岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 128–134.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200114

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

涩北气田弱水驱气藏水侵早期识别方法

邓成刚1, 李江涛1, 柴小颖1, 陈汾君1, 杨喜彦2, 王海成1, 连运晓1, 涂加沙1   

  1. 1. 中国石油青海油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 敦煌 736202;
    2. 中国石油青海油田分公司 气田开发处, 甘肃 敦煌 736202
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-23 修回日期:2019-08-20 出版日期:2020-01-21 发布日期:2019-11-22
  • 作者简介:邓成刚(1976-),男,高级工程师,主要从事气田开发地质方面的研究工作。地址:(736202)甘肃省敦煌市七里镇青海油田勘探开发研究院气田开发研究所。Email:dcgqh@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项课题“柴达木盆地老气区控水稳气及新气区高效开发技术研究”（编号：2016E-0106GF）资助

Early identification methods of water invasion in weak water drive gas reservoirs in Sebei gas field,Qaidam Basin

DENG Chenggang1, LI Jiangtao1, CHAI Xiaoying1, CHEN Fenjun1, YANG Xiyan2, WANG Haicheng1, LIAN Yunxiao1, TU Jiasha1   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang 736202, Gansu, China;
    2. Department of Gas Field Development, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang 736202, Gansu, China
  • Received:2019-05-23 Revised:2019-08-20 Online:2020-01-21 Published:2019-11-22

PDF (PC)

331

摘要： 弱水驱气藏开发早期的水侵特征不明显，识别起来比较困难。现场多采用水样监测和对水气比曲线进行分析等方法对气藏的水侵特征进行识别，但这些方法都是在地层水进入气井之后才能进行判断，不利于提前采取预防措施。以涩北二号气田边水能量较弱的A气藏为例，通过引入生产指示曲线法、存水体积系数法和视地质储量法对气藏早期的水侵特征进行识别，并通过不同采出程度下的曲线特征进行了对比。结果表明：视地质储量法对气藏水侵作用敏感性强，曲线发生上翘拐点时对应的采出程度最低，比现场经验法低20%；视地质储量法水侵识别结果可靠性高，能更早地发现气藏的水侵特征。该研究成果对于无裂缝发育、孔隙性相对均质的弱水驱气藏进行早期的水侵特征识别具有指导意义。

关键词: 水驱气藏识别, 存水体积系数法, 生产指示曲线法, 视地质储量法, 涩北气田

Abstract: In the early stage of development of weak water drive gas reservoirs,the water invasion characteristics are not obvious,so it is difficult to identify them. Water monitoring and water-gas ratio curve analysis were often used to identify water invasion characteristics of gas reservoirs,but these methods can only be used after formation water enters gas wells,which is not conducive to taking preventive measures in advance. Taking A gas reservoir with weak edge water energy in Sebei No. 2 gas field as an example,the early water invasion characteristics of gas reservoir were identified by introducing production indicator curve method,water storage volume coefficient method and apparent geological reserves method,and the curve characteristics under different recovery degrees were compared. The results show that the apparent geological reserve method is sensitive to water invasion of gas reservoirs,and the corresponding recovery degree is the lowest when the curve warping point occurs, which is 20% lower than the field experience method. The result of water invasion identified by the apparent geological reserve method is more reliable,and the water invasion characteristics of gas reservoirs can be found earlier. The research results have guiding significance for early identification of water invasion characteristics of weak water drive gas reservoirs without fracture development and relatively homogeneous porosity.

Key words: water drive gas reservoir identification, water storage volume coefficient method, production indicator curve method, apparent geological reserves method, Sebei gas field

中图分类号: 

  • TE341
[1] 万玉金, 李江涛, 杨炳秀, 等.多层疏松砂岩气田开发.北京:石油工业出版社, 2016:11-39. WAN Y J, LI J T, YANG B X, et al. Multilayer unconsolidated sandstone gas field development. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2016:11-39.
[2] 黄炳光, 刘蜀知, 唐海, 等.气藏工程与动态分析方法.北京:石油工业出版社, 2004:48-55. HUANG B G, LIU S Z, TANG H, et al. Gas reservoir engineering and dynamic analysis methods. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2004:48-55.
[3] 李传亮. 油藏工程原理. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2005:115-131. LI C L. Reservoir engineering principles. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2005:115-131.
[4] 秦同洛, 李璗, 陈元千, 等.实用油藏工程方法.北京:石油工业出版社, 1989:138-152. QIN T L, LI D, CHEN Y Q, et al. Practical reservoir engineering methods. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1989:138-152.
[5] 何晓东, 邹绍林, 卢晓敏. 边水气藏水侵特征识别及机理初探.天然气工业, 2006, 26(3):87-89. HE X D, ZOU S L, LU X M. Preliminary study on identification and mechanism of water invasion characteristics of edge water gas reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(3):87-89.
[6] 廖恒杰, 杨志兴, 李元生, 等.西湖凹陷气藏出水规律及控制因素.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):135-141. LIAO H J, YANG Z X, LI Y S, et al. Water production law and controlling factors of gas reservoirs in Xihu Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):135-141.
[7] 康晓东, 李相方, 张国松.气藏早期水侵识别方法.天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(6):637-639. KANG X D, LI X F, ZHANG G S. Identification method of early water invasion in gas reservoirs. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2004, 15(6):637-639.
[8] 李晓平, 袁淋, 罗诚, 等.边水推进对水平井产量的影响.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5):107-112. LI X P, YUAN L, LUO C, et al. The effect of edge water advance on horizontal well production. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(5):107-112.
[9] 李江涛, 柴小颖, 邓成刚, 等.提升水驱气藏开发效果的先期控水技术.天然气工业, 2017, 37(8):132-139. LI J T, CHAI X Y, DENG C G, et al. Advanced water control technology to enhance the development effect of water drive gas reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(8):132-139.
[10] 邓勇, 杜志敏, 陈朝晖. 涩北气田疏松砂岩气藏出水规律研究. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2008, 30(2):336-338. DENG Y, DU Z M, CHEN C H. Study on water production law of unconsolidated sandstone gas reservoir in Sebei gas field. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute), 2008, 30(2):336-338.
[11] 罗万静, 万玉金, 王晓东, 等.涩北气田多层合采出水原因及识别.天然气工业, 2009, 29(2):86-88. LUO W J, WAN Y J, WANG X D, et al. Reasons and identification of multi-layer produced water in Sebei gas field. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(2):86-88.
[12] 郭珍珍, 李志平, 杨志浩, 等.羊塔1气藏生产动态资料判断水侵模式方法.科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(1):206-209. GUO Z Z, LI Z P, YANG Z H, et al. Method for judging water invasion pattern from production performance data of Yangta 1 gas reservoir. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(1):206-209.
[13] 杨通佑, 范尚炯, 陈元千, 等.石油及天然气储量计算方法.北京:石油工业出版社, 1990:108-131. YANG T Y, FAN S J, CHEN Y Q, et al. Calculating methods of oil and gas reserves. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1990:108-131.
[14] 鹿克峰, 马恋, 刘彬彬, 等.水驱气藏早期直线外推动储量探讨.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1):153-158. LU K F, MA L, LIU B B, et al. Discussion on reserves driven outward by straight line in early stage of water driven gas reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1):153-158.
[15] 高勤峰, 党玉琪, 李江涛, 等.柴达木盆地涩北气田动态储量计算与评价.新疆石油地质, 2009, 30(4):499-500. GAO Q F, DANG Y Q, LI J T, et al. Dynamic reserves calculation and evaluation of Sebei gas field in Qaidam Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2009, 30(4):499-500.
[16] 王怒涛, 黄炳光, 张崇军, 等.水驱气藏动态储量及水侵量计算新方法.西南石油学院学报, 2000, 22(4):26-27. WANG N T, HUANG B G, ZHANG C J, et al. New method for calculating dynamic reserves and water influx of water drive gas reservoirs. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2000, 22(4):26-27.
[17] 胡俊坤, 李晓平, 张健涛, 等.计算水驱气藏动态储量和水侵量的简易新方法.天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(6):1175-1178. HU J K, LI X P, ZHANG J T, et al. Simple new method for calculating dynamic reserves and water influx of water drive gas reservoirs. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(6):1175-1178.
[18] 王怒涛, 唐刚, 任洪伟.水驱气藏水侵量及水体参数计算最优化方法.天然气工业, 2005, 25(5):75-78. WANG N T, TANG G, REN H W. Optimum method for calculating water influx and water parameters of water drive gas reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(5):75-78.
[19] 李传亮.气藏水侵量的计算方法研究.新疆石油地质, 2003, 24(5):430-431. LI C L. Study on the calculation method of water influx in gas reservoirs. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2003, 24(5):430-431.
[20] 邓成刚, 孙勇, 曹继华, 等.柴达木盆地涩北气田地质储量和水侵量计算.岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2):98-101. DENG C G, SUN Y, CAO J H, et al. Calculation of geological reserves and water influx in Sebei gas field of Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(2):98-101.
[1] 张运来, 陈建波, 周海燕, 张吉磊, 章威. 海上底水油藏水平井水驱波及系数定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 146-153.
[2] 宋明明, 韩淑乔, 董云鹏, 陈江, 万涛. 致密砂岩储层微观水驱油效率及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 135-143.
[3] 黄广庆. 离子组成及矿化度对低矿化度水驱采收率的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 129-133.
[4] 冯强汉, 阳生国, 熊哲, 高航, 张佳超, 杨懿, 杨振. 苏里格气田西部S48区气水分布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 61-69.
[5] 吴丰, 姚聪, 丛林林, 袁龙, 闻竹, 张凤生, 习研平. 岩石气水两相渗流的玻璃刻蚀驱替实验与有限元数值模拟对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 121-132.
[6] 周焱斌, 何逸凡, 章威, 张吉磊, 杨磊. 海上注水开发油田单井经济极限含水率分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 130-134.
[7] 鹿克峰, 马恋, 刘彬彬, 李宁, 刘启楠, 宋刚祥. 水驱气藏早期直线外推动储量探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 153-158.
[8] 凌浩川, 孟智强, 石洪福, 孙强, 潘杰. 基于甲型水驱规律曲线的表征方法改进[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 125-130.
[9] 王振鹏, 陈民锋, 尹承哲. 砾岩油藏水驱开发潜力分级评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5): 109-115.
[10] 廖恒杰, 杨志兴, 李元生, 程俊阳, 程超. 西湖凹陷气藏出水规律及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6): 135-141.
[11] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159-164.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广，刘博，吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良，曾溅辉，张善文，王永诗，王洪玉，刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷　明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发