苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20190501

岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 1–11.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190501

• 油气地质 • 下一篇

苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价

郭艳琴^1,2, 何子琼^1,2, 郭彬程³, 惠磊^1,2, 蔡志成^1,2, 王美霞^1,2, 李文厚⁴, 李百强⁴

1. 西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065;
2. 西安石油大学陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室, 西安 710065;
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
4. 西北大学地质学系, 西安 710069

收稿日期:2019-07-16 修回日期:2019-08-26 出版日期:2019-09-21 发布日期:2019-09-16
作者简介:郭艳琴(1972-),女,博士,教授,主要从事沉积学与储层地质学方面的教学与研究工作。地址:(710065)陕西省西安市电子二路18号。Email:guoyanqin@xsyu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
地质矿产调查评价项目“鄂尔多斯盆地油气基础地质综合编图”（编号：121201011000150014）、“十三五”国家油气重大专项“致密油甜点预测方法与甜点区评价”（编号：2016ZX05046-002）和国家科技重大专项“十三五”专题“塔里木深层—超深层白云岩成岩作用与储层表征”（编号：2017ZX05005-002-004）联合资助

Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of tight sandstone of He 8 member in southeastern Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin

GUO Yanqin^1,2, HE Ziqiong^1,2, GUO Bincheng³, HUI Lei^1,2, CAI Zhicheng^1,2, WANG Meixia^1,2, LI Wenhou⁴, LI Baiqiang⁴

1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Geology, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
4. Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China

Received:2019-07-16 Revised:2019-08-26 Online:2019-09-21 Published:2019-09-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 召41井区是鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田东南部（苏东南）二叠系石盒子组盒8段致密砂岩气上产的主力区块，但单井产量低，产能差异大。运用铸体薄片、扫描电镜、阴极发光、高压压汞、物性分析、核磁共振、气水相渗等实验以及试气资料，对储层的岩石学特征、成岩作用、物性、孔隙结构和渗流特征进行了详细研究和分类评价，并探讨了储层类型与天然气产能之间的关系。结果表明，苏东南盒8段储层的岩石类型主要为岩屑石英砂岩，其次为岩屑砂岩和少量石英砂岩，填隙物基本上是胶结物，主要为伊利石、绿泥石、高岭石、硅质和铁方解石；成岩作用为压实压溶、胶结和溶解作用，已普遍进入中成岩B期阶段；孔隙类型主要为岩屑溶孔和晶间孔，其次是残余粒间孔；孔隙结构以粗孔-中喉型和细孔-小喉型为主；可动流体饱和度变化较大，且与物性密切相关，随物性变好而增大；综合储层物性、孔隙结构特征以及储层的沉积相带、砂体展布特征等，将苏东南盒8段储层划分为4种类型，天然气产能明显受储层类别的控制，且随储层类别的降低，天然气产能也逐渐降低。

关键词: 致密砂岩, 储层特征, 成岩作用, 孔隙, 石盒子组, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Zhao 41 well area is the main gas producing area of tight sandstone of He 8 member in southeast Sulige Gas Field. However,the single well production is low and the productivity varies greatly. The petrological characteristics,diagenesis,physical properties,pore structure and seepage characteristics of reservoir were studied and evaluated by using data of cast thin sections,scanning electron microscope,cathodoluminescence,highpressure mercury injection,petrophysical analysis,nuclear magnetic resonance,gas-water relative permeability experiment and gas test,and the relationship between reservoirs type and natural gas productivity was discussed. The results show that the reservoir rocks of He 8 member in the study area are mainly lithic quartz sandstone,followed by lithic sandstone and a small amount of quartz sandstone,and the fillings is basically cements which are mainly illite,chlorite,kaolinite,siliceous and ferron calcite. Diagenesis is mainly compaction-pressure solution,cementation and dissolution,which has generally entered the stage B of middle diagenesis. The pore types are mainly secondary pores such as debris dissolved pores and intercrystalline pores,followed by residual intergranular pores,and the pore structure mainly consists of coarse pore-middle throat and fine pore-small throat. The saturation of movable fluid varies greatly,which is closely related to physical properties and increases with the improvement of physical properties. Based on the characteristics of reservoir physical properties,pore structure,sedimentary facies zone and sand body distribution,the reservoir of He 8 member in the study area was divided into four types. The productivity of natural gas is obviously controlled by reservoir types,and with the decline of reservoir type,the productivity of natural gas gradually decreases.

Key words: tight sandstone, reservoir characteristics, diagenesis, pore, Shihezi Formation, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2+3

郭艳琴, 何子琼, 郭彬程, 惠磊, 蔡志成, 王美霞, 李文厚, 李百强. 苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 1–11.

GUO Yanqin, HE Ziqiong, GUO Bincheng, HUI Lei, CAI Zhicheng, WANG Meixia, LI Wenhou, LI Baiqiang. Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of tight sandstone of He 8 member in southeastern Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5): 1–11.

参考文献

[1] 曹锋,邹才能,付金华,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格大气区天然气近源运聚的证据剖析.岩石学报,2010,27(3):857-866. CAO F,ZOU C N,FU J H,et al. Evidence analysis of natural gas near-source migration-accumulation model in the Sulige large gas province,Ordos Basin,China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010,27(3):857-866.
[2] 李义军,王军杰,樊爱萍,等. 苏里格气田东区气井产能主控因素分析. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,29(2):14-19. LI Y J,WANG J J,FAN A P,et al. Analysis of main control factors on capacity of gas well in the east area of Sulige Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science),2010,29(2):14-19.
[3] YIN S,WANG Y,ZHAO J Z,et al. Energy distribution of weak deformed rock mass and its influence on gas well productivity. Interpretation,2019,7(2):423-435.
[4] 郭艳琴,蔡志成,余芳,等. 苏东南地区盒8段砂体叠置关系及其对气水分布的影响. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,33(4):1-7. GUO Y Q,CAI Z C,YU F,et al. Sandbody superimposition relation of 8th member of Shihezi Formation in southeastern Sulige and its influence on gas-water distribution. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2018,33(4):1-7.
[5] 孙诗,王峰,陈洪德,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘府谷剖面中二叠统盒8段沉积相特征. 地球科学与环境学报,2019,41(2):225-240. SUN S,WANG F,CHEN H D,et al. Sedimentary facies characteristics of He-8 member of Middle Permian in Fugu section,the northeastern margin of Ordos Basin,China. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2019,41(2):225-240.
[6] 肖红平,刘锐娥,张福东,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段沉积模式重建及其勘探意义. 石油勘探与开发,2019,46(2):268-280. XIAO H P,LIU R E,ZHANG F D,et al. Sedimentary model reconstruction and exploration significance of Permian He 8 member in Ordos Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(2):268-280.
[7] 惠威,贾昱昕,程凡,等. 苏里格气田东部盒8储层微观孔隙结构及可动流体饱和度影响因素.油气地质与采收率,2018, 25(5):10-16. HUI W,JIA Y X,CHENG F,et al. Impact of microscopic pore structure on moveable fluid saturation in He 8 reservoir of eastern Sulige Gas Field. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(5):10-16.
[8] 高洁,孙卫,段瑞芳. 苏里格气田苏东南地区盒8段储层孔隙结构研究. 西安科技大学学报,2017,37(2):194-199. GAO J,SUN W,DUAN R F. Reservoir pore structure in He 8 formation of the southeastern Sulige Gas Field. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2017,37(2):194-199.
[9] 刘晓鹏,刘新社,赵会涛,等. 一种计算致密砂岩油气藏有效孔喉下限的新方法:以苏里格气田盒8气藏为例. 新疆石油地质,2016,40(3):360-364. LIU X P,LIU X S,ZHAO H T,et al. A new method to calculate the lower limit of effective pore throat threshold of tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of He 8 gas reservoir in Sulige Gas Field. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,40(3):360-364.
[10] HUANG H X,CHEN L,SUN W,et al. Pore-throat structure and fractal characteristics of Shihezi Formation tight gas sandstone in the Ordos Basin,China. Fractals,2018,26(2):1-22.
[11] MA S W,REN D Z,ZHOU L F,et al. Impacts of diagenesis of tight sandstone gas reservoir on reservoir physical properties:a case study,Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin,China. Interpretation,2019,7(3):687-699.
[12] 张海涛,时卓,任战利,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田盒8气藏含水特征及气水分布主控因素分析.现代地质,2011,25(5):931-937. ZHANG H T,SHI Z,REN Z L,et al. Characteristics of water bearing-formation and gas-water distribution control factors in gas reservoir He 8 of Sulige Gas field,Ordos Basin. Geoscience,2011,25(5):931-937.
[13] 王波,陈义才,李小娟,等.苏里格气田盒8段气水分布及其控制因素. 天然气勘探与开发,2010,33(2):29-33. WANG B,CHEN Y C,LI X J,et al. Gas-water distribution and its control factors of He 8 member in Sulige Gas Field. Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2010,33(2):29-33.
[14] 吴则鑫. 苏里格气田致密气井产能主控因素分析. 非常规油气,2018,5(5):62-67. WU Z X. Analysis of main control factors on capacity of tight gas well of Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2018,5(5):62-67.
[15] 侯明才,窦伟坦,陈洪德,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田北部盒8、山1段成岩作用及有利储层分布. 矿物岩石,2009,29(4):66-74. HOU M C,DOU W T,CHEN H D,et al. Study on diagenesis of the He 8 member and Shan 1 member in north of the Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin. Mineral Petrol,2009,29(4):66-74.
[16] 杜洋,欧阳诚,胡杨,等. 苏里格气田苏5区块储集层特征及有利勘探区域. 新疆石油地质,2013,34(6):636-639. DU Y,OUYANG C,HU Y,et al. The reservoir characteristics and the favorable prospecting target in Su 5 block in Sulige Gas Field. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2013,34(6):636-639.
[17] 费世祥,张保国,李洋,等. 苏里格东南召41井区盒8段沉积微相研究. 西安科技大学学报,2016,36(2):228-234. FEI S X,ZHANG B G,LI Y,et al. Sedimentary microfacies of He 8 Section in Zhao 41 area of southeast Sulige. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2016,36(2):228-234.
[18] 曹青,赵靖舟,柳益群. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界流体包裹体特征及其意义. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2013,43(5):749-756. CAO Q,ZHAO J Z,LIU Y Q. Characteristics and significance of fluid inclusions in Upper Paleozoic of southeast Ordos Basin. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2013, 43(5):749-756.
[19] 王振华,陈刚,李书恒,等. 核磁共振岩心实验分析在低孔渗储层评价中的应用. 石油实验地质,2014,36(6):773-779. WANG Z H,CHEN G,LI S H,et al. Application of NMR core experimental analysis in evaluation of low-porosity and lowpermeability sandstone reservoirs. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):773-779.
[20] 白松涛,程道解,万金彬,等. 砂岩岩石核磁共振谱定量表征. 石油学报,2016,37(3):382-391. BAI S T,CHENG D J,WAN J B,et al. Quantitative characterization of sandstone NMR T 2 spectrum. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016,37(3):382-391.
[21] 赵会涛,王怀厂,刘健,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部地区盒8段致密砂岩气低产原因分析.岩性油气藏,2014,26(5):75-79. ZHAO H T,WANG H C,LIU J,et al. Reasons of low yield of tight sandstone gas of He 8 member in eastern Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(5):75-79.
[22] 何自新. 鄂尔多斯盆地演化与油气. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2003. HE Z X. Evolution and oil & gas of Ordos Basin. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

苏里格气田东南部盒8段致密砂岩储层特征及评价

Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of tight sandstone of He 8 member in southeastern Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张文凯, 施泽进, 田亚铭, 王勇, 胡修权, 李文杰. 川东南志留系小河坝组致密砂岩孔隙类型及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 10-19.
[2]	柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[3]	尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[4]	徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[5]	李志远, 杨仁超, 张吉, 王一, 杨特波, 董亮. 天然气扩散散失率定量评价——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[6]	郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[7]	刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[8]	何绪全, 黄东, 赵艾琳, 李育聪. 川中地区大安寨段页岩油气储层测井评价指标体系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 129-137.
[9]	许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[10]	郭永伟, 闫方平, 王晶, 褚会丽, 杨建雷, 陈颖超, 张笑洋. 致密砂岩油藏CO₂驱固相沉积规律及其储层伤害特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 153-161.
[11]	姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[12]	魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[13]	李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[14]	张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长8₁致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36-48.
[15]	严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.