岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 108–113.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190512

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

低渗透油田储层连通关系动静态综合评价方法

张志刚1, 刘春杨2, 刘国志2   

  1. 1. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 测试技术服务分公司, 黑龙江 大庆 163414;
    2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-08 修回日期:2018-12-24 出版日期:2019-09-21 发布日期:2019-09-16
  • 作者简介:张志刚(1973-),男,工程师,主要从事油水井测试方面的研究工作。地址:(163414)黑龙江省大庆市红岗区解放街道图强东街7号测试技术服务分公司第二大队。Email:DLTS_zhangzg@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“低渗、特低渗复杂油藏规模有效动用关键技术”（编号：2017ZX05013006）资助

Dynamic and static comprehensive evaluation method for reservoir connectivity of low-permeability oilfield

ZHANG Zhigang1, LIU Chunyang2, LIU Guozhi2   

  1. 1. Well Logging Technology Service Company, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing 163414, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2018-11-08 Revised:2018-12-24 Online:2019-09-21 Published:2019-09-16

PDF (PC)

185

摘要： 葡西油田G137区块水驱控制程度达79%，而油田却有50%以上油井因注水不受效关井，说明仅用水驱控制程度评价注采系统的适应性已经不能满足油田开发的需求。将注采系统研究中连通关系细分为静态连通和动态连通，并提出有效连通系数概念，即注水受效厚度与砂体静态连通厚度的比值；将常用的真水驱控制程度定义为视水驱控制程度和有效连通系数的乘积。该方法实现了静态连通和动态连通的分阶段评价。应用该方法分析了葡西油田试验区和G137区块注水受效差的本质区别，前者是由于砂体规模小、静态不连通所致，后者则是因为储层物性差、动态不连通所致。因此，对于低渗透油田，将油田开发的水驱控制程度考核指标分解为视水驱控制程度和有效连通系数进行考核更为合理。

关键词: 低渗透油田, 水驱控制程度, 有效连通系数, 注采系统, 葡西油田

Abstract: The water drive control degree of block Gu137 in Puxi Oilfield is 79%,while more than 50% of the oil wells in the oilfield are not affected by water injection,indicating that the adaptability evaluation of injectionproduction system by water drive control degree cannot meet the demands of oilfield production. Therefore,the connectivity relationship in the research of injection-production system was subdivided into static connectivity and dynamic connectivity,and the concept of effective connectivity coefficient was proposed,which is the ratio of the thickness of the water injection effect to the static thickness of the sand body. The commonly used(true) water drive control degree was defined as the product of apparent water drive control degree and effective connectivity coefficient. The method implements a phased evaluation of static connectivity and dynamic connectivity. This method was used to analyze the essential difference of poor water injection efficiency between the test area and G137 block in Puxi Oilfield. The former is due to the small size of the sand body and static disconnection, while the latter is due to poor physical properties of the reservoir and dynamic disconnection. Therefore,for lowpermeability oilfields,it is more reasonable to decompose the water drive control degree assessment index of oilfield development into visual water drive control degree and effective connectivity coefficien.

Key words: low-permeability oilfield, water drive control degree, effective connectivity coefficien, injectionproduction system, Puxi Oilfield

中图分类号: 

  • TE343
[1] 王焕,黄伟明,贺梦琦,等.考虑有效驱动体系的合理井网密度计算方法.合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,41(8):1108-1111. WANG H,HUANG W M,HE M Q,et al. Calculation method of reasonable well pattern density considering effective driving system. Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Natural Science),2018,41(8):1108-1111.
[2] 赵习森,党海龙,庞振宇,等. 特低渗储层不同孔隙组合类型的微观孔隙结构及渗流特征:以甘谷驿油田唐157井区长6储层为例.岩性油气藏,2017,29(6):8-14. ZHAO X S,DANG H L,PANG Z Y,et al. Microscopic pore structure and seepage characteristics of different pore assemblage types in ultra low permeability reservoir:a case of Chang 6 reservoir in Tang 157 well area,Ganguyi Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(6):8-14.
[3] 徐波,王建,于乐丹,等.致密油储层成岩相类型及其对产能的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地姜家川地区长8储层为例.岩性油气藏,2018,30(6):109-116. XU B,WANG J,YU L D,et al. Diagenetic facies types of tight reservoir and its effects on productivity:a case of Chang 8 reservoir in Jiangjiachuan area,Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(6):109-116.
[4] 苗志国. 有效驱动系数对低和特低渗透储层开发效果的影响.大庆石油地质与开发,2016,35(2):43-47. MIAO Z G. Influence of effective driving coefficient on the development effects of low and extra-low-permeability reservoirs. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2016, 35(2):43-47.
[5] 朱圣举,张皎生,安小平,等.低渗透油藏菱形反九点井网产量计算研究.岩性油气藏,2012,24(6):115-120. ZHU S J,ZHANG J S,AN X P,et al. Oil production calculation for rhombic inverted nine-spot areal well pattern of low permeability reservoirs. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(6):115-120.
[6] 罗健辉,王平美,彭宝亮,等.低渗透油田水驱扩大波及体积技术探讨.油田化学,2017,34(4):756-760. LUO J H,WANG P M,PENG B L,et al. Discussion on expanding swept volume technique of water flooding in low permeability oilfield. Oilfield Chemistry,2017,34(4):756-760.
[7] 石成方.油田注水开发效果评价方法研究.北京:中国地质大学(北京),2009. SHI C F. Research on evaluation method of oilfield water injection development effect. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2009.
[8] 张俊法.高含水油田开发效果评价与挖潜研究:以卡多夫油田为例.北京:中国地质大学(北京),2010. ZHANG J F. Research on development effect evaluation and potential tapping of high water cut oil field:Take Cardorf Oilfield as an Example. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2010.
[9] 刘芬,朱筱敏,潘荣,等.低渗透储层形成及库车坳陷实例分析.岩性油气藏,2014,26(3):28-37. LIU F,ZHU X M,PAN R,et al. Formation of low permeability reservoir and typical case analysis in Kuqa Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(3):28-37.
[10] 陶帅,郝永卯,周杰,等.透镜体低渗透岩性油藏合理井网井距研究.岩性油气藏,2018,30(5):116-123. TAO S,HAO Y M,ZHOU J,et al. Reasonable pattern well spacing deployment of lens lithologic reservoirs with low permeability. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(5):116-123.
[11] 毛文静.低渗透油藏井网优化及开发技术政策研究.四川地质学报,2013,33(4):399-403. MAO W J. A study of Well pattern optimization and developmental tech niquein the low permeable oil reservoir. Journal of Sichuan Geology,2013,33(4):399-403.
[12] 王柏程.特低渗透储层动用界限及建立驱动体系研究.大庆:东北石油大学,2017. WANG B C. Research on the utilisation limit and establishment of driving system for ultra-low permeability reservoirs. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2017.
[1] 熊山, 王学生, 张遂, 赵涛, 庞菲, 高磊. WXS油藏长期水驱储层物性参数变化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 120-129.
[2] 吕端川, 林承焰, 任丽华, 宋金鹏, 狄喜凤. 杏六区东部分流河道砂体渗流单元组合及水淹模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 103-108.
[3] 吴陈冰洁, 朱筱敏, 魏巍, 蒋飞虎, 谈明轩, 潘荣. 查干凹陷下白垩统巴二段储层特征及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1): 71-80.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广，刘博，吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良，曾溅辉，张善文，王永诗，王洪玉，刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷　明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发