岩性油气藏 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 38–53.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260304

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界变质岩古潜山油气成藏条件及勘探启示

霍爱民()   

  1. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 滨南采油厂山东 滨州 256600
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-24 修回日期:2026-01-21 出版日期:2026-05-01 发布日期:2026-04-24
  • 第一作者:霍爱民(1981—),男,硕士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事油田开发方面的研究工作。地址:(256600)山东省滨州市黄河六路531号滨南采油厂。Email:huoaimin.slyt@sinopec.com
  • 基金资助:
    新型油气勘探开发国家科技重大专项“多层系潜山油气富集规律与增储领域”(2024ZD1400103)

Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration implication of Archean metamorphic buried hill reservoirs in Binxian uplift, Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

HUO Aimin()   

  1. Binnan Oil Production Plant, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Branch, Binzhou 256600, Shandong, China
  • Received:2025-12-24 Revised:2026-01-21 Online:2026-05-01 Published:2026-04-24

摘要:

综合运用岩心观察、物性测试、常规测井和成像测井等技术手段,系统分析了渤海湾盆地东营凹陷滨县凸起古潜山成藏条件及成藏模式。研究结果表明:①东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界储层类型为裂缝性储层和风化壳储层,风化壳具有溶蚀层-崩解层双层结构,溶蚀层多分布于斜坡下部,为最优储层。②研究区潜山油藏油源来自利津洼陷沙三段、沙四段烃源岩,经历了2期生烃过程;储层以风化壳溶蚀层为主,储集空间以高导缝和溶蚀缝为主;盖层为沙三段、沙四段厚层泥岩,封盖能力良好;输导体系包括断裂垂向输导和不整合面侧向输导2种类型。③研究区潜山的源-储配置关系对成藏有重要影响,古地貌和裂缝密度对储层质量具有控制作用,断层和裂缝为油气主要运移通道,发育“新生古储-侧向尖灭”型和“新生古储-潜山顶部”型油气藏,前者分布于中部斜坡带,油气从烃源岩侧向运移进入与泥岩对接的潜山储层;后者分布于东翼斜坡带大断层附近,油气沿断层垂向运移至潜山顶部。④相比冀中坳陷束鹿潜山,研究区风化壳双层结构明显、侧向尖灭模式占主导、油气性质单一,共识别出5个有利区带,其中位于潜山中部斜坡带的Ⅱ号和Ⅲ号区带的成藏条件最为优越,为最有利勘探目标。

关键词: 变质岩潜山, 裂缝性储层, 风化壳储层, 源-储配置, 新生古储, 太古界, 滨县凸起, 东营凹陷, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract:

By comprehensively utilizing technologies such as core observation, physical property testing, conventional logging, and imaging logging, reservoir formation conditions and hydrocarbon accumulation models of the buried hill in Binxian uplift of Dongying Sag in Bohai Bay Basin were systematically analyzed. Research results show that: (1) Archean reservoir types of Binxian uplift in Dongying Sag are fractured reservoirs and weathered crust reservoirs,with the weathered crust exhibiting a double-layer structure of dissolution layer and disintegration layer. Dissolution layers are mostly distributed in the lower part of the slope, making them optimal reservoirs. (2) The buried hill oil source of the study area comes from the third member of Shahejie Formation(Es3) and the fourth member of Shahejie Formation (Es4) source rocks in Lijin sub-depression, which has undergone two stages of hydrocarbon generation. The reservoir is dominated by weathered crust dissolution layers, with high-conductivity fractures and dissolution fractures as main reservoir spaces. Caprocks are thick dark mudstones of Es3 and Es4,with good sealing capacity. Migration pathways include two types: vertical migration along faults and lateral migration along unconformity surfaces. (3) The source-reservoir configuration relationship of buried hills in the study area has significant impacts on the reservoir formation. Paleogeomorphology and fracture density have controlling effects on reservoir quality. Faults and fractures are main migration channels for oil and gas. There are two types of oil and gas reservoirs,including “new source and old reservoir-lateral pinch out” type and “new source and old reservoir-buried hill top” type. The former is distributed in the central slope zone, where hydrocarbons migrate laterally from source rocks into buried hill reservoirs in contact with mudstones. The latter is distributed near large faults in the eastern slope zone, where oil and gas migrate vertically along faults to the top of the buried hill. (4) Compared with Shulu buried hill in Jizhong Depression, the study area exhibit an obvious double-layer structure of weathered crust, with lateral pinch out accumulation model as the dominant model and hydrocarbon properties being unitary. Five favorable zones are identified, among which Zone Ⅱ and Zone Ⅲ located in the central slope zone of the buried hill have optimal reservoir formation conditions and represent the most favorable exploration targets.

Key words: metamorphic buried hill, fractured reservoir, weathered crust reservoirs, source-reservoir configuration, new source and old reservoir, Archean, Binxian uplift, Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122

图1

渤海湾盆地东营凹陷滨县凸起构造位置(a)及单124井岩性地层综合柱状图(b)"

图2

东营凹陷利津洼陷埋藏史-热史图"

图3

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山片麻岩岩心照片 (a) 灰色片麻岩,单古6井,1 983.15~1 983.57 m;(b) 灰绿色片麻岩,单古601井,1 392.51~1 393.28 m;(c)、(d) 灰色油斑片麻岩,单193井,2 176.50 m和2 179.20 m。"

图4

东营凹陷滨县凸起单古6井太古界(2 031~2 032 m)潜山片麻岩岩心裂缝发育特征"

图5

东营凹陷滨县凸起单古6井太古界潜山片麻岩储层测井响应特征"

图6

东营凹陷滨县凸起单古6井太古界潜山片麻岩储层成像测井裂缝响应特征"

表1

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山裂缝密度与渗透率关系统计"

井名 深度/m 裂缝密度/(条·m-1) 基质
渗透率/mD
裂缝
渗透率/
mD
渗透率
提高倍数/倍
单古6 1 983~2 074 8~12 1.0~5.0 20.0~50.0 4~10
单193 2 177~2 286 6~10 2.0~5.0 10.0~30.0 3~6
单古603 2 048~2 191 4~6 1.0~3.0 5.0~15.0 3~5
单古601 1 392~1 393 3~5 2.0~4.0 8.0~12.0 3~4
单古2 2 353~2 500 < 3 0.5~2.0 2.0~5.0 2~3

图7

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山风化壳双层结构示意图"

图8

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山风化壳储层纵向结构划分"

图9

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山风化壳储层连井剖面(剖面位置见图10)"

图10

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山风化壳储层分布特征"

图11

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山东南坡风化壳储层发育模式"

图12

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山储层上覆泥岩盖层分布特征"

表2

东营凹陷滨县凸起不同盖层厚度区带试油成功率统计"

盖层厚度/m 试油井数/口 成功井数/口 成功率/% 代表井
> 50 4 4 100 单古6
40~50 2 2 100 单193
30~40 3 2 67 单古603
< 30 2 0 0 单102

图13

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山东南坡单古2井—单古603井—单古6井—利31井油藏剖面(剖面位置见图10)"

表3

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山斜坡带出油井试油统计"

井名 井段/m 射孔
厚度/m
日产油/
t
含水率/
%
试油
结论
单古2 2 511.80~2 573.00 51.8 油花 100.0 含油水层
2 353.00~2 500.00 63.0 1.13 0 低产油层
单古603 1 931.81~2 037.00 105.2 干层
2 167.57~2 248.00 80.4 干层
2 048.00~2 191.00 6.0 2.77 41.9 油水同层
单古6 1 974.08~2 074.00 99.9 0.80 低产油层
2 539.18~2 636.00 96.8 水层
2 519.37~2 545.41 26.0 干层
1 974.08~2 071.71 97.6 7.74 37.4 油水同层
利31 2 246.00~2 253.00 7.0 6.40
利古6 2 886.79~2 922.00 35.2 2.23 0 低产油层
2 893.79~3 190.20 296.4 油花 含油水层
2 893.79~3 051.11 157.3 油花 含油水层
2 893.79~2 987.24 30.0 2.21 低产油层
2 871.00~2 987.24 44.0 5.80 油层
单193 2 177.00~2 286.00 12.00 55.0 油水同层

图14

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山东南坡“新生古储-侧向尖灭”型油气藏"

图15

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山东南坡“新生古储-潜山顶部”型油气藏"

表4

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山与冀中坳陷束鹿潜山带成藏特征对比"

对比要素 束鹿潜山带 滨县凸起
成藏类型 “近源、断层输导、断背斜”
型油气藏
“远源、不整合输导、断块”
型油气藏
“侧向尖灭”型油气藏
“潜山顶部”型油气藏
储层岩性 奥陶系碳酸盐岩
(泥晶白云岩、灰质白云岩)
太古界片麻岩(斜长
片麻岩、钾长片麻岩)
储层特征 岩溶孔-缝-洞极为发育
渗透率大于100.0 mD
风化壳双层结构
渗透率10.0~50.0 mD
储集空间 次生孔-洞-缝为主
裂缝网络连通性好
高导缝和溶蚀缝为主
溶蚀层 + 崩解层组合
主控因素 断层和裂缝网络输导
多期油气充注
古地貌和源-储配置
风化壳类型控制
油气性质 轻质油、重质油分异
密度0.757~1.062 g/cm³
正常油,性质单一
API度25~35
成藏期次 2期充注 1期充注
保存条件 洼中隆好,斜坡带差 相对稳定

表5

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山油藏有利区带评价参数"

区带
编号
高点
埋深/m
面积/km2 有效
厚度/m
单储系数/
(103 t·km-2·m-1
预测资源量/104 t
1 400 1.4 20 3 8.4
2 400 2.0 20 3 12.0
1 800 1.8 20 3 10.8
1 700 1.6 20 3 9.6
2 800 0.5 10 3 1.5

图16

东营凹陷滨县凸起太古界潜山油藏勘探有利区 注:Ⅰ—Ⅴ为有利区编号。"

[1] DAKE C L, BRIDGE J, MISSOURI R, et al. Buried and resurrected hills of central Ozarks[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1932, 16(7):629-652.
doi: 10.1306/3D932AA2-16B1-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[2] PAN C H. Petroleum in basement rocks[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1982, 66(10):1597-1643.
doi: 10.1306/03B5A994-16D1-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[3] UZKEDA H, BULNES M, POBLET J, et al. Kinematic and mechanic evolution of the Andes buried front at the Boomerang Hills hydrocarbon province (Bolivia):Control exerted by the pre-Andean history[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 116:104299.
doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104299
[4] YANSIN Q, DING Yan, BAKLOUTI S, et al. An integrated fracture parameter prediction and characterization method in deeply-buried carbonate reservoirs based on deep neural network[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208:109346.
doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109346
[5] ZHAO Xianzheng, JIN Fengming, WANG Quan, et al. Buried-hill play, Jizhong subbasin, Bohai Bay Basin:A review and future prospectivity[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2015, 99(1):1-26.
doi: 10.1306/07171413176
[6] 邓运华. 渤海大中型潜山油气田形成机理与勘探实践[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(3):253-261.
doi: 10.7623/syxb201503001
DENG Yunhua. Formation mechanism and exploration practice of large-medium buried-hill oil fields in Bohai Sea[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(3):253-261.
doi: 10.7623/syxb201503001
[7] 蒋有录, 叶涛, 张善文, 等. 渤海湾盆地潜山油气富集特征与主控因素[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(3):20-29.
JIANG Youlu, YE Tao, ZHANG Shanwen, et al. Enrichment characteristics and main controlling factors of hydrocarbon in buried hill of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(3):20-29.
[8] 刘念, 邱楠生, 秦明宽, 等. 冀中坳陷束鹿潜山带油气成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J]. 地质学报, 2023, 97(3):897-910.
LIU Nian, QIU Nansheng, QIN Mingkuan, et al. Main controlling factors and models of hydrocarbon accumulation in the Shulu buried-hill belt,Jizhong depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2023, 97(3):897-910.
[9] 李波, 田美荣, 张帆, 等. 东营凹陷太古界基岩储层特征及分布规律研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1):52-56.
LI Bo, TIAN Meirong, ZHANG Fan, et al. Study on characte-ristics and distribution of Archaeozoic reservoir in Dongying Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(1):52-56.
[10] 李军, 刘丽峰, 赵玉合, 等. 古潜山油气藏研究综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2006, 21(3):879-887.
LI Jun, LIU Lifeng, ZHAO Yuhe, et al. A review of study on ancient buried hill reservoir[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2006, 21(3):879-887.
[11] 崔海峰, 韩小锋, 黄元溢, 等. 银额盆地油气勘探历程与钻探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5):22-33.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250503
CUI Haifeng, HAN Xiaofeng, HUANG Yuanyi, et al. Oil and gas exploration history and drilling enlightenment of Yin’e Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(5):22-33.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250503
[12] 郭海峰, 肖坤叶, 程晓东, 等. 乍得Bongor盆地花岗岩潜山裂缝型储层有效渗透率计算方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6):117-126.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230613
GUO Haifeng, XIAO Kunye, CHENG Xiaodong, et al. Determination of effective permeability of granitic buried-hill fractured reservoirs in Bongor Basin,Chad[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6):117-126.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230613
[13] 孟涛. 济阳坳陷太古界潜山油气成藏及有利勘探区[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(1):66-69.
MENG Tao. Hydrocarbon accumulation and prospects in Archean buried hill of Jiyang Depression[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2015, 22(1):66-69.
[14] 陈社教, 吴燕冈, 胡加山. 高精度重力方法在高青地区探测古潜山构造中的应用[J]. 吉林地质, 2006, 25(4):32-38.
CHEN Shejiao, WU Yangang, HU Jiashan. Application of high-precision gravity survey in exploring ancient hidden mountain structure in Gaoqing area[J]. Jilin Geology, 2006, 25(4):32-38.
[15] 杨玲, 胡明. 东营凹陷太古界储层裂缝发育控制因素及油气勘探方向[J]. 特种油气藏, 2010, 17(2):35-38.
YANG Ling, HU Ming. Controlling factors of Archeozoic reservoir fractures development and hydrocarbon prospecting direction in Dongying depression[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2010, 17(2):35-38.
[16] 王军, 董臣强, 罗霞, 等. 裂缝性潜山储层地震描述技术[J]. 石油物探, 2003, 42(2):179-185.
WANG Jun, DONG Chenqiang, LUO Xia, et al. Seismic description technology for fractured buried hill reservoir[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2003, 42(2):179-185.
[17] 张鹏飞, 刘惠民, 曹忠祥, 等. 太古宇潜山风化壳储层发育主控因素分析:以鲁西—济阳地区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报 (地球科学版), 2015, 45(5):1289-1298.
ZHANG Pengfei, LIU Huimin, CAO Zhongxiang, et al. Analysis on main controlling factors of Archaeozoic weathering crust reservoir:With Jiyang and Luxi area as an example[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(5):1289-1298.
[18] 李秀芹, 侯欣欣, 刘中奇. 王庄油田片麻岩储集层测井识别及评价方法[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2012, 34(11):83-86.
LI Xiuqin, HOU Xinxin, LIU Zhongqi. Log recognition and evaluation method of gneissose reservoir in Wangzhuang Oilfield[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2012, 34(11):83-86.
[19] 徐方慧, 王祝文, 刘菁华, 等. 基于EMD的声波测井信息提取与火成岩裂缝地层特征分析[J]. 石油物探, 2018, 57(6):936-943.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2018.06.016
XU Fanghui, WANG Zhuwen, LIU Jinghua, et al. Acoustic logging information extraction and fractural volcanic formation characteristics based on empirical mode decomposition[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2018, 57(6):936-943.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2018.06.016
[20] 郑华, 康凯, 刘卫林, 等. 渤海深层变质岩潜山油藏裂缝主控因素及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏. 2022, 34(3):29-38.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220303
ZHENG Hua, KANG Kai, LIU Weilin, et al. Main controlling factors and prediction of fractures in deep metamorphic buried hill reservoirs in Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3):29-38.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220303
[21] 李欣, 闫伟鹏, 崔周旗, 等. 渤海湾盆地潜山油气藏勘探潜力与方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2012, 34(2):140-144.
LI Xin, YAN Weipeng, CUI Zhouqi, et al. Prospecting potential and targets of buried-hill oil and gas reservoirs in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2012, 34(2):140-144.
[22] 陈啸宇, 章成广, 朱雷, 等. 致密砂岩储层地应力对电阻率测井的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1):106-110.
CHEN Xiaoyu, ZHANG Chengguang, ZHU Lei, et al. Influence of ground stress on resistivity logging response in tight sandstone reservoir[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(1):106-110.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.01.014
[23] 王永诗, 张鹏飞, 王学军, 等. 济阳坳陷古生界潜山油气成藏新认识与攻关方向[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2024, 31(6):1-17.
WANG Yongshi, ZHANG Pengfei, WANG Xuejun, et al. New understanding and research directions of oil and gas accumulation in Paleozoic buried hills,Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2024, 31(6):1-17.
[24] 王雅倜. 浊积岩反演储层预测技术:以东营凹陷滨县凸起为例[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2024, 21(1):103-112.
WANG Yati. Turbidite reservoir prediction based on inversion technique:A case study in Binxian uplift of Dongying Sag[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2024, 21(1):103-112.
[25] 叶涛, 韦阿娟, 曾金昌, 等. 渤海湾盆地中生代构造差异演化与潜山油气差异富集[J]. 地质科学, 2019, 54(4):1135-1154.
YE Tao, WEI Ajuan, ZENG Jinchang, et al. Structure differential evolution in Mesozoic Era and its controlling to hydrocarbon enrichment of basement in Bohai Bay Basin,eastern of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2019, 54(4):1135-1154.
[26] 徐守立, 尤丽, 毛雪莲, 等. 琼东南盆地松南低凸起周缘花岗岩潜山储层特征及控制因素[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(8):2717-2728.
XU Shouli, YOU Li, MAO Xuelian, et al. Reservoir characte-ristics and controlling factors of granite buried hill in Songnan low uplift,Qiongdongnan Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(8):2717-2728.
[1] 蒋龙, 程紫燕, 孙红霞, 刘祖鹏, 李忠新, 田选华, 彭琳雄, 朱丽. 渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷古近系沙三下亚段页岩储层特征及可动孔喉下限[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 54-66.
[2] 赵野, 许鹏, 胡贺伟, 王航, 杨娇娇. 渤海湾盆地盆缘庙西南地区构造特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2): 145-152.
[3] 熊钰, 张维岑, 李亚梅, 耿文爽, 吴道铭, 母丹, 刘通. 高倾角油藏水转气重力驱油效率及界面稳定性预测方法——以渤海湾盆地柳赞地区古近系沙河街组油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2): 178-193.
[4] 李滨, 闵忠顺, 孟令娜, 张源李, 尹剑峰, 周培杰. 基于高精度地质建模技术的断层侧向封闭性评价方法——以辽河坳陷兴隆台构造带太古界潜山油气藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(1): 126-135.
[5] 孙远锋, 曹爱锋, 周勇, 高晨曦, 王柯. 渤海湾盆地临南洼陷古近系沙四上亚段沉积演化特征及古地貌控砂模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6): 119-130.
[6] 程焱, 张铜耀, 郝鹏, 杨江浩, 刘学睿, 张伟森, 何俊辉, 王波. 渤海海域石臼坨凸起秦皇岛M-3区新近系明下段岩性油藏油气运聚特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6): 162-171.
[7] 赵宝银, 杨晓利, 徐颖新, 孟令箭, 崔紫瑄, 王方鲁, 刘剑伦, 于福生. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新生代构造演化特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 59-69.
[8] 尹艳树, 李建琴, 吴伟, 王立鑫, 谭先锋. 东营凹陷林东地区中新统馆陶组网状河沉积特征及储层构型[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 1-16.
[9] 王永刚, 杜广宏, 何润, 瞿长, 佘钰蔚, 黄诚. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区下古生界风化壳储层地球物理识别及分布预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 127-135.
[10] 陈家旭, 陈长伟, 刘国全, 邹磊落, 董晓伟, 刘川, 杨飞, 钟巍. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷深凹区古近系孔二段原油充注特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 136-146.
[11] 王丽娟, 韩登林, 马良帅, 胡蓉蓉, 王晨晨, 马斌玉, 闫康, 朱朝彬. 渤海海域太古界潜山型储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 84-94.
[12] 陈怀毅, 李龙, 白冰, 岳军培, 康荣, 张兴强. 渤海湾盆地莱州湾凹陷古近系沙四段走滑盐拱带特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 120-128.
[13] 廖新武, 杨庆红, 李超, 郭诚, 赵大林. 渤海湾盆地垦利6-1油田新近系明化镇组下段浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 1-11.
[14] 薛辉, 叶大帅, 郭悦苗, 陈柯童, 吴健平, 许梦婷, 李雅雯. 渤海湾盆地保定凹陷清苑地区古近系东三段曲流河沉积特征及控储作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 139-152.
[15] 曲星宇. 东营凹陷梁东地区古近系沙三中亚段层序地层划分及石油地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 166-177.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!