岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 147–154.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210215

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

剩余油分布的微观特征及其可动用程度的定量表征

王立辉1, 夏惠芬1, 韩培慧2, 曹瑞波2, 孙先达1, 张思琪1   

  1. 1. 东北石油大学 石油工程学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318;
    2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-16 修回日期:2020-11-28 出版日期:2021-04-01 发布日期:2021-03-31
  • 通讯作者: 夏惠芬(1962—),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事化学驱提高采收率原理与技术研究工作。Email:757581676@qq.com。 E-mail:757581676@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王立辉(1989—),男,东北石油大学在读博士研究生,研究方向为提高采收率原理与技术。地址:(163318)黑龙江省大庆市高新技术产业开发区学府街99号东北石油大学石油工程学院。Email:523411995@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“化学驱后提高采收率技术研究与试验”(编号:2016E-0207)资助

Microscopic characteristics of remaining oil distribution and quantitative characterization of its producibility

WANG Lihui1, XIA Huifen1, HAN Peihui2, CAO Ruibo2, SUN Xianda1, ZHANG Siqi1   

  1. 1. School of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Co., Ltd, Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2020-09-16 Revised:2020-11-28 Online:2021-04-01 Published:2021-03-31

摘要: 目前微观剩余油定量表征研究存在宏观与微观分析结果差距大、图像不清晰、分析方法相对较少等问题。针对上述问题,利用岩心驱油实验、冷冻制片技术、岩心荧光分析等方法,对不同驱替方式、岩心不同位置、不同类型微观剩余油的分布特征和可动用程度进行了分析。结果表明:岩心注入端、中间端、采出端的剩余油比例依次升高。水驱后剩余油以自由态和束缚态为主,合计占比为93.65%,半束缚态只占6.35%。聚合物驱对簇状、粒间吸附状、孔表薄膜状、角隅状剩余油作用明显。三元复合驱后剩余油比例较高的是粒间吸附状、颗粒吸附状和孔表薄膜状。荧光分析与岩心驱油实验结果差别很小,验证了分析结果正确性。

关键词: 岩心荧光分析技术, 微观剩余油, 分布特征, 可动用程度, 定量表征

Abstract: At present,there are some problems in the quantitative characterization of microscopic remaining oil, such as large gap between macro and micro analysis results,unclear image and relatively few analysis methods. In view of the above problems,by means of core displacement experiment,frozen slicing technology and core fluorescence analysis system,the distribution characteristics and producing degree of microscopic remaining oil in different displacement modes,different core positions and different types were analyzed. The results show that the ratio of remaining oil in injection end,middle end and produced end of core increases in turn. After water flooding,the remaining oil is mainly in free state and bound state,accounting for 93.65% in total,and only 6.35% in semi bound state. Polymer flooding has obvious effect on remaining oil with cluster,intergranular adsorption,thin film on pore surface and corner. After ASP flooding,the proportion of remaining oil with granular adsorption and intergranular adsorption is high. There is little difference between the results of fluorescence analysis and core flooding experiment, which verifies the correctness of the analysis results

Key words: core fluorescence analysis technology, microscopic remaining oil, distribution characteristics, producing degree, quantitative characterization

中图分类号: 

  • TE357
[1] 白振强, 吴胜和, 付志国.大庆油田聚合物驱后微观剩余油分布规律.石油学报, 2013, 34(5):924-931. BAI Z Q, WU S H, FU Z G. Microscopic residual oil distribution after polymer flooding in Daqing Oilfield. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(5):924-931.
[2] 李洁, 隋新光, 邵振波.大庆油田葡一组油层聚驱后剩余油微观分布规律研究.大庆石油地质与开发, 2005, 24(2):26-28. LI J, SUI X G, SHAO Z B. Study on micro distribution of remaining oil in pu1 formation of Daqing Oilfield after polymer flooding. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2005, 24(2):26-28.
[3] 郭娟, 赵迪斐, 梁孝柏, 等.页岩纳米孔隙的结构量化表征:以川东南地区五峰组为例.岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):113-121. GUO J, ZHAO D F, LIANG X B, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale nanopore structure:a case study of Wufeng Formation in southeast Sichuan. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5):113-121.
[4] 宋明明, 韩淑乔, 董云鹏, 等.致密砂岩储层微观水驱油效率及其主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1):135-143. SONG M M, HAN S Q, DONG Y P, et al. Microscopic water displacement efficiency and its main controlling factors in tight sandstone reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(1):135-143.
[5] 孙先达.储层微观剩余油分析技术开发与应用研究.长春:吉林大学, 2011. SUN X D. Development and application of micro residual oil analysis technology. Changchun:Jilin University, 2011.
[6] 李宜强, 戴琦雯.激光扫描共聚焦显微镜在微孔隙研究中的应用.电子显微学报, 2014, 33(2):123-128. LI Y Q, DAI Q W. Application of laser scanning confocal microscopy in micropore research. Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society, 2014, 33(2):123-128.
[7] 狄勤丰, 张景楠, 华帅, 等.聚合物-弱凝胶调驱核磁共振可视化实验.石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(2):270-274. DI Q F, ZANG J N, HUA S, et al. Polymer weak gel profile control,nuclear magnetic resonance visualization experiment. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(2):270-274.
[8] 夏惠芬, 李文卓, 刘洋, 等.弱碱三元驱后剩余油定量分析.科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(24):127-131. XIA H F, LI W Z, LIU Y, et al. Quantitative analysis of residual oil after weak alkali ASP flooding. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(24):127-131.
[9] 刘丽丽, 王立辉, 杨树人, 等.微孔道聚合物溶液驱替残余油变形研究.工程热物理学报, 2018, 39(2):348-354. LIU L L, WANG L H, YANG S R, et al. Study on residual oil displacement by microporous polymer solution. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2018, 39(2):348-354.
[10] 殷代印, 项俊辉, 王东琪.大庆油田长垣外围特低渗透扶杨油层综合分类.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):150-154. YIN D Y, XIANG J H, WANG D Q. Comprehensive classification of ultra-low permeability Fuyang oil layers in the periphery of Daqing Oilfield placanticline. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):150-154.
[11] 袁瑞, 朱锐, 瞿建华, 等.一种基于岩石薄片图像的粒度分析新方法.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5):104-107. YUAN R, ZHU R, QU J H, et al. A new method of grain size analysis based on rock slice image. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(5):104-107.
[12] 程杰成, 夏惠芬, 马文国, 等.三元体系的界面特性对驱油效率的影响机制. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(4):162-168. CHENG J C, XIA H F, MA W G, et al. Influence mechanism of interfacial characteristics of ternary system on oil displacement efficiency. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2014, 38(4):162-168.
[13] 徐祖新.基于CT扫描图像的页岩储层非均质性研究.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6):46-49. XU Z X. Study on shale reservoir heterogeneity based on CT scanning image. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(6):46-49.
[14] 徐清华.大庆油田三元复合驱后微观剩余油分布特征.大庆石油地质与开发, 2019, 38(4):110-116. XU Q H. Distribution characteristics of micro residual oil after ASP flooding in Daqing Oilfield. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2019, 38(4):110-116.
[15] 汤明光, 刘清华, 张贵才, 等.抗垢碱提高稠油采收率机理研究.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3):125-130. TANG G M, LIU Q H, ZHANG G C, et al. Study on mechanism of enhancing heavy oil recovery by anti-scaling alkali. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(3):125-130.
[16] 孙先达, 张民志, 索丽敏, 等.应用激光共聚焦方法研究火山岩中流体和熔融包裹体特征.电子显微学报, 2006(增刊1):339-340. SUN X D, ZHANG M Z, SUO L M, et al. Study on characteristics of fluid and melt inclusions in volcanic rocks by laser confocal method. Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society, 2006(Suppl 1):339-340.
[1] 金凤鸣, 崔周旗, 王权, 李莉, 任春玲, 崔明洋, 肖伟. 冀中坳陷地层岩性油气藏分布特征与主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 19-27.
[2] 龚小平,唐洪明,赵 峰,王俊杰,熊 浩. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩储层孔隙结构的定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3): 48-57.
[3] 孙廷彬,国殿斌,李中超,王 玲,尹楠鑫,李胜玉. 鄱阳湖浅水三角洲分支河道分布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 144-148.
[4] 陈培元,谭秀成,杨辉廷,王海芳,靳秀菊. 礁滩型储层层间非均质性定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(4): 27-32.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广,刘博,吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,王永诗,王洪玉,刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[8] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[9] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .
[10] 刘全新, 高建虎, 董雪华. 储层预测中的非线性反演方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 81 -85 .