岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 35–42.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20180305

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂砾岩储集层微观非均质性定量评价——以柴达木盆地昆北油田为例

臧士宾, 郑永仙, 崔俊, 毛建英, 张小波   

  1. 中国石油青海油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 敦煌 736202
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-24 修回日期:2018-02-05 出版日期:2018-05-21 发布日期:2018-05-21
  • 作者简介:臧士宾(1965-),男,高级工程师,主要从事油气地质实验分析研究和技术管理工作。地址:(736202)甘肃省敦煌市七里镇青海油田研究院。Email:zsbqh@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“柴达木盆地建设千万吨油气田综合配套技术研究”（编号：2011E-03）资助

Quantitative evaluation on micro-heterogeneity of glutenite reservoir: a case from Kunbei Oilfield in Qiadam Basin

ZANG Shibin, ZHENG Yongxian, CUI Jun, MAO Jianying, ZHANG Xiaobo   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration & Development, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang 736202, Gansu, China
  • Received:2017-10-24 Revised:2018-02-05 Online:2018-05-21 Published:2018-05-21

PDF (PC)

186

摘要： 砂砾岩储集层岩石颗粒分选差，孔隙结构复杂，存在类似双重孔隙介质特征，孔隙结构微观非均质性较强。柴达木盆地昆北油田古近系路乐河组储集层即为此类砂砾岩储集层，毛管压力曲线无“平台”部分，孔喉大小分布呈明显的多峰特征，具有“大孔-小孔”似双重孔隙介质特征。通过对储集层岩石毛管压力数据的分析，计算得出“主要流动空间百分数”，可以定量表征此类砂砾岩储集层孔隙空间中大孔道和小孔道所占比例，进而定量评价此类储集层的微观孔隙结构非均质性。结果表明：路乐河组砂砾岩储集层中由“大孔”组成的孔隙空间所占比例较少，平均约占全部孔隙空间的1/3，对储集层渗透率的贡献却达到了95%，而“小孔”虽占据了约2/3的孔隙空间，但对渗透率的贡献仅为5%，说明储集层微观孔隙结构非均质性较强。

关键词: 成岩作用；次生孔隙；侏罗系；鱼卡&mdash, 九龙山地区；柴达木盆地北缘

Abstract: Different from the mono-pore media of routine sandstone reservoirs, glutenite reservoirs have the characteristics of dual-porosity media. Lager pores and smaller pores exist in glutenite reservoir simultaneously,as a result,the pore structure is complex and the micro-heterogeneity is strong. Lulehe Formation of Kunbei Oilfield in Qaidam Basin belongs to a glutenite reservoir. The capillary pressure curves have no horizontal parts,and pores distributions are obviously bimodal. The glutenite reservoir pore space of Kunbei Oilfield can be generally divided into two pore systems,one is the larger pore system which constitutes the preferred flowing paths and contributes 95% of flowing potentiality,and another the smaller one which constitutes non-preferred flowing paths and contributes 5% of flowing potentiality only. A parameter of main flowing space percentage obtained form the data of capillary pressure is precisely to describe the proportion of lager pores to the smaller ones of reservoir pore space, and then be used to evaluate quantitatively the micro-heterogeneity of glutenite reservoir. The results indicate that the average of main flowing space percentage in Kunbei Oilfield is 33%,that is,the larger pores take up smaller parts of reservoir pore space (about 1/3)but contribute greater permeability of the reservior,and the smaller pores take up most reservoir pore space (about 2/3)but contribute lesser flowing potentiality. The microheterogeneity of glutenite reservoir in Kunbei Oilfiled is severe.

Key words: diagenesis, secondary pores, Jurassic, Yuka-Jiulongshan area, northern margin of Qaidam Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 胡复唐.砂砾岩油藏开发模式. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1997:31-53. HU F T. The development models of glutenite reservoir. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1997:31-53.
[2] 闫建平, 言语, 李尊芝, 等.砂砾岩储层物性演化及影响因素研究——以东营凹陷北部陡坡带为例.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):1-6. YAN J P, YAN Y, LI Z Z, et al. Physical property evolution of glutenite reservoir and its influencing factors:a case study from northern steep slope zone in Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):1-6
[3] 何更生, 唐海.油层物理. 2版. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2011:76-78. HE G S, TANG H. Reservoir physics. 2nd ed. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011:76-78.
[4] 于兴河.油气储层地质学基础. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2009:191-204. YU X H. Basis of hydrocarbon reservoir geology. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009:191-204.
[5] 罗蛰潭, 王允诚.油气储集层的孔隙结构.北京:科学出版社, 1986:198-205. LUO Z T, WANG Y C. Pore structure of oil and gas reservoirs. Beijing:Science Press, 1986:198-205.
[6] 郝乐伟, 王琪, 唐俊.储层岩石微观孔隙结构研究方法与理论综述.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5):123-128 HAO L W, WANG Q, TANG J. Research progress of reservoir microscopic pore structure. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(5):123-128.
[7] 昝灵, 王顺华, 张枝焕, 等.砂砾岩储层研究现状.长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 8(3):63-66. ZAN L, WANG S H, ZHANG Z H, et al. Research status of sandy conglomerates reservoir. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 8(3):63-66.
[8] 张庭辉.克拉玛依油田砾岩储层孔隙结构特征及分类评价. 新疆石油地质, 1991, 12(1):34-42. ZHANG T H. The pore structure characteristics and sort evaluation of conglomeratic reservoir in Karamay Oilfield. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1991, 12(1):34-42.
[9] 鲜本忠, 路智勇, 佘源琦, 等.东营凹陷陡坡带盐18-永921地区砂砾岩沉积与储层特征.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4):28-35. XIAN B Z, LU Z Y, SHE Y Q, et al. Sedimentary and reservoir characteristics of glutenite in Yan 18-Yong 921 area, steep slope of Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(4):28-35.
[10] 邹妞妞, 张大权, 钱海涛, 等.准噶尔盆地玛北斜坡区扇三角洲砂砾岩储层主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):24-33. ZOU N N, ZHANG D Q, QIAN H T, et al. Main controlling factors of glutenite reservoir of fan delta in Mabei slope, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):24-33.
[11] 高树生.新疆莫北油田砂砾岩储层渗流机理与油藏工程应用研究.北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2011. GAO S S. Research on seepage theory and use of petroleum reservoir engineering of sand-conglomerate reservoir formation in Mobei oilfleld, Xinjiang. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2011
[12] 张代燕, 彭永灿, 肖芳伟, 等.克拉玛依油田七中、东区克下组砾岩储层孔隙结构特征及影响因素. 油气地质与采收率, 2013, 20(6):29-34. ZHANG D Y, PENG Y C, XIAO F W, et al. Pore structure and influence factors of conglomerate reservoir-a case study of lower Karamay Formation in mid and east of 7 th block, Karamay Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2013, 20(6):29-34.
[13] 甘俊奇, 王俊文, 吴忠宝, 等.海拉尔油田砂砾岩储集层孔隙结构特征分析.石油地质与工程, 2014, 28(5):95-97. GAN J Q, WANG J W, WU Z B, et al. Pore structure characteristics analysis of glutenite reservoir in Hailaer Oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2014, 28(5):95-97.
[14] 付玲, 张子亚, 付锁堂, 等.柴达木盆地昆北油田路乐河组沉积相及储层特征.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 37(5):494-500. FU L,ZHANG Z Y,FU S T, et al. Characteristics of the sedimentary facies and reservoir in Lulehe Formation of the Kunbei oilfield in Qaidam Basin, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 37(5):494-500.
[15] 付锁堂, 马达德, 汪立群, 等.柴达木徐地昆北冲断带古隆起油藏特征及油气成藏条件.石油学报, 2013, 34(4):675-682. FU S T, MA D D, WANG L Q, et al. Characteristics and accumulation conditions of paleo-uplift reservoirs in Kunbei thrust belt.Qaidam Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(4):675-682.
[16] 李乐, 牟中海, 汪立群, 等.柴达木盆地昆北油田切6区E1+2碎屑岩储层特征及其控制因素.岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4):75-79. LI L, MU Z H, WANG L Q, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of E1+2 clastic reservoir in Qie 6 block of Kunbei Oilfield in Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(4):75-79.
[17] 张长好, 程丰, 黄革萍, 等. 柴达木盆地昆北油田切16区路乐河组沉积特征与储层预测.岩石学报, 2013, 29(8):2883-2894. ZHANG C H, CHENG F, HUANG G P, et al. Sediment and reservoir characteristics with reservoir evaluation of Lulehe Formation in Qie 16 block of Kunbei oilfield in Qaidam Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(8):2883-2894.
[18] 斯春松, 刘占国, 寿建峰, 等.柴达木盆地昆北地区路乐河组砂砾岩有效储层发育主控因素及分布规律.沉积学报, 2014, 32(5):966-972. SI C S, LIU Z G, SHOU J F, et al. Dominant factors and distribution of effective reservoir in sandy conglomerate bodies of Lulehe Formation in Kunbei area, Qaidam Basin. Acta Sendimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(5):966-972.
[19] 刘义坤, 王永平, 唐慧敏, 等.毛管压力曲线和分形理论在储层分类中的应用.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3):89-92. LIU Y K, WANG Y P, TANG H M, et al. Application of capillary pressure curves and fractal theory to reservoir classification. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(3):89-92.
[20] 臧士宾, 郑永仙, 孙玺, 等.低渗砂岩与微裂缝泥灰岩储集层毛细管压力曲线特征对比.新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(5):504-507. ZANG S B, ZHENG Y X, SUN X, et al. Comparisons of capillary pressure curves between low permeability sandstone and micro-fractured marlstone. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2011, 32(5):504-507.
[21] 臧士宾, 崔俊, 郑永仙, 等.柴达木盆地南翼山油田新近系油砂山组低渗微裂缝储集层特征及成因分析. 古地理学报, 2012, 14(1):133-141. ZANG S B, CUI J, ZHENG Y X, et al. Analysis of the characteristics of low-permeability reservoir with micro-fracture and their origins of Youshashan Formation of Neogene in Nanyishan Oilfield, Qaidam Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2012, 14(1):133-141.
[1] 吴志雄，张永庶，邹开真，王牧，杜忠明，史基安. 柴北缘鱼卡—九龙山地区侏罗系储层特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(1): 63-68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元，赵贤正，金凤鸣，王权，李先平，王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践（IV）——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成，郑荣才，文华国，张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树，张尚峰，尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰，杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦，胡望水，李瑞升，关键，李涛，聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发