岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 101–107.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190511

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

水驱开发效果评价新方法及其矿场应用

贾红兵1, 赵辉1, 包志晶1, 赵光杰2, 毛伟1, 李亚光1   

  1. 1. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江 大庆 163712;
    2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 第一采油厂, 黑龙江 大庆 163000
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-04 修回日期:2019-06-10 出版日期:2019-09-21 发布日期:2019-09-16
  • 第一作者:贾红兵(1980-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事油藏工程方面的研究工作。地址:(163712)黑龙江省大庆市让胡路区勘探开发研究院海塔开发研究室。Email:jiahongbing@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”（编号：2016ZX05054）资助

New method for evaluating water flooding development effect and its oil field application

JIA Hongbing1, ZHAO Hui1, BAO Zhijing1, ZHAO Guangjie2, MAO Wei1, LI Yaguang1   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Limited, Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. NO.1 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Limited, Daqing 163000, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2019-03-04 Revised:2019-06-10 Online:2019-09-21 Published:2019-09-16

PDF (PC)

284

摘要： 为明确注水开发效果的影响因素，有效指导油田综合调整，提出应用图版评价开发效果的新思路。依据谢尔卡乔夫公式和Arps产量递减方程，考虑储层物性、流体性质、相渗特征、井网密度、采出程度等因素，建立了一种开发效果评价图版。在海拉尔盆地A区块的应用实例表明，该图版评价结果与实际油田开发特征相匹配，对不同类别区块的开发规律及注水矛盾区分明显。在开发效果评价研究的基础上，制定了A区块综合调整措施，取得了良好的实施效果。该方法简单实用，具有一定的推广价值。

关键词: 开发效果评价, 水驱, 图版, 开发调整, 采出程度

Abstract: In order to clarify the influencing factors of waterflooding development effect and effectively guide the comprehensive adjustment of oilfield,a new approach of using chart to evaluate development effect was put forward. Based on Sherkachev formula and Arps production decline equation,considering reservoir properties, fluid properties,relative permeability characteristics,well spacing density and recovery degree,a water flooding development effect evaluation chart was established. The application in block A shows that the evaluation results of this chart is consistent with the actual oilfield development characteristics. The development law and water injection contradiction of different blocks can be distinguished obviously. Based on the evaluation of water flooding development effect,the comprehensive adjustment measures of block A were put forward,and it had a good implementation effect. This method is simple and practical,and has certain popularization value.

Key words: development effect evaluation, water flooding, chart, development adjustment, recovery degree

中图分类号: 

  • TE312
[1] 邹存友,王国辉,窦宏恩,等. 油田开发效果评价方法与关键技术.石油天然气学报,2014,36(4):125-130. ZOU C Y,WANG G H,DOU H E,et al. Method and key techniques for evaluating the effect of oilfield development. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2014,36(4):125-130.
[2] 王振鹏,陈民锋,尹承哲. 砾岩油藏水驱开发潜力分级评价. 岩性油气藏,2018,30(5):109-114. WANG Z P,CHEN M F,YIN C Z. Development potential classification evaluation for water-flooding in conglomerate reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(5):109-114.
[3] 方辉煌,汪吉林,宫云鹏,等. 基于灰色模糊理论的页岩气储层评价:以重庆南川地区龙马溪组页岩为例. 岩性油气藏, 2016,28(5):76-80. FANG H H,WANG J L,GONG Y P,et al. Evaluation of shale gas reservoirs based on gray fuzzy theory:a case study from Longmaxi Formation in Nanchuan area,Chongqing. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):76-80.
[4] 尤启东,周方喜,张建良.复杂小断块油藏水驱开发效果评价方法.油气地质与采收率,2009,16(1):78-81. YOU Q D,ZHOU F X,ZHANG J L. Evaluation procedure of water flooding effect of complicated small fault blocks. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2009,16(1):78-81.
[5] DUNN M D,CHUKWU G A. Simulation based dimensionless type curves for predicting water-flood recovery. SPE 68839, 2001.
[6] JONES A D W,A1-QABANDI S,REDDICK C E,et a1. Rapid assessment of pattern water flooding uncertainty in a giant oil reservoir. SPE 38890,1997.
[7] LEMOUZY P M,ESCHARD R,BEUCHER H. An integrated approach EOR evaluation of production scenarios in the field delineation phase. SPE 22906,1991.
[8] 卢俊. 评价和预测注水开发油田调整挖潜效果的一项新指标.石油勘探与开发,1993,20(1):62-65. LU J. A new index used in the evaluation and prediction of the reservoir performance of a water flooding oil field. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1993,20(1):62-65.
[9] 苏彦春,王月杰,缪飞飞. 水驱砂岩油藏开发指标评价新体系.中国海上油气,2015,27(3):60-65. SU Y C,WANG Y J,MIAO F F. A new evaluation system for water flooding sandstone reservoirs. Chian Offshore Oil and Gas,2015,27(3):60-65.
[10] 刘辉,何顺利,李俊键,等. 特低渗油藏水驱开发效果评价方法研究.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(1):58-60. LIU H,HE S L,LI J J,et al. Evaluating methods of water flooding development effect in ultra-low permeability reservoir. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2009,31(1):58-60.
[11] 陈汶滨,赵明,蔡明,等.基于指标特征模型的油藏注水开发效果定量化评价.石油学报,2016,37(增刊2):80-86. CHEN W B,ZHAO M,CAI M,et al. Quantitative evaluation of reservoir water-flooding development effect based on index characteristic model. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(Suppl 2):80-86.
[12] 缪飞飞,张宏友,张言辉,等.一种水驱油田递减率指标开发效果评价的新方法.断块油气田,2015,22(3):353-355. MIAO F F,ZHANG H Y,ZHANG Y H,et al. New method for evaluating waterflooding effect by decline rate index. FaultBlock Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(3):353-355.
[13] 邹存友,于立君.中国水驱砂岩油田含水与采出程度的量化关系.石油学报,2012,33(2):288-292. ZOU C Y,YU L J. A quantization relationship between water cut and degree of reserve recovery for waterflooding sandstone reservoirs in China. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):288-292.
[14] 崔传智,徐建鹏,王端平,等.特高含水阶段新型水驱特征曲线.石油学报,2015,36(10):1267-1271. CUI C Z,XU J P,WANG D P,et al. A new water flooding characteristic curve at ultra-high water cut stage. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015,36(10):1267-1271.
[15] 侯健,陈月明,赵红兵,等.特高含水油藏综合调整效果的模糊评价方法.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,31(4):70-73. HOU J,CHEN Y M,ZHAO H B,et al. Fuzzy evaluation method of reservoir comprehensive adjustment effect in ultra-high water cut stage. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Sciences),2007,31(4):70-73.
[16] 宋子齐,赵磊,王瑞飞,等.一种水驱开发效果评价方法在辽河油田的应用. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,19(3):17-22. SONG Z Q,ZHAO L,WANG R F,et al. The application of a water flooding development result evaluation method in Liaohe Oilfield. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2004,19(3):17-22.
[17] 薛中天,李论,呼舜兴,等.油田注水开发动态分析系统方法在桥29块的应用.断块油气田,1997,4(4):30-33. XUE Z T,LI L,HU S X,et al. The application of dynamic system analysis method for water flooding development in Qiao-29 block. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,1997,4(4):30-33.
[18] 张继风.水驱油田开发效果评价方法综述及发展趋势.岩性油气藏,2012,24(3):118-122. ZHANG J F. Evaluation methods of development effect for water drive oilfield and development trend. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012,24(3):118-122.
[19] 高兴军,宋子齐,程仲平,等.影响砂岩油藏水驱开发效果的综合评价方法.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(2):68-69. GAO X J,SONG Z Q,CHENG Z P,et al. Geologic factors influencing the water-drive development of sandstone reservoirs and their comprehensive evaluation using grey system theory. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(2):68-69.
[20] 马立平,任宝生,赵明,等.油田水驱开发效果评价与预警模型研究.西南科技大学学报,2010,25(2):51-54. MA L P,REN B S,ZHAO M,et al. Research on oilfield water flooding development effect evaluation and its pre-warning model. Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology,2010,25(2):51-54.
[21] 管纪昂,武若霞,韩东.用生产资料确定谢卡尔乔夫公式参数的方法.西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2003,18(2):25-27. GUAN J A,WU R X,HAN D. Calculating displacement efficiency and well-pattern index in B.H. Xie's formula according to actual producing data. Journal of Xi'an Petroleum Institute (Natural Science Edition),2003,18(2):25-27.
[22] 范光军,祁大晟,寇向荣.大宛齐油田井网密度与采收率的关系.新疆石油地质,2009,30(5):624-625. FAN G J,QI D S,KOU X R. The relationship between well spacing density and recovery factor in Dawanqi Oilfield. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2009,30(5):624-625.
[1] 刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[2] 白佳佳, 司双虎, 陶磊, 王国庆, 王龙龙, 史文洋, 张娜, 朱庆杰. DES+CTAB复配驱油剂体系提高低渗致密砂岩油藏采收率机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 169-177.
[3] 钱真, 毛志强, 郑伟, 黄远军, 陈立峰, 曾慧勇, 李岗, 宋嫒. 井间单套缝洞型油藏橡胶颗粒调剖堵水实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 161-168.
[4] 孟智强, 葛丽珍, 祝晓林, 王永平, 朱志强. 气顶边水油藏气/水驱产油量贡献评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 162-170.
[5] 宋传真, 马翠玉. 塔河油田奥陶系缝洞型油藏油水流动规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 150-158.
[6] 王静怡, 周志军, 魏华彬, 崔春雪. 基于页岩孔隙网络模型的油水两相流动模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 148-154.
[7] 李传亮, 王凤兰, 杜庆龙, 由春梅, 单高军, 李斌会, 朱苏阳. 砂岩油藏特高含水期的水驱特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 163-171.
[8] 孙亮, 李保柱, 刘凡. 基于Pollock流线追踪的油藏高效水驱管理方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 169-176.
[9] 钱真, 李辉, 乔林, 柏森. 碳酸盐岩油藏低矿化度水驱作用机理实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 159-165.
[10] 杜旭林, 戴宗, 辛晶, 李海龙, 曹仁义, 罗东红. 强底水稠油油藏水平井三维水驱物理模拟实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 141-148.
[11] 邓成刚, 李江涛, 柴小颖, 陈汾君, 杨喜彦, 王海成, 连运晓, 涂加沙. 涩北气田弱水驱气藏水侵早期识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 128-134.
[12] 龙明, 刘英宪, 陈晓祺, 王美楠, 于登飞. 基于曲流河储层构型的注采结构优化调整[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 145-154.
[13] 张志刚, 刘春杨, 刘国志. 低渗透油田储层连通关系动静态综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 108-113.
[14] 黄广庆. 离子组成及矿化度对低矿化度水驱采收率的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 129-133.
[15] 熊山, 王学生, 张遂, 赵涛, 庞菲, 高磊. WXS油藏长期水驱储层物性参数变化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 120-129.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣，侯中健，王亚辉，王莹，王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才，李晓平，窦天财，吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳，张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯，郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜，秦伟军，郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉，陆正元，袁帅，李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云， 卢渊，伊向艺，张俊良，张锦良，王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发