岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 178–188.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250216

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    

东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷渐新统花港组河湖交互沉积特征

秦兰芝1, 李宁1, 徐东浩1, 孙中恒2, 王维2   

  1. 1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司 上海分公司, 上海 200335;
    2. 中国地质大学(武汉)资源学院, 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-18 修回日期:2024-01-03 发布日期:2025-03-06
  • 第一作者:秦兰芝(1983—),女,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事沉积储层方面的研究工作。地址:(200030)中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司。Email:qinlzh2@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“浅水湖盆河湖交互沉积体系及其成因机理研究”(编号:42172127)与中国海洋石油有限公司重大科技专项“东海西湖凹陷大中型气田勘探方向及关键技术研究”(编号:KJZX-2023-0101)联合资助。

Fluvial to lacustrine alternating sedimentary characteristics of the Oligocene Huagang Formation in Xihu Sag, East China Sea shelf Basin

QIN Lanzhi1, LI Ning1, XU Donghao1, SUN Zhongheng2, WANG Wei2   

  1. 1. Shanghai Branch of CNOOC China Limited, Shanghai 200335, China;
    2. China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2023-10-18 Revised:2024-01-03 Published:2025-03-06

摘要: 根据钻井岩心、测井及三维地震等资料,通过沉积演化序列重建及沉积体系空间展布刻画等方法对东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中南部黄岩地区花港组浅水湖盆河湖交互沉积特征与控砂机制进行了详细研究。研究结果表明:①东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷黄岩地区花港组自北向南主要发育三大沉积体系:河流-泛滥平原沉积体系、浅水三角洲沉积体系和湖泊沉积体系,可识别出河流相、浅水三角洲相与湖泊相3种沉积相类型。②黄岩地区花港组河湖交互沉积体系可划分为河控主体区、河湖交互区与湖控主体区3个沉积单元,河控主体区发育厚层含砾砂岩,地震相表现为低频弱振幅特征;河湖交互区发育厚层砂岩,泥质夹层增多,地震相表现为中低频、中弱振幅,以隐性前积、叠瓦状前积为主;湖控主体区泥岩较发育,地震相表现为中高频、中强振幅。③研究区花港组沉积期受微地貌与水位幕式升降控制,三级层序等时格架内有3种浅水湖盆控砂模式:洪水期湖泊主体区范围最大,三角洲主体没入水下,孤立砂坝发育;平水期湖平面下降,河湖交互区扩张,砂体在横向上呈席状连片发育,在垂向上砂体被分隔;枯水期主要发育河控主体区,河道萎缩形成网状,河道细砂岩较为发育。④黄岩地区发育多个反转背斜,其翼部具有发育大规模构造—岩性圈闭的潜力,洪水期的优质砂体富集于朵叶侧向叠置部位,枯水期的优质砂体富集于废弃河道处,枯水期的优质砂体富集于河道内部。

关键词: 浅水湖盆, 河湖交互沉积, 浅水三角洲, 古地貌, 水位幕式升降, 河道, 花港组, 渐新统, 黄岩地区, 西湖凹陷, 东海陆架盆地

Abstract: Based on drilling core,well logging,and 3D seismic data,combined with evolution sequence recon-struction and spatial distribution depiction of depositional systems,the fluvio-lacustrine interactive depositional characteristics and sand-controlling mechanisms of Oligocene Huagang Formation in the shallow lacustrine basin of the Huangyan area,central-southern Xihu Sag of East China Sea shelf Basin were studied. The results show that:(1)There are three major depositional systems,including river-floodplain,shallow delta,and lacustrine systems,primarily developed from north to south in the Huagang Formation of the Xihu Sag. Huangyan area in central-southern region characterized by three sedimentary facies types:fluvial,shallow delta,and lacustrine. (2)The fluvial-lacustrine interaction system of the Huagang Formation in the Huangyan area can be subdivided into three distinct sedimentary units:river-dominated main area,fluvial-lacustrine transitional zone,and lake-dominated main area. The main area of the river control zone is developed with thick layers of gravel sandstone,and the seismic facies exhibit low-frequency weak amplitude characteristics;The interaction zone between rivers and lakes is characterized by the development of thick sandstone layers and an increase in mudstone interlayers. The seismic facies show low to medium frequency and weak amplitude,mainly consisting of implicit progradation and imbricate progradation;The mudstone in the main area of the lake is relatively developed,and the seismic facies are characterized by medium to high frequency and moderate to strong amplitude.(3)During the deposition of the Huagang Formation in the Huangyan area,micro-geomorphology and episodic fluctuations in water levels played pivotal roles. Within the isochronous framework of third-order sequences,three sand-controlling models for shallow lacustrine basins were established:During flood periods, the lake-dominated zone reached its maximum extent,with the main delta body submerged underwater and isolated sandbars developed.During average water levels,the lake level declined,the fluvio-lacustrine interactive zone expanded,resulting in laterally continuous sheet-like sandbodies and vertically separated sandbodies. During dry periods,the river-dominated zone predominated,with rivers shrinking into a network distribution and fine-grained sandstone deposition becoming more pronounced within channels.(4)The Huangyan area has developed multiple inverted anticline structures,with their limbs exhibiting significant potential for the development of large-scale structural-lithologic traps. favorable sand bodies are enriched in laterally superimposed lobes during flood periods,abandoned channels during normal flow periods ,and within channels during dry periods.

Key words: shallow-lake basin, river-lake interaction of sedimentation system, shallow water delta, paleogeo-morphy, curtain rise and fall channel of water level, channel, Huagang Formation, Oligocene, Huangyan area, Xihu Sag, East China Sea shelf Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 邹才能,赵文智,张兴阳,等.大型敞流坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲与湖盆中心砂体的形成与分布[J].地质学报,2008,82(6):813-825. ZOU Caineng,ZHAO Wenzhi,ZHANG Xingyang,et al. Formation and distribution of shallow water delta and central sand body in large open-flow depression lake basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2008,82(6):813-825.
[2] 胡明毅,柯岭,梁建设.西湖凹陷花港组沉积相特征及相模式[J].石油天然气学报,2010,32(5):1-5. HU Mingyi,KE Ling,LIANG Jianshe. Sedimentary facies characteristics and facies model of Huagang Formation in Xihu Sag[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2010,32(5):1-5.
[3] 刘君龙,纪友亮,杨克明,等.浅水湖盆三角洲岸线控砂机理与油气勘探意义:以川西坳陷中段蓬莱镇组为例[J].石油学报,2015,36(9):1060-1073. LIU Junlong,JI Youliang,YANG Keming,et al. Sand-controlling mechanism of delta shoreline in shallow lake basin and its signifi-cance for oil and gas exploration:A case study of Penglaizhen Formation in the middle part of western Sichuan depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(9):1060-1073.
[4] 孙春燕,胡明毅,胡忠贵,等.松辽盆地兴城地区泉四段浅水三角洲沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(3):66-74. SUN Chunyan,HU Mingyi,HU Zhonggui,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of shallow-water delta in the fourth member of Quantou Formation in Xingcheng area,Songliao Basin[J]. Litho-logic Reservoirs,2015,27(3):66-74.
[5] 朱茂,朱筱敏,曾洪流,等.冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷浅水曲流河三角洲沉积体系:以赵皇庄-肃宁地区沙一段为例[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(2):59-67. ZHU Mao,ZHU Xiaomin,ZENG Hongliu,et al. Shallow mean-dering river delta sedimentary system in Raoyang Sag,Jizhong Depression:A case study of the first member of Shahejie Formation in Zhaohuangzhuang-Suning area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(2):59-67.
[6] 楼章华,兰翔,卢庆梅,等.地形、气候与湖面波动对浅水三角洲沉积环境的控制作用:以松辽盆地北部东区葡萄花油层为例[J].地质学报,1999,73(1):83-92. LOU Zhanghua,LAN Xiang,LU Qingmei,et al. The control of topography,climate and lake level fluctuation on the sedimentary environment of shallow water delta:A case study of Putao-hua oil layer in the eastern part of northern Songliao Basin, 1999,73(1):83-92.
[7] 朱筱敏,邓秀芹,刘自亮,等.大型坳陷湖盆浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征及模式:以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组为例[J].地学前缘,2013,20(2):19-28. ZHU Xiaomin,DENG Xiuqin,LIU Ziliang,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and model of shallow-water braided river delta in large-scale depression lacustrine basin:A case study of Yanchang Formation in Longdong area,Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(2):19-28.
[8] 曾洪流,赵贤正,朱筱敏,等.隐性前积浅水曲流河三角洲地震沉积学特征:以渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷肃宁地区为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(5):566-576. ZENG Hongliu,ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHU Xiaomin,et al. Seismic sedimentology characteristics of shallow-water meandering river delta with hidden foreset:A case study of Suning area,Raoy-ang sag,Jizhong depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(5):566-576.
[9] 王航,杨海风,黄振,等.基于可容纳空间变化的河流相演化新模式及其控藏作用:以莱州湾凹陷垦利A构造为例[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(5):73-83. WANG Hang,YANG Haifeng,HUANG Zhen,et al. A new model of fluvial facies evolution based on accommodation space change and its controlling effect on reservoir:A case study of Kenli A structure in Laizhouwan sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(5):73-83.
[10] 李晓辉,杜晓峰,官大勇,等.辽东湾坳陷东北部新近系馆陶组辫曲过渡型河流沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(3):93-103. LI Xiaohui,DU Xiaofeng,GUAN Dayong,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of braided meandering transitional river of Neogene Guantao Formation in northeastern Liaodong Bay Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(3):93-103.
[11] 朱红涛,刘依梦,Liu Keyu,等.陆内克拉通盆地"溯源退积"层序构型构建:以鄂尔多斯盆地山西组为例[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2013,38(4):776-782. ZHU Hongtao.,LIU Yimeng.,LIU Keyu,et al. Sequence archi-tecture construction of ‘traceable retrogradation' in intraconti-nental cratonic basin:A case study of Shanxi Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosci-ences,2013,38(4):776-782.
[12] 李嘉光.干旱湖盆曲流河末端细粒沉积体系及沉积模式[J].地球科学,2018,43(增刊1):264-276. LI Jiaguang. Fine-grained sedimentary system and sedimentary model at the end of meandering river in arid lake basin[J]. Earth Science,2018,43(Suppl 1):264-276.
[13] 张昌民,宋新民,支东明,等.陆相含油气盆地沉积体系再思考:来自分支河流体系的启示[J].石油学报,2020,41(2):127-153. ZHANG Changmin,SONG Xinmin,ZHI Dongming,et al. Rethinking of sedimentary system of continental petroliferous ba-sin:enlightenment from branch river system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(2):127-153.
[14] DAI Liming.,LI Sanzhong,LOU Da.,et al.,Numerical modeling of Late Miocene tectonic inversion in the Xihu Sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin,China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014,86(1):25-37.
[15] 赵志刚,王鹏,祁鹏,等.东海盆地形成的区域地质背景与构造演化特征[J].地球科学,2016,41(3):546-554. ZHAO Zhigang,WANG Peng,QI Peng,et al. The regional geological background and tectonic evolution characteristics of the formation of the East China Sea Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2016,41(3):546-554.
[16] 李祥权,刘金水,陆永潮,等.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷花港组原型盆地性质厘定[J].地球科学,2018,43(2):502-513. LI Xiangquan,LIU Jinshui,LU Yongchao,et al. Nature determination of prototype basin of Huagang Formation in Xihu Sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Earth Science,2018,43(2):502-513.
[17] 吴嘉鹏,万丽芬,张兰,等.西湖凹陷平湖组岩相类型及沉积相分析[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(1):27-34. WU Jiapeng,WAN Lifen,ZHANG Lan,et al. Lithofacies types and sedimentary facies analysis of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(1):27-34.
[18] 李盛谦,曾溅辉,刘亚洲,等.东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].岩性油气藏, 2023,35(5):49-61. LI Shengqian,ZENG Jianhui,LIU Yazhou,et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Paleogene Pinghu Formation reservoir in Kongqueting area,Xihu sag,East China Sea Basin[J]. Litho-logic Reservoirs,2023,35(5):49-61.
[19] 陈忠云,鲁法伟,张建培,等.东海陆架西湖凹陷新生代沉积地层时代厘定[J].上海国土资源,2013,34(1):42-45. CHEN Zhongyun,LU Fawei,ZHANG Jianpei,et al. Age deter-mination of Cenozoic sedimentary strata in Xihu sag of East China Sea continental shelf[J]. Shanghai Branch of China National Offshore Oil Corporation,2013,34(1):42-45.
[20] 杨超,朱红涛,牛成民,等.陆相盆地浅水背景河湖交互特征及其模式[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2021,46(5):1771-1782. YANG Chao,ZHU Hongtao,NIU Chengmin,et al. Characteris-tics and model of river-lake interaction in shallow water back-ground of continental basin[J]. Earth Science (Journal of China University of Geosciences),2021,46(5):1771-1782.
[21] 杨治林.柴达木盆地第三系杂色泥岩的成因及其地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发,1983,10(1):32-37. YANG Zhilin. Genesis of Tertiary variegated mudstones in the Qaidam Basin and its geological significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1983,10(1):32-37.
[22] 李淋淋.松科1井上白垩统泥岩岩相类型与有机地球化学特征[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2018. LI Linlin. Lithofacies types and organic geochemical character-istics of Upper Cretaceous mudstone in Well Songke 1[D]. Bei-jing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing),2018.
[23] 侯国伟,刘金水,蔡坤,等.东海丽水凹陷古新统源-汇系统及控砂模式[J].地质科技情报,2019,38(2):65-74. HOU Guowei,LIU Jinshui,CAI Kun,et al. Paleocene sourcesink system and sand-controlling model in Lishui Sag,East China Sea[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2019,38(2):65-74.
[24] 李元昊,宋方新,韩鹏,等.构造稳定时期河控三角洲三元控砂模式[J].古地理学报,2019,21(3):397-406. LI Yuanhao,SONG Fangxin,HAN Peng,et al. The three-element sand control model of river-dominated delta during the stable period of structure[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition),2019,21(3):397-406.
[1] 廖新武, 杨庆红, 李超, 郭诚, 赵大林. 渤海湾盆地垦利6-1油田新近系明化镇组下段浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 1-11.
[2] 尹艳树, 黄圣斌, 黄奇志, 谢鹏飞, 王立鑫, 吴伟. 尼日尔Termit盆地Koulele油田始新统浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及成因模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 12-25.
[3] 李想, 付磊, 魏璞, 李俊飞, 徐港, 曹倩倩, 钟杨, 王振鹏. 沉积古地貌恢复及古地貌对沉积体系的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地石西地区三叠系百口泉组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 38-48.
[4] 刘勇, 刘永旸, 赵圣贤, 尹美璇, 李博, 陈雷, 吴帅材, 谢圣阳. 泸州—渝西地区志留系龙马溪组沉积期古地貌特征及控储作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 49-59.
[5] 李亚, 王尉, 赵立可, 刘冉, 张玺华, 陈延贵, 黄天海, 肖笛. 四川盆地德阳—绵阳凹陷南缘二叠系栖霞组沉积演化及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 81-91.
[6] 吴冠桦, 刘宏, 宋林珂, 曾琪, 杨涛. 四川盆地西南部东瓜场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沉积特征及有利储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 92-102.
[7] 陈生华, 王健伟, 刘舒, 严曙梅, 韩建辉, 傅恒, 谢才铸, 孙莉. 东海西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区始新统平湖组中段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 103-114.
[8] 胡鑫, 朱筱敏, 金绪铃, 黄成, 周越, 程长领, 修金磊, 任新成. 准噶尔盆地永进地区侏罗系齐古组浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 115-126.
[9] 曲星宇. 东营凹陷梁东地区古近系沙三中亚段层序地层划分及石油地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 166-177.
[10] 薛煜恒, 李坤, 尚娅敏, 陈秋佟, 盛烈豪, 刘建斌. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭区断裂体系特征及控藏效应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 161-169.
[11] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[12] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[13] 王同川, 陈浩如, 温龙彬, 钱玉贵, 李玉琢, 文华国. 川东五百梯地区石炭系岩溶古地貌识别及储集意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 109-121.
[14] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[15] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!