岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 119–127.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.06.015

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

低渗透油藏CO2吞吐压力响应曲线分析

李友全1, 韩秀虹2, 阎燕1, 张德志1, 周志为2, 孟凡坤3   

  1. 1. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 山东 东营 257015;
    2. 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院, 山东 青岛 266580;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-03 修回日期:2017-07-12 出版日期:2017-11-21 发布日期:2017-11-21
  • 作者简介:李友全(1970-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事试井及高压物性实验方面的研究工作。地址:(257015)山东省东营市东营区聊城路2号。Email:liyouquan.slyt@Sinopec.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目"页岩油多尺度运移机制及数值模拟"(编号:51674279)资助

Pressure transient analysis on CO2 huff and puff in low permeability reservoir

LI Youquan1, HAN Xiuhong2, YAN Yan1, ZHANG Dezhi1, ZHOU Zhiwei2, MENG Fankun3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying 257015, Shandong, China;
    2. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2017-05-03 Revised:2017-07-12 Online:2017-11-21 Published:2017-11-21

摘要: CO2吞吐是低渗透油藏提高采收率的一种重要方式,但是目前对吞吐过程中的压力响应认识不足。低渗透油藏注入CO2后,黏度等流体性质随CO2浓度分布变化而产生平面非均质现象。为了表征低渗透条件下的压力动态,基于Fick定律求解CO2浓度分布来反映流体的性质差异,在达西渗流方程中引入渗透率模数和启动压力梯度来反映油藏的低渗透特性,通过黏度耦合浓度方程和渗流方程,建立了低渗透油藏CO2吞吐压力响应模型,采用数值方法对模型进行求解,并通过解析方法和数值模拟对模型可靠性进行了验证,最后分析了低渗透特性参数以及CO2浓度相关参数对压力响应曲线的影响。研究结果表明:启动压力梯度越大,CO2注入压力越大,压力及压力导数曲线斜率也越大;渗透率模数越大,压力及压力导数曲线末期斜率越小;CO2注入速度越快,其注入压力越大,浓度扩散越快,波及区与未波及区的界限越明显;CO2扩散系数越大,储层流体性质的非均质性越小,波及区与未波及区界限越不明显。该模型可应用于低渗透油藏CO2吞吐注入过程试井分析、地层参数预测以及CO2浓度分布动态分析。

关键词: 砂砾岩储层, 黄铁矿, 识别图版, 等效体积模型, 齐古组, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: CO2 huff and puff are important way to improve oil recovery in low permeability reservoir. However, the recognition of the pressure response performance is not clear. After the injection of CO2 in low permeability reservoir,the fluid properties such as viscosity vary with the CO2 concentration,resulting in the phenomenon of plane heterogeneity. In order to characterize the pressure transient, the CO2 concentration distribution was obtained based on Fick's law to characterize the fluid property. The permeability modulus and starting pressure gradient were introduced in Darcy flow equation to characterize the low permeability characteristics. The pressure response model for CO2 huff and puff in low permeability reservoir was established by viscosity coupling concentration equation and flow equation,and it was solved by numerical method. The reliability of the model was verified by analytical method and numerical simulation, and finally the influences of low permeability properties and CO2 concentration on the pressure response curve were analyzed. The results show that the increase of starting-up pressure gradient leads to higher CO2 injection pressure and the rise of pressure and pressure derivative curve slope. The pressure and pressure derivative curve slope become smaller with the increase of the permeability modulus. The diffusion of CO2becomes faster while increasing the injection rate of CO2,and the injection pressure becomes larger,at the same time,the boundary between swept area and unswept area is clearer. As the diffusion efficient of CO2 increases,the difference of fluid properties in difference place becomes smaller and the boundary between swept area and unswept area is not clear. This model can be applied to well testing of CO2 huff and puff process in low permeability reservoir, the prediction of reservoir parameter and analysis of CO2 concentration distribution.

Key words: glutenite reservoirs, pyrite, identification chart, equivalent volume model, Qigu Formation, Junggar Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE348
[1] 刘炳官. CO2吞吐法在低渗透油藏的试验. 特种油气藏, 1996, 3(2):44-50. LIU B G. CO2 stimulation test in low permeability reservoir. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 1996, 3(2):44-50.
[2] 吴文有, 张丽华, 陈文彬. CO2吞吐改善低渗透油田开发效果可行性研究.大庆石油地质与开发, 2001, 20(6):51-53. WU W Y, ZHANG L H, CHEN W B. Feasibility study on improving the efficiency of low permeability oil field development by CO2 stimulation. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield, 2001, 20(6):51-53.
[3] 杨胜来, 王亮, 何建军, 等. CO2吞吐增油机理及矿场应用效果. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 19(6):23-26. YANG S L, WANG L, HE J J, et al. Oil production enhancing mechanism and field applying result of carbon dioxide huff-puff. Journal of Xi' an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 19(6):23-26.
[4] 钟立国, 韩大匡, 李莉, 等.特低渗透油藏二氧化碳吞吐模拟. 大庆石油学院学报, 2009, 33(4):120-124. ZHONG L G, HAN D K, LI L, et al. Analysis of the sensitivity of carbon dioxide huff`and puff for fractured reservoirs with low permeability. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2009, 33(4):120-124.
[5] 赵彬彬, 郭平, 李闽, 等.CO2吞吐增油机理及数值模拟研究. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2009, 28(2):117-120. ZHAO B B, GUO P, LI M, et al. Research on CO2 stimulation mechanism and numerical simulation. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2009, 28(2):117-120.
[6] GOZALPOUR F, REN S R, TOHIDI B. CO2 EOR and storage in oil reservoir. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 2005, 60(3):537-546.
[7] 郭平, 许清华, 孙振, 等.天然气藏CO2驱及地质埋存技术研究进展.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3):6-11. GUO P, XU Q H, SUN Z, et al. Research progress of CO2 nooding and geological storage in gas reservoirs. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3):6-11.
[8] 王涛. 盐水层CO2埋存潜力及影响因素分析. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(增刊1):85-88. WANG T. Study on CO2 storage potential in saline aquifer and its influencing factors. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(Suppl 1):85-88.
[9] BYBEE K. Screening criteria for carbon dioxide huff-n-puff opera-tions. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2007, 59(1):55-59.
[10] 王守岭, 孙宝财, 王亮, 等. CO2吞吐增产机理室内研究与应用.钻采工艺, 2004, 27(1):91-94. WANG S L, SUN B C, WANG L, et al. Study and application of the stimulation mechanism of CO2 huff and Puff. Drilling & Production Technology, 2004, 27(1):91-94.
[11] 马涛, 汤达祯, 蒋平, 等. 注CO2提高采收率技术现状.油田化学, 2007, 24(4):379-383. MA T, TANG D Z, JIANG P, et al. The status of enhanced oil recovery by CO2 injection. Oilfield Chemistry, 2007, 24(4):379-383.
[12] 王佩文, 刘春艳, 万小迅, 等.就地生成二氧化碳吞吐开采稠油室内实验研究.新疆石油天然气, 2016, 12(2):60-65. WANG P W, LIU C Y, WAN X X, et al. Laboratory experimental study on heavy oil production by local generated carbon dioxide huff and puff. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2016, 12(2):60-65.
[13] 孙玥.二氧化碳吞吐驱油试验研究.引文版:工程技术, 2016, 75:242. SUN Y. Experimental study on oil displacement by CO2 huff and puff. Engineering Technology, 2016, 75:242.
[14] 李亚辉. G104油藏二氧化碳吞吐物模参数优选及数值模拟研究. 成都:西南石油大学, 2014. LI Y H. Parameter optimization and numerical simulation of carbon dioxide huff and puff in G104 reservoir. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2014.
[15] 张娟.浅薄稠油油藏水平井二氧化碳吞吐数值模拟研究. 成都:西南石油大学, 2012. ZHANG J. Numerical simulation of carbon dioxide huff and puff for horizontal wells in shallow heavy oil reservoir. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2012.
[16] 彭彩珍, 李超, 杨栋.低渗透油藏二氧化碳吞吐选井研究.油气藏评价与开发, 2017, 7(1):32-35. PENG C Z, LI C, YANG D.Well selection of CO2 huff and puff in low permeability reservoir. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2017, 7(1):32-35.
[17] TRAN N D, VU H H, TAKAGI S, et al. Design & implementation of CO2 huff-n-puff operation in a vietnam offshore field.SPE 161835, 2012.
[18] MACALLISTER D J. Pressure transient analysis of CO2 and enriched-gas injection and production wells. SPE 16225, 1987.
[19] TANG R W, AMBASTHA A K. Analysis of CO2 pressure transient data with two-and three-region analytical radial composite models. SPE 18275, 1988.
[20] SU K, LIAO X W, ZHAO X L. Transient pressure analysis and interpretation for analytical composite model of CO2 flooding. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 125:128-135.
[21] 苏玉亮, 孟凡坤, 周诗雨, 等.低渗透油藏CO2 驱试井曲线特征分析.科技导报, 2015, 33(18):34-39. SU Y L, MENG F K, ZHOU S Y, et al. Characteristics analysis of well testing curve of CO2 flooding in low permeability reservoir. Science Technology Review, 2015, 33(18):34-39.
[22] 李友全, 孟凡坤, 阎燕, 等.考虑流体非均质性的低渗透油藏CO2 驱试井分析.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):106-112. LI Y Q, MENG F K, YAN Y, et al. Pressure transient analysis on CO2 flooding in low permeability reservoirs considering fluid heterogeneity. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):106-112.
[23] LI L L, YAO J, LI Y, et al. Pressure-transient analysis of CO2 flooding based on a compositional method. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 33:30-36.
[24] 廉黎明, 秦积舜, 杨思玉, 等.二氧化碳驱数学模型研究进展及发展方向.油气地质与采收率, 2013, 20(2):77-82. LIAN L M, QIN J S, YANG S Y, et al. Research progress and development directions of mathematical models in CO2 flooding. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2013, 20(2):77-82.
[25] 郭丽华, 吕庆升, 王文芝. 二氧化碳吞吐增油技术机理与应用.中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2011, 31(1):48. GUO L H, LYU Q S, WANG W Z. Mechanism and application of the technology of increasing oil by carbon dioxide. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2011, 31(1):48.
[26] 苏玉亮, 吴晓东, 侯艳红, 等.低渗透油藏CO2 混相驱油机制及影响因素.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(3):99-102. SU Y L, WU X D, HOU Y H, et al. Mechanism of CO2miscible displacement in low permeability reservoir and influencing factor. Journal of China University of Petroleumn(Edition of Natural Science), 2011, 35(3):99-102.
[27] 苏玉亮, 吴春新.倾斜油藏二氧化碳驱油中的黏性指进分析. 石油钻探技术, 2009, 37(5):93-96. SU Y L, WU C X. Analysis of viscous fingering of CO2 flooding in tilted reservoirs. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2009, 37(5):93-96.
[28] 侯艳红.低渗透油藏CO2 混相驱油机理研究.青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2010. HOU Y H. Mechanism study of CO2 miscible displacement in low permeability reservoir. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China), 2010.
[29] 雷霄, 孙召勃, 王妍妍, 等.低渗透疏松油藏注水井试井分析. 科技导报, 2014, 32(20):69-73. LEI X, SUN Z B, WANG Y Y, et al. Well test analysis of water injection wells in low-permeability unconsolidated oil reservoirs. Science & Technology Review, 2014, 32(20):69-73.
[30] 张怀文, 张翠林, 多力坤. CO2 吞吐采油工艺技术研究. 新疆石油科技, 2006, 16(4):19-21. ZHANG H W, ZHANG C L, DUO L K. Study on CO2 huff and puff production technology. Xinjiang Petroleum Science & Technology, 2006, 16(4):19-21.
[31] 李涤淑, 宋先保, 刘秀珍, 等. CO2 单井吞吐矿场试验. 国外油田工程, 2004, 20(3):40-41. LI D S, SONG X B, LIU X Z, et al. Field test of CO2 single well huff and puff. Foreign Oilfield Engineering, 2004, 20(3):40-41.
[32] 王文环.应力敏感砂岩地层三区复合凝析气藏不稳定试井模型.石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(3):117-119. WANG W H. Three-zone composite well test model of condensate gas reservoir in stress-sensitive sandstone. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(3):117-119.
[33] 谢晓庆, 张贤松, 陈民锋.薄层低品位油藏启动压力梯度实验研究.石油地质与工程, 2011, 25(3):97-99. XIE X Q, ZHANG X S, CHEN M F. Experimental study of lamellate low grade reservoir start pressure grade. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2011, 25(3):97-99.
[34] 李善鹏, 吴凯, 方艳兵.特低渗透油藏启动压力现象研究——以侯市地区为例.岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1):125-127. LI S P, WU K, FANG Y B. Study on the starting pressure phenomenon in ultra-low permeability reservoir:an example from Houshi area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(1):125-127.
[1] 郭秋麟, 吴晓智, 卫延召, 柳庄小雪, 刘继丰, 陈宁生. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系油气运移路径模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 37-45.
[2] 陈棡, 卞保力, 李啸, 刘刚, 龚德瑜, 曾德龙. 准噶尔盆地腹部中浅层油气输导体系及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 46-56.
[3] 陈静, 陈军, 李卉, 努尔艾力·扎曼. 准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系—三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 71-80.
[4] 余兴, 尤新才, 白雨, 李鹏, 朱涛. 玛湖凹陷南斜坡断裂识别及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 81-89.
[5] 关新, 潘树新, 曲永强, 许多年, 张寒, 马永平, 王国栋, 陈雪珍. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷滩坝砂的发现及油气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 90-98.
[6] 杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[7] 李树博, 郭旭光, 郑孟林, 王泽胜, 刘新龙. 准噶尔盆地东部西泉地区石炭系火山岩岩性识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 258-266.
[8] 宁从前, 周明顺, 成捷, 苏芮, 郝鹏, 王敏, 潘景丽. 二维核磁共振测井在砂砾岩储层流体识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 267-274.
[9] 张满郎, 孔凡志, 谷江锐, 郭振华, 付晶, 郑国强, 钱品淑. 九龙山气田珍珠冲组砂砾岩储层评价及有利区优选[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 1-13.
[10] 徐子煜, 王安, 韩长城, 田继军, 张军生, 刘磊, 张楠. 玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组优质砂砾岩储层形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 82-92.
[11] 胡潇, 曲永强, 胡素云, 潘建国, 尹路, 许多年, 滕团余, 王斌. 玛湖凹陷斜坡区浅层油气地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 67-77.
[12] 李佳思, 付磊, 张金龙, 陈静, 牛斌, 张顺存. 准噶尔盆地乌夏地区中上二叠统碎屑岩成岩作用及次生孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 54-66.
[13] 马永平, 王国栋, 张献文, 潘树新, 黄林军, 陈永波, 郭娟娟. 粗粒沉积次生孔隙发育模式——以准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系夏子街组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 34-43.
[14] 刘冬冬, 杨东旭, 张子亚, 张晨, 罗群, 潘占昆, 黄治鑫. 基于常规测井和成像测井的致密储层裂缝识别方法——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 76-85.
[15] 李亚哲, 王力宝, 郭华军, 单祥, 邹志文, 窦洋. 基于地震波形指示反演的砂砾岩储层预测——以中拐-玛南地区上乌尔禾组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 134-142.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .