岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 29–38.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210604

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    

鄂尔多斯盆地东南部长6油层组致密砂岩成岩作用及其孔隙度定量恢复

张玉晔1,2, 高建武3, 赵靖舟1,2, 张恒3, 吴和源1,2, 韩载华4, 毛朝瑞1,2, 杨晓1,2   

  1. 1. 西安石油大学 地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065;
    2. 陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室, 西安 710065;
    3. 延长油田股份有限公司 七里村釆油厂, 陕西 延安 717100;
    4. 中国石油大学 (华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-19 修回日期:2021-05-21 发布日期:2021-11-25
  • 作者简介:张玉晔(1994-),女,西安石油大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气成藏地质。地址:(710032)陕西省西安市西安石油大学。Email:18909464482@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目“准连续型溶蚀—胶结作用致密机理:以苏里格地区二叠系砂岩为例”(编号:2020JQ-767)与陕西省教育厅重点科学研究计划项目“封闭—半封闭体系下成岩作用特征与砂岩致密成因机理研究:以苏里格气区二叠系为例”(编号:20JS128)联合资助

Diagenesis and pore evolution of Chang 6 tight sandstone reservoir in southeastern Ordos Basin

ZHANG Yuye1,2, GAO Jianwu3, ZHAO Jingzhou1,2, ZHANG Heng3, WU Heyuan1,2, HAN Zaihua4, MAO Zhaorui1,2, YANG Xiao1,2   

  1. 1. College of Earth Science and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Oil and Gas Accumulation Geology, Xi'an 710065, China;
    3. Qilicun Oil Production Plant, Yanchang Oil Field Corporation, Yan'an 717100, Shaanxi, China;
    4. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
  • Received:2021-03-19 Revised:2021-05-21 Published:2021-11-25

摘要: 鄂尔多斯盆地佛古塬区延长组长6油层组致密油储量丰富,但储层致密、非均质性强,从而导致油气勘探程度低。在岩心观察和薄片分析的基础上,综合运用扫描电镜、阴极发光及X射线衍射等方法,对研究区长6油层组的岩石学特征和成岩作用进行研究,并进一步对其孔隙度进行定量恢复。结果表明:研究区长6油层组岩性以灰白色长石细砂岩为主,储集空间以溶蚀次生孔和残余粒间孔为主,属于特低孔、超低渗的致密砂岩储层。成岩演化阶段为中成岩阶段A期,主要经历了压实、胶结、溶蚀和交代等成岩作用,且不同成岩作用对储层的孔隙发育具有不同影响。压实作用破坏了大量原生粒间孔,是导致研究区储层致密化的主要因素,孔隙度平均降低22.76%,减孔率达58.40%;胶结作用使储层孔隙度平均降低13.57%,减孔率达34.93%,其中晚期胶结作用是储层致密化的关键因素;溶蚀和交代作用产生了大量次生孔隙,从而改善了储层物性,增加的孔隙度平均为12.39%。该研究成果可为同类油田的进一步勘探开发提供一定借鉴。

关键词: 成岩作用, 孔隙度定量恢复, 致密砂岩, 延长组, 七里村油田, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: There are abundant tight oil reserves in Chang 6 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Foguyuan area of Ordos Basin, but the tight reservoir and strong heterogeneity lead to low degree of oil and gas exploration. Based on core observation and thin section analysis, the petrological characteristics and diagenesis of Chang 6 reservoir in the study area were studied by means of scanning electron microscopy, cathodoluminescence and X-ray diffraction, and quantitative reconstruction of porosity was carried out. The results show that Chang 6 reservoir is mainly composed of grayish white feldspar fine sandstone, and the reservoir space is mainly dissolved secondary pores and residual intergranular pores, which belongs to ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability tight sandstone reservoir. Chang 6 reservoir has entered the middle diagenetic stage A, and has undergone diagenesis such as compaction, cementation, dissolution and metasomatism, and different diagenesis has affected the pore development of the reservoir with varying degrees. Compaction destroys a large number of primary intergranular pores, which is the main factor leading to the reservoir densification in the study area. The compaction causes an average reduction in porosity of 22.76% and a porosity reduction rate of 58.40%. The cementation causes the porosity to decrease by an average of 13.57%, with a porosity reduction rate of 34.93%, of which late cementation is the key factor for reservoir compaction. Dissolution and metasomatism produce a large number of secondary pores, thereby improving the physical properties of the reservoir, and the increased porosity is 12.39% on average. The research results can provide reference for the further exploration and development of similar oilfields.

Key words: diagenesis, quantitative reconstruction of porosity, tight sandstone, Yanchang Formation, Qilicun Oilfield, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+1
[1] 赵靖舟, 吴少波, 武富礼. 论低渗透储层的分类与评价标准:以鄂尔多斯盆地为例. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3):28-31. ZHAO J Z, WU S B, WU F L. The classification and evaluation criterion of low permeability reservoir:An example from Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3):28-31.
[2] 王继伟, 朱玉双, 饶欣久, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长61致密砂岩储层成岩特征与孔隙度定量恢复. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):34-43. WANG J W, ZHU Y S, RAO X J, et al. Diagenetic characteristics and quantitative porosity restoration of Chang 61 tight sandstone reservoir in Hujianshan area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):34-43.
[3] 郑荣才, 耿威, 周刚, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6砂岩成岩作用与成岩相研究. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2):1-8. ZHENG R C, GENG W, ZHOU G, et al. Diagenesis and diagenetic facies of Chang 6 sandstone of Yanchang Formation in Baibao area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2):1-8.
[4] 杨华, 刘显阳, 张才利, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组低渗透岩性油藏主控因素及其分布规律. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3):1-6. YANG H, LIU X Y, ZHANG C L, et al. The main controlling factors and distribution of low permeability lithologic reservoirs of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3):1-6.
[5] 赵靖舟, 付金华, 曹青, 等. 致密油气成藏理论与评价技术. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2017. ZHAO J Z, FU J H, CAO Q, et al. Accumulation theory and evaluation technology of tight oil and gas. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2017.
[6] 姚泾利, 邓秀芹, 赵彦德, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密油特征. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(2):150-158. YAO J L, DENG X Q, ZHAO Y D, et al. Characteristics of tight oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(2):150-158.
[7] 邹才能, 陶士振, 周慧, 等. 成岩相的形成、分类与定量评价方法. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(5):526-540. ZOU C N, TAO S Z, ZHOU H, et al. Genesis, classification and evaluation method of diagenetic facies. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(5):526-540.
[8] 朱筱敏, 潘荣, 朱世发, 等. 致密储层研究进展和热点问题分析. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(2):141-146. ZHU X M, PAN R, ZHU S F, et al. Research progress and core issues in tight reservoir exploration. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(2):141-146.
[9] 王瑞飞, 王立新, 李俊鹿, 等. 浅层致密砂岩油藏成岩作用及孔隙演化. 地球物理学进展, 2020, 35(4):1465-1470. WANG R F, WANG L X, LI J L, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of ultra-low permeability and shallow layers sandstone reservoir. Progress in Geophysics, 2020, 35(4):1465-1470.
[10] 罗静兰, 罗晓容, 白玉彬, 等. 差异性成岩演化过程对储层致密化时序与孔隙演化的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长7致密浊积砂岩储层为例. 地球科学与环境学报, 2016, 38(1):79-92. LUO J L, LUO X R, BAI Y B, et al. Impact of differential diagenetic evolution on the chronological tightening and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoirs. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2016, 38(1):79-92.
[11] 王朋, 孙灵辉, 王核, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区延长组长6储层特征及其控制因素. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):63-72.WANG P, SUN L H, WANG H, et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Chang 6 of Yanchang Formation in Wuqi area,Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5):63-72.
[12] 肖晖, 王浩男, 杨引弟, 等. 致密砂岩孔隙演化特征及其成岩作用对储层质量的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地马岭南延长组长8储层为例. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(6):800-811. XIAO H, WANG H N, YANG Y D, et al. Influence of diagenetic evolution on tight sandstone reservoir flow capacity:Chang 8 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in southern Maling,Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(6):800-811.
[13] 黎盼, 孙卫, 杜堃, 等. 致密砂岩储层不同成岩作用对孔隙度定量演化的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田长6储层为例. 现代地质, 2018, 32(3):527-536. LI P, SUN W, DU K, et al. Effect of differential diagenesis on the quantitative evolution of porosity in tight sandstone reservoirs:Taking the Chang 6 reservoir of the Jiyuan Oilfield in Ordos Basin as an example. Geoscience, 2018, 32(3):527-536.
[14] 赵靖舟, 白玉彬, 曹青, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地准连续型低渗透-致密砂岩大油田成藏模式. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(6):811-827. ZHAO J Z, BAI Y B, CAO Q, et al. Quasi-continuous hydrocarbon accumulation:A new pattern for large tight sand oilfields in the Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(6):811-827.
[15] 邹才能, 赵文智, 张兴阳, 等. 大型敞流坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲与湖盆中心砂体的形成与分布.地质学报, 2008, 82(6):813-825. ZOU C N, ZHAO W Z, ZHANG X Y, et al. Formation and distribution of shallow-water delta and central sand bodies in lacustrine basin in large open-flow depression. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(6):813-825.
[16] 邓秀芹, 付金华, 姚泾利, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中及上三叠统延长组沉积相与油气勘探的突破. 古地理学报, 2011, 13(4):443-455. DENG X Q, FU J H, YAO J L, et al. Sedimentary facies of the Middle-Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin and breakthrough in petroleum exploration. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2011, 13(4):443-455.
[17] 郭艳琴, 李文厚, 郭彬程, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地沉积体系与古地理演化. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(2):293-320. GUO Y Q, LI W H, GUO B C, et al. Sedimentary systems and palaeogeography evolution of Ordos Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2019, 21(2):293-320.
[18] 李文厚, 张倩, 李克永, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地及周缘地区晚古生代沉积演化. 古地理学报, 2021, 23(1):1-14. LI W H, ZHANG Q, LI K Y, et al. Sedimentary evolution of the Late Paleozoic in Ordos Basin and its adjacent areas. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2021, 23(1):1-14.
[19] 国家能源局. SY/T 6285-2011油气储层评价方法. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2011. National Energy Administration. SY/T 6285-2011 Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011.
[20] 张哲豪, 魏新善, 弓虎军, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地定边油田长7致密砂岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化规律. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(2):43-52. ZHANG Z H, WEI X S, GONG H J, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Chang 7 dense sandstone reservoir in Dingbian Oilfield, Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(2):43-52.
[21] 汪洋, 刘洛夫, 李树同, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬西部三叠系延长组长8油层组成岩作用与致密化过程. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(5):892-906. WANG Y, LIU L F, LI S T, et al. Diagenesis and densification process of the Chang 8 interval of Triassic Yanchang Formation, western Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin.Journal of Palaeogeography, 2017, 19(5):892-906.
[22] 杜贵超, 胡双全, 石立华, 等. 七里村油田长6油层组储层特征及孔隙演化. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1):51-57. DU G C, HU S Q, SHI L H, et al. Reservoir characteristics and pore evolution of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Qilicun Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(1):51-57.
[23] 陈怡婷, 刘洛夫, 王梦尧, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长6、长7储集层特征及控制因素. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1):51-65. CHEN Y T, LIU L F, WNG M Y, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of Chang 6 and Chang 7 reservoirs in southwestern Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(1):51-65.
[24] 郭伟, 史丹妮, 何顺利. 鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6砂岩成岩作用及其对储层物性的影响. 石油实验地质, 2010, 32(3):227-232. GUO W, SHI D N, HE S L. Diagenesis of Chang 6 sandstone in Baibao area of Ordos Basin and its influence on reservoir physical properties. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2010, 32(3):227-232.
[25] 汪洋, 王桂成, 王羽君, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地郑庄油区延长组长6油层组储层特征. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3):48-52. WANG Y, WANG G C, WANG Y J, et al. Characteristics of Chang 6 reservoir in Zhengzhuang oil region of Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3):48-52.
[26] 王琪, 禚喜准, 陈国俊, 等. 鄂尔多斯西部长6砂岩成岩演化与优质储层. 石油学报, 2005, 26(5):21-27. WANG Q, ZHUO X Z, CHEN G J, et al. Evolution of sandstone diagenesis and high-quality reservoir in west minister 6 of Ordos. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2005, 26(5):21-27.
[27] 孙玉善, 刘新年, 张艳秋, 等. 中国西部地区方沸石胶结相与碎屑岩次生优质储集层形成机制. 古地理学报, 2014, 16(4):517-526. SUN Y S, LIU X N, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Analcite cementation facies and forming mechanism of high-quality secondary clastic rock reservoirs in western China. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2014, 16(4):517-526.
[28] 朱国华. 陕北浊沸石次生孔隙砂体的形成与油气关系. 石油学报, 1985, 6(1):1-8. ZHU G H. Formation and oil-gas relationship of secondary pore sand bodies of turbidite northern Shaanxi. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1985, 6(1):1-8.
[29] 韩载华, 赵靖舟, 孟选刚, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠纪湖盆东部"边缘"长7段烃源岩的发现及其地球化学特征. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(6):991-1000. HAN Z H, ZHAO J Z, MENG X G, et al. Discovery and geochemical characteristics of Chang 7 source rocks from the eastern margin of a Triassic lacustrine basin in the Ordos Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(6):991-1000.
[1] 王永骁, 付斯一, 张成弓, 范萍. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部山西组2段致密砂岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 12-20.
[2] 李博, 崔军平, 李莹, 李金森, 赵金, 陈彦武. 伊陕斜坡吴起地区延长组油气成藏期次分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 21-28.
[3] 许璟, 贺永红, 马芳侠, 杜彦军, 马浪, 葛云锦, 王瑞生, 郭睿, 段亮. 鄂尔多斯盆地定边油田主力油层有效储层厚度[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 107-119.
[4] 张文凯, 施泽进, 田亚铭, 王勇, 胡修权, 李文杰. 川东南志留系小河坝组致密砂岩孔隙类型及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 10-19.
[5] 柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[6] 徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[7] 李志远, 杨仁超, 张吉, 王一, 杨特波, 董亮. 天然气扩散散失率定量评价——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[8] 郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[9] 刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[10] 许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[11] 郭永伟, 闫方平, 王晶, 褚会丽, 杨建雷, 陈颖超, 张笑洋. 致密砂岩油藏CO2驱固相沉积规律及其储层伤害特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 153-161.
[12] 姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[13] 魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[14] 张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长81致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36-48.
[15] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!