鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长81致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20210205

岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 36–48.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210205

鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长8₁致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响

张晓辉^1,2, 张娟^3,4, 袁京素⁵, 崔小丽^1,2, 毛振华^1,2

1. 中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 西安 710018;
2. 低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室, 西安 710018;
3. 西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065;
4. 陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室, 西安 710065;
5. 中国石油长庆油田分公司第八采油厂, 西安 710018

收稿日期:2020-03-15 修回日期:2020-06-12 出版日期:2021-04-01 发布日期:2021-03-31
第一作者:张晓辉(1987—),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事低渗透油藏评价与开发方面的研究工作。地址:(710018)陕西省西安市未央区凤城四路长庆科技长庆油田勘探开发研究院。Email:zxh1987_cq@petrochina.com.cn。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项课题“鄂尔多斯盆地致密油资源潜力、甜点预测与关键技术应用”（编号：2016 ZX05046005）和中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“鄂尔多斯盆地石油富集规律及勘探目标评价”（编号：2016 E-0501）联合资助

Micro pore throat structure and its influence on seepage of Chang 8₁ tight reservoir in Nanliang-Huachi area,Ordos Basin

ZHANG Xiaohui^1,2, ZHANG Juan^3,4, YUAN Jingsu⁵, CUI Xiaoli^1,2, MAO Zhenhua^1,2

1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710018, China;
2. National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low Permeability Oil and Gas Fields, Xi'an 710018, China;
3. College of Geosciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
4. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Geology, Xi'an 710065, China;
5. No. 8 OilProduction Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710018, China

Received:2020-03-15 Revised:2020-06-12 Online:2021-04-01 Published:2021-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁华池长8₁油藏孔喉结构多样、渗流特征复杂，成藏及油水关系认识不清，制约了该区石油勘探突破及规模开发进程。通过铸体薄片、恒速压汞、核磁共振、油水相渗测试等方法，系统研究了南梁-华池地区长8₁储层微观孔隙结构，对比分析了该区不同物性样品微观孔喉结构差异及其对油水渗流特征的影响。结果表明：①储层物性越好，微观非均质性越强，可动流体饱和度越大，无水期驱油效率先增后减，最终水驱油效率越高。②当渗透率大于1.000 mD时，渗透率贡献率主要依靠少数半径大于6.00 μm的连通喉道；当渗透率小于1.000 mD时，渗透率贡献率主要由喉道半径峰值区间的小喉道决定。③连通喉道半径小于0.10 μm的孔隙流体为不可流动的束缚流体，储层物性越好，半径大于0.50 μm喉道控制的孔隙体积越大，可动流体饱和度越高。④研究区油水相渗特征可以分为3类，其中Ⅰ类相渗物性最差、驱油效率最低；Ⅱ类相渗喉道半径为0.50~1.00 μm，两相共渗范围较宽，无水期驱油效率和最终驱油效率均最高；Ⅲ类相渗喉道半径多大于1.50 μm，含水上升较快，无水期驱油效率最低，但最终驱油效率只略低于Ⅱ类相渗最终驱油效率。喉道半径的分布、连通特征决定了储层渗透率和可动流体饱和度大小，影响油水两相渗流规律，对石油充注、成藏以及开发均有重要的影响，是该区油水关系复杂的重要因素之一。该研究成果对分析岩性油藏油水关系、预测有利储层分布具有一定指导意义。

关键词: 致密砂岩, 微观孔隙结构, 恒速压汞, 核磁共振, 渗流特征, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Chang 8₁ reservoir in Nanliang-Huachi area of Ordos Basin is characterized by various pore throat structures,complex seepage characteristics,unclear understanding of reservoir accumulation and oil-water relationship,which restricts the process of oil exploration breakthrough and scale development. The micro pore structure of Chang 8₁ reservoir in Nanliang-Huachi area was systematically studied by means of casting thin section, constant velocity mercury injection,nuclear magnetic resonance and oil-water relative permeability test,and the difference of micro pore throat structure of samples with different physical properties in the study area and its influence on oil-water seepage characteristics were compared and analyzed. The results show that:(1) The better the reservoir physical properties of the reservoir,the stronger the micro heterogeneity,the greater the movable fluid saturation, the displacement efficiency in the anhydrous period increases first, then decreases, and the higher the final water displacement efficiency.(2) When the permeability is higher than 1.000 mD,the permeability contribution mainly depends on a few connected throats with radius greater than 6.00 μm,while the permeability is lower than 1.000 mD, the permeability contribution is mainly determined by the small throats in the peak range of throats radius. (3) The pore fluid in the radius of connected throat less than 0.10 μm is immovable fluid. The better the reservoir physical properties are,the larger the pore volume controlled by the throat with the radius greater than 0.50 μm is,the higher the saturation of movable fluid is.(4) The characteristics of oil-water relative permeability in the study area can be divided into three types,among which the physical property of type I is poorest and the oil displacement efficiency is the lowest. The throat radius of type Ⅱ is 0.50-1.00 μm,and the permeability range of the two-phase is wide,the oil displacement efficiency and final oil displacement efficiency are highest in anhydrous period. The throat radius of type Ⅲ is greater than 1.50 μm,the water cut rises rapidly,the oil displacement efficiency is lowest in anhydrous period,but its final oil displacement efficiency is slightly lower than that of type Ⅱ. The distribution and connection characteristics of throat radius are one of the important factors of complex oilwater relationship in this area,which determine the permeability of reservoir and the saturation of movable fluid, affect the rule of oil-water two-phase flow,and have an important influence on oil filling,reservoir accumulation and development. The research results have certain guiding significance for analyzing oil-water relationship of lithologic reservoir and predicting favorable reservoir distribution.

Key words: tight sandstone, micro pore structure, constant velocity mercury injection, nuclear magnetic resonance, seepage characteristics, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122

张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长8₁致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36–48.

ZHANG Xiaohui, ZHANG Juan, YUAN Jingsu, CUI Xiaoli, MAO Zhenhua. Micro pore throat structure and its influence on seepage of Chang 8₁ tight reservoir in Nanliang-Huachi area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2): 36–48.

参考文献

[1] 张晓丽, 段毅, 何金先, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区三叠系延长组长8油层组油气成藏条件分析.地质科技情报, 2013, 32(4):127-131. ZHANG X L, DUAN Y, HE J X, et al. Analysis of reservoir forming conditions of Chang 8 formation in Huaqing area,Ordos Basin. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(4):127-131.
[2] 耳闯, 罗安湘, 赵靖舟, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区三叠系延长组长7段富有机质页岩岩相特征.地学前缘, 2016, 23(2):108-117. ER C, LUO A X, ZHAO J Z, et al. Lithofacies features of organicrich shale of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in Huachi area, Ordos Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2):108-117.
[3] DESBOIS G, URAI J L, KUKLA P A, et al. High-resolution 3D fabric and porosity model in a tight gas sandstone reservoir:a new approach to investigate microstructures from mm to nm scale combining argon beam cross-sectioning and SEM imaging. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2011, 78(2):243-257.
[4] XI K L, CAO Y C, HAILE B G, et al. How does the pore-throat size control the reservoir quality and oiliness of tight sandstones? The case of the Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation in the southern Songliao Basin, China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 76:1-15.
[5] 吴丰, 姚聪, 丛林林, 等.岩石气水两相渗流的玻璃刻蚀驱替实验与有限元数值模拟对比.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4):121-132. WU F, YAO C, CONG L L, et al. Comparison of glass etching displacement experiment and finite element numerical simulation for gas-water two-phase seepage in rocks. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4):121-132.
[6] 任大忠, 孙卫, 魏虎, 等.华庆油田长81储层成岩相类型及微观孔隙结构特征.现代地质, 2014, 28(2):379-387. REN D Z, SUN W, WEI H, et al. Types of sandstone reservoir diagenetic facies and microscopic pore structure characteristics of Chang 81 reservoir in Huaqing Oilfield. Geoscience, 2014, 28(2):379-387.
[7] 李长政, 孙卫, 任大忠, 等.华庆地区长81储层微观孔隙结构特征研究.岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(4):19-22. LI C Z, SUN W, REN D Z, et al. Microscopic pore structure characteristics of Chang 81 reservoir in Huaqing area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(4):19-22.
[8] 张纪智, 陈世加, 肖艳, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长8致密砂岩储层特征及其成因. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(5):679-684. ZHANG J Z, CHEN S J, XIAO Y, et al. Characteristics of the Chang 8 tight sandstone reservoirs and their genesis in Huaqing area,Ordos Basin. Oil and Gas Geology, 2013, 34(5):679-684.
[9] 陈世加, 路俊刚, 姚泾利, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长8油层组成藏特征及控制因素.沉积学报, 2012, 30(6):1130-1139. CHEN S J, LU J G, YAO J L, et al. Characteristics of reservoir formation and the controlling factors of Chang 8 oil-bearing formation in Huaqing area of Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012, 30(6):1130-1139.
[10] 周晓峰, 丁黎, 杨卫国, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8油层组砂岩中绿泥石膜的生长模式.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):1-10. ZHOU X F, DING L, YANG W G, et al. Growth pattern of chlorite film in Chang 8 sandstone of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4):1-10.
[11] 张晓辉, 冯顺彦, 梁晓伟, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长7段沉积微相及沉积演化特征. 地质学报, 2020, 94(3):957-967. ZHANG X H, FENG S Y, LIANG X W, et al. Sedimentary microfacies identification and inferred evolution of the Chang 7 member of Yanchang Formation in the Longdong area,Ordos Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2020, 94(3):957-967.
[12] 陈怡婷, 刘洛夫, 王梦尧, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长6、长7储集层特征及其控制因素.岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1):51-65. CHEN Y T, LIU L F, WANG M Y, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of Chang 6 and Chang 7 reservoirs in southwestern Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(1):51-65.
[13] 周翔, 何生, 刘萍, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地代家坪地区长6致密油储层孔隙结构特征及分类评价.地学前缘.2016, 23(3):253-265. ZHOU X, HE S, LIU P, et al. Characteristics and classification of tight oil pore structure in reservoir Chang 6 of Daijiaping area, Ordos Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(3):253-265.
[14] 赵习, 刘波, 郭荣涛, 等.储层表征技术及应用进展.石油实验地质, 2017, 39(2):287-294. ZHAO X, LIU B, GUO R T, et al. Reservoir characterization and its application to development. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39(2):287-294.
[15] CURTIS M E, AMBROSE R J, SONDERGELD C H, et al. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy investigation of pore connectivity of gas shales on the nanoscale. SPE 144391, 2011.
[16] 肖佃师, 卢双航, 陆正元, 等.联合核磁共振和恒速压汞方法测定致密砂岩孔喉结构.石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6):961-970. XIAO D S, LU S H, LU Z Y, et al. Combining nuclear magnetic resonance and rate-controlled porosimetry to probe the porethroat structure of tight sandstones. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(6):961-970.
[17] 李成, 郑庆华, 张三, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地镇北地区长4+5储层微观孔隙结构研究.石油实验地质, 2015, 37(6):729-736. LI C, ZHENG Q H, ZHANG S, et al. Microscopic pore structure of the fourth and fifth members of the Yanchang Formation in Zhenbei area of the Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(6):729-736.
[18] 欧阳思琪, 孙卫, 黄何鑫.多方法协同表征特低渗砂岩储层全孔径孔隙结构:以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区砂岩储层为例.石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4):595-604. OUYANG S Q, SUN W, HUANG H X. Multi-method synergistic characterization of total pore structure of extra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs:Case study of the Heshui area of Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(4):595-604.
[19] 黄兴, 李天太, 王香增, 等.致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及影响因素:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8油层组为例.石油学报, 2019, 40(5):557-567. HUANG X, LI T T, WANG X Z, et al. Distribution characteristics and its influence factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoir:a case study from Chang 8 oil layer of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan oilfield, Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(5):557-567.
[20] 李海波, 郭和坤, 李海舰, 等.致密储层束缚水膜厚度分析.天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(1):186-192. LI H B, GUO H K, LI H J, et al. Thickness analysis of bound water film in tight reservoir. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(1):186-192.
[21] 王浩男, 肖晖, 苗晨阳, 等.致密砂岩储层油充注下限综合确定方法及其应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地马岭地区长8油藏为例. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39(2):186-192. WANG H N, XIAO H, MIAO C Y, et al. Comprehensive determining method of the lower limit of the oil-charging in tight sandstone reservoirs and its application:a case of Chang 8 oil reservoir in Maling area of Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 39(2):186-192.
[22] 黎盼, 孙卫, 李长政, 等.低渗透砂岩储层可动流体变化特征研究:以鄂尔多斯盆地马岭地区长8储层为例.地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(6):2394-2402. LI P, SUN W, LI C Z, et al. Characteristics of movable fluids in the low permeability sandstone reservoir:Taking the Chang 8 reservoir of Maling oilfield, Ordos Basin as an example. Progress in Geophysics, 2018, 33(6):2394-2402.
[23] 柳娜, 周兆华, 任大忠, 等.致密砂岩气藏可动流体分布特征及其控制因素:以苏里格气田西区盒8段与山1段为例.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6):14-25. LIU N, ZHOU Z H, REN D Z, et al. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone gas reservoir:a case study of the eighth member of Xiashihezi Formation and the first member of Shanxi Formation in western Sulige gas field. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6):14-25.
[24] 李琴.相对渗透率法评定储集层岩石表面润湿性.石油实验地质, 1996, 18(4):454-458. LI Q. A relative permeability method for assessing the moisteninc capacity of reservoir rock surface. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 1996, 18(4):454-458.
[25] 祝春生, 程林松, 阳忠华, 等.特低渗透砂岩油藏渗流特性研究.油气地质与采收率, 2008, 15(2):102-104. ZHU C S, CHENG L S, YANG Z H, et al. Flowing characteristics in extra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15(2):102-104.
[26] 李素梅, 张爱云, 王铁冠.原油极性组分的吸附与储层润湿性及研究意义.地质科技情报, 1998, 17(4):65-70. LI S M, ZHANG A Y, WANG T G. Polar-fractions'adsorption of crude oil and wettability of reservoir and their research significance. Geological Science and Technology Information, 1998, 17(4):65-70.
[27] 段秋者, 董兆雄, 罗平亚, 等.沥青在石英砂上吸附特征和润湿性的微观研究.电子显微学报, 2001, 20(4):283-286. DUAN Q Z, DONG Z X, LUO P Y, et al. Adsorption characteristics of asphaltene on silica sand and wettability by SEM. Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society, 2001, 20(4):283-286.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长8₁致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响

Micro pore throat structure and its influence on seepage of Chang 8₁ tight reservoir in Nanliang-Huachi area,Ordos Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	崔传智, 李静, 吴忠维. 扩散吸附作用下CO₂非混相驱微观渗流特征模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 181-188.
[2]	关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[3]	张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[4]	陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[5]	王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[6]	尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[7]	牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[8]	邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[9]	段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[10]	王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[11]	曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[12]	钟会影, 余承挚, 沈文霞, 毕永斌, 伊然, 倪浩铭. 考虑启动压力梯度的致密油藏水平井裂缝干扰渗流特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 172-179.
[13]	李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[14]	雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[15]	翟咏荷, 何登发, 开百泽. 鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中—晚二叠世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 32-44.