岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 57–68.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190107

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国南方3套海相页岩气成藏条件分析

何贵松, 何希鹏, 高玉巧, 张培先, 万静雅, 黄小贞   

  1. 中国石化华东油气分公司 勘探开发研究院, 南京 210011
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-04 修回日期:2018-11-03 出版日期:2019-01-18 发布日期:2019-01-18
  • 作者简介:何贵松(1988-),男,工程师,主要从事中国南方海相页岩气富集规律与勘探评价方面的研究工作。地址:(210011)江苏省南京市鼓楼区热河南路37号。Email:heguisong001@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“彭水地区常压页岩气勘探开发示范工程”（编号：2016ZX05061）和中国石化科技开发部项目“渝东南盆缘转换带页岩气富集主控因素研究”（编号：P18057-2）联合资助

Analysis of accumulation conditions of three sets of marine shale gas in southern China

HE Guisong, HE Xipeng, GAO Yuqiao, ZHANG Peixian, WAN Jingya, HUANG Xiaozhen   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, East China Branch of Sinopec, Nanjing 210011, China
  • Received:2018-09-04 Revised:2018-11-03 Online:2019-01-18 Published:2019-01-18

PDF (PC)

457

摘要： 为了揭示中国南方3套海相页岩的勘探潜力差异，利用黔南、渝东南和湘中地区典型钻井的岩心实验分析、钻井、压裂测试等资料，从先期建造和后期改造等方面对成藏条件进行对比。结果表明：①五峰组-龙马溪组为台内坳陷深水陆棚相硅质页岩型，生烃潜力大和储层物性好，含气量和地层压力均较高，为最有利勘探开发层系；优质页岩厚度、保存条件和可压性均是选区评价的重点。②九门冲组为被动大陆边缘深水陆棚相粉砂质-硅质页岩互层型，生烃潜力大，但热成熟度高，物性较差，保存条件复杂，埋深大，为重要接替层系；热演化程度、构造稳定性和埋深均是选区评价的重点。③大隆组为裂陷盆地深水台凹泥岩-灰质泥岩互层型，生烃潜力大、物性好，但夹层多，黏土含量高，顶底板封盖性差，含气量较低，为潜在有利层系；有利相带、页岩连续厚度和可压性均是选区评价的重点。④川中、川南、川东南地区的五峰组-龙马溪组，川中、黔南、宜昌地区的九门冲组，湘中涟源地区的大隆组均是页岩气勘探开发有利区。

关键词: 页岩气, 保存条件, 泥页岩类型, 成藏条件, 五峰组-龙马溪组, 九门冲组, 大隆组, 中国南方

Abstract: In order to reveal the exploration potential differences of three sets of regional marine shale in southern China,the accumulation conditions were compared from the aspects of early transformation and post-reformation by using the data of core experiment analysis,drilling,fracturing test of typical wells in southern Guizhou, southeastern Chongqing and central Hunan area. The results show that:(1)Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation is siliceous shale in deep continental shelf of depression basin. It is the most favorable exploration and development layer with excellent potential for hydrocarbon generation,superior reservoir physical properties,high gas content and high formation pressure. High-quality shale thickness,preservation conditions and compressibility are the focus of the selection and evaluation of shale gas.(2)Jiumenchong Formation is interbedded silty-siliceous shale in deep continental shelf of the passive continental margin. It is an important successor layer for shale gas exploration with great potential for hydrocarbon generation,high thermal maturity,relatively poor physical properties,complicated storage conditions and deep burial depth. Thermal evolution degree,structural stability and burial depth are the focus of the selection and evaluation of shale gas.(3)Dalong Formation is interbedded mudstone-calcareous mudstone in deep water platform of rift basin. It is potential favorable layer with great potential for hydrocarbon generation,good physical properties,many interlayers,high clay mineral content,poorly capped roof and floor rocks,and low gas content. Favorable facies zones,continuous thickness of organic-rich shale and compressibility are the focus of the selection and evaluation of shale gas.(4)Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in central,southern and southeastern Sichuan,Jiumenchong Formation in central Sichuan,southern Guizhou and Yichang areas,and Dalong Formation in Lianyuan area of central Hunan are favorable areas for shale gas exploration and development.

Key words: shale gas, preservation conditions, shale type, accumulation conditions, Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Jiumenchong Formation, Dalong Formation, southern China

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 梁狄刚,郭彤楼,陈建平,等.中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(一)南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的分布. 海相油气地质,2008,13(2):1-16. LIANG D G,GUO T L,CHEN J P,et al. Some progresses on studies of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation in marine sedimentary regions,southern China(Part 1):Distribution of four suits of regional marine source rocks. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2008,13(2):1-16.
[2] 周文,徐洁,余谦,等.四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组与筇竹寺组页岩含气性差异及成因. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):18-25. ZHOU W,XU J,YU Q,et al. Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):18-25.
[3] 王淑芳,董大忠,王玉满,等.中美海相页岩气地质特征对比研究.天然气地球科学,2015,26(9):1666-1678. WANG S F,DONG D Z,WANG Y M,et al. A comparative study of the geological feature of marine shale gas between China and the United States. Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(9):1666-1678.
[4] 肖正辉,牛现强,杨荣丰,等.湘中涟源-邵阳凹陷上二叠统大隆组页岩气储层特征.岩性油气藏,2015,27(4):17-24. XIAO Z H,NIU X Q,YANG R F,et al. Reservoir characteristics of shale gas of Upper Permian Dalong Formation in Lianyuan-Shaoyang Depression,central Hunan. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(4):17-24.
[5] 朱彤,王烽,俞凌杰,等.四川盆地页岩气富集控制因素及类型.石油与天然气地质,2016,37(3):399-407. ZHU T,WANG F,YU L J,et al. Controlling factors and types of shale gas enrichment in the Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(3):399-407.
[6] 赵文智,李建忠,杨涛,等.中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义.石油勘探与开发,2016,43(4):499-510. ZHAO W Z,LI J Z,YANG T,et al. Geological difference and its significance of marine shale gases in South China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(4):499-510.
[7] 何治亮,胡宗全,聂海宽,等. 四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集特征与"建造-改造"评价思路.天然气地球科学, 2017,28(5):724-733. HE Z L,HU Z Q,NIE H K,et al. Characterization of shale gas enrichment in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its evaluation of geological construction-transformation evolution sequence. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(5):724-733.
[8] 梁狄刚,郭彤楼,边立曾,等.中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(三)南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的沉积相及发育的控制因素. 海相油气地质,2009,14(2):1-9. LIANG D G,GUO T L,BIAN L Z,et al. Some progresses on studies of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation in marine sedimentary regions,southern China(Part 3):Controlling factors on the sedimentary facies and development of Paleozoic marine source rocks. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2009, 14(2):1-9.
[9] 刘忠宝,高波,张钰莹,等.上扬子地区下寒武统页岩沉积相类型及分布特征.石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):21-31. LIU Z B,GAO B,ZHANG Y Y,et al. Types and distribution of the shale sedimentary facies of the Lower Cambrian in Upper Yangtze area,South China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):21-31.
[10] 黄金亮,邹才能,李建忠,等.川南下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气形成条件及资源潜力.石油勘探与开发,2012,39(1):69-75. HUANG J L,ZOU C N,LI J Z,et al. Shale gas generation and potential of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin,China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):69-75.
[11] 何希鹏,高玉巧,唐显春,等.渝东南地区常压页岩气富集主控因素分析.天然气地球科学,2017,28(4):654-664. HE X P,GAO Y Q,TANG X C,et al. Analysis of major factors controlling the accumulation in normal pressure shale gas in the southeast of Chongqing. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(4):654-664.
[12] 聂海宽,金之钧,马鑫,等. 四川盆地及邻区上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组底部笔石带及沉积特征.石油学报, 2017,38(2):160-174. NIE H K,JIN Z J,MA X,et al. Graptolites zone and sedimentary characteristics of Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(2):160-174.
[13] 陈旭,樊隽轩,张元动,等.五峰组及龙马溪组黑色页岩在扬子覆盖区内的划分与圈定. 地层学杂志,2015,39(4):351-358. CHEN X,FAN J X,ZHANG Y D,et al. Subdivision and delineation of the Wufeng and Longmaxi black shales in the subsurface areas of the Yangtze platform. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2015,39(4):351-358.
[14] 姜生玲,汪生秀,洪克岩,等.渝东北地区下古生界页岩气聚集条件及资源潜力.岩性油气藏,2017,29(5):11-18. JIANG S L,WANG S X,HONG K Y,et al. Accumulation conditions of Lower Paleozoic shale gas and its resources in northeastern Chongqing. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(5):11-18.
[15] 黄俨然,杨荣丰,肖正辉,等.湘西北下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩含气性影响因素分析. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(4):11-16. HUANG Y R,YANG R F,XIAO Z H,et al. Influencing factors of shale gas-bearing property of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in northwestern Hunan. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015, 27(4):11-16.
[16] 陈居凯,朱炎铭,崔兆帮,等.川南龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构综合表征及其分形特征.岩性油气藏,2018,30(1):55-62. CHEN J K,ZHU Y M,CUI Z B,et al. Pore structure and fractal characteristics of Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(1):55-62.
[17] 李可,王兴志,张馨艺,等.四川盆地东部下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征及影响因素.岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):52-58. LI K,WANG X Z,ZHANG X Y,et al. Shale reservoir characteristics and influencing factors of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):52-58.
[18] 何治亮,聂海宽,张钰莹. 四川盆地及其周缘奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素分析. 地学前缘,2016, 23(2):8-17. HE Z L,NIE H K,ZHANG Y Y. The main factors of shale gas enrichment of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):8-17.
[19] 方志雄,何希鹏. 渝东南武隆向斜常压页岩气形成与演化. 石油与天然气地质,2016,37(6):819-827. FANG Z X,HE X P. Formation and evolution of normal-pressure shale gas reservoir at Wulong syncline,southeast Chongqing. Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(6):819-827.
[20] 翟刚毅,王玉芳,包书景,等.我国南方海相页岩气富集高产主控因素及前景预测.地球科学,2017,42(7):1057-1068. ZHAI G Y,WANG Y F,BAO S J,et al. Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity of marine shale gas and prospect forecast in southern China. Earth Science,2017, 42(7):1057-1068.
[21] 梅廉夫,刘昭茜,汤济广,等.湘鄂西-川东中生代陆内递进扩展变形:来自裂变径迹和平衡剖面的证据.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2010,35(2):161-174. MEI L F,LIU Z Q,TANG J G,et al. Mesozoic intra-continental progressive deformation in western Hunan-Hubei-eastern Sichuan provinces of China:Evidence from apatite fission track and balanced cross-section. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2010,35(2):161-174.
[22] 黄成刚,关新,倪祥龙,等. 柴达木盆地英西地区E32咸化湖盆白云岩储集层特征及发育主控因素. 天然气地球科学, 2017,28(2):219-231. HUANG C G,GUAN X,NI X L,et al. The characteristics and major factors controlling on the E32 dolomite reservoirs in saline lacustrine basin in the Yingxi area of Qaidam Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(2):219-231.
[23] 黄成刚,倪祥龙,马新民,等.致密湖相碳酸盐岩油气富集模式及稳产、高产主控因素:以柴达木盆地英西地区为例. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(5):724-738. HUANG C G,NI X L,MA X M,et al. Petroleum and gas enrichment pattern and major controlling factors of stable and high production of tight lacustrine carbonate rock reservoirs:a case of the Yingxi area in Qaidam Basin. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2017,47(5):724-738.
[1] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[2] 向雪冰, 司马立强, 王亮, 李军, 郭宇豪, 张浩. 页岩气储层孔隙流体划分及有效孔径计算——以四川盆地龙潭组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 137-146.
[3] 丛平, 闫建平, 井翠, 张家浩, 唐洪明, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 晁静. 页岩气储层可压裂性级别测井评价及展布特征——以川南X地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 177-188.
[4] 许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[5] 龙国徽, 王艳清, 朱超, 夏志远, 赵健, 唐鹏程, 房永生, 李海鹏, 张娜, 刘健. 柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带油气成藏条件与有利勘探区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 145-160.
[6] 冯越, 黄志龙, 李天军, 张华, 李宏伟, 周亚东. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷七克台组二段致密油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 97-108.
[7] 钟红利, 吴雨风, 闪晨晨. 北大巴山地区鲁家坪组页岩地球化学特征及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 13-22.
[8] 王建君, 李井亮, 李林, 马光春, 杜悦, 姜逸明, 刘晓, 于银华. 基于叠后地震数据的裂缝预测与建模——以太阳—大寨地区浅层页岩气储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 122-132.
[9] 符东宇, 李勇明, 赵金洲, 江有适, 陈曦宇, 许文俊. 基于REV尺度格子Boltzmann方法的页岩气藏渗流规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 151-160.
[10] 王登, 余江浩, 赵雪松, 陈威, 黄佳琪, 徐聪. 四川盆地石柱地区自流井组页岩气成藏条件与勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 27-35.
[11] 周瑞, 苏玉亮, 马兵, 张琪, 王文东. 随机分形体积压裂水平井CO2吞吐模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 161-168.
[12] 王跃鹏, 刘向君, 梁利喜. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组张家滩陆相页岩各向异性及能量演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 149-160.
[13] 陈相霖, 郭天旭, 石砥石, 侯啓东, 王超. 陕南地区牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及吸附能力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 52-60.
[14] 姜瑞忠, 张福蕾, 崔永正, 潘红, 张旭, 张春光, 沈泽阳. 考虑应力敏感和复杂运移的页岩气藏压力动态分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 149-156.
[15] 王朋飞, 姜振学, 杨彩虹, 金璨, 吕鹏, 王海华. 重庆周缘龙马溪组和牛蹄塘组页岩有机质孔隙发育特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 27-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[2] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[3] 刘伟方, 段永华, 高建虎, 张喜梅, 孙勤华. 利用地震属性预测碳酸盐岩储层[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 101 -104 .
[4] 林承焰, 谭丽娟, 于翠玲. 论油气分布的不均一性(Ⅰ)———非均质控油理论的由来[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 16 -21 .
[5] 王天琦, 王建功, 梁苏娟, 沙雪梅. 松辽盆地徐家围子地区葡萄花油层精细勘探[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 22 -27 .
[6] 王西文,石兰亭,雍学善,杨午阳. 地震波阻抗反演方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 80 -88 .
[7] 何宗斌,倪　静,伍　东,李　勇,刘丽琼,台怀忠. 根据双TE 测井确定含烃饱和度[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 89 -92 .
[8] 袁胜学,王　江. 吐哈盆地鄯勒地区浅层气层识别方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 111 -113 .
[9] 赵军, 海川, 张承森. 测井储层描述在塔中I 号礁滩体中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 86 -90 .
[10] 陈斐，魏登峰，余小雷，吴少波. 鄂尔多斯盆地盐定地区三叠系延长组长2 油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 43 -47 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发