WAN Yanrong,MU Jingkui,LIAO Jianbo,WEI Lihua. Three types of sediment gravity flows and their petroliferous features of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] LIU Yun,LU Yuan,YI Xiangyi, ZHANG Junliang, ZHANG Jinliang,WANG Zhenxi. Gas hydrate forecasting model and its influencing factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .
TRENDMD: