岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 11–18.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.05.002

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

渝东北地区下古生界页岩气聚集条件及资源潜力

姜生玲1,2, 汪生秀3, 洪克岩2, 朱亮亮2, 胡晓兰2   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京)地球科学与测绘工程学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国华电集团清洁能源有限公司勘探开发事业部, 北京 100160;
    3. 重庆地质矿产研究院, 重庆 400042
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-24 修回日期:2017-03-06 出版日期:2017-09-21 发布日期:2017-09-21
  • 作者简介:姜生玲(1984-),女,博士,工程师,主要从事非常规油气勘探及评价方面的研究工作。地址:(100160)北京市丰台区汽车博物馆东路6号院。Email:jiangsl@cg.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国土资源部全国油气资源战略选区调查与评价专项“渝东北地区页岩气资源战略调查与选区”(编号:2009GYXQ15)和国家重大科技专项“来凤咸丰及鹤峰区块复杂构造区海相页岩气勘查评价应用试验”(编号:2016ZX05034004-004)联合资助

Accumulation conditions of Lower Paleozoic shale gas and its resources in northeastern Chongqing

JIANG Shengling1,2, WANG Shengxiu3, HONG Keyan2, ZHU Liangliang2, HU Xiaolan2   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Branch, China Huadian Green Energy Co., Ltd., Beijing 100160, China;
    3. Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 400042, China
  • Received:2016-12-24 Revised:2017-03-06 Online:2017-09-21 Published:2017-09-21

摘要: 为了系统研究渝东北地区下寒武统水井沱组和上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩气聚集条件,利用野外露头观测、实验测试分析、概率统计等多种方法,分别对2套页岩的分布、有机地球化学特征、储集条件及含气性进行了全面分析。结果表明:2套页岩均具有有机碳(TOC)含量高、成熟度高、厚度适中、有机质类型以腐泥型干酪根为主、含气量较高的特征;2套页岩均夹有薄层粉砂岩、细砂岩,富含石英、长石等碎屑组分,易于破裂形成裂缝、微裂缝,为页岩气的聚集提供了有利的物质基础及储集空间;2套页岩均对甲烷具有较强的吸附能力,现场解析平均含气质量体积分别为1.07m3/t和2.30m3/t。在此基础上,进一步确定了2套页岩有利区分布面积,采用条件概率体积法对其资源潜力分别进行了评价,得出下寒武统水井沱组和上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩气资源量分别为0.42万亿m3和0.38万亿m3,均具有良好的页岩气勘探前景,城口地区的明中—厚坪一带和巫溪地区的咸水—文峰—大同一带均可作为渝东北地区页岩气勘探的有利区域。

关键词: 致密砂岩气, 气层识别, 密度-中子加权平均法, 含气指示, 变岩-电参数, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: In order to evaluate Paleozoic shale gas potential in northeastern Chongqing,based on the methods of filed outcrops survey,experimental test and mathematical statistics,the distribution,source rock and reservoir conditions of Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation and Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation were comprehensively analyzed. These shale rocks are characterized by high organic carbon content,high maturity, appropriate thickness and mainly type I kerogen. The results of field shale desorption show that the average gas content is 1.07 m3/t and 2.30 m3/t respectively. The siltstone and fine sandstone are easy for fracturing due to more quartz and other detrital components. These characteristics provide a favorable material basis and reservoir space for shale gas accumulation. Evaluated with conditional probability volume method,the shale gas resources of Shuijingtuo Formation and Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation are 0.42×1012m3 and 0.38×1012m3 respectively.Chengkou and Wuxi should be favorable areas for shale gas exploration in the northeastern Chongqing.

Key words: tight gas sandstone, gas layer identification, neutron-density weighted average, gas indication, variable rock-electro parameters, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 张金川,金之钧,袁明生. 页岩气成藏机理和分布. 天然气工业,2004,24(7):15-18. ZHANG J C,JIN Z J,YUAN M S. Reservoiring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution. Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(7):15-18.
[2] MONTGOMERY S L,JARVIE D M,BOWKER K A,et al. Mississippian Barnett Shale,Fort Worth Basin,north-central Texas:gas-shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential. AAPG Bulletin,2005,89(2):155-175.
[3] CURTIS J B. Fractured shale-gas systems. AAPG Bulletin, 2002,86(11):1921-1938.
[4] JARVIE D M,HILL R D,RUBLE T E,et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment.AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[5] WARLICK D. Gas shale and CBMdevelopment in NorthAmerica. Oil and Gas Financial Journal,2006,3(11):1-5.
[6] 张大伟,李玉喜,张金川,等. 全国页岩气资源潜力调查评价. 北京:地质出版社,2012:70. ZHANG D W,LI Y X,ZHANG J C,et al. Investigation and evaluation of shale gas resource potential in China. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2012:70.
[7] 闫建平,崔志鹏,耿斌,等. 四川盆地龙马溪组与大安寨段泥页岩差异性分析. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(4):16-23. YAN J P,CUI Z P,GENG B,et al. Differences of shale between Longmaxi Formation and Da'anzhai member in Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(4):16-23.
[8] 冷济高,龚大建,李飞,等. 黔东北地区牛蹄塘组页岩气勘探前景分析.地学前缘,2016,23(2):29-38. LENG J G,GONG D J,LI F,et al. Analyses on the shale gas exploration prospect of the Niutitang Formation in north-eastern Guizhou area. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):29-38.
[9] 罗健,戴鸿鸣,邵隆坎,等. 四川盆地下古生界页岩气资源前景预测. 岩性油气藏,2012,24(4):70-74. LUO J,DAI H M,SHAO L K,et al. Prospect prediction for shale gas resources of the Lower Paleozoic in Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(4):70-74.
[10] 聂海宽,张金川,李玉喜. 四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统页岩气聚集条件.石油学报,2011,32(6):959-967. NIE H K,ZHANG J C,LI Y X. Accumulation conditions of the Lower Cambrian shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(6):959-967.
[11] 李可,王志兴,张馨艺,等. 四川盆地东部下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征及影响因素. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):52-58. LI K,WANG Z X,ZHANG X Y,et al. Shale reservoir characteristics and influencing factors of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016,28(5):52-58.
[12] 周文,徐浩,余谦,等. 四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组与筇竹寺组页岩气含气性差异及成因. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):18-25. ZHOU W,XU H,YU Q,et al. Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):18-25.
[13] 龙鹏宇,张金川,李玉喜,等. 重庆及其周缘地区下古生界页岩气成藏条件及有利区预测.地学前缘,2013,19(2):221-233. LONG PY,ZHANG J C,LI Y X,et al. Reservoir-forming conditions and strategic select favorable area of shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Chongqing and its adjacent areas. Earth Science Frontiers,2013,19(2):221-233.
[14] 武瑾,梁峰,拜文华,等. 渝东北地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩气勘探前景.特种油气藏,2015,22(6):50-55. WU J,LIANG F,BAIWH,et al. Exploration prospect of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas in northeastern Chongqing city. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(6):50-55.
[15] 严德天,王清晨,陈代钊,等. 扬子及周缘地区上奥陶统-下志留统烃源岩发育环境及其控制因素. 地质学报,2008,82(3):321-327. YAN D T,WANG Q C,CHEN D Z,et al. Sedimentary environment and development controls of the hydrocarbon sources beds:the upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation and the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Yangtze area. Acta Geologica Sinica,2008,82(3):321-327.
[16] 张金川,薛会,张德明,等. 页岩气及其成藏机理. 现代地质, 2003,17(4):466. ZHANG J C,XUE H,ZHANG D M,et al. Shale gas and its accumulation mechanism. Geoscience,2003,17(4):466.
[17] 张小龙,张同伟,李艳芳,等. 页岩气勘探和开发进展综述. 岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):116-122. ZHANG X L,ZHANG T W,LI Y F,et al. Research advance in exploration and development of shale gas. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013,25(2):116-122.
[18] 聂海宽,唐玄,边瑞康. 页岩气成藏控制因素及中国南方页岩气发育有利条件预测.石油学报,2009,30(4):484-491. NIE H K,TANG X,BIAN R K. Controlling factors for shale gas accumulation and prediction of potential development area in shale gas reservoir of South China. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009,30(4):484-491.
[19] ROSS D J K,BUSTIN R M. Impact of mass balance calculations on adsorption capacities in microporous shale gas reservoirs. Fuel,2007,86(17):2696-2706.
[20] 中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心. 重庆城口区块页岩气形成富集条件与资源潜力.页岩气动态,2016,(9):15-22. Oil and Gas Survey Center of China Geological Survey. Shale gas accumulation conditions and it's resource potential in Chenkou block,Chongqing. Shale Gas Dynamic,2016,(9):15-22.
[21] 余川,程礼军,曾春林,等. 渝东北地区下古生界页岩含气性主控因素分析.断块油气田,2014,21(3):296-300. YU C,CHENG L J,ZENG C L,et al. Main controlling factor analysis on gas-bearing property of Lower Paleozoic shale in northeastern Chongqing Region. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field. 2014,21(3):296-300.
[22] 梁峰,拜文华,邹才能,等. 渝东北地区巫溪2井页岩气富集模式及勘探意义. 石油勘探与开发,2016,43(3):350-358. LIANG F,BAIWH,ZOU C N,et al. Shale gas enrichment pattern and exploration significance of well Wuxi-2 in northeast Chongqing,NE Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016,43(3):350-358.
[23] 付常青,朱炎铭,陈尚斌,等. 渝东北地区WX2井页岩气赋存特征及其勘探指示意义. 高校地质学报,2016,22(4):679-689. FU C Q,ZHU Y M,CHEN S B,et al. Shale gas occurrence characteristics and exploration significance of WX2 well in the northeast Chongqing. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2016,22(4):679-689.
[24] 李新景,吕宗刚,董大忠,等. 北美页岩气资源形成的地质条件.天然气工业,2009,29(5):27-32. LI X J,LYU Z G,DONG D Z,et al. Geologic controls on accumulation of shale gas in north America. Natural Gas Industry, 2009,29(5):27-32.
[25] 李玉喜,聂海宽,龙彭宇. 我国富含有机质泥页岩发育特点与页岩气战略选区. 天然气工业,2009,29(12):115-118. LI Y X,NIE H K,LONG P Y. Development characteristic of organic-rich shale and the strategic selection of shale gas in China. Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(12):115-118.
[26] 张金川,聂海宽,徐波,等. 四川盆地页岩气成藏地质条件. 天然气工业,2008,28(2):151-156. ZHANG J C,NIE H K,XU B,et al. Geological condition of shale gas accumulation in Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2008,28(2):151-156.
[27] 张金川,徐波,聂海宽,等. 中国页岩气资源勘探潜力. 天然气工业,2008,28(6):136-140. ZHANG J C,XU B,NIE H K,et al. Exploration potential of shale gas resources in China. Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(6):136-140.
[28] 李延钧,刘欢,刘家霞,等. 页岩气地质选区及资源潜力评价方法. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,33(2):28-34. LI Y J,LIU H,LIU J X,et al. Geological regional selection and an evaluation method of resource potential of shale gas. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition),2011,33(2):28-34.
[29] 李玉喜,乔德武,姜文利,等. 页岩气含气量和页岩气地质评价综述. 地质通报,2011,30(2/3):308-317. LIYX,QIAO DW,JIANGWL,et al.Gas content of gas-bearing shale and its geological evaluation summary. Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):308-317.
[30] 董大忠,程克明,王世谦,等. 页岩气资源评价方法及其在四川盆地的应用.天然气工业,2009,29(5):33-39. DONG D Z,CHENG K M,WANG S Q,et al. An evaluation method of shale gas resource and its application in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(5):33-39.
[31] SCHMOKER J W. Resource-assessment perspectives for unconventional gas system. AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1993-1999.
[32] 张金川,林腊梅,李玉喜,等. 页岩气资源评价方法与技术:概率体积法.地学前缘,2012,19(2):184-191. ZHANG J C,LIN L M,LI Y X,et al. The method of shale gas assessment:probability volume method. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012,19(2):184-191.
[1] 徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[2] 李志远, 杨仁超, 张吉, 王一, 杨特波, 董亮. 天然气扩散散失率定量评价——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[3] 刘桓, 苏勤, 曾华会, 孟会杰, 张小美, 雍运动. 近地表Q补偿技术在川中地区致密气勘探中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 104-112.
[4] 许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[5] 姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[6] 魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[7] 张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长81致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36-48.
[8] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[9] 周新平, 邓秀芹, 李士祥, 左静, 张文选, 李涛涛, 廖永乐. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组下组合地层水特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 109-120.
[10] 高计县, 孙文举, 吴鹏, 段长江. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘神府区块上古生界致密砂岩成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 121-130.
[11] 曹江骏, 陈朝兵, 罗静兰, 王茜. 自生黏土矿物对深水致密砂岩储层微观非均质性的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部合水地区长6油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 36-49.
[12] 何维领, 罗顺社, 李昱东, 吴悠, 吕奇奇, 席明利. 斜坡背景下沉积物变形构造时空展布规律——以鄂尔多斯盆地镇原地区长7油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 62-72.
[13] 张鹏, 杨巧云, 范宜仁, 张云, 张海涛. 基于Xu-White模型的致密砂岩储层含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 138-145.
[14] 王朋, 孙灵辉, 王核, 李自安. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区延长组长6储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 63-72.
[15] 侯科锋, 李进步, 张吉, 王龙, 田敏. 苏里格致密砂岩气藏未动用储量评价及开发对策[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 115-125.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇,胡明毅,刘富艳,王辉,胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙,田景春,肖玲,王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维,李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮,涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .