酒泉盆地鸭儿峡地区白垩系下沟组K1g13沉积相及有利储层预测

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.03.007

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 52–65.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.03.007

酒泉盆地鸭儿峡地区白垩系下沟组K₁g₁³沉积相及有利储层预测

苑伯超, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 韦德强

中国石油玉门油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 甘肃酒泉 735019

收稿日期:2016-06-11 修回日期:2016-09-08 出版日期:2017-05-21 发布日期:2017-05-21
第一作者:苑伯超(1987-),男,硕士,主要从事沉积学及储层地质学方面的研究工作。地址:(735019)甘肃省酒泉市肃州区飞天路5号。Email:yuanbochao.ok@163.com。
基金资助:
中国石油股份有限公司重大科技专项“酒泉盆地精细勘探技术研究及目标优选”（编号：2013E-3301）资助

Sedimentary facies and favorable reservoir prediction of Cretaceous Xiagou Formation K₁g₁³ in Ya'erxia area, Jiuquan Basin

YUAN Bochao, XIAO Wenhua, WEI Haoyuan, WEI Deqiang

Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Yumen Oilfield Company, Jiuquan 735019, Gansu, China

Received:2016-06-11 Revised:2016-09-08 Online:2017-05-21 Published:2017-05-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鸭儿峡地区白垩系下沟组沟一3亚段（K₁g₁³）是酒泉盆地的主要产油层段之一，但对其沉积相、有利储层影响因素与分布规律认识不清。以酒泉盆地鸭儿峡地区白垩系下沟组K₁g₁³为研究对象，分析岩心、测井及室内测试等资料，探讨其沉积相类型及有利储层分布。结果表明，鸭儿峡地区下沟组K₁g₁³主要发育扇三角洲-湖泊及近岸水下扇-湖泊两大沉积体系，可进一步识别出8种亚相、16种微相；有利储层分布受沉积相带及溶蚀带展布的双重控制。水下分流河道及河口沙坝均是主要的有利储层沉积相带，次生溶蚀孔是主要的储集空间，其发育主要受长石含量、岩屑及杂基含量、埋深等因素的控制；叠合优势沉积微相、溶蚀带分布及埋深图等，预测鸭儿峡地区白垩系下沟组K₁g₁³有利储层分布区东以鸭西1-1-鸭西116井为界，西以鸭西115-柳10井为界，南至鸭西5井，北至鸭西112井。

关键词: 储层特征, 影响因素, 成岩作用, 延长组, 周家湾地区, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: The submember of the first member of Cretaceous Xiagou Formation (K₁g₁³)is one of the main oilproducing intervals in Ya'erxia area, Jiuquan Basin. However, the understanding of its sedimentary facies and influencing factors and distribution of favorable reservoirs are unclear. Based on the data of core, well logging, oil production test, the sedimentary facies and favorable reservoir distribution of K₁g₁³ in Ya'erxia area were discussed. The results show that fan delta-lacustrine and nearshore subaqueous fan-lacustrine sedimentary systems are mainly developed in K₁g₁³, which can be further divided into eight types of subfacies and 16 types of microfacies, and the favorable reservoir distribution is controlled by sedimentary facies belt and dissolution zone. The subaqueous distributary channel and mouth bar are the main favorable sedimentary facies belts. The secondary dissolved pores are the main reservoir spaces, and their development is mainly controlled by the content of feldspar, debris and matrix, and burial depth. By superposing the dissolution zone and favorable microfacies on the structural map, the distribution of favorable reservoirs of K₁g₁³ was predicted:east to well Yaxi 1-1 and well Yaxi 116, west to well Yaxi 115 and well Liu 10, south to well Yaxi 5, and north to well Yaxi 112.

Key words: reservoir characteristics, influencing factors, diagenesis, Yanchang Formation, Zhoujiawan area, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

苑伯超, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 韦德强. 酒泉盆地鸭儿峡地区白垩系下沟组K₁g₁³沉积相及有利储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 52–65.

YUAN Bochao, XIAO Wenhua, WEI Haoyuan, WEI Deqiang. Sedimentary facies and favorable reservoir prediction of Cretaceous Xiagou Formation K₁g₁³ in Ya'erxia area, Jiuquan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3): 52–65.

参考文献

[1] 文华国, 郑荣才, 叶泰然, 等.酒西盆地青西凹陷下白垩统沉积特征与有利勘探区预测.沉积与特提斯地质, 2005, 25(4):71-77. WEN H G, ZHENG R C, YE T R, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the Lower Cretaceous strata and prediction of the favorable exploration areas in the Qingxi Depression, Jiuxi Basin,Gansu. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2005, 25(4):71-77.
[2] 杨克荣, 赵谦平, 阿晓芸.酒泉盆地青南次凹下沟组储集层沉积特征.新疆石油地质, 2004, 25(3):291-293. YANG K R, ZHAO Q P, A X Y. The reservoir and sedimentary characteristics in Xiagou Formation of Lower Cretaceous in Qingnan hypo-sag, Jiuquan Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2004, 25(3):291-293.
[3] 孙成田, 王蓉, 周在华, 等.酒泉盆地青西凹陷下白垩统储集层预测.新疆石油地质, 2004, 25(3):286-287. SUN C T, WANG R, ZHOU Z H, et al. Prediction of Lower Cretaceous reservoir Qingxi Sag in Jiuquan Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2004, 25(3):286-287.
[4] 潘荣, 朱筱敏, 王星星, 等.深层有效碎屑岩储层形成机理研究进展.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4):73-80. PAN R, ZHU X M, WANG X X, et al. Advancement on formation mechanism of deep effective clastic reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(4):73-80.
[5] SCHMIDT V, MCDONALD D A. The role of secondary porosity in the course of sandstone diagenesis//SEHOLLE P A, SCHLUGER P R. Aspects of diagenesis. Tulsa:SEPM Special Publication 26, 1979:175-207.
[6] SURDAM R C, BOESE S W, CROSSEY L J. The chemistry of secondary porosity:part 2. Aspects of porosity modification subject group:reservoirs-sandstones. AAPG Memoir 37, 1984:127-149.
[7] SURDAM R C, CROSSEY L J, HAGEN E S, et al. Organicinorganic interactions and sandstone diagenesis. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73(1):1-23.
[8] 苗建宇, 祝总祺, 刘文荣, 等.济阳坳陷下第三系温度、压力与深部储层次生孔隙的关系.石油学报, 2000, 21(3):36-40. MIAO J Y, ZHU Z Q, LIU W R, et al. Relationship between temperature-pressure and secondary pores of deep reservoir in Eogene of Jiyang Depression. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2000, 21(3):36-40.
[9] 李义军.浅述次生孔隙的成因.西北地质, 2002, 35(1):65-69. LI Y J. The discussion about the genesis of induced porosity. Northwestern Geology, 2002, 35(1):65-69.
[10] 张以明, 侯方浩, 方少仙, 等.冀中饶阳凹陷下第三系沙河街组第三段砂岩次生孔隙形成机制.石油与天然气地质, 1994, 15(3):208-215. ZHANG Y M, HOU F H, FANG S X, et al. Secondary pore formation mechanism of third member of Shahejie Formation, Raoyang Depression. Oil & Gas Geology, 1994, 15(3):208-215.
[11] 杨香华, 叶加仁, 周士科, 等.成岩动力学分析与深部储层孔隙预测.现代地质, 1998, 12(1):108-114. YANG X H, YE J R, ZHOU S K, et al. Analysis of diagenetic dynamics and porosity prediction of deep-buried reservoir. Geoscience, 1998, 12(1):108-114.
[12] 李涛, 杨克荣, 韩小松, 等.酒泉盆地鸭西地区白垩系岩性油藏控制因素分析.岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(增刊1):14-17. LI T, YANG K R, HAN X S, et al. Analysis on controlling factors of Cretaceous lithologic reservoirs in Yaxi area of Jiuquan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(Suppl 1):14-17.
[13] 朱筱敏, 查明, 张卫海, 等.陆西凹陷上侏罗统近岸水下扇沉积特征.石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1995, 19(1):1-6. ZHU X M, ZHA M, ZHANG W H, et al. Sedimentary features of Upper Jurassic nearshore subaqueous fan in Luxi Depression. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China(Edition of Natural Science), 1995, 19(1):1-6.
[14] 张萌, 田景春. "近岸水下扇"的命名、特征及其储集性.岩相古地理, 1999, 19(4):42-52. ZHANG M, TIAN J C. The nomenclature, sedimentary characteristics and reservoir potential of nearshore subaqueous fans. Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeography, 1999, 19(4):42-52.
[15] 董艳蕾, 朱筱敏, 耿晓洁, 等.泌阳凹陷东南部核桃园组近岸水下扇与扇三角洲沉积特征比较及控制因素分析.石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(2):271-279. DONG Y L, ZHU X M, GENG X J, et al. Sedimentary characteristics comparison and controlling factors analyses of nearshore subaqueous fan and fan delta in the Hetaoyuan Formation of southeastern Biyang Sag. Qil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(2):271-279.
[16] 庞军刚, 杨友运, 蒲秀刚.断陷湖盆扇三角洲、近岸水下扇及湖底扇的识别特征. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 47(4):18-23. PANG J G, YANG Y Y, PU X G. Identification characteristics of fan delta, nearshore subaqueous fan and sublacustrine fan in fault trough lake basin. Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sciences), 2011, 47(4):18-23.
[17] 郑荣才, 王成善, 朱利东, 等.酒西盆地首例湖相"白烟型"喷流岩——热水沉积白云岩的发现及其意义.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 30(1):1-8. ZHENG R C, WANG C S, ZHU L D, et al. Discovery of the first example of "white smoke type" of exhalative rock(hydrothermal sedmentary dolostone)in Jiuxi Basin and its significance. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2003, 30(1):1-8.
[18] 范铭涛, 杨麟科, 方国玉, 等.青西凹陷下白垩统湖相喷流岩成因探讨及其意义.沉积学报, 2003, 21(4):560-564. FAN M T, YANG L K, FANG G Y, et al. Origin of lacustrine hydrothermal sedimentary rock(Lower Cretaceous)in Qingxi Sag and its significance. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2003, 21(4):560-564.
[19] 傅饶, 郑荣才, 常海亮, 等.湖相"白烟型"喷流岩——新型的致密油储层类型——以准噶尔盆地西缘乌尔禾地区风城组为例.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3):32-42. FU R, ZHENG R C, CHANG H L, et al. Lacustrine "white smoke type" exhalative rock-a new type of tight oil reservoir:a case study from Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation in Urho area, western margin of Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3):32-42.
[20] 陈建平, 陈建军, 张立平, 等.酒西盆地油气形成与勘探方向新认识(二)——烃源岩成烃演化与主力油源确认.石油勘探与开发, 2001, 28(2):15-18. CHEN J P, CHEN J J, ZHANG L P, et al. New opinions on oil and gas generation and exploration in Jiuxi Basin(Ⅱ)-determination of process of hydrocarbon generating and the principal oil source rock. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2001, 28(2):15-18.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

酒泉盆地鸭儿峡地区白垩系下沟组K₁g₁³沉积相及有利储层预测

Sedimentary facies and favorable reservoir prediction of Cretaceous Xiagou Formation K₁g₁³ in Ya'erxia area, Jiuquan Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2]	王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[3]	尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[4]	牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[5]	申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[6]	段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[7]	王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[8]	曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[9]	李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[10]	雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[11]	翟咏荷, 何登发, 开百泽. 鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中—晚二叠世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 32-44.
[12]	龙盛芳, 侯云超, 杨超, 郭懿萱, 张杰, 曾亚丽, 高楠, 李尚洪. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部庆城地区三叠系长7段—长3段层序地层特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 145-156.
[13]	杜江民, 崔子豪, 贾志伟, 张毅, 聂万才, 龙鹏宇, 刘泊远. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五₅亚段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
[14]	李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[15]	魏嘉怡, 王红伟, 刘刚, 李涵, 曹茜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘冲断带石炭系羊虎沟组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 120-130.