岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 29–40.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210404

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因

柴毓1, 王贵文2, 柴新3   

  1. 1. 石油工业出版社有限公司, 北京 100011;
    2. 中国石油大学 (北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    3. 中国石油集团测井有限公司 天津分公司, 天津 300280
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-20 修回日期:2021-01-19 出版日期:2021-08-01 发布日期:2021-08-06
  • 第一作者:柴毓(1989-),女,硕士,编辑,主要从事图书编辑与出版方面的工作。地址:(100011)北京市朝阳区安华西里三区18号楼石油工业出版社有限公司。Email:cherrychai213@126.com
  • 通信作者: 王贵文(1966-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事测井地质学、储层沉积学方面的研究。Email:wanggw@cup.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“低渗透碎屑岩储层品质与岩石物理相测井评价方法”（编号：2011ZX05020-008）和中石油创新基金“致密砂砾岩岩性岩相测井识别方法研究”（编号：2013D-5006-030）联合资助

Reservoir heterogeneity and genesis of the second member of Xujiahe Formation of Triassic in Jinqiu block，Sichuan Basin

CHAI Yu1, WANG Guiwen2, CHAI Xin3   

  1. 1. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing 100011, China;
    2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. Tianjin Company, CNPC logging Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300280, China
  • Received:2020-09-20 Revised:2021-01-19 Online:2021-08-01 Published:2021-08-06

PDF (PC)

315

摘要： 为了研究四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因，以分析其微观驱替效率和剩余油分布、制定合理的开发方案、提高开发效率，开展了岩心观察、薄片鉴定、扫描电镜分析、压汞测试、核磁共振和常规测井分析等。结果表明：①四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段在多期构造运动和后期成岩改造作用下，孔隙类型多样、喉道普遍较细，孔喉结构和物性在各地区表现出较大的差异性，非均质性强。②须二段储层储集空间以次生孔隙为主，原生孔隙较少，表明沉积物进入埋藏成岩环境后，主要受后期成岩作用、成岩环境和成岩演化阶段的影响，形成了现今储层非均质性强的特点，并根据成岩作用类型、强度和对储层物性的建设或破坏作用将须二段储层划分为4种成岩相类型。③须二段储层物性和非均质性受构造、沉积、成岩作用共同影响，特定构造和沉积背景为储层非均质性的形成奠定了基础，溶蚀、破裂作用等建设性成岩作用及其强度是决定储层非均质性的关键因素。该研究成果可为四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段油气勘探提供借鉴。

关键词: 储层非均质性, 成岩作用, 成岩相, 须二段, 三叠系, 金秋区块, 四川盆地

Abstract: In order to study the heterogeneity and genesis of the second member of Xujiahe Formation of Triassic in Jinqiu blockn,Sichuan Basin,to analyze its micro displacement efficiency and remaining oil distribution,and to formulate reasonable development plan and improve development efficiency,core observation,thin section identification,scanning electron microscope analysis,mercury injection test,nuclear magnetic resonance and conventional logging analysis were carried out. The result shows that：（1）Under the effect of multi-stage tectonic movement and late diagenetic transformation, the pore types of the second member of Xujiahe Formation are diverse, the throat is generally fine, the pore throat structure and physical properties show great differences in different regions,and the heterogeneity is strong.（2）The reservoir space of the second member of Xujiahe Formation is mainly composed of secondary pores and less primary pores,which indicates that after entered the burial diagenetic environment,the sediments were mainly affected by later diagenesis,diagenetic environment and diagenetic evolution stage,forming strong heterogeneity of the present reservoir. According to the type and intensity of diagenesis and the construction or destruction of reservoir physical properties,the second member of Xujiahe Formation was divided into four types of diagenetic facies.（3）The physical properties and heterogeneity of the second member of Xujiahe Formation are affected by structure,sedimentation and diagenesis. The specific structure and sedimentary background provide prerequisite for the formation of reservoir heterogeneity. Constructive diagenesis（dissolution and fracturing）and diagenetic strength are crucial for reservoir heterogeneity. The research results can provide a reference for oil and gas exploration of the second member of Xujiahe Formation in Jinqiu block, Sichuan Basin.

Key words: reservoir heterogeneity, diagenesis, diagenetic facies, the second member of Xujiahe Formation, Triassic, Jinqiu block, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+1
[1] 隋淑玲. 河流相储层三维流动单元模型建立:以孤东油田七区馆上段为例. 油气地质与采收率, 2005, 12(3):12-14. SUI S L. 3D flow unit modeling in reservoirs with fluvial facies:Taking upper member of Guantao Formation in 7 area of Gudong Oilfield as an example. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2005, 12(3):12-14.
[2] 尹志军, 鲁国永, 邹翔, 等. 陆相储层非均质性及其对油藏采收率的影响:以冀东高尚堡和胜利永安镇油藏为例. 石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(1):106-110.YIN Z J, LU G Y, ZOU X, et al. Heterogeneity of non-marine reservoirs and its influences on recovery factor:Take Gaoshangpu and Yonganzhen oil reservoirs in Jidong and shengli oilfields as examples. Oil & Gas Geology, 2006, 27(1):106-110.
[3] 于翠玲, 林承焰. 储层非均质性研究进展. 油气地质与采收率, 2007, 14(4):15-22. YU C L, LIN C Y. Advancement of reservoir heterogeneity research. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2007, 14(4):15-22.
[4] ALAA M, SALEM S, MORAD S. Diagenesis and reservoir quality evolution of fluvial sandstones during progressive burial and uplift:Evidence from the Upper Jurassic Boipeba member, Revoncavo Basin, northeastern Brazil. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(7):1015-1040.
[5] 裘怿楠, 薛叔浩. 油气储层评价技术. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2001:152-172. QIU Y N, XUE S H. Reservoir assessment technology. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2001:152-172.
[6] 龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 等. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 33(3):1-11. LONG S F, WANG Y S, LI G L, et al. Heterogeneity characteristics of tight reservoir of lower submember of He 8 member in Su 49 block, Sulige gas field. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 33(3):1-11.
[7] 赵文智, 王红军, 徐春春, 等. 川中地区须家河组天然气藏大范围成藏机理与富集条件. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(2):146-157. ZHAO W Z, WANG H J, XU C C, et al. Reservoir-forming mechanism and enrichment conditions of the extensive Xujiahe Formation gas reservoirs, central Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(2):146-157.
[8] 柴毓, 王贵文. 致密砂岩储层岩石物理相分类与优质储层预测:以川中安岳地区须二段储层为例. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3):74-85. CHAI Y, WANG G W. Petrophysical facies classification of tight sandstone reservoir and high-quality reservoir prediction:a case study from the second member of Xujiahe Formation in Anyue area, central Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(3):74-85.
[9] 柴毓, 王贵文, 张晓涛, 等. 川中安岳地区须二段致密砂岩储层孔隙结构特征及测井识别.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 47(3):819-828. CHAI Y, WANG G W, ZHANG X T, et al. Pore structure characteristics and logging recognition of tight sandstone reservoir of the second member of Xujiahe Formation in Anyue area, central Sichuan. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2016, 47(3):819-828.
[10] 李建忠, 郭彬程, 郑民, 等. 中国致密砂岩气主要类型、地质特征与资源潜力. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(4):607-615. LI J Z, GUO B C, ZHENG M, et al. Main types, geological features and resource potential of tight sandstone gas in China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(4):607-615.
[11] 吴元燕, 吴胜和, 蔡正旗. 油矿地质学. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2005:179-194. WU Y Y, WU S H, CAI Z Q. Oil deposit geology. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2005:179-194.
[12] 段新国, 宋荣彩, 李国辉, 等. 四川盆地须二段综合成岩相特征研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(1):7-14. DUAN X G, SONG R C, LI G H, et al. Research of integrated diagenetic facies characteristics of T3x2 reservoir in Sichuan Basin. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33(1):7-14.
[13] ZENG L B. Microfracturing in the Upper Triassic Sichuan Basin tight-gas sandstones:Tectonic, overpressure, and diagenetic origins. AAPG Bulletin, 2010, 94(12):1811-1825.
[14] LAUBACH S E. A method to detect natural fracture strike in sandstones. AAPG Bulletin, 1997, 81(4):604-623.
[15] 康健, 朱文革, 王胜利. 文东深层低渗油藏储层孔隙结构特征研究. 断块油气田, 2000, 7(4):23-26. KANG J, ZHU W G, WANG S L. The study on pore structure characteristics for deep zone and low permeability reservoir in Wendong Oilfield. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2000, 7(4):23-26.
[16] 吴胜和, 熊琦华. 油气储层地质学. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1998:113-122. WU S H, XIONG Q H. Hydrocarbon Reservoir Geology. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1998:113-122.
[17] 白斌, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(3):329-333. BAI B, ZHU R K, WU S T, et al. Multi-scale method of nano (micro) -CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(3):329-333.
[18] LAME O, BELLET D, DI M M, et al. Bulk observation of metal powder sintering by X-ray synchrotron microtomography. Acta Materialia, 2004, 52(4):977-984.
[19] 邵维志, 丁娱娇, 刘亚, 等. 核磁共振测井在储层孔隙结构评价中的应用. 测井技术, 2009, 33(1):52-56. SHAO W Z, DING Y J, LIU Y, et al. The application of NMR log data in evaluation of reservoir pore structure. Well Logging Technology, 2009, 33(1):52-56.
[20] 应凤祥, 杨式升, 张敏, 等. 激光扫描共聚焦显微镜研究储层孔隙结构. 沉积学报, 2002, 20(1):75-79. YING F X, YANG S S, ZHANG M, et al. Application of laser scanning confocal microscope to the measurement of pore texture in reservoirs. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(1):75-79.
[21] SUN S W, SHU L S, ZENG Y W, et al. Porosity-permeability and textural heterogeneity of reservoir sandstones from the Lower Cretaceous Putaohua member of Yaojia Formation, Weixing Oilfield, Songliao Basin, Northeast China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2007, 24(2):109-127.
[22] 杨威, 魏国齐, 金惠, 等. 川东北飞仙关组鲕滩储层成岩作用和孔隙演化. 中国地质, 2007, 34(5):822-888. YANG W, WEI G Q, JIN H, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of the oolitic shoal reservoir in the Feixianguan Formation in northeastern Sichuan. Geology in China, 2007, 34(5):822-888.
[23] 朱如凯, 邹才能, 张鼐, 等. 致密砂岩气藏储层成岩流体演化与致密成因机理:以四川盆地上三叠统须家河组为例. 中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2009, 39(3):327-339. ZHU R K, ZOU C N, ZHANG N, et al. Diagenetic fluid evolution and tight genetic mechanism of tight sandstone gas reservoir:a case study of Xujiahe Formation of Upper Triassic in Si-chuan Basin. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2009, 39(3):327-339.
[24] 张代燕, 彭永灿, 肖芳伟, 等. 克拉玛依油田七中、东区克下组砾岩储层孔隙结构特征及影响因素. 油气地质与采收率, 2013, 20(6):29-34. ZHANG D Y, PENG Y C, XIAO F W, et al. Pore structure and influence factors of conglomerate reservoir:Case study of lower Karamay formation in mid and east of 7 th block, Karamay oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2013, 20(6):29-34.
[25] 车国琼, 王立恩, 汪轰静, 等. 断层对致密砂岩气藏甜点区的控制作用:以四川盆地中部蓬莱地区须二段气藏为例. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(9):22-32. CHE G Q, WANG L N, WANG H J, et al. Control action of faults on the sweet spots of tight sandstone gas reservoir:a case study of the second member of Xujiahe gas reservoir in the Penglai area, Central Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(9):22-32.
[26] 刘殊, 任兴国, 姚声贤, 等. 四川盆地上三叠统须家河组气藏分布与构造体系的关系. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(11):1-14. LIU S, REN X G, YAO S X, et al. Relationship between gas reservoir distribution and structural system of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(11):1-14.
[27] 胡望水, 曹春, 何海泉, 等. 新立地区嫩三段储层非均质性及其影响因素分析. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(6):20-26. HU W S, CAO C, HE H Q, et al. Reservoir heterogeneity and influencing factors of Nen 3 member in Xinli area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(6):20-26.
[28] 谢武仁, 杨威, 李熙喆, 等. 川中地区上三叠统须四段砂体成因及对油气运移影响分析. 中国地质, 2009, 36(2):387-396. XIE W R, YANG W, LI X Z, et al. The genesis of the Triassic Xu 4 member sand body in central Sichuan and its influence on oil and gas migration. Geology in China, 2009, 36(2):387-396.
[29] 王雅楠, 李达, 齐银, 等. 苏里格气田苏14井区盒8段储层成岩作用与孔隙演化. 断块油气田, 2011, 18(3):297-300. WANG Y N, LI D, QI Y, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of He 8 reservoir in well block Su 14 of Sulige Gas Field. FaultBlock Oil & Gas Field, 2011, 18(3):297-300.
[30] 张响响, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 等. 川中地区上三叠统须家河组储层成岩相. 石油学报, 2011, 32(2):257-264. ZHNG X X, ZOU C N, ZHU R K, et al. Reservoir diagenetic facies of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the central Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(2):257-264.
[31] 钱治家, 钟克修.川东北地区须家河组沉积相与储层特征. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(6):9-12. QIAN Z J, ZHONG K X. Sedimentary facies and reservoir features of the Xujiahe Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(6):9-12.
[32] 徐安娜, 汪泽成, 赵文智, 等. 四川盆地须家河组二段储集体非均质性特征及其成因. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(11):53-58. XU A N, WANG Z C, ZHAO W Z, et al. Features and genesis of reservoir heterogeneity in the second member of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Fm, Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(11):53-58.
[33] 陈冬霞, 庞雄奇, 杨克明, 等. 川西坳陷中段上三叠统须二段致密砂岩孔隙度演化史. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(增刊1):42-51. CHEN D X, PANG X Q, YANG K M, et al. Porosity evolution of tight gas sand of the second member of Xujiahe Formation of Upper Triassic, western Sichuan Depression. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(Suppl 1):42-51.
[34] 薛永超, 程林松, 彭仕宓. 新立油田泉三、四段储层成岩储集相研究. 特种油气藏, 2006, 13(2):19-22. XUE Y C, CHENG L S, PENG S M. Study on diagenesis and diagenetic reservoir facies of the third and fourth member of Quantou Formation in Xinli Oil-field. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2006, 13(2):19-22.
[35] 孟元林, 高建军, 牛嘉玉, 等. 扇三角洲体系沉积微相对成岩的控制作用:以辽河坳陷西部凹陷南段扇三角洲沉积体系为例. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(1):36-39. MENG Y L, GAO J J, NIU J Y, et al. Controls of the fan-delta sedimentary microfacies on the diageneses in the south of western Liaohe Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006, 33(1):36-39.
[36] 周彦, 黎平, 谭秀成, 等. 川东北须家河组砂岩储层成岩特征研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(6):20-24. ZHOU Y, LI P, TAN X C, et al. Study on diagenesis characteristics of sandstone reservoir in Xujiahe Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33(6):20-24.
[37] 刘伟, 窦齐丰, 黄述旺, 等. 成岩作用的定量表征与成岩储集相研究:以科尔沁油田交2断块区九佛堂组(J3jf)下段为例. 中国矿业大学学报, 2002, 31(5):399-403. LIU W, DOU Q F, HUANG S W, et al. Quantitative characterization of diagenesis and diagenesis reservoir facies:the case study of lower member of J3jf of Jiao 2 block in Kerqin oil-field. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2002, 31(5):399-403.
[38] 杜红权, 朱如凯, 何幼斌, 等. 柴西南地区古-新近系砂岩储层成岩作用及其对储层物性的影响. 中国地质, 2010, 37(1):152-158. DU H Q, ZHU R K, HE Y B, et al. The diagenesis of PaleogeneNeogene sandstone reservoirs and its effects on the physical character of reservoirs in southwestern Qaidam Basin. Geology in China, 2010, 37(1):152-158.
[39] 罗孝俊, 杨卫东, 李荣西, 等. pH值对长石溶解度及次生孔隙发育的影响. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2001, 20(2):103-107. LUO X J, YANG W D, LI R X, et al. Effects of pH on the solubility of the feldspar and the development of secondary porosity. Bulletin of Mineralogy Petrology and Geochemistry, 2001, 20(2):103-107.
[40] 罗文军, 彭军, 杜敬安, 等. 川西坳陷须家河组二段致密砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化:以大邑地区为例. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(2):287-301. LUO W J, PENG J, DU J A, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of tight sand reservoirs in the 2nd member of Xujiahe Formation, western Sichuan Depression:an example from Dayi region. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(2):287-301.
[41] 宋成辉, 李晓, 陈剑, 等. 储层成岩-储集相划分方法.天然气工业, 2004, 24(10):27-29. SONG C H, LI H, CHEN J, et al. Diagenetic-storing facies division of reservoir. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(10):27-29.
[1] 赵军, 李勇, 文晓峰, 徐文远, 焦世祥. 基于斑马算法优化支持向量回归机模型预测页岩地层压力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 12-22.
[2] 闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[3] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[4] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[5] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[6] 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[7] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[8] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[9] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[10] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[11] 曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[12] 宋志华, 李垒, 雷德文, 张鑫, 凌勋. 改进的U-Net网络小断层识别技术在玛湖凹陷玛中地区三叠系白碱滩组的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 40-49.
[13] 张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
[14] 白雪峰, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智, 卢双舫, 隋立伟, 王继平, 董忠良. 四川盆地仪陇—平昌地区侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征及富集条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 52-64.
[15] 岑永静, 梁锋, 王立恩, 刘倩虞, 张鑫哲, 丁熊. 四川盆地蓬莱—中江地区震旦系灯影组二段成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 89-98.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇，胡明毅，刘富艳，王辉，胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙，田景春，肖玲，王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维，李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮，涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发