岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 139–151.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220512

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

川中地区中三叠统雷口坡组三段源储特征及配置关系

阮蕴博1,2, 周刚3, 霍飞1,2, 孙豪飞3, 郭佩1,2, 罗涛1, 蒋华川1,2, 文华国1,2   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 成都 610059;
    2. 成都理工大学 沉积地质研究院, 成都 610059;
    3. 中国石油西南油气田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-17 修回日期:2022-03-10 出版日期:2022-09-01 发布日期:2022-09-06
  • 第一作者:阮蕴博(1998-),男,成都理工大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为海相碳酸盐岩沉积学。地址:(610059)四川省成都市成华区二仙桥东三路1号成都理工大学。Email:1025850858@qq.com
  • 通信作者: 文华国(1979-),男,博士,教授,主要从事碳酸盐岩沉积学方面的科研和教学工作。Email:wenhuaguo08@cdut.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省青年科技创新研究团队项目“天然气成藏物质基础”（编号：22CXTD0064）资助

Source-reservoir characteristics and configuration of the third member of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in central Sichuan Basin

RUAN Yunbo1,2, ZHOU Gang3, HUO Fei1,2, SUN Haofei3, GUO Pei1,2, LUO Tao1, JIANG Huachuan1,2, WEN Huaguo1,2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
    2. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2021-11-17 Revised:2022-03-10 Online:2022-09-01 Published:2022-09-06

PDF (PC)

248

摘要： 通过岩心观察和薄片鉴定等资料，结合岩石物性、X射线衍射、总有机碳（TOC）含量及岩石热解和干酪根碳同位素等分析结果，对川中地区中三叠统雷口坡组三段（雷三段）的烃源岩和储层特征以及二者的配置关系进行了研究。研究结果表明：①川中地区雷三段2亚段发育一套以页岩和泥质灰岩为主的烃源岩，厚度为20～100 m，页岩平均TOC值为1.08%，最高可达4.01%，泥质灰岩平均TOC值为0.40%，有机质类型以Ⅱ1型为主，Ⅰ型次之，处于高成熟—过成熟早期阶段，生烃潜力较好。②研究区雷三段3亚段发育一套以粉晶白云岩和砂屑白云岩为主的储层，储集空间主要为晶间（溶）孔和粒间溶孔，平均孔隙度为4.05%，平均渗透率为1.1 mD，具有低孔中渗的特征。③雷三段2亚段烃源岩与3亚段储层形成了良好的源储配置关系，可形成“下生上储”、“自生自储”型油气藏，裂缝系统既为油气运移通道，也是重要的储集空间，上覆雷四段膏盐岩和须家河组一段泥岩均为有效盖层。

关键词: 烃源岩, 白云岩, 源储配置, 下生上储, 自生自储, 雷口坡组三段, 中三叠统, 川中地区

Abstract: Based on the data of core observation and thin section identification,combined with the analysis results of rock physical properties,X-ray diffraction,total organic carbon(TOC)content,rock pyrolysis and kerogen carbon isotope,the characteristics of source rocks and reservoirs of the third member of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation(T2 l3)in the Central Sichuan Basin and their configuration relationship were systematically studied. The results show that:(1)There is a set of hydrocarbon source rocks mainly composed of shale and marl developed in the second sub-member of T2l3(T2l32)in Central Sichuan Basin,with a thickness of 20-100 m. The average TOC value of shale is 1.08%,up to 4.01%,and the average TOC value of marl is 0.40%. The organic matters are mainly type Ⅱ1,followed by type Ⅰ,which are in the early stage of high maturity to over maturity,and have good hydrocarbon generation potential.(2)A set of reservoir mainly composed of silty dolomite and sandy dolomite is developed in the third sub-member of T2 l3(T2 l33). The reservoir space is mainly composed of intercrystalline(dissolved)pores and intergranular dissolved pores,with an average porosity of 4.05% and an average permeability of 1.1 mD. It has the characteristics of low porosity and medium permeability.(3)The source rocks of T2 l32 have a good source-reservoir configuration relationship with the reservoirs of T2 l33,which can form the hydrocarbon accumulation model of "lower generation and upper accumulation" and "self-generation and self-accumulation". The fracture system is not only an oil and gas migration channel,but also an important reservoir space. The overlying gypsum salt rocks of the fourth member of Leikoupo Formation and the mudstone of the first member of Xujiahe Formation are effective caprocks.

Key words: hydrocarbon source rocks, dolomite, source-reservoir configuration, lower generation and upper accumulation, self-generation and self-accumulation, the third member of Leikoupo Formation, Middle Triassic, central Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 文华国,霍飞,郭佩,等. 白云岩-蒸发岩共生体系研究进展及展望[J]. 沉积学报,2021,39(6):1321-1343. WEN Huaguo,HUO Fei,GUO Pei,et al. Advances and pros- pects of dolostone-evaporite paragenesis system[J]. Acta Sedi- mentologica Sinica,2021,39(6):1321-1343.
[2] 四川省地质矿产局. 四川省区域地质志[M]. 北京:地质出版社,1991. Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resource of Sichuan Province. Regional geology of Sichuan province[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1991.
[3] 郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉,等. 四川盆地形成与演化[M]. 北京:地质出版社,1996:56-65. GUO Zhengwu,DENG Kangling. HAN Yonghui,et al. The for- mation and development of Sichuan Basin[M]. Beijing:Geo- logical Publishing House,1996:56-65.
[4] 李凌,谭秀成,周素彦,等. 四川盆地雷口坡组层序岩相古地理[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2012,34(4):13-22. LI Ling,TAN Xiucheng,ZHOU Suyan,et al. Sequence lithofa- cies paleography of Leikoupo Formation,Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2012,34(4):13-22.
[5] 刘树根,孙玮,宋金民,等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组天然气勘探的关键地质问题[J]. 天然气地球科学,2019,30(2):151-167. LIU Shugen,SUN Wei,SONG Jinmin,et al. The key geologi- cal problems of natural gas exploration in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geosci- ence,2019,30(2):151-167.
[6] 王顺玉,戴鸿鸣,王廷栋,等. 磨溪气田高成熟天然气的气源与运移[J]. 勘探家,1998,3(2):5-8. WANG Shunyu,DAI Hongming,WANG Tingdong,et al. Gas source and migration of high-mature natural gas in Moxi gas field[J]. Petroleum Explorationist,1998,3(2):5-8.
[7] 廖凤蓉,吴小奇,黄士鹏,等. 川西北地区中坝气田雷口坡组天然气地球化学特征及气源探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学,2013, 24(1):108-115. LIAO Fengrong,WU Xiaoqi,HUANG Shipeng,et al. Geo- chemical characteristics and gas-source correlation of Leikoupo Formation in Zhongba field,Northwest Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(1):108-115.
[8] 王廷栋,郑永坚,李绍基,等. 从油气地化特征探讨川西北中坝雷三气藏的气源[J]. 天然气工业,1989,9(5):20-26. WANG Tingdong,ZHENG Yongjian,LI Shaoji,et al. From geo- chemical characteristics of oil and gas to discuss the gas source of Lei 3 reservoir,Zhongba gas field,in northwest Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Industry,1989,9(5):20-26.
[9] 刘若冰,郭彤楼,邵明莉. 川东北元坝地区中浅层天然气气源及成因类型[J]. 天然气工业,2011,31(6):34-38. LIU Ruobing,GUO Tonglou,SHAO Mingli. Sources and genet- ic types of gas in the middle-shallow strata of the Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(6):34-38.
[10] 周世超,王兴志,曾德铭,等. 川中龙岗地区中三叠统雷四3亚段气藏地球化学特征与成藏分析[J]. 新疆石油地质,2015, 36(4):415-422. ZHOU Shichao,WANG Xingzhi,ZENG Deming,et al. Geo- chemistry and accumulation analysis of gas reservoir of Leikou- po 43 sub-member of Middle Triassic in Longgang area,central Sichuan Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2015,36(4):415-422.
[11] 孙玮,刘树根,宋金民,等. 叠合盆地古老深层碳酸盐岩油气成藏过程和特征:以四川叠合盆地震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2017,44(3):257-285. SUN Wei,LIU Shugen,SONG Jinmin,et al. The formation pro- cess and characteristics of ancient and deep carbonate petro- leum reservoirs in superimposed basins:A case study of Sinian (Ediacaran)Dengying Formation in the Sichuan superimposed basin,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition),2017,44(3):257-285.
[12] 谢刚平. 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组四段气藏气源分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2015,37(4):418-422. XIE Gangping. Source of gas reservoirs in the fourth member of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(4):418-422.
[13] 杨克明. 四川盆地西部中三叠统雷口坡组烃源岩生烃潜力分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2016,38(3):366-374. YANG Keming. Hydrocarbon potential of source rocks in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(3):366-374.
[14] 吴小奇,陈迎宾,翟常博,等. 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组天然气气源对比[J]. 石油学报,2020,41(8):918-927. WU Xiaoqi,CHEN Yingbin,ZHAI Changbo,et al. Gas-source correlation of natural gas in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo For- mation in the Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Si- nica,2020,41(8):918-927.
[15] 陈迎宾,胡烨,王彦青,等. 大邑构造雷口坡组四段天然气成藏条件[J]. 特种油气藏,2016,23(3):25-29. CHEN Yingbin,HU Ye,WANG Yanqing,et al. Natural gas accumulation conditions of the 4th member in Leikoupo Formation of Dayi structure[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2016,23(3):25-29.
[16] 王彦青,陈迎宾,胡烨,等. 蒸发环境烃源岩生烃能力探讨:以川西坳陷雷口坡组为例[J]. 断块油气田,2018,25(4):426- 430. WANG Yanqing,CHEN Yingbin,HU Ye,et al. Discussion on hydrocarbon generation ability of evaporation environment:A case study of Leikoupo Formation in West Sichuan Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2018,25(4):426-430.
[17] SUN Shu,LI Jiliang,CHEN Haihong,et al. Mesozoic and Ce- nozoic sedimentary history of South China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1989,73(10):1247-1269.
[18] 孙豪飞,罗冰,文龙,等. 四川盆地雷口坡组富有机页岩的发现及盐下勘探新领域[J]. 天然气地球科学,2021,32(2):233-247. SUN Haofei,LUO Bing,WEN Long,et al. The first discovery of organic-rich shale in Leikoupo Formation and new areas of subsalt exploration,Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021,32(2):233-247.
[19] 刘树根,孙玮,李智武,等. 四川叠合盆地海相碳酸盐岩油气分布特征及其构造主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):1-18. LIU Shugen,SUN Wei,LI Zhiwu,et al. Distribution characteristics of marine carbonate reservoirs and their tectonic control- ling factors across the Sichuan superimposed basin[J]. Litho- logic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):1-18.
[20] 何登发,李德生,张国伟,等. 四川多旋回叠合盆地的形成与演化[J]. 地质科学,2011,46(3):589-606. HE Dengfa,LI Desheng,ZHANG Guowei,et al. Formation and evolution of multi-cycle superposed Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology,2011,46(3):589-606.
[21] MENG Qingren,WANG E,HU Jianmin. Mesozoic sedimentary evolution of the northwest Sichuan Basin:Implication for con- tinued clockwise rotation of the South China block[J]. Geologi- cal Society of America Bulletin,2005,117(3):396-410.
[22] 汪泽成,赵文智,张林,等. 四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2002. WANG Zecheng,ZHAO Wenzhi,ZHANG Lin,et al. Structural sequence and natural gas exploration in Sichuan Basin[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2002.
[23] 冯增昭,鲍志东. 中国南方早中三叠世岩相古地理[J]. 地质科学,1997,32(2):212-220. FENG Zengzhao,BAO Zhidong. Lithofacies palaeogeography of the early and Middle Triassic of south China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology,1997,32(2):212-220.
[24] 林良彪,陈洪德,张长俊. 四川盆地西北部中三叠世雷口坡期岩相古地理[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质,2007,27(3):51-58. LIN Liangbiao,CHEN Hongde,ZHANG Changjun. Sedimentary facies and palaeogeography of northwestern Sichuan Basin during the Leikoupoan(Middle Triassic)[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2007,27(3):51-58.
[25] 李凌,谭秀成,邹春,等. 四川盆地雷口坡组膏盐岩成因及膏盐盆迁移演化与构造意义[J]. 地质学报,2012,86(2):316-324. LI Ling,TAN Xiucheng,ZOU Chun,et al. Origin of the Leikoupo Formation gypsum-salt and migration evolution of the gypsum salt pot in the Sichuan Basin,and their structure significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86(2):316-324.
[26] TISSOT B P,WELTE D H. Petroleum Formation and occur- rence[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag,1984.
[27] 朱童,王兴志,沈忠民,等. 川中雷口坡组膏盐岩成因及对储层的影响[J]. 中国地质,2014,41(1):122-134.ZHU Tong,WANG Xingzhi,SHEN Zhongmin,et al. The origin of gypsum- salt rock of Leikoupo Formation and its influence on the gas reservoir in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Geological in China,2014,41(1):122-134.
[28] HUNT J M. 石油地球化学和地质学[M]. 胡伯良,译. 北京:石油工业出版社,1986. HUNT J M. Petroleum geochemistry and geology[M]. HU Bo- liang,trans. Beljing:Petroleum Industry Press,1986.
[29] 梁狄刚,张水昌,张宝民,等. 从塔里木盆地看中国海相生油问题[J]. 地学前缘,2000,7(4):534-547. LIANG Digang,ZHANG Shuichang,ZHANG Baomin,et al. Understanding on marine oil generation in China based on Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2000,7(4):534-547.
[30] 龚大兴,林金辉,唐云凤,等.上扬子地台北缘古生界海相烃源岩有机地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2010,22(3):31-37. GONG Daxing,LIN Jinhui,TANG Yunfeng,et al. Organic geo- chemical characteristics of Paleozoic marine source rocks in northern margin of Upper Yangtze Platform[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(3):31-37.
[31] 秦建中,刘宝泉,国建英,等. 关于碳酸盐烃源岩的评价标准[J]. 石油实验地质,2004,26(3):281-286. QIN Jianzhong,LIU Baoquan,GUO Jianying,et al. Evaluation criteria for carbonate source rocks[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2004,26(3):281-286.
[32] 薛海涛,卢双舫,钟宁宁. 碳酸盐岩气源岩有机质丰度下限研究[J]. 中国科学D辑,2004,34(增刊1):127-133. XUE Haitao,LU Shuangfang,ZHONG Ningning. Study on lower limit of organic matter abundance of carbonate gas source rock[J]. Science in China(Series D),2004,34(Suppl 1):127-133.
[33] 陈建平,梁狄刚,张水昌,等. 中国古生界海相烃源岩生烃潜力评价标准与方法[J]. 地质学报,2012,86(7):1132-1142. CHEN Jianping,LIANG Digang,ZHANG Shuichang,et al. Evaluation criterion and methods of the hydrocarbon genera- tion potential for China's Paleozoic marine source rocks[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86(7):1132-1142.
[34] 关新,陈世加,苏旺,等. 四川盆地西北部栖霞组碳酸盐岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2018,30(2):67-76. GUAN Xin,CHEN Shijia,SU Wang,et al. Carbonate reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in NW Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reser- voirs,2018,30(2):67-76.
[35] 许国明,宋晓波,王琼仙. 川西坳陷中段三叠系雷口坡组-马鞍塘组油气地质条件及有利勘探目标分析[J]. 海相油气地质,2012,17(2):14-19. XU Guoming,SONG Xiaobo,WANG Qiongxian. Analysis of petroleum geologic conditions and favorable prospecting tar- gets of Triassic Leikoupo-Ma'antang Formations in the middle segment of Chuanxi Depression,Western Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2012,17(2):14-19.
[36] DALY A R,EDMAN J D. Loss of organic carbon from source rocks during thermal maturation[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1987,71(5):546.
[37] 张水昌,梁狄刚,张大江. 关于古生界烃源岩有机质丰度的评价标准[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2002,29(2):8-12. ZHANG Shuichang,LIANG Digang,ZHANG Dajiang. Evalua- tion criteria for Paleozoic effective hydrocarbon source rocks[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2002,29(2):8-12.
[38] 邬立言. 生油岩热解快速定量评价[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1986:39-47. WU Liyan. Fast quantitative evaluation method for source rock on rock-eval analysis[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1986:39-47.
[39] 胡丽,曾丽媛,沈秋媛,等. 川中-川西南地区雷三段碳酸盐烃源岩生烃评价[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2022, 49(1):61-67. HU Li,ZENG Liyuan,SHEN Qiuyuan,et al. Evaluation of hydrocarbon generation of carbonate source rocks in the third mem- ber of Leikoupo Formation in central and southwest Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Natural Science Edition),2022,49(1):61-67.
[40] 辛勇光,郑兴平,周进高,等. 四川盆地中西部地区雷口坡组三 3亚段储层特征及其分布[J]. 天然气工业,2013,33(3):5-9. XIN Yongguang,ZHENG Xingping,ZHOU Jingao,et al. Characteristics and distribution of reservoirs in the Lei-33 of the Leikoupo Formation in the western central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(3):5-9.
[41] 龙翼,刘树根,宋金民,等. 龙岗地区中三叠统雷四3亚段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(6):36-44. LONG Yi,LIU Shugen,SONG Jinmin,et al. Reservoir charac- teristics and controlling factors of Middle Triassic T2l43 in Long- gang area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(6):36-44.
[42] HUO Fei,WANG Xingzhi,WEN Huaguo,et al. Genetic mech- anism and pore evolution in high quality dolomite reservoirs of the Changxing-Feixianguan Formation in the northeastern Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020,194:107511.
[43] 孙腾蛟. 四川盆地中三叠雷口坡组烃源岩特征及气源分析[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2014. SUN Tengjiao. Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation source rocks characteristics and analysis of gas source in Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2014.
[44] HE Dengfa,MA Yongsheng,LI Yingqiang,et al. New direc- tions in an established gas play:Promising dolomite reservoirs in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation of the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2019,103(1):1-29.
[45] 熊加贝,何登发. 全球碳酸盐岩地层-岩性大油气田分布特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(1):187-200. XIONG Jiabei,HE Dengfa. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of global giant carbonate stratigraphic-litho- logic oil and gas fields[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(1):187-200.
[1] 冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[2] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[3] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[4] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[5] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[6] 乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[7] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[8] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[9] 邱玉超, 李亚丁, 文龙, 罗冰, 姚军, 许强, 文华国, 谭秀成. 川东地区寒武系洗象池组构造特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 122-132.
[10] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[11] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[12] 程焱, 王波, 张铜耀, 齐玉民, 杨纪磊, 郝鹏, 李阔, 王晓东. 渤中凹陷渤中A-2区新近系明化镇组岩性油气藏油气运移特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[13] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[14] 杨为华. 松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段致密油成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 25-34.
[15] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄思静,黄培培,王庆东,刘昊年,吴　萌,邹明亮. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] 刘震, 陈艳鹏, 赵阳,, 郝奇, 许晓明, 常迈. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] 丁超，郭兰，闫继福. 子长油田安定地区延长组长6 油层成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[4] 李彦山，张占松，张超谟，陈鹏. 应用压汞资料对长庆地区长6 段储层进行分类研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[5] 罗 鹏,李国蓉,施泽进,周大志,汤鸿伟,张德明. 川东南地区茅口组层序地层及沉积相浅析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[6] 左国平，屠小龙，夏九峰. 苏北探区火山岩油气藏类型研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[7] 王飞宇. 提高热采水平井动用程度的方法与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .
[8] 袁云峰，才业，樊佐春，姜懿洋，秦启荣，蒋庆平. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带石炭系火山岩储层裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 47 -51 .
[9] 袁剑英，付锁堂，曹正林，阎存凤，张水昌，马达德. 柴达木盆地高原复合油气系统多源生烃和复式成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 7 -14 .
[10] 石战战，贺振华，文晓涛，唐湘蓉. 一种基于EMD 和GHT 的储层识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 102 -105 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发