岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 115124.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230411
杜长鹏
DU Changpeng
摘要: 综合地震、包裹体、烃源岩和生产测试等资料,在构造特征、成藏期次和成藏条件分析的基础上,明确了松辽盆地莺山-双城断陷白垩系致密火山岩气藏的分布特征及成藏主控因素。研究结果表明: ①莺山-双城断陷经历了3期伸展与3期挤压的构造活动,青山口组沉积末期(84~88 Ma)为主成藏期,研究区处于稳定坳陷期,构造活动弱,有利于气藏的形成与保存。②研究区火山岩储层以火山碎屑岩、火山熔岩为主,孔隙度和渗透率分别为9.6%和0.93 mD,沙河子组烃源岩的有机质丰度高,TOC(总有机碳含量)和S1+S2(生烃潜量)分别为2.61%和0.62 mg/g,镜质体反射率Ro平均为3.26%,处于过成熟阶段,天然气通过断裂和不整合面向上运移至营一段致密火山岩并富集成藏。③莺山-双城断陷天然气成藏受烃源岩、断层、不整合面、火山体等成藏条件及耦合关系控制,断裂差异性活动控制营一段和沙河子组地层发育和叠加,沙河子组烃源岩发育于北部莺山断陷局部,营一段则集中发育于四站—太平庄断裂之间;气藏集中在Ro大于3.0%的高—过成熟烃源岩附近,高产气井围绕生烃中心呈环状分布;靠近通源断裂与不整合面的爆发相、溢流相储层物性好,是区内重要的天然气富集区。④研究区内的天然气藏可划分为莺山断陷“下生上储-断体匹配-近源垂向运移”和双城断陷“侧生侧储-断面耦合-远源侧向运聚” 2种成藏模式,莺山断陷的构造-岩性气藏是研究区最有利的勘探区。
中图分类号:
[1] 邱振,李建忠,吴晓智,等.国内外致密油勘探现状、主要地质特征及差异[J].岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4):119-126. QU Zhen, LI Jianzhong, WU Xiaozhi, et al. Exploration status, main geologic characteristics and their differences of tight oil between America and China[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4):119-126. [2] HOLDITCH S A. Tight gas and sands[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2006, 58(6):86-94. [3] 邹才能,翟光明,张光亚,等.全球常规-非常规油气形成分布、资源潜力及趋势预测[J].石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(1):13-25. ZOU Caineng, ZHAI Guangming, ZHANG Guangya, et al. Formation, distribution, potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1):13-25. [4] 周翔,何生,刘萍,等.鄂尔多斯盆地代家坪地区长6致密油储层孔隙结构特征及分类评价[J].地学前缘, 2016, 23(3):253-265. ZHOU Xiang, HE Sheng, LIU Ping, et al. Characteristic and classification of tight oil pore structure in reservoir Chang 6 of Daijiaping area, Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(3):253-265. [5] 侯启军,何海清,李建忠,等.中国石油天然气股份有限公司近期油气勘探进展及前景展望[J].中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(1):1-13. HOU Qijun, HE Haiqing, LI Jianzhong, et al. Recent progress and prospect of oil and gas exploration by PetroChina Company Limited[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(1):1-13. [6] 孙龙德,邹才能,朱如凯,等.中国深层油气形成、分布与潜力分析[J].石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(6):641-649. SUN Longde, ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, et al. Formation, distribution and potential of deep hydrocarbon resources in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(6):641-649. [7] 冉清昌,钟安宁,周翔,等.沙河子组致密砂砾岩成岩相及孔隙演化分析[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(1):13-26. RAN Qingchang, ZHONG An'ning, ZHOU Xiang, et al. Diagenesis facies and its porosity evolution of tight sandstone in Shahezi Formation[J]. Journal of Southwest Petro-leum University (Science&Technology Edition), 2022, 44(1):13-26. [8] 孙立东,印长海,刘超,等.松辽盆地营城组优质烃源岩地质特征及勘探意义[J].石油学报, 2019, 40(10):1171-1179. SUN Lidong, YIN Changhai, LIU Chao, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration significance of high-quality source rocks in Yingcheng Formation, Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(10):1171-1179. [9] 印长海,孙立东,刘超,等.松辽盆地双城地区登娄库组储层特征及控制因素[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2019, 38(2):1-7. YIN Changhai, SUN Lidong, LIU Chao, et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Denglouku Formation in Shuangcheng area of Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2019, 38(2):1-7. [10] 张姣,辛朝坤,张军勇.火山喷发机构、期次及其控藏作用:松辽盆地北部莺山凹陷营一段为例[J].石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(2):291-299. ZHANG Jiao, XIN Chaokun, ZHANG Junyong. A study on volcanic eruption edifices and stages and their control over hydrocarbon accumulation:A case study of the first member of the Yingcheng Formation in Yingshan Sag, northern Songliao Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2018, 39(2):291-299. [11] 印长海,绪磊,杨亮,等.莺山凹陷营城组火山岩储层特征及成因[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2014, 33(5):92-96. YIN Changhai, XU Lei, YANG Liang, et al. Characteristics and origins of Yingcheng Formation volcanic reservoir in Yingshan Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2014, 33(5):92-96. [12] 冯子辉,印长海,刘家军,等.中国东部原位火山岩油气藏的形成机制:以松辽盆地徐深气田为例[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2014, 44(10):2221-2237. FENG Zihui, YIN Changhai, LIU Jiajun, et al. Formation mechanism of in-situ volcanic reservoirs in eastern China:A case study from Xushen gasfield in Songliao Basin[J]. Science China:Earth Sciences, 2014, 44(10):2221-2237. [13] 朱如凯,崔景伟,毛治国,等.地层油气藏主要勘探进展及未来重点领域[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):12-24. ZHU Rukai, CUI Jingwei, MAO Zhiguo, et al. Main exploration progress and future key fields of stratigraphic reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoir, 2021, 33(1):12-24. [14] 罗群,白新华.天然气藏的破坏机理与保存条件评价:以莺山断陷为例[J].新疆石油地质, 2002, 23(2):98-101. LUO Qun, BAI Xinhua. Destructive mechanism of gas accumulation and its assessment of preservative conditions:A example of Yingshan fault depression[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2002, 23(2):98-101. [15] 周翔.松辽盆地北部营城组火山岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4):1001-1014. ZHOU Xiang. Geochemistry and tectonic implications of volcanic rocks in Yingcheng Formation, northern Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(4):1001-1014. [16] 李博,崔军平,李莹,等.伊陕斜坡吴起地区延长组油气成藏期次分析[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):21-28. LI Bo, CUI Junping, LI Ying, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation phases of Yanchang Formation in Wuqi area, Yishan slop[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):21-28. [17] 邵英梅,冯子辉.徐家围子断陷营城组火山岩岩石学及地球化学特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2007, 26(4):27-30. SHAO Yingmei, FENG Zihui. Petrologic and geochemical characteristics of volcanic rock of Yingcheng Formation in Xujiaweizi fault depression[J]. Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2007, 26(4):27-30. [18] 陈棡,卞保力,李啸,等.准噶尔盆地腹部中浅层油气输导体系及其控藏作用[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):46-56. CHEN Gang, BIAN Baoli, LI Xiao, et al. Transport system and its control on reservoir formation of Jurassic-Cretaceous reservoir in hinterland of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):46-56. [19] 周翔,于士泉,张大智,等.松辽盆地徐深气田致密火山岩气藏气水分布特征及主控因素[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5):1038-1047. ZHOU Xiang, YU Shiquan, ZHANG Dazhi, et al. Characteristics and major controlling factors of gas-water distribution in tight volcanic gas reservoir in Xushen gas field, Songliao Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5):1038-1047. [20] 冯志强,刘嘉麟,王璞珺,等.油气勘探新领域:火山岩油气藏-松辽盆地大型火山岩气田发现的启示[J].地球物理学报, 2011, 54(2):269-279. FENG Zhiqiang, LIU Jialin, WANG Pujun, et al. New oil and gas exploration field:Volcanic hydrocarbon reservoir-Enlightenment from the discovery of the large gas field in Songliao Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(2):269-279. [21] 陈静,陈军,李卉,等.准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系-三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):71-80. CHEN Jing, CHEN Jun, LI Hui, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Permian-Triassic superimposed reservoirs in central Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):71-80. [22] 邵晓州,王苗苗,齐亚林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地平凉北地区长8油藏特征及成藏主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):59-69. SHAO Xiaozhou, WANG Miaomiao, QI Yalin, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Chang 8 reservoir in northern Pingliang area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoir, 2021, 33(6):59-69. |
[1] | 冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76. |
[2] | 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134. |
[3] | 肖博雅. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 135-148. |
[4] | 王洪星, 韩诗文, 胡佳, 潘志浩. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系火石岭组凝灰岩储层预测及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 35-45. |
[5] | 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97. |
[6] | 杨为华. 松辽盆地双城断陷白垩系营城组四段致密油成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 25-34. |
[7] | 何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18. |
[8] | 卞保力, 刘海磊, 蒋文龙, 王学勇, 丁修建. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷石炭系火山岩凝析气藏的发现与勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 96-105. |
[9] | 史卜庆, 丁梁波, 马宏霞, 孙辉, 张颖, 许小勇, 王红平, 范国章. 东非海域大型深水沉积体系及油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 10-17. |
[10] | 马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36. |
[11] | 范蕊, 刘卉, 杨沛广, 孙星, 马辉, 郝菲, 张珊珊. 阿曼盆地A区白垩系泥岩充填型碳酸盐岩溶蚀沟谷识别技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 72-81. |
[12] | 罗贝维, 尹继全, 胡广成, 陈华, 康敬程, 肖萌, 朱秋影, 段海岗. 阿联酋西部地区白垩系森诺曼阶高孔渗灰岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 63-71. |
[13] | 刘计国, 周鸿璞, 秦雁群, 邹荃, 郑凤云, 李早红, 肖高杰. 非洲Muglad盆地Fula凹陷白垩系AG组岩性油气藏勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 82-91. |
[14] | 齐育楷, 郭景祥, 罗亮, 骆福嵩, 周学文, 姚威, 张坦, 林会喜. 库车坳陷南部斜坡带隐蔽圈闭发育模式及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 108-119. |
[15] | 武小宁, 邓勇, 林煜, 钟厚财, 康晓宁, 汪钰婷, 屈琳. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡石炭系有利岩相预测及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 125-136. |
|