岩性油气藏 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 71–82.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260507

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地中部中三叠统雷口坡组一段沉积特征及有利储层分布

青春1(), 吴学妍2(), 唐松1, 刘博文1, 淦文杰1, 余燕1, 梁新玉1, 廖月1   

  1. 1 中国石油西南油气田公司 川中油气矿， 四川 遂宁 629000
    2 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院， 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-30 修回日期:2026-04-29 出版日期:2026-09-01 发布日期:2026-09-04
  • 第一作者:青春（1971—），男，高级工程师，主要从事天然气开发方面的研究管理工作。地址：（629000）遂宁市河东新区香林南路178号。 Email：qingchun@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 通信作者: 吴学妍
  • 基金资助:
    新型油气勘探开发国家科技重大专项“四川盆地全油气系统与新领域勘探技术”(2025ZD1400403);国家自然基金（面上项目）“海相白云岩与蒸发岩共生组合形成机制研究：以四川盆地雷口坡组为例”(42572194)

Sedimentary characteristics and favorable reservoirs distribution of the first member of Leikoupo Formation in Middle Triassic， central Sichuan Basin

QING Chun1(), WU Xueyan2(), TANG Song1, LIU Bowen1, GAN Wenjie1, YU Yan1, LIANG Xinyu1, LIAO Yue1   

  1. 1 Central Sichuan Oil and Gas District， PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company， Suining 629000， Sichuan， China
    2 School of Geoscience and Technology， Southwest Petroleum University， Chengdu 610500， China
  • Received:2026-03-30 Revised:2026-04-29 Online:2026-09-01 Published:2026-09-04
  • Contact: WU Xueyan E-mail:qingchun@petrochina.com.cn;15913269101@163.com

RichHTML

15

PDF (PC)

17

摘要：

综合岩心观察、薄片鉴定、测井相分析，制定了川中地区中三叠统雷口坡组一段（雷一段）的沉积相划分方案；通过连井剖面对比，对沉积相展布及演化规律进行了系统剖析；基于常规、非常规油气双领域视角，划分了有利储集区带。研究结果表明：①川中地区雷一段主要发育蒸发台地与局限台地，进一步划分为蒸发潮坪、局限潮坪、台内滩3个亚相及膏坪、膏云坪、云坪、灰坪、泥云坪、颗粒滩6个微相。②研究区沉积演化受古构造、古地貌与海平面变化协同控制，具有“早期滩坪发育、晚期蒸发增强”的阶段性沉积演化序列，雷一1亚段沉积期，盆地西高东低、海平面相对较高，发育局限台地云坪与颗粒滩沉积；雷一2亚段沉积期，气候干旱、海平面下降，膏云坪广泛发育，陆源泥质输入增多，沉积体系演化为蒸发岩为主的咸化沉积体系，构成海退序列。③研究区储层特征存在明显分层差异，雷一1亚段以颗粒滩和云坪相控常规储层为主，储集岩性为颗粒白云岩与晶粒白云岩，经准同生期暴露、早期岩溶及白云石化作用叠加改造而形成优质储层；雷一2亚段发育泥质白云岩非常规储层，具有“源-储一体”的成藏优势，顶底板受膏岩层封堵，构成密闭型成藏系统。④磨溪地区为颗粒滩相最有利发育区，川中西部—南部为云坪相有利储集分布区，蓬阳地区为泥云坪相非常规油气“甜点”区。

关键词: 沉积相, 颗粒滩相, 非常规油气, “甜点”预测, 局限台地相, 测井相, 雷口坡组一段, 中三叠统, 川中地区

Abstract:

Based on core observation， thin section identification， and logging facies analysis， a sedimentary facies classification scheme for the first member of Leikoupo Formation（Lei 1 Member）in Middle Triassic of central Sichuan Basin was established. Through cross-well profiles correlation， the distribution and evolution of sedimentary facies are systermatically analyzed. From dual perspectives of conventional and unconventional oil and gas fields， favorable reservoir zones were delineated. The results show that：（1） Lei 1 Member in central Sichuan Basin mainly develops evaporative platform and restricted platform，which can be further divided into three subfacies （evaporative tidal flat， restricted tidal flat， and intra-platform shoal） and six microfacies （gypsum flat， gypsiferous dolomite flat， dolomite flat， limestone flat， argillaceous dolomite flat， and grain shoal）. （2） Sedimentary evolution of the study area was jointly controlled by paleostructure, paleogeomorphology， and sea level changes， exhi-biting the staged sedimentary evolution sequence of “shoal and flat developed in the early stage， and evaporation enhanced in the late stage”. During the deposition of Lei 11 submember， the basin was characterized by a topography of “high west and low east” with a relatively high sea level， developing dolomite flats and grain shoals in a restricted platform setting. During the deposition of Lei 12 submember， the climate turned arid and sea level fell， leading to widespread gypsiferous dolomite flats， increased terrestrial argillaceous material input. The depositional system evolved into an evaporite‑dominated saline system， constituting a regressive sequence. （3） Reservoir characteristics in the study area show obvious stratification differences. Lei 11 submember is dominated by facies‑ controlled conventional reservoirs of grain shoals and dolomite flats， with reser-voir lithologies consisting of grain dolostone and crystalline dolostone， which were transformed into high‑quality reservoirs through penecontemporaneous exposure， early karstification， and dolomitization. Lei 12 submember features “source‑reservoir integrated” unconventional argillaceous dolomite reservoirs， with the top and bottom sealed by gypsum layers， forming a closed hydrocarbon accumulation system. （4） Moxi area is the most favorable zone for grain shoal facies. The west and south parts of central Sichuan Basin are favorable for dolomite flat facies， and Pengyang area is the “sweet spot” for unconventional exploration of argillaceous dolomite flats.

Key words: sedimentary facies, grain shoal facies, unconventional oil and gas, “sweet spot” prediction, restri-cted platform facies, logging facies, the first member of Leikoupo Formation, Middle Triassic, central Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3

图1

四川盆地中部地区构造位置（a）和中三叠统雷口坡组岩性地层综合柱状图（b）（据文献[13，22]修改）"

图2

四川盆地中部中三叠统雷口坡组一段主要岩石类型宏观和微观照片 （a） 灰白色晶粒白云岩，华探1井，4 217.21~4 217.55 m，岩心照片；（b） 泥—细粉晶白云岩，磨4井，2 752.69 m，铸体薄片，单偏光；（c） 纹层状泥质白云岩，华探1井，4 203.08~4 203.23 m，岩心照片；（d） 泥质白云岩，充探1井，4 090.00 m，普通薄片，单偏光；（e）灰 色砂屑白云岩，充探1井，4 028.54~4 028.73 m，岩心照片；（f） 砂屑白云岩，磨溪22井，3 132.00 m，铸体薄片，单偏光；（g） 粉晶灰岩，兴华1井，3 290.97~3 291.30 m，岩心照片；（h） 泥晶灰岩，兴华1井，3 291.00 m，普通薄片，单偏光；（i） 膏岩，鸡笼铁丝构造，广元宝轮石灰窑剖面；（j） 膏岩，磨溪4井，2 785.21 m，铸体薄片，正交偏光；（k） 膏质白云岩，兴华1井，3 312.63~3 314.14 m，岩心照片；（l） 云质膏岩，磨溪22井，3 002.00 m，铸体薄片，正交偏光。"

图3

四川盆地中部中三叠统雷口坡组一段测井相类型与特征"

表1

四川盆地中部中三叠统雷口坡组一段沉积相类型划分"

沉积体系 相 亚相 微相 主要岩性
碳酸盐岩
台地		 蒸发
台地		 蒸发
潮坪		 膏云坪 膏质白云岩、膏岩与白云岩、
泥质白云岩互层
膏坪 膏岩、云质膏岩
局限
台地		 局限
潮坪		 云坪 泥—粉晶白云岩、结晶白云岩
灰坪 泥—粉晶灰岩
台内滩 泥云坪 泥质白云岩、含泥白云岩
颗粒滩 砂屑白云岩、鲕粒白云岩

图4

川中地区北东—南东向三叠统雷一1亚段沉积相连井剖面对比（剖面位置见图1a）"

图5

川中地区西—南部三叠统雷一1亚段沉积相连井剖面对比（剖面位置见图1a）"

图6

川中地区北东—南东向三叠统雷一2亚段沉积相连井剖面对比（剖面位置见图1a）"

图7

川中地区西—南部中三叠统雷一2亚段沉积相连井剖面对比（剖面位置见图1a）"

图8

四川盆地中部中三叠统雷一1亚段沉积相平面展布"

图9

四川盆地中部中三叠统雷一2亚段沉积相平面展布"

图10

四川盆地中部中三叠统雷一段沉积模式"

图11

四川盆地中部中三叠统雷一1亚段储层物性特征 注：N为研究区所取样品数量，个；K为渗透率，mD；ϕ为孔隙度，%。"

图12

四川盆地中部中三叠统雷口坡组一段有利储集区带预测"

[1] 杨雨, 文龙, 谢继容, 等. 四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩天然气勘探进展与方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3):44-55.
YANG Yu, WEN Long, XIE Jirong, et al. Progress and direction of marine carbonate gas exploration in Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3):44-55.
[2] 彭军, 褚江天, 陈友莲, 等. 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区下寒武统沧浪铺组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4):12-22.
PENG Jun, CHU Jiangtian, CHEN Youlian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Lower Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4):12-22.
[3] 刘树根, 孙玮, 李智武, 等. 四川叠合盆地海相碳酸盐岩油气分布特征及其构造主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):1-17.
LIU Shugen, SUN Wei, LI Zhiwu, et al. Distribution characteri-stics of marine carbonate reservoirs and their tectonic controlling factors across the Sichuan superimposed basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):1-17.
[4] 汪泽成, 赵文智, 胡素云, 等. 我国海相碳酸盐岩大油气田油气藏类型及分布特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(2):153-160.
WANG Zecheng, ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, et al. Reservoir types and distribution characteristics of large marine carbonate oil and gas fields in China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(2):153-160.
[5] 熊加贝, 何登发. 全球碳酸盐岩地层-岩性大油气田分布特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1):187-200.
XIONG Jiabei, HE Dengfa. Distribution characteristics and con-trolling factors of global giant carbonate stratigraphic-lithologic oil and gas fields[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1):187-200.
[6] TAN Xiucheng, LI Ling, LIU Hong, et al. Mega-shoaling in carbonate platform of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation,Sichuan Basin,southwest China[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2014, 57(3):465-479.
[7] 辛勇光, 周进高, 倪超, 等. 四川盆地中三叠世雷口坡期障壁型碳酸盐岩台地沉积特征及有利储集相带分布[J]. 海相油气地质, 2013, 18(2):1-7.
XIN Yongguang, ZHOU Jingao, NI Chao, et al. Sedimentary facies features and favorable lithofacies distribution of Middle Triassic Leikoupo barriered carbonate platform in Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2013, 18(2):1-7.
[8] 龙翼, 刘树根, 宋金民, 等. 龙岗地区中三叠统雷四3亚段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(6):36-44.
LONG Yi, LIU Shugen, SONG Jinmin, et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Middle Triassic T2l43 in Longgang area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(6):36-44.
[9] 阮蕴博, 周刚, 霍飞, 等. 川中地区中三叠统雷口坡组三段源储特征及配置关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):139-151.
RUAN Yunbo, ZHOU Gang, HUO Fei, et al. Source-reservoir characteristics and configuration of the third member of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Litho-logic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):139-151.
[10] 吕玉珍, 倪超, 张建勇, 等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组有利沉积相带及岩相古地理特征[J]. 海相油气地质, 2013, 18(1):26-32.
LYU Yuzhen, NI Chao, ZHANG Jianyong, et al. Favorable sedi-mentary facies zones and lithofacies palaeogeography of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2013, 18(1):26-32.
[11] 李凌, 谭秀成, 丁熊, 等. 四川盆地雷口坡组台内滩与台缘滩沉积特征差异及对储层的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1):70-76.
LI Ling, TAN Xiucheng, DING Xiong, et al. Difference in depo-sitional characteristics between intra-platform and marginal-platform shoals in Leikoupo Formation,Sichuan Basin and its impact on reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(1):70-76.
[12] 黄东, 袁家林, 沈浩, 等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组雷三、雷四段盐岩沉积环境与成因研究[J]. 盐湖研究, 2014, 22(1):6-11.
HUANG Dong, YUAN Jialin, SHEN Hao, et al. Triassic Leikou-po Formation of T2l3,T2l4salt sedimentary environment and genesis study in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Salt Lake Research, 2014, 22(1):6-11.
[13] 李祖兵, 李顺, 欧家强, 等. 四川盆地中部磨溪气田中三叠统雷一1气藏储层特征及发育主控因素[J]. 地质与勘探, 2024, 60(5):1066-1080.
LI Zubing, LI Shun, OU Jiaqiang, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of the 1st sub-member of the 1st member in Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation of the Moxi gas field,Central Sichuan Basin[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2024, 60(5):1066-1080.
[14] 李强, 师江波, 辛勇光, 等. 四川盆地合川—潼南地区雷口坡组一段2亚段泥质白云岩非常规气藏形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2026, 45(1):19-26.
LI Qiang, SHI Jiangbo, XIN Yongguang, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration direction of argillaceous-dolomite unconventional gas reservoirs in the 2nd sub-member of the first member of Leikoupo Formation in Hechuan-Tongnan area of Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Deve-lopment in Daqing, 2026, 45(1):19-26.
[15] WANG Yuanchong, JIANG Weimin, LIU Hangyu, et al. Sedimentary and diagenetic features and their impacts on microbial carbonate reservoirs in the fourth member of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation,western Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(9):2293.
[16] 胡忠贵, 王纪煊, 李世临, 等. 川东地区寒武系高台组白云岩-蒸发岩共生地层高频层序划分及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2):113-124.
HU Zhonggui, WANG Jixuan, LI Shilin, et al. High-frequency sequence division and geological significance of dolomiteevapo-rite paragenetic strata of Cambrian Gaotai Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2):113-124.
[17] 石书缘, 杨威, 周刚, 等. 特提斯域演化对四川超级盆地油气系统形成的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(5):1024-1039.
SHI Shuyuan, YANG Wei, ZHOU Gang, et al. Impact of Tethyan domain evolution on the formation of petroleum systems in the Sichuan super basin,SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(5):1024-1039.
[18] 徐康, 宫晗凝. 四川盆地雷口坡组岩相古地理特征及有利储集相带[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(4):841-855.
XU Kang, GONG Hanning. Lithofacies palaeogeographic cha-racteristics and favorable reservoir facies of the Leikoupo Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 2023, 25(4):841-855.
[19] 宋晓波, 陈安清, 苏成鹏, 等. 四川盆地南部中三叠统雷口坡组岩相古地理与常规—非常规双领域勘探意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2025, 47(4):731-741.
SONG Xiaobo, CHEN Anqing, SU Chengpeng, et al. Lithofacies palaeogeography of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the southern Sichuan Basin and its implications for conventional and unconventional dual-domain exploration[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2025, 47(4):731-741.
[20] 孟宪武, 刘勇, 石国山, 等. 四川盆地川西坳陷中段构造演化对中三叠统雷口坡组油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6):986-995.
MENG Xianwu, LIU Yong, SHI Guoshan, et al. The structural evolution of the middle section of the west Sichuan Depression in the Sichuan Basin controlled the hydrocarbon accumulation in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation[J]. Petroleum Geo-logy & Experiment, 2021, 43(6):986-995.
[21] 陈安清, 王立成, 姬广建, 等. 川东北早—中三叠世聚盐环境及海水浓缩成钾模式[J]. 岩石学报, 2015, 31(9):2757-2769.
CHEN Anqing, WANG Licheng, JI Guangjian, et al. Evaporatic environment and the concentration model of potash in the Early-Middle Triassic,northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2015, 31(9):2757-2769.
[22] 黄东, 张健, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组地层划分探讨[J]. 西南石油大学学报 (自然科学版), 2011, 33(3):89-95.
HUANG Dong, ZHANG Jian, YANG Guang, et al. The discussion of stratum division and stratum for the Leikoupo Formation of Middle Triassic in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33(3):89-95.
[23] 杜金虎, 徐春春, 汪泽成, 等. 四川盆地二叠—三叠系礁滩天然气勘探[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2010.
DU Jinhu, XU Chunchun, WANG Zecheng, et al. Natural gas exploration in Permian-Triassic reef & Oolite in Sichuan Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2010.
[24] 蒋宇杭. 川中龙岗地区中三叠统雷口坡组风化壳岩溶储层研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2019.
JIANG Yuhang. Reservoir of weathered crust karst reservoir of Leikoupo Formation of Middle Triassic in Longgang area,central Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2019.
[25] 苏靖. 川东北地区中三叠统雷口坡组沉积相研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2024.
SU Jing. Study on sedimentary facies of Middle Triassic Leikou-po Formation in northeast Sichuan[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2024.
[26] 王纯豪. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组沉积特征及储层控制因素分析[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2020.
WANG Chunhao. Study on sedimentary characteristics and reser-voir control factors of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation,Sichuan Basin[D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2020.
[27] 孙春燕, 胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组沉积特征及有利储集相带[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3):498-512.
SUN Chunyan, HU Mingyi, HU Zhonggui, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and favorable reservoir facies distribution of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation,Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(3):498-512.
[28] 牟冠华. 川东北龙岗—营山地区雷口坡组沉积及储层特征[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2022.
MOU Guanhua. Sedimentary and reservoir characteristics of Leikoupo Formation in Longgang-Yingshan area,northeast Sichuan[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2022.
[29] 李德星, 刘树根, 张长俊, 等. 四川盆地中南部地区中三叠统雷口坡组沉积相研究[J]. 海洋石油, 2010, 30(1):36-42.
LI Dexing, LIU Shugen, ZHANG Changjun, et al. Study on sedi-mentary facies of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation of the southern area in Central Sichuan Basin[J]. Offshore Oil, 2010, 30(1):36-42.
[30] 李浩. 川中北部地区雷口坡组沉积、成岩作用及与储层的关系[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2013.
LI Hao. Sedimentation, diagenesis and its relationship with reser-voir of Leikoupo Formation in northern central Sichuan[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2013.
[31] 甘学启. 川中雷口坡组风化壳岩溶储层特征及主控因素研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2012.
GAN Xueqi. Study on the characteristics and main controlling factors of karst reservoirs in the weathering crust of Leikoupo Formation in central Sichuan[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2012.
[32] 李凌, 谭秀成, 邹春, 等. 四川盆地雷口坡组膏盐岩成因及膏盐盆迁移演化与构造意义[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(2):316-324.
LI Ling, TAN Xiucheng, ZOU Chun, et al. Origin of the Leikou-po Formation gypsum-salt and migration evolution of the gy-psum-salt pot in the Sichuan Basin,and their structural significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(2):316-324.
[1] 樊宇洁, 万永平, 蒲仁海, 折印楠, 崔宏俊, 高小平. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安—甘泉地区山23亚段大型河道带沉积特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(5): 125-135.
[2] 徐忠凡, 丁熊, 尹宏, 田云英, 宋毅, 杨曦冉. 川西北双鱼石地区上三叠统须家河组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(3): 107-119.
[3] 薛博文, 张兆辉, 张皎生, 邹建栋, 张闻亭. 基于GWO-XGBoost模型的致密砂岩储层流体测井智能识别——以鄂尔多斯盆地洪德地区三叠系长8段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2): 111-121.
[4] 占王忠, 隋博雨, 王忠伟, 霍飞, 戚俊, 谢尚克, 曾胜强, 侯乾. 北羌塘坳陷东部玛曲地区侏罗系雀莫错组沉积特征及储层评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2026, 38(2): 162-177.
[5] 崔海峰, 韩小锋, 黄元溢, 张慧元. 银额盆地油气勘探历程与钻探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 22-33.
[6] 户昶昊, 裴家学, 蔡国钢. 开鲁盆地陆东凹陷白垩系九佛堂组油气连续成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 1-12.
[7] 杨杰, 张文萍, 丁朝龙, 石存英, 马云海. 川中地区三叠系须家河组二段致密气储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 137-148.
[8] 李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 李啸, 苏航, 周俊峰, 仇庭聪, 石小茜. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[9] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[10] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[11] 夏茂龙, 张本健, 曾乙洋, 贾松, 赵春妮, 冯明友, 李勇, 尚俊鑫. 川中地区蓬莱气田震旦系灯影组二段储层发育主控因素及分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 50-60.
[12] 邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[13] 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[14] 魏嘉怡, 王红伟, 刘刚, 李涵, 曹茜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘冲断带石炭系羊虎沟组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 120-130.
[15] 付文俊, 张昌民, 冀东升, 娄林, 刘家乐, 王绪龙. 准噶尔盆地南安集海河剖面中侏罗统头屯河组浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 145-160.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发