岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 101–107.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190511

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

水驱开发效果评价新方法及其矿场应用

贾红兵1, 赵辉1, 包志晶1, 赵光杰2, 毛伟1, 李亚光1   

  1. 1. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江 大庆 163712;
    2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 第一采油厂, 黑龙江 大庆 163000
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-04 修回日期:2019-06-10 出版日期:2019-09-21 发布日期:2019-09-16
  • 作者简介:贾红兵(1980-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事油藏工程方面的研究工作。地址:(163712)黑龙江省大庆市让胡路区勘探开发研究院海塔开发研究室。Email:jiahongbing@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”（编号：2016ZX05054）资助

New method for evaluating water flooding development effect and its oil field application

JIA Hongbing1, ZHAO Hui1, BAO Zhijing1, ZHAO Guangjie2, MAO Wei1, LI Yaguang1   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Limited, Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. NO.1 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Limited, Daqing 163000, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2019-03-04 Revised:2019-06-10 Online:2019-09-21 Published:2019-09-16

PDF (PC)

224

摘要： 为明确注水开发效果的影响因素，有效指导油田综合调整，提出应用图版评价开发效果的新思路。依据谢尔卡乔夫公式和Arps产量递减方程，考虑储层物性、流体性质、相渗特征、井网密度、采出程度等因素，建立了一种开发效果评价图版。在海拉尔盆地A区块的应用实例表明，该图版评价结果与实际油田开发特征相匹配，对不同类别区块的开发规律及注水矛盾区分明显。在开发效果评价研究的基础上，制定了A区块综合调整措施，取得了良好的实施效果。该方法简单实用，具有一定的推广价值。

关键词: 开发效果评价, 水驱, 图版, 开发调整, 采出程度

Abstract: In order to clarify the influencing factors of waterflooding development effect and effectively guide the comprehensive adjustment of oilfield,a new approach of using chart to evaluate development effect was put forward. Based on Sherkachev formula and Arps production decline equation,considering reservoir properties, fluid properties,relative permeability characteristics,well spacing density and recovery degree,a water flooding development effect evaluation chart was established. The application in block A shows that the evaluation results of this chart is consistent with the actual oilfield development characteristics. The development law and water injection contradiction of different blocks can be distinguished obviously. Based on the evaluation of water flooding development effect,the comprehensive adjustment measures of block A were put forward,and it had a good implementation effect. This method is simple and practical,and has certain popularization value.

Key words: development effect evaluation, water flooding, chart, development adjustment, recovery degree

中图分类号: 

  • TE312
[1] 邹存友,王国辉,窦宏恩,等. 油田开发效果评价方法与关键技术.石油天然气学报,2014,36(4):125-130. ZOU C Y,WANG G H,DOU H E,et al. Method and key techniques for evaluating the effect of oilfield development. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2014,36(4):125-130.
[2] 王振鹏,陈民锋,尹承哲. 砾岩油藏水驱开发潜力分级评价. 岩性油气藏,2018,30(5):109-114. WANG Z P,CHEN M F,YIN C Z. Development potential classification evaluation for water-flooding in conglomerate reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(5):109-114.
[3] 方辉煌,汪吉林,宫云鹏,等. 基于灰色模糊理论的页岩气储层评价:以重庆南川地区龙马溪组页岩为例. 岩性油气藏, 2016,28(5):76-80. FANG H H,WANG J L,GONG Y P,et al. Evaluation of shale gas reservoirs based on gray fuzzy theory:a case study from Longmaxi Formation in Nanchuan area,Chongqing. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):76-80.
[4] 尤启东,周方喜,张建良.复杂小断块油藏水驱开发效果评价方法.油气地质与采收率,2009,16(1):78-81. YOU Q D,ZHOU F X,ZHANG J L. Evaluation procedure of water flooding effect of complicated small fault blocks. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2009,16(1):78-81.
[5] DUNN M D,CHUKWU G A. Simulation based dimensionless type curves for predicting water-flood recovery. SPE 68839, 2001.
[6] JONES A D W,A1-QABANDI S,REDDICK C E,et a1. Rapid assessment of pattern water flooding uncertainty in a giant oil reservoir. SPE 38890,1997.
[7] LEMOUZY P M,ESCHARD R,BEUCHER H. An integrated approach EOR evaluation of production scenarios in the field delineation phase. SPE 22906,1991.
[8] 卢俊. 评价和预测注水开发油田调整挖潜效果的一项新指标.石油勘探与开发,1993,20(1):62-65. LU J. A new index used in the evaluation and prediction of the reservoir performance of a water flooding oil field. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1993,20(1):62-65.
[9] 苏彦春,王月杰,缪飞飞. 水驱砂岩油藏开发指标评价新体系.中国海上油气,2015,27(3):60-65. SU Y C,WANG Y J,MIAO F F. A new evaluation system for water flooding sandstone reservoirs. Chian Offshore Oil and Gas,2015,27(3):60-65.
[10] 刘辉,何顺利,李俊键,等. 特低渗油藏水驱开发效果评价方法研究.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(1):58-60. LIU H,HE S L,LI J J,et al. Evaluating methods of water flooding development effect in ultra-low permeability reservoir. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2009,31(1):58-60.
[11] 陈汶滨,赵明,蔡明,等.基于指标特征模型的油藏注水开发效果定量化评价.石油学报,2016,37(增刊2):80-86. CHEN W B,ZHAO M,CAI M,et al. Quantitative evaluation of reservoir water-flooding development effect based on index characteristic model. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(Suppl 2):80-86.
[12] 缪飞飞,张宏友,张言辉,等.一种水驱油田递减率指标开发效果评价的新方法.断块油气田,2015,22(3):353-355. MIAO F F,ZHANG H Y,ZHANG Y H,et al. New method for evaluating waterflooding effect by decline rate index. FaultBlock Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(3):353-355.
[13] 邹存友,于立君.中国水驱砂岩油田含水与采出程度的量化关系.石油学报,2012,33(2):288-292. ZOU C Y,YU L J. A quantization relationship between water cut and degree of reserve recovery for waterflooding sandstone reservoirs in China. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):288-292.
[14] 崔传智,徐建鹏,王端平,等.特高含水阶段新型水驱特征曲线.石油学报,2015,36(10):1267-1271. CUI C Z,XU J P,WANG D P,et al. A new water flooding characteristic curve at ultra-high water cut stage. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015,36(10):1267-1271.
[15] 侯健,陈月明,赵红兵,等.特高含水油藏综合调整效果的模糊评价方法.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,31(4):70-73. HOU J,CHEN Y M,ZHAO H B,et al. Fuzzy evaluation method of reservoir comprehensive adjustment effect in ultra-high water cut stage. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Sciences),2007,31(4):70-73.
[16] 宋子齐,赵磊,王瑞飞,等.一种水驱开发效果评价方法在辽河油田的应用. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,19(3):17-22. SONG Z Q,ZHAO L,WANG R F,et al. The application of a water flooding development result evaluation method in Liaohe Oilfield. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2004,19(3):17-22.
[17] 薛中天,李论,呼舜兴,等.油田注水开发动态分析系统方法在桥29块的应用.断块油气田,1997,4(4):30-33. XUE Z T,LI L,HU S X,et al. The application of dynamic system analysis method for water flooding development in Qiao-29 block. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,1997,4(4):30-33.
[18] 张继风.水驱油田开发效果评价方法综述及发展趋势.岩性油气藏,2012,24(3):118-122. ZHANG J F. Evaluation methods of development effect for water drive oilfield and development trend. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012,24(3):118-122.
[19] 高兴军,宋子齐,程仲平,等.影响砂岩油藏水驱开发效果的综合评价方法.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(2):68-69. GAO X J,SONG Z Q,CHENG Z P,et al. Geologic factors influencing the water-drive development of sandstone reservoirs and their comprehensive evaluation using grey system theory. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(2):68-69.
[20] 马立平,任宝生,赵明,等.油田水驱开发效果评价与预警模型研究.西南科技大学学报,2010,25(2):51-54. MA L P,REN B S,ZHAO M,et al. Research on oilfield water flooding development effect evaluation and its pre-warning model. Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology,2010,25(2):51-54.
[21] 管纪昂,武若霞,韩东.用生产资料确定谢卡尔乔夫公式参数的方法.西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2003,18(2):25-27. GUAN J A,WU R X,HAN D. Calculating displacement efficiency and well-pattern index in B.H. Xie's formula according to actual producing data. Journal of Xi'an Petroleum Institute (Natural Science Edition),2003,18(2):25-27.
[22] 范光军,祁大晟,寇向荣.大宛齐油田井网密度与采收率的关系.新疆石油地质,2009,30(5):624-625. FAN G J,QI D S,KOU X R. The relationship between well spacing density and recovery factor in Dawanqi Oilfield. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2009,30(5):624-625.
[1] 孙亮, 李保柱, 刘凡. 基于Pollock流线追踪的油藏高效水驱管理方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 169-176.
[2] 钱真, 李辉, 乔林, 柏森. 碳酸盐岩油藏低矿化度水驱作用机理实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 159-165.
[3] 杜旭林, 戴宗, 辛晶, 李海龙, 曹仁义, 罗东红. 强底水稠油油藏水平井三维水驱物理模拟实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 141-148.
[4] 邓成刚, 李江涛, 柴小颖, 陈汾君, 杨喜彦, 王海成, 连运晓, 涂加沙. 涩北气田弱水驱气藏水侵早期识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 128-134.
[5] 龙明, 刘英宪, 陈晓祺, 王美楠, 于登飞. 基于曲流河储层构型的注采结构优化调整[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 145-154.
[6] 张志刚, 刘春杨, 刘国志. 低渗透油田储层连通关系动静态综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 108-113.
[7] 黄广庆. 离子组成及矿化度对低矿化度水驱采收率的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 129-133.
[8] 熊山, 王学生, 张遂, 赵涛, 庞菲, 高磊. WXS油藏长期水驱储层物性参数变化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 120-129.
[9] 鹿克峰, 马恋, 刘彬彬, 李宁, 刘启楠, 宋刚祥. 水驱气藏早期直线外推动储量探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 153-158.
[10] 凌浩川, 孟智强, 石洪福, 孙强, 潘杰. 基于甲型水驱规律曲线的表征方法改进[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 125-130.
[11] 罗伟, 林永茂, 董海峰, 熊昕东, 张志成. 元坝高含硫气井油套环空正常起压规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 146-153.
[12] 廖恒杰, 杨志兴, 李元生, 程俊阳, 程超. 西湖凹陷气藏出水规律及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 135-141.
[13] 熊连桥, 于福生, 姚根顺, 高崇龙, 王玉. 砂砾岩储层中黄铁矿的油气地质意义——以准噶尔盆地车60井区齐古组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 73-80.
[14] 徐赢，潘有军，周荣萍，吴迪，蒲玉娥，肖露. 油田注水开发期含水率随时间变化规律研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4): 127-132.
[15] 陈国飞，唐 海，唐 聪,梁 毅. 预测水驱油田含水率的 Von Bertalanffy 模型[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 135-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广，刘博，吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良，曾溅辉，张善文，王永诗，王洪玉，刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷　明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发