岩性油气藏 ›› 2010, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 59–64.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2010.01.011

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂构造变形地区致密岩石力学性质实验分析

葛善良1,周文1,谢润成1,单钰铭2   

  1. 1.成都理工大学能源学院; 2.成都理工大学“油气藏地质及开发工程”国家重点实验室
  • 出版日期:2010-03-15 发布日期:2010-03-15
  • 作者简介:葛善良,1984 年生,男,成都理工大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气田开发地质。地址:(610059)四川省成都市成都理工大学 能源学院326 办公室。E-mail:zw326gsl@foxmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点实验室协助、中国石化西南油气田分公司重点科研项目部分成果(编号:GJ-106-0818)

Orientation analysis about compacted rock mechanic character in complicated tectonic deformation area

GE Shanliang1, ZHOU Wen1, XIE Runcheng1, SHAN Yuming2   

  1. 1. College of Energy Resources, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • Online:2010-03-15 Published:2010-03-15

摘要:

在模拟地层条件下,利用“MTS 系统”,对川东北河坝构造陆相地层样品作波速及力学参数的同步测试,分层位、分岩性研究纵向上岩石力学参数的变化规律及动态、静态参数的关系。地层条件下,砂岩的抗压强度、弹性模量、泊松比、内聚力和内摩擦角分别为241.87 MPa,35.5 GPa,0.27,29.32 MPa 和36.1°;泥岩的抗压强度、弹性模量、泊松比、内聚力和内摩擦角分别为115.63 MPa,24.8 GPa,0.33,10.11 MPa 和19°;砂岩的抗张强度为自流井组>须家河组>沙溪庙组>千佛崖组,平均值分别为7.09 MPa,6.2 MPa,4.72 MPa,4.51 MPa。岩石力学参数受颗粒大小、泥质含量、胶结物性质及孔隙度大小的影响。饱水后岩样的纵波速度、弹性模量、泊松比较饱水前明显增加。随着围压的增大,岩石塑性变形的比例也增大,更多地表现出弹-塑性变形特征。

关键词: 凝灰质砂岩, 导电机制, 含水饱和度模型, 乌尔逊凹陷

Abstract:

Based on the equipment ofMTS, the wave velocity and mechanical parameters of sands and mudstones from northeast of Sichuan are taken into synchronous experimentation under the condition of simulated formation. The varying regular pattern and the relationship between dynamic and quiescent parameters on the vertical formation are discussed. Under the condition of simulated formation, in terrestrial formation, the average compressive strength value of sand is 241.87 MPa, and it is 115.63 MPa of the mudstone. The average elastic modulus value of sand is 35.5 GPa, and it is 24.8 GPa of the mudstone. The average poisson ratio value of sand is 0.27, and it is 0.33 of the mudstone. The average cohesion value of sand is 29.32 MPa, and it is 10.11 MPa of the mudstone. The average internal frictional angle value of sand is 36.1 , and it is 19 of the mudstone. The relationship of tensile strength on the terrestrial formation is J2z>T3x>J2s>J2q, and the average value of tensile strength is 7.09MPa, 6.2MPa, 4.72MPa, 4.51MPa. The value of rock mechanic parameters is affected by the grain size, shale content, binding material’s property and the porosity. After being saturated bywater, the longitudinal velocity, elastic modulus and the poisson ration is increased remarkably than before. With the broadening of confinement pressure, the plastic deformation proportion is increasing, and the distortional character is displaying to elastic-plastic deformation more.

Key words: tuffaceous sandstone, conduction mechanism, water saturation model, Wuerxun Sag

[1] 李智武,罗玉宏,刘树根,等.川东北地区岩石声发射实验及历史构造应力研究[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2005,32(6):614-619.
[2] 周文,闫长辉,王世泽,等.油气藏现今地应力场评价方法及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2007.
[3] 李智武,刘树根,罗玉宏,等.川东北地区致密碎屑岩动静弹参数实验研究[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(3):286-291.
[4] 李智武,罗玉宏,刘树根,等.川东北地区地层条件下致密储层力学性质实验分析[J].矿物岩石,2005,25(4):52-59.
[5] 周文,高雅琴,单钰铭.川西新场气田沙二段致密砂岩储层岩石力学性质[J].天然气工业,2008,28(2):34-37.
[6] 雷芳菲,贺成才.岩石压缩系数的计算及其对气藏数值模拟结果的影响研究[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(3):134-137.
[7] 李传亮,图兴万.储层岩石的 2 种应力敏感机制———应力敏感有利于驱油[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(1):111-113.
[8] 李传亮.岩石应力敏感指数与压缩系数之间的关系式[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(4):95-98.
[9] 李敬功.利用常规测井资料计算气藏横波速度[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):67-70.
[10] 安明玉,王洪英,魏东,等.大庆油田深层岩石力学特性参数的试验研究[J].石油钻探技术,2002,30(1):13-15.
[11] 刘新荣,鲜学福,余海龙.岩性特征对岩石力学性质的影响[J].江西有色金属,2001,15(2):11-13.
[12] 夏在连,刘树根,时华星,等.中伊朗盆地地层条件下裂缝性储层岩石力学性质实验分析[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(1):96-92.
[13] 陈勉.我国深层岩石力学研究及在石油工程中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(14):2455-2462.
[1] 闫博,吕晓辉. 塔南凹陷储层孔隙特征及其发育成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(1): 26-29.
[2] 张彤,李忠权,蒙启安,朱德丰,陈骁,陈均亮. 构造变换带的识别及其在乌尔逊凹陷的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 52-57.
[3] 王鹏,赵玉莲,韩琳. 乌尔逊凹陷凝灰质砂岩储层含水饱和度计算[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 114-118.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] 蔡佳. 琼东南盆地长昌凹陷新近系三亚组沉积相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] 付广,刘博,吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 马中良,曾溅辉,张善文,王永诗,王洪玉,刘惠民. 砂岩透镜体油运移过程模拟及成藏主控因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] 易定红, 石兰亭, 贾义蓉. 吉尔嘎朗图凹陷宝饶洼槽阿尔善组层序地层与隐蔽油藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] 杨占龙, 彭立才, 陈启林, 郭精义, 李在光, 黄云峰. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷岩性油气藏成藏条件与油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .